HIS DARK MATERIALS

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (453 of them)
Apparently they are thinking of re-titling the first instalment of the movie in the US as "The Lead Balloon".

Sam (chirombo), Monday, 7 July 2003 15:57 (twenty years ago) link

I wouldn't put any stock in the idea of a movie. Much better to see this whole thing in your head; any cinematic adaptation would be watered down like county fair beer. ("We've got Anthony Hopkins to play God, so now he's not a senile old drooler, he's hale and hearty! He kicks ass!")

My brother and I have spent hours arguing over these books, but my kids won't even want to read them before age 12, at which point my daughter will be all over them.

Neudonym, Monday, 7 July 2003 16:07 (twenty years ago) link

Is it fair to compare these to the Harry Potter books (which I've never read and, at this point, don't really intend to)?

Whether it is or not, Steven King did just that in his review of the new Potter book. He claims that Order of the Phoenix is better than any of the books in the books in this series.

Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 7 July 2003 17:51 (twenty years ago) link

Interesting. Then again, I think that King might be reacting strongly to Pullman's general theological conclusions, as I seem to remember King's a fairly devout Christian. Is there a link?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 7 July 2003 17:53 (twenty years ago) link

Woah, Stephen King is getting all meta, comparing a book to a book in a book. ;-)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 7 July 2003 17:57 (twenty years ago) link

King was raised a devout Christian, but based the mother in Carrie on his own mother ... I think it's safe to say that if he's still religious, it isn't in that sense.

What King probably is reacting strongly to, though, is that Pullman pisses off an inordinate number of writers by giving interviews in which he comes across like he thinks he's the only writer to ever work in a genre and write stories which are about more than dragons and robots and robot dragons -- that it hadn't occurred to anyone else to address some kind of, you know, theme, and possibly employ some characterization and so forth. I like his books, but he's definitely part of this "everyone sucks except me, and possibly several people who are now dead" recent generation of writers.

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 7 July 2003 17:58 (twenty years ago) link

Ah, that makes more sense. If that is Pullman's attitude indeed, well, he sucks. Still, King was pretty overt about The Stand being a battle between good and evil and all...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:01 (twenty years ago) link

I think King ... well, we could derail the thread and I could project like one of those things that ... you know ... projects a lot ... but I think he was raised with a certain powerful, compelling worldview, and even though he doesn't espouse it himself -- or not to the same degree or utility -- he draws on it for fiction because when he reaches for the fastball, that's what comes to hand.

... not, like I said, that I'm projecting or anything :)

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:04 (twenty years ago) link

Nicely done. ;-) I have to say that based on a variety of essays and introductions I've read that King is generally a perceptive and excellent critic -- his recent one for the edition of Shirley Jackson's The Haunting of Hill House works not only as a discussion of her but of Lovecraft and he makes an excellent (and I think ultimately compelling) argument for Jackson as the better writer that moves beyond the usual attacks directed at Lovecraft.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:08 (twenty years ago) link

Ned: just because a writer is a self-centered asshole doesn't mean his or her writing is bad. These three books kick more ass than Bear Bryant on a meth-fueled 1964 practice session, and screw what their author says in interviews.

And Stephen King is not innocent hisself. Maybe skeered though.

Neudonym, Monday, 7 July 2003 18:10 (twenty years ago) link

Oh yeah, the Pullman books are still excellent. I've got a whole mental list of writers I just avoid outside-the-story.

I think in this case -- I'd have to read what he actually said -- King was just blinded. I like both Harry Potter and Pullman, but I can't see how anyone could argue that Order of the Phoenix is better than the Pullman books. It's got that whole "it's about damn time it came out"/"hunger is the best spice" thing going for it, granted.

Tep (ktepi), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:14 (twenty years ago) link

Ned: just because a writer is a self-centered asshole doesn't mean his or her writing is bad.

Hey now, back up -- I wasn't saying THAT. As noted above, I haven't even read his books yet (though I know something of the general story and approve).

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:18 (twenty years ago) link

Here's the quote from King:

My own feeling is that they are much better than Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials trilogy, which is their only contemporary competitor. Will kids (and adults as well) still be wild about Harry 100 years from now, or 200? My best guess is that he will indeed stand time's test and wind up on a shelf where only the best are kept; I think Harry will take his place with Alice, Huck, Frodo, and Dorothy, and this is one series not just for the decade, but for the ages.

I would reprint the whole review but I don't want the copyright police after me.

Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:22 (twenty years ago) link

http://www.ciudadfutura.com/poprock/cheaptrickdream.jpg

PUT DOWN THE COMPUTER, NICOLE.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:25 (twenty years ago) link

Nicole, keep your head down until Labor Day and the Copyright Police won't be able to come after you (unless they have winter uniforms).

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:31 (twenty years ago) link

THOSE ARE THE WINTER UNIFORMS YOU FOOL.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:33 (twenty years ago) link

White after Labor Day? MAJOR FAUX PAX.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:35 (twenty years ago) link

Copyright police arrest these men/they talk in maths, etc.

Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:38 (twenty years ago) link

Some military strategist Perry is. CAMOFLAUGE YOU RIDICULOUS MAN.

http://image.allmusic.com/00/amg/pic200_web/drp000/p043/p04307mc5wb.jpg

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:42 (twenty years ago) link

(I am now wishing I'd said, "If those are their winter uniforms, the commanding officer of the Copyright Police must be Major Faux Pas.")

(Is it Pas or Pax? God, I'm hopeless.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:43 (twenty years ago) link

The DanandNed collective would dress the Copyright Police in camo Pink.

Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:43 (twenty years ago) link

just didn't want you to go too far with that 'if that's his attitude then he sucks' thing, Ned m'boy, you'd be depriving yrself, that's all

Neudonym, Monday, 7 July 2003 18:48 (twenty years ago) link

My oldest friend (who shares a surname with the evil foster parents in HP) introduced me to Pullman, and loved the first two books - then listened to an interview with PP, and loathed him so much he's not read the last. I have therefore avoided interviews etc. with PP to avoid the risk of similar effects.

I suspect the substance of the themes and the brilliant bravura superscience will be lost in a movie adaptation, which will surely aim at the HP audience. I think these are genuinely great books on all kinds of levels, far better than Tolkien in pretty much every way. They are probably my favourite children's books ever, even ahead of Alan Garner. Well made, a lot of it will look really fabulous, especially duelling polar bears in armour. I hope they don't cop out on the seriousness, or the religious and scientific content.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:50 (twenty years ago) link

I hope they don't skimp on the sheer loathsomeness of most of the adults. Lyra's parents = Ma and Pa Dickface.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 7 July 2003 18:53 (twenty years ago) link

martin those are only yr fave children's books because you've never read mine! [insert emoticon indicating lighthearted way of making a point that's SERIOUS AS A HEART ATTACK]

Neudonym, Monday, 7 July 2003 19:02 (twenty years ago) link

I didn't know you had written any, Matt! Sorry!

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 7 July 2003 19:21 (twenty years ago) link

My mother sent me this trilogy, which I dutifully read and then set aside. I seem to have missed exactly what it is that is so grand about these stories. Actually, I do remember liking the first two. And I remember exactly nothing about the third. So maybe that was my problem with the series (I feel the same way about several of the books in the Chronicles of Narnia, too).

However, I wouldn't compare them to the H.P. tales - I think that _HDM_ is meant for a more mature audience, and the stories are infinitely more complex. While the H.P. story line is becoming increasingly complex and addresses more issues, the stories still make me think of fifth- and sixth-grade student readers, whereas I think of seventh- and eight-grades as being the starting points for _HDM_ (which is the same range for The Lord of the Rings in my mind, though The Hobbit works with younger little ones.

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Monday, 7 July 2003 20:46 (twenty years ago) link

I'm giving these books to my kids when they turn eight.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 7 July 2003 20:48 (twenty years ago) link

*laughing* An excellent plan.

Why eight?

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Monday, 7 July 2003 21:06 (twenty years ago) link

That's the age I was when I read _Watership Down_.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 7 July 2003 21:16 (twenty years ago) link

make them read shardik

mark s (mark s), Monday, 7 July 2003 21:18 (twenty years ago) link

Read it to them in the womb you lazy man.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 7 July 2003 21:19 (twenty years ago) link

But how will I fit in there with them, let alone turn pages?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 7 July 2003 21:20 (twenty years ago) link

Much better than Potter, like 3D is better than 2D. Though I now have the new Potter and am childishly excited about reading it.

HDM is very pompous, portentous, but full of excellent tales which do try and push the envelope (ick) for children's fiction. He's really made an effort, and while it all gets a bit up its own arse, it's pretty damn good reading.

Mark C (Mark C), Monday, 7 July 2003 21:43 (twenty years ago) link

But how will I fit in there with them, let alone turn pages?

I assume you're able to get in there already, surely.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 7 July 2003 21:57 (twenty years ago) link

I loved the first two but was never able to finish the Amber Spyglass. About halfway through it started getting extremely dull. Anyone else experience this?

That Girl (thatgirl), Monday, 7 July 2003 22:27 (twenty years ago) link

This thread got me motivated enough to go buy these books--I am currently halfway through the first one and all I can say is:

ARMORED BEARS, MOTHERFUCKER!!!

I mean, has there ever been a better idea in all of literature anywhere? Aside from that it's quite good--nicely dark and I heartily approve of street urchins smoking and drinking.

adam (adam), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 05:25 (twenty years ago) link

The first two were excellent, stay up all night for books.

That Girl (thatgirl), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 06:19 (twenty years ago) link

I can't remember the last time ANY author came off well in an interview - totally irrelevant to the books in this case certainly. They pretty much rock. The Amber Spyglass goes veering off track though, for me. I think he's trying to cram too many ideas in without properly integrating everything, whereas up until then he'd been doing a great job. I mean, it's still hugely powerful, but I just plain don't like the wheelie things.

Archel (Archel), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 07:23 (twenty years ago) link

how timely. 1/3 through the second (subtle..) am having fun. will reread thread when i have no spoiler fear.

gaz (gaz), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 08:51 (twenty years ago) link

Awesome books, but yes, the wheelie things were very... odd...

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 09:20 (twenty years ago) link

They're not the best children's books ever (Moomins obv) but yes they're very very good.

Is anyone going to buy/read Lyra's Oxford?

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 09:41 (twenty years ago) link

What is Lyra's Oxford?

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 09:46 (twenty years ago) link

Pullman's new cash-in/book, set 2 years after HDM, lushly illustrated travelogue of Lyra wandering around fantasy Oxford, may or may not have any plot.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 09:51 (twenty years ago) link

I'm reading Stephen Jay Gould on evolution right now and in hindsight I'm quite impressed with the wheelie things, from a design/evolutionary point at least.

Mark C (Mark C), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 11:37 (twenty years ago) link

I quite liked the wheelie things, actually. So there.

caitlin (caitlin), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 14:01 (twenty years ago) link

Wheelie things = grebt. Also because they are part of the MARY MALONE plot and Mary Malone = r0wr! (in a fictional sort of way)

("for the Dads")

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 14:03 (twenty years ago) link

Actually why aren't there more for-the-Dads characters in children's lit?

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 14:04 (twenty years ago) link

http://members.aol.com/DadsWV/Graphics/dads.gif

Dada, Tuesday, 8 July 2003 14:05 (twenty years ago) link

harry potter <= ???

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 14:06 (twenty years ago) link

Ah that makes sense

Chuck_Tatum, Tuesday, 27 October 2020 23:20 (three years ago) link

I just finished season 1 of the HBO adaptation. The first bunch of episodes were a bit dispiriting, with so many corny moments. I understand wanting to show various side plots instead of focusing in Lyra, but I would've preferred sticking with the book's structure. Lin-Manual Miranda was a particularly bad call. I was also not excited about starting the Will plot in S1, but it ended up making sense overall. The show was really redeemed in the last few episodes, which went much darker, and the finale ended on a pleasingly ambiguous note.

Mr. Cacciatore (Moodles), Tuesday, 27 October 2020 23:22 (three years ago) link

im cautiously optimistic for season 2, despite a trailer that seemed to be deliberately obfuscatory

glengarry gary beers (voodoo chili), Tuesday, 27 October 2020 23:31 (three years ago) link

love ruth wilson so much

mark s, Sunday, 8 November 2020 21:09 (three years ago) link

(s2e1 dropped)

mark s, Sunday, 8 November 2020 21:10 (three years ago) link

She does sadistic almost *too* well.

Vanishing Point (Chinaski), Sunday, 8 November 2020 21:45 (three years ago) link

three weeks pass...

finally got round to s2e2

mark s, Sunday, 29 November 2020 21:20 (three years ago) link

Not feeling this season yet. Both kids’ acting was pretty poor throughout.

the thing that the angry Left forbids (hardcore dilettante), Sunday, 29 November 2020 21:55 (three years ago) link

one month passes...

Forgive the thread spam, but I wanted to note that this show's 2020 season is nominated in the 2020 ILX TV poll:

ILX's Best Television of 2020 Poll / VOTING AND CAMPAIGNING THREAD / Voting Ends After January 29, 2021

If you like this show and you'd like to see it have a good showing in the poll (running in February) all you need to do is submit a ballot including it and your other favorites (3 minimum, 25 maximum, ranked by your favorite to least favorite) to forksclovetofu at gmail. It'll take five minutes; get to it!

the serious avant-garde universalist right now (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 21 January 2021 19:46 (three years ago) link

finished season 2 the other day! i thought it was a big improvement on season 1 (especially in the daemon department, aka the most important department) while still feeling like it's missing something essential and ineffable that the books had. it seems like they're neutering the "killing god" aspect of the books, which might make season 3 very weird, and they've totally messed up scoresby and the witches. but they've got the will/lyra relationship down, and ruth wilson is transfixing even as she's completely different from my conception of the character from the books lol

boz conspiracy by toby hus (voodoo chili), Thursday, 21 January 2021 20:02 (three years ago) link

Lin-Manual Miranda is terrible in this!

Dan I., Saturday, 30 January 2021 20:17 (three years ago) link

horrifically miscast, it’s true

tiwa-nty one savage (voodoo chili), Saturday, 30 January 2021 20:25 (three years ago) link

one year passes...

Season 3 is 2 episodes in - one of the Belgian reviewers called this whole series "probably the best fantasy series ever"

StanM, Wednesday, 7 December 2022 17:55 (one year ago) link

I will probably watch the last season, but I found season 2 to be a bit dull

Muad'Doob (Moodles), Wednesday, 7 December 2022 18:00 (one year ago) link

waiting with bated breath for the final book of dust book lol, but i will def check out this season. i have absolutely no idea how they're gonna manage to adapt this final book, but i am intrigued to see how they fail

comedy khadafi (voodoo chili), Wednesday, 7 December 2022 18:55 (one year ago) link

three weeks pass...

it's years since i read these and i remember book three as hurried -- this version has a measured pace to it that is maybe righting that?

mark s, Tuesday, 3 January 2023 19:17 (one year ago) link

just got a massive goosebumps moment so that's a 👍🏽

sadly it involved lin-manuel miranda 👎🏽

mark s, Tuesday, 3 January 2023 22:13 (one year ago) link

Didn’t watch the first season past a couple episodes as it seemed to be sticking to the original book so closely, and because I wasn’t enjoying McAvoy and the Lyra actress

Super curious to see this season though - thought the third book was disappointing but I’m interested to see how they do the final battle and God and the wheely creatures and whatnot

Chuck_Tatum, Wednesday, 4 January 2023 00:01 (one year ago) link

I enjoyed in the 3rd book how the literal actual death of god was like a passing thing buried in the middle of a paragraph and you might have missed it.

The land of dreams and endless remorse (hardcore dilettante), Wednesday, 4 January 2023 06:10 (one year ago) link

It was the same in the show I now realise. There was this very brief scene with a large crystal cube that has a person/angel curled up in it that they disintegrated. I didnt understand what it was but I do now.

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Wednesday, 4 January 2023 07:27 (one year ago) link

the wheely creatures look a bit too like if snorky from the banana splits turned up in avatar -- and the rush through the plot-points is beginning to arrive: mary's discovery of the amber lens seemed both too easy and under-explained

its various settings are still great and i feel that dafne keen has grown into the role and the character now that lyra (like keen) is a little older

ruth wilson remains MVP

mark s, Wednesday, 4 January 2023 10:41 (one year ago) link

iorek byrnison giving mcavoy a richly deserved hard time lol

claws shd have been out tho

mark s, Wednesday, 4 January 2023 18:47 (one year ago) link

the battle in heaven was p well realised IMO, tho it also makes you realise how dr who-ish the steampunky dimension of this story can get -- like the story will be resolved when who (or whoever) gets to press a red button on the head villain's dash which reads "my evil universe-transforming plan into explodey ruins"

(does the book use the term "mutiverse"? it's not wrong exactly but i was wincing every time azrael said it)

one ep to go

mark s, Thursday, 5 January 2023 11:21 (one year ago) link

Of what I remember, Asriel & Mrs Coulter's motives get increasingly confusing in the last book, like they're two characters from an old Gossip Girl episode whose motivations change on a dime, just because plot

Chuck_Tatum, Thursday, 5 January 2023 13:48 (one year ago) link

in that case -- as my memory of the book is v spotty (i suspect bcz flaws in book but also a long time since i read it) -- the TV show handles this with rather more clarity even when their motivation is intensely conflicted (towards lyra, towards one another). with her especially -- more thx to ruth wilson than philip pullman maybe? -- we have learned always to read everything she does thru a "things not as they seem" filter. metatron is amusingly rude abt her to her face ("you are a cess-pit of moral filth") but she is NOT AT ALL BOTHERED and her face just says "i know you are but what am i"

mark s, Thursday, 5 January 2023 14:02 (one year ago) link

Really enjoyed the whole series of this. The Amber Spyglass was prob my least favourite of the books and I did wonder how some things could possibly work on screen, but they pulled it off. Both young leads loads better in the last season. Not a spoiler, but the visuals for the physical battle in heaven and plunging fall were absolutely stunning.

that mustardless plate (Bill A), Thursday, 5 January 2023 17:00 (one year ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.