Oops, wrong vote--Trammell's at 24.3% in his 10th year. He's made incremental gains for the past three ballots, so, in view of Blyleven's election, maybe it's too soon to write him off altogether.
― clemenza, Saturday, 5 March 2011 19:20 (ten years ago) link
Yeah I'm not arguing Trammell is going to get in, just that even in HoF voting he's still gotten more attention/respect than Whitaker.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Saturday, 5 March 2011 19:22 (ten years ago) link
I may have found the Whitaker/Trammell thing...I'm not sure; I found something in the '91 Baseball Book, but it's more general than I remembered. Also more pointed. After showing that their Games/Runs/RBIs/OBA/SA were virtually identical to that point in their careers, James put a lot of the perceived differences between the two down to race: "In spite of this, there, is, believe it or not, a widespread belief among the Detroit public that Trammell is a tough, agressive player who has built himself up to this level by working hard, while Lou is just...well, a kind of shiftless black guy who has a lot of ability but hasn't done much with it. This appalling attitude, as close to overt racism as you can get without ruining your linen, is expressed freely in the Motor City media." He also points out, derisively, that "Trammell is a visible on field 'leader,' a holler guy; Whitaker is quiet, laid back. Sometimes he's a little bit of a space cadet."
― clemenza, Sunday, 6 March 2011 18:31 (ten years ago) link
Can someone remind me why Will Clark retired when he did? He was 36 and had a 964 OPS in his final season. He played 130 games that season too, so it wasn't injuries.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Saturday, 30 June 2012 10:39 (nine years ago) link
I'd probably bet that baseball got in the way of hunting season and Will Clark had enough money to not have to worry about having to travel and play baseball anymore.
― earlnash, Saturday, 21 July 2012 03:40 (nine years ago) link
That sounds exactly right for him. I doubt he's given the game a 2nd thought since retiring.
― Neil Jung (WmC), Saturday, 21 July 2012 03:56 (nine years ago) link
Clark comes in to talk to the young guys
― pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Saturday, 21 July 2012 06:45 (nine years ago) link
NoTime briefly alluded to Belle above, but what exactly were the circumstances of his retirement--had he just worn out his welcome league-wide, was it physical, or were PEDs lurking in the background? I've forgotten. Even in an inflated era, 23 homers/103 RBI/.281/.342/.474 doesn't seem like an exit season at age 34.
― clemenza, Saturday, 21 July 2012 15:16 (nine years ago) link
I remember reading he was having physical problems -- back? arthritis? I can't remember the details.
― Neil Jung (WmC), Saturday, 21 July 2012 15:20 (nine years ago) link
Arthritic right hip, apparently.
― Neil Jung (WmC), Saturday, 21 July 2012 15:24 (nine years ago) link
That rings a bell. (Sorry.) Give him five more years, and he probably becomes a somewhat controversial HOF case.
― clemenza, Saturday, 21 July 2012 15:27 (nine years ago) link
AB's hips were falling apart.
Often stated pieces of trivia about the Niekro bros was that they go to the age where they couldn't react fast enuf to the comebacker; not that they couldn't keep pitching
― Grimy Little Pimp (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Saturday, 21 July 2012 15:29 (nine years ago) link
what i remember about p-neeks was in his last few years of pitching he looked like he was 70 years old
― omar little, Saturday, 21 July 2012 19:52 (nine years ago) link
Derrek Lee? I know his mid-career monster year was largely a product of the era (which may answer the question) and the park (Wrigley), but in his final season he ended with a huge September in Pittsburgh (.337, 7 homers, .584 slugging pct.) and pretty good numbers overall for the year. Was he injured, or did nobody want him? He was 35.
― clemenza, Saturday, 15 June 2013 15:32 (eight years ago) link
Should never assume...Lee's 2005 had nothing to do with Wrigley. He was .328/.425/.669 at home, with 24 home runs, and .342/.421/.654 on the road, with 22. 26 doubles at home, 24 on the road. 60 runs and 52 RBI at home, 60 and 55 on the road. Dead even.
― clemenza, Saturday, 15 June 2013 16:49 (eight years ago) link
there were rumors last summer of him pulling a roy oswalt and joining a team midseason, but i guess they never panned out, not sure why
― mookieproof, Saturday, 15 June 2013 19:05 (eight years ago) link
was Ralph Kiner a huge lush who had to retire because of his drinking (what my dad told me growing up)? or was it really his back or knees?
― bishop desmond youtube (sanskrit), Saturday, 15 June 2013 19:06 (eight years ago) link
(btw oswalt is 3-2, 2.16 in five starts for double-a tulsa and will probably join the rockies next week)
― mookieproof, Saturday, 15 June 2013 19:08 (eight years ago) link
Back trouble for Kiner, according to Wikipedia; also mentions recurring salary disputes with Branch Rickey as his ticket out of Pittsburgh two years earlier. He was 32, coming off his worst season since he was a rookie, and the Indians released him. Only found one message-board post for a "Ralph Kiner alcohol" search, but the link won't work for me.
― clemenza, Saturday, 15 June 2013 19:17 (eight years ago) link
Derrek Lee turned down an offer from the Yankees this March. I think it was the sort of thing where he was only willing to play if somebody made him a nice offer
― Panaïs Pnin (The Yellow Kid), Saturday, 15 June 2013 21:57 (eight years ago) link
Related to the revived HOF thread:
He was one of the best old players ever, and could still rake even at age 40 and 41 (2.6 oWAR each year, 138 OPS+ at age 41).
Also, what about Doyle Alexander:
He retired after the '89 season, only two years removed from being the toast of baseball in '87. He did lead the league in losses and was 38, but had thrown 200 + IP for six straight years. His K rate took a dive and BB rate jumped, so I guess his stuff was gone? The '89 game logs seem to suggest this -- he had a good start to the year and steadily declined.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Monday, 13 October 2014 04:28 (seven years ago) link
Billy Wagner is another closer that really hadn't lost anything when he hung it up. I think for some of these guys, they make so much money they just get tired of the job.
― earlnash, Monday, 13 October 2014 04:47 (seven years ago) link
I don't remember the exact circumstances with Downing and Alexander, but looking at their career boxes, it looks to me like they had gone as far as they could. Downing's contract had expired and he was 41, so he probably just didn't have any offers (even though, as you say, he was still productive). Alexander had just gone 6-18 at age 38, with a worse-than-league ERA, and had pitched 19 years for eight different teams.
Downing makes me think of weightlifting, and that James used to name him as his favourite player. With Alexander, it's being carried off the field in '85 when the Jays clinched their first divisional title.
― clemenza, Monday, 13 October 2014 05:21 (seven years ago) link
Brian Downing had one of the more unique batting styles with that totally open stance.
― earlnash, Monday, 13 October 2014 05:25 (seven years ago) link
That too! Forgot about that--really unusual.
― clemenza, Monday, 13 October 2014 05:27 (seven years ago) link
I think the pressures of playing baseball really drained Wagner, he'd made up his mind to retire before the season began. He'd had enough of the grind, I don't think it was the money.
Contract status probably did come into play with some of the older guys. Alexander took one year deals in '88 and '89, the Tigers didn't want him back and he would have had to search for a new team. Instead, he retired. In today's game, he would have signed a 3-4 year free agent deal after '87 and pitched until his arm fell off.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Monday, 13 October 2014 05:37 (seven years ago) link
He popped up on the Baseball Reference photo-collage at the top left today. He had a fantastic year in '93 (.310/.416/.585, 29 HR, 162 OPS+), especially for a catcher, and received a few MVP votes. For the next five seasons, he settles in around 2.5 WAR and 17 or 18 HR a year. In his final season, still only 33, he hits 15 HR with a slash line of .262/.358/.476, his best slugging pct. since '93. Looked to be pretty good defensively too.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 25 September 2018 18:55 (three years ago) link
His Wikipedia page doesn't offer any explanation, though he did go on to coach at the university level--maybe he had a job all lined up.
His .994 career fielding percentage ranks ninth all-time among Major League catchers. Hoiles' career .837 on-base plus slugging percentage is seventh-highest all-time among major league catchers. His .467 slugging percentage is 11th highest all-time among major league catchers.
PED era, but still.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 25 September 2018 18:58 (three years ago) link
could no longer catch with a degenerative hip and bad back
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 25 September 2018 19:09 (three years ago) link
willis otanez did not turn out to be a wise choice, tho
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 25 September 2018 19:12 (three years ago) link
Paul Molitor and Moises Alou both could still swing the stick at the end of their career.
Molitor is one of the players that probably benefited most from the DH, as he could not stay healthy playing in the field. His counting stats would have been even more off the charts as he easily missed 3 seasons of games for injuries in his first decade of playing.
― earlnash, Wednesday, 26 September 2018 00:42 (three years ago) link
Molitor was definitely one of the best "old" hitters ever. 225 hits at age 39! He probably could have hung around for another couple of years as a pinch hitter if he wanted to.
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Wednesday, 26 September 2018 08:50 (three years ago) link
I think Molitor pushed it about as far as he could. There was clear decline his last three years, he was 41, and, by his own standards (and in the context of peak-PED-era), he really wasn't much of a hitter his last year.
― clemenza, Wednesday, 26 September 2018 16:48 (three years ago) link
Steady and solid through the '70s, MVP votes three consecutive years, hits .321 with the Expos in 1979, has his first negative WAR year with the Padres in '80, gets released, and--at the age of 32--never plays again. Was no one interested, or did he just retire?
― clemenza, Friday, 21 May 2021 15:45 (four months ago) link
Cash went to spring training in 1981 but was released as the season started on April 4. He hit just .172 in the exhibition games for the Padres, yet it was still a shock to him to be let go. Cash said, “I know I hadn’t produced during the spring, but I was playing on a slightly injured knee. It occurred in batting practice, and the knee bothered me a bit after that. I’m not using it as an excuse, but it did have an effect.” After his release, he attempted to catch on with a team that would be a contender, but things never worked out.
― Piven After Midnight (The Yellow Kid), Friday, 21 May 2021 15:51 (four months ago) link
Thanks...so he definitely wanted to play. I though he might have gone to Japan, which many players did at the time.
― clemenza, Friday, 21 May 2021 15:55 (four months ago) link
not Japan but...
In 1989, Cash played for the Orlando Juice of the Senior Professional Baseball Association. He hit .321 in 35 games with the team. The next season, he played for the Florida Tropics and hit .304 in 14 games before the league folded.
― Piven After Midnight (The Yellow Kid), Friday, 21 May 2021 16:00 (four months ago) link