It's true, maps certainly aren't going to fit in the breast pocket that's been stitched down to suggest that it would feel much more self-actualized if it were stuffed with shotgun shells.
The funny thing is that I have a grey wool overshirt almost exactly like that one, but it doesn't have the shotgun pocket or the map pocket, the pockets don't have snappy flaps, and I got it in the outlet store in Batavia, NY for a song. Like MAYBE it was $15.
― go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 15:07 (thirteen years ago) link
yeah see i stuff my shotgun shell pockets with d cell batteries so i can get that real authentic look
― tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 15:20 (thirteen years ago) link
D batteries you salvaged from an abandoned steel mill as you photographed your way across the rust belt, you meant to say.
― go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 16:10 (thirteen years ago) link
guys i mean i feel you but come on
― max, Tuesday, 15 February 2011 16:29 (thirteen years ago) link
i think the weird thing w/the whole mid century outdoorsmen look is how many have embraced it so wholeheartedly - its not like theyre just adding a pair of redwings to their wardrobe or wearing an occasional flannel - its going whole hog down to how particularly the shit is rocked like cuffing yr selvage just so or w/e - and then theres j crew opening up menswear stores completely catering to what at this point seems more a statement of intent than a style - its saying weve occupied ourselves w/prissy nonsense for too long, lets get manly yall - but of course its not manly to obsess over w/e vintage eyelet detail in yr hiking boots so it just comes off vaguely drag queenish
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 15 February 2011 16:31 (thirteen years ago) link
also i feel like there are many long time standards in my wardrobe - woolrich jacket, wool sweater, beard - that i pair w/sneakers as is my habit and now i just look like some entry level vers of this guy
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 15 February 2011 16:35 (thirteen years ago) link
but w/e ive only been in ny like 1 month of the last year so i dont really have to worry abt it i guess
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 15 February 2011 16:37 (thirteen years ago) link
btw i think overall its a p nice look
Haha I just wrote and deleted a couple of lines about how people who are actually FROM the North Country or whatever semi-fictional places this gear is supposed to be worn, those people are more likely to be found wearing local state university sweatshirts and probably a garish ski parka. Even at the most woodsman-ish end of the spectrum, LL Bean, maybe Woolrich are about the most "authentic" you're gonna find.
― go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 16:39 (thirteen years ago) link
like this is the ll bean boot youre likely to see people wearing from where i type in n vermont
http://grab.by/8XHn
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 15 February 2011 16:43 (thirteen years ago) link
lol yes EXACTLY!
― go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 16:47 (thirteen years ago) link
maybe in 30 years nyc ad agency employees will be obsessing over nascar tshirts and photo realistic camo gear
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 15 February 2011 16:48 (thirteen years ago) link
i guess the glib thing 2 say is that menswear is infatuated w/ any culture that signifies tradition/craft/heritage/permanence bcuz of the instability & uncertainty around men's identity 'in the modern world'. like these clothes were 1st worn by men w/an unthinking sort of command & mastery of their milieux or w/e. prep is less tiresome bcuz its still connected to its own essential nature & culture whereas the workwear thing is just gross now.
im p sick of both of these tho been torrenting old episodes of friends to jack chandler 95s style
― Lamp, Tuesday, 15 February 2011 16:53 (thirteen years ago) link
otm re: statement of intent over style -- it's not so much the style that bugs me as how the garments are held as fetish objects of authenticity & masculinity. like if i have to read another graph about the naval origins & functional design of the peacoat then i will barf. yes it's a perennial classic look, it crops up every couple years, the only thing new this time is the emphasis on functionality when it is really no more or less functional than, say, a nylon parka
― tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 16:54 (thirteen years ago) link
yeah were in a stage where men generally are getting more into clothes but there seems to be the need in order to maintain a comfort level to quantify the experience via stats and history as far as how well it withstands the elements or like the fact that this pocket could conceivably be used for something that youll never use it for - its the rei outdoor gortex wicking headlamp gear mentality which imo is a v low form of materialism - guys should just admit to themselves that they like beautiful things and want to look beautiful - i think at that point theres room for powers of discernment to go way up
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:01 (thirteen years ago) link
i guess the glib thing 2 say is that menswear is infatuated w/ any culture that signifies tradition/craft/heritage/permanence bcuz of the instability & uncertainty around men's identity 'in the modern world'. like these clothes were 1st worn by men w/an unthinking sort of command & mastery of their milieux
Elephant in the room, totes obvious but hardly ever mentioned. And something I'm really conflicted about have v much appreciation for since that so-called "mastery" was at the expense of every group that wasn't Them.
― go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:06 (thirteen years ago) link
hey it was a good time to be a white american male *lights cigar, gazes toward the setting sun*
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:08 (thirteen years ago) link
spotted @ the ri antiques mall: watch cap, checked shirt, canvas work vest, selvedge, red wings; dropping $$$$ on a midcentury teak sideboard like it wasn't even a thing
― tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:12 (thirteen years ago) link
ballin
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:14 (thirteen years ago) link
guys should just admit to themselves that they like beautiful things and want to look beautiful
yah theres a definite need in menswear for a 'narrative' - you can pay a grand for a pair of shoes if you know the detailed history of not only the wizened englishman who handcrafted them but the cattle that gave their lives too - whereas a girl can pay a grand for a pair of heels bcuz they make her ass look good
haha last fall i got an amazing midcentury teak credenza for $170 bucks
this is like the time i saw pants i own on fuckyeahmenswear isnt it?
― Lamp, Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:16 (thirteen years ago) link
I rly like a lot of boy's adventure stories from the turn of the cent through the mid-cent, plus lots of light adult fic, esp exciting now that so much of it is avail as ebooks in public domain, for FREE, and I gotta say, the modern analog of the 1920s woodsman or whatever is totally not who or what Filson customers think it is.
― go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:20 (thirteen years ago) link
Must have read this 5x as "teak skateboard" for some reason and that still didn't even surprise me.
― go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:30 (thirteen years ago) link
with prep style, tho -- i always thought one of the keys to the look was a privileged indifference to trad rules of formality -- eg sockless loafers or like showing up to luncheon in tennis whites or w/e -- but now i see bloggers wearing blue blazers over long sleeve rugbys over a collared shirt w/ the repp tie peeking out -- too much, dudes
― tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:39 (thirteen years ago) link
teak skateboard, hand foraged steel trucks nbd
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:40 (thirteen years ago) link
http://www.proteak.com/images/skateboard.jpg
― kkvgz, Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:42 (thirteen years ago) link
are we bagging on midcentury furniture now too!!! my lifestyle is under attack/dont h8 the player h8 the game
― max, Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:43 (thirteen years ago) link
I have gotten into discussions with women over this and I come down on the side of expensive menswear being somewhat more reasonable. A couple of girls cracked up about me wearing $400 White's boots. But I wear them 15 hours a day, every day (and I can't even buy good-looking boots in my size from RW or w/e) - I'm paying for craftsmanship (they'll last forever with resoling) and for the fact I need custom. Contrast that with designer heels that are functionally no different from cheap heels, sometimes down to appearance, and aren't worn as often.
Ditto jeans, but in unisex - expensive selvage from Japan or the US are generally of higher quality (materials, craftsmanship) than designer brands that cost nearly the same. I'd rather pay for material and because on guy in Oakland is sewing than buy Diesel sewn in the developing world.
Compared to thrifting or buying cheap jeans from Wal-Mart, it's all frivolous of course. But the menswear aesthetic of focusing on craft and history (if not real world function) is not without its merits compared to fashion as a whole.
― boots get knocked from here to czechoslovakier (milo z), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:44 (thirteen years ago) link
pfft midcentry furniture so 00s
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:45 (thirteen years ago) link
milo i feel you on valuing craftsmanship, i guess from my pov it so easily goes over board into gross conceptuality which is actually imo an impediment to appreciation
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:49 (thirteen years ago) link
― tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, February 15, 2011 9:20 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark
this just reminds me of a time in 7th grade study hall when my discman was out of batteries so i leaned over and jokingly asked this one D&D/gamer lookin dude if he happened to have any batteries and he did. his pockets were full of fucking batteries. it was totally weird
― ullr saves (gbx), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:49 (thirteen years ago) link
nah teak is cool w/ me
maybe just don't dress like a woodsman as you politely ask the dude in the reeboks & wranglers to load the credenza into yr mercedes van
― tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:49 (thirteen years ago) link
Contrast that with designer heels that are functionally no different from cheap heels, sometimes down to appearance
This not actually true, but w/e, not germane to thread.
― go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:50 (thirteen years ago) link
craftsmanship will not save u from the yawning abyss of technology fyi
― max, Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:50 (thirteen years ago) link
mercedes van
You mean your Dodge Sprinter, right?
― go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:51 (thirteen years ago) link
But you paid xtra for the Merc branding kit to be installed at the dealership.
― go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:52 (thirteen years ago) link
Because of, u know, craftsmanship.
speaking of technology how abt this new term for craftsmanship where there is no craftsman 'build quality'
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:53 (thirteen years ago) link
laurel: that's the one
― tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:54 (thirteen years ago) link
I love this thread so much, it's all about how 20-sthing hipsters want to my life or something??? Hilarious!
― go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:58 (thirteen years ago) link
you know what i always thought were awesome these amc eagle if a truck was a car units - feel like the urban woodsman should get into it
http://grab.by/8XMW
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:58 (thirteen years ago) link
But the menswear aesthetic of focusing on craft and history (if not real world function) is not without its merits compared to fashion as a whole.
'craft' has its merits - i mean im wearing edward green oxfords atm - but my point was more about how menswear almost needs to come pacakged w/ this kind of narrative in order for dudes to pay $$$$. the totemic qualities of 'craft' and 'quality' are p easily coopted imo & its a helpful & less self-deluding to admit that we dress for others n/h
― Kabutt (Lamp), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 17:58 (thirteen years ago) link
My midwestern, woodworking, auto-repairing, LL Bean flannel and Carhartt-wearing dad has a Sprinter. Dodge logo package, because it cost extra for the Merc one and he just laughed.
― go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 18:00 (thirteen years ago) link
feel like the 'well I'm never gonna have to replace this because it's SO WELL MADE' argument is often made just to justify having to pay a ridiculous amount for something you really wanted for other reasons - like, if you do the math, replacing it 10 times could be cheaper.
― iatee, Tuesday, 15 February 2011 18:02 (thirteen years ago) link
Seriously it's like you/they all want to be my dad. He has like EEE-wide feet, btw, but has never even for a second considered $400 custom work boots, I can promise you that. I can picture the face he would make right now if I even mentioned it.
― go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 18:02 (thirteen years ago) link
lol did not know abt the dodge/benz premium pricing van scam, my god
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 15 February 2011 18:02 (thirteen years ago) link
totes mcgotes. i wanted one of these so bad as a kid
― ullr saves (gbx), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 18:03 (thirteen years ago) link
it looks like a donk right out the box!
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 15 February 2011 18:04 (thirteen years ago) link
ok also if mercedes made their militaristic jeep in the shape of a car itd be so rad
http://grab.by/8XNv
― ice cr?m, Tuesday, 15 February 2011 18:06 (thirteen years ago) link
feel like the 'well I'm never gonna have to replace this because it's SO WELL MADE' argument is often made just to justify having to pay a ridiculous amount for something you really wanted for other reasons - like, if you do the math, replacing it 10 times could be cheaper.― iatee, Tuesday, February 15, 2011 12:02 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark
― iatee, Tuesday, February 15, 2011 12:02 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark
otm. even though i can be a 'well-made' fetishist (p common among bike jerks) the simple fact is that cheap disposable jobs are likely cheaper. plus, the ppl that actually ~do the manly stuff~ that yr urban lumberjack just use whatever's close to hand. a friend of mine built his own house in rural NH and i can assure you that he wasn't using heirloom woodworking tools and wearing filson tincloth pants. it was cheap-end power tools and jeans and sneakers and tshirts all the way
xp driving those merc jeeps is sort of an experience, tbh. like the doors are just so fucking heavy and close with this solemn, teutonic "clunk". they're just so ~well-made~
― ullr saves (gbx), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 18:07 (thirteen years ago) link
Yeah, I think the Sprinters ship from the factory as Freightliner/Dodge Sprinter even though really everything about them is Mercedes-engineered. But to have all the places where there are logos changed costs some token amount, I don't remember the number. And by "token", I'm thinking it was like some thousands of dollars?
― go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Tuesday, 15 February 2011 18:08 (thirteen years ago) link