Radiohead - The King of Limbs

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1877 of them)

Hail To The Thief otoh is immense and everything I ask of Radiohead and more - propah fucken widescreen that record

lj knows where it's at

Damn this thread seems so....different without ilxor (ilxor), Monday, 14 February 2011 17:56 (thirteen years ago) link

My main problem with In Rainbows is that it lacks unarguable tunes tbh. Understated and subtle Radiohead resulted in A Punchup At A Wedding which is one of my favourite Radiohead songs, but that one's taut and nervous and unearthly and dramatic in a way that only a few of In Rainbows' tracks approach

acoleuthic, Monday, 14 February 2011 17:57 (thirteen years ago) link

I feel very strange going into this album, because I used to love Radiohead's music, and now I don't get much pleasure out of it.

I will never forget finding out about In Rainbows...anticipating it like hell, and there on that Wednesday morning, seeing the update on the school internet. Limbs I'm just going to look forward to hearing this weekend, and try to reconnect and cast my mind back to my fandom of this band.

Davek (davek_00), Monday, 14 February 2011 17:58 (thirteen years ago) link

I guess if they're going to go "subtle"* I'd rather they do so like "Go To Sleep" or "I Will" rather than... um I can't even match In Rainbows song titles to the songs, which one is the one in 6/8?

* this seems like a very odd word to use in conjunction with Radiohead

DJP, Monday, 14 February 2011 17:59 (thirteen years ago) link

yeah A Punchup isn't really *subtle* as such, more 'incremental', brooding, and eventually spectacular

acoleuthic, Monday, 14 February 2011 18:02 (thirteen years ago) link

I listened to In Rainbows in the downstairs part of the library for the first time, bunking off a morning lesson as I was so excited. The chills lasted the entire day.

I would've ranked it as no2 behind Kid A across their discography.

Davek (davek_00), Monday, 14 February 2011 18:04 (thirteen years ago) link

Punchup is the worst song on any Radiohead album, it's just plodding.

I predict this record will sound nothing like dubstep, either dubstep proper or some kind of James Blake indiestep. It would feel like too obvious a move.

Matt DC, Monday, 14 February 2011 18:05 (thirteen years ago) link

hmmm...i...agree with lj!

bows don't kill people, arrows do (Jordan), Monday, 14 February 2011 18:06 (thirteen years ago) link

I hate Punchup too actually. My jam on HTTT was always Where I End And You Begin..

Davek (davek_00), Monday, 14 February 2011 18:07 (thirteen years ago) link

What? No! "Punchup" is fucking great!

At any rate nothing is worse than everything on Pablo Honey that isn't "Creep"

DJP, Monday, 14 February 2011 18:07 (thirteen years ago) link

or "Blow Out" or "Stop Whispering"

acoleuthic, Monday, 14 February 2011 18:08 (thirteen years ago) link

(There are too many songs on HTTT that compete for favorite song from that album for me, which is another reason why it's my favorite Radiohead album.)

DJP, Monday, 14 February 2011 18:08 (thirteen years ago) link

xp I don't know about proper predictions, but it just seems likely to me that they'll respond in their own way to 00s dubstep the way they did to 90s IDM.

Either way, I like how we've had barely any pointers or hints about its direction. Such a surprise when we hit play I guess..

Davek (davek_00), Monday, 14 February 2011 18:09 (thirteen years ago) link

god yeah, where to start? 2+2=5 is one of the best opening tracks qua opening tracks of the 00's and it keeps on being amazing from there onwards

acoleuthic, Monday, 14 February 2011 18:10 (thirteen years ago) link

xp: last time we got this level of surprise, I hated the album

DJP, Monday, 14 February 2011 18:10 (thirteen years ago) link

i'm hoping for a heavily electronic album that's influenced by all the recent shit they've been listening to, but i really doubt that's what we're getting.

bows don't kill people, arrows do (Jordan), Monday, 14 February 2011 18:11 (thirteen years ago) link

xp I dunno, I was geeking out on live tracks they played on the 2006 tour, so actually the only proper surprise for me with IR was hearing how they'd sound all recorded, mixed and sequenced.

The Citizen Insane thing upthread could give us some hints, if we're inclined that way..

Davek (davek_00), Monday, 14 February 2011 18:12 (thirteen years ago) link

this album will be funky house

ciderpress, Monday, 14 February 2011 18:13 (thirteen years ago) link

Chillstep

Ned Raggett, Monday, 14 February 2011 18:14 (thirteen years ago) link

omg

Radiohead doing a witch house album would be so my type of shit

DJP, Monday, 14 February 2011 18:15 (thirteen years ago) link

this album is going to be snorecore

blond BBQ teen chipotle while angus bacon movies (crüt), Monday, 14 February 2011 18:15 (thirteen years ago) link

i was just thinking the other day that a lot of the james blake album just sounds like a thinner 'everything in its right place'

ciderpress, Monday, 14 February 2011 18:15 (thirteen years ago) link

It's going to sound like Asian Dub Foundation.

MarkoP, Monday, 14 February 2011 18:17 (thirteen years ago) link

God, that is a terrifying thought.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 14 February 2011 18:18 (thirteen years ago) link

The cover looks kind of Black Metal, maybe that's where they're going.

Inevitable stupid dubstep mix (chap), Monday, 14 February 2011 18:20 (thirteen years ago) link

It's gonna sound like latterday Anathema, don't kid yrselves

acoleuthic, Monday, 14 February 2011 18:21 (thirteen years ago) link

there is no format that can realistically compete with CDs in terms of sound quality

Any MP3 over 192kbps is fine with me.

Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 14 February 2011 18:37 (thirteen years ago) link

Named after this?

OMG it's going to be their Joshua Tree.

James Mitchell, Monday, 14 February 2011 18:37 (thirteen years ago) link

That is one evil looking tree.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 14 February 2011 18:39 (thirteen years ago) link

loooool Moka

markers, Monday, 14 February 2011 18:39 (thirteen years ago) link

Named after this?

OMG it's going to be their Joshua Tree.

― James Mitchell

From wikipedia

The name of the new album relates to an oak tree in Wiltshire’s Savernake Forest, thought to be around 1,000 years old.[4] The forest lies around three miles away from Tottenham House, a listed country house where Radiohead recorded part of In Rainbows. The tree is a pollarded oak, referring to an ancient technique for harvesting timber for fencing and firewood. The phrase also appears in the 23rd chapter of the Qur'an.[2]

Moka, Monday, 14 February 2011 18:40 (thirteen years ago) link

$15 for .wav files is such bs.

Fastnbulbous, Monday, 14 February 2011 18:42 (thirteen years ago) link

I can't find any reference to the 'King of Limbs' in the Qur'an because there isn't one. Whoever wrote that got confused. After searching for 'King of Limbs' via google, they probably arrived at a [1] wikipedia page about the Qur'an which mentions a commentator 'Ibn Kathir' who used the term to expand on a verse. He described the heart as being 'the king of limbs' while explaining his understanding of the Qur'anic term 'Al-Khushoo'.

The site of al-Khushoo is in the heart and heart is the king of the limbs, so if one intends to pray wholeheartedly the limbs will follow the heart.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Mu%E2%80%99minoon#Qualities_of_the_believers

Moka, Monday, 14 February 2011 18:43 (thirteen years ago) link

So it's going to be their pastoral hauntological album then..

Davek (davek_00), Monday, 14 February 2011 18:45 (thirteen years ago) link

That or they're going back to their roots.

Moka, Monday, 14 February 2011 18:46 (thirteen years ago) link

Album cover features surprise cameo by Slimer.

Melissa W, Monday, 14 February 2011 18:49 (thirteen years ago) link

They may be branching out.

Under Me Smang Tang (Doran), Monday, 14 February 2011 18:51 (thirteen years ago) link

They should charge $30 for a DVD w the Protools session files.

Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 14 February 2011 19:15 (thirteen years ago) link

$15 for .wav files is such bs.

Yeah that seems pretty expensive considering the mp3s are only $9; does it really cost $6 more in bandwidth to transfer? Come on man

frogbs, Monday, 14 February 2011 19:17 (thirteen years ago) link

uncompressed wavs are admittedly pretty giant

bows don't kill people, arrows do (Jordan), Monday, 14 February 2011 19:18 (thirteen years ago) link

Wikipedia says the average price paid for In Rainbows was £4 (based on a survey of 3,000), and I was sure I saw somewhere else that the average was $5... Regardless, it seems inaccurate to assume they came up with those prices from In Rainbows data

Fellini.Kuti, Monday, 14 February 2011 19:20 (thirteen years ago) link

just looking at the files for one song on my record here - the 320kpbs mp3 version is 10.8 mb, and the wav version is 47.9 mb

bows don't kill people, arrows do (Jordan), Monday, 14 February 2011 19:21 (thirteen years ago) link

First band to release a tracklisting via Youtube?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYslBdou_zM

James Mitchell, Monday, 14 February 2011 19:23 (thirteen years ago) link

oh lol @ track 3

acoleuthic, Monday, 14 February 2011 19:23 (thirteen years ago) link

it's on

acoleuthic, Monday, 14 February 2011 19:24 (thirteen years ago) link

They're finally releasing "Follow Me Around" in some form? Interesting...

Ned Raggett, Monday, 14 February 2011 19:24 (thirteen years ago) link

This site says the avg. for those who paid was $6, but only 38% of people paid anything.

Fellini.Kuti, Monday, 14 February 2011 19:26 (thirteen years ago) link

it's a song about twitter. the chorus contains the line "please rt, please rt"

markers, Monday, 14 February 2011 19:26 (thirteen years ago) link

That youtube account is not real.

Melissa W, Monday, 14 February 2011 19:26 (thirteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.