Radiohead - The King of Limbs

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1877 of them)

I still don't understand why killing the CD seems so important for some people while currently there is no format that can realistically compete with CDs in terms of sound quality. Yes, lossless exists, but nobody buys lossless.

You're Twistin' My Melody Man! (Geir Hongro), Monday, 14 February 2011 13:34 (thirteen years ago) link

Well, looks like there's no separate cd option yet, but there's one included with the vinyl sale. They do sell it in .wav format, though, so you can burn your own cd.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 14 February 2011 13:35 (thirteen years ago) link

I doubt if this'll ever be on Spotify, In Rainbows isn't.

nate woolls, Monday, 14 February 2011 13:36 (thirteen years ago) link

xp Yes they do

philippe is standing on it (MaresNest), Monday, 14 February 2011 13:36 (thirteen years ago) link

I had to do it twice. It worked the second time. x-post

yeah I have a rule with shit like this, if your frontend is too clunky to let my order go through the first time then I just buy an old Bathory album from Hells Headbangers instead

aerosmith: the acid house years (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 14 February 2011 13:37 (thirteen years ago) link

in some ways, this is an even more interesting experiment with digital-sales than in rainbows, since now -- with the data the band gathered the last time -- they can see if the model for hitting an optimal price-point works.

i guess the response is that radiohead, unlike a lot of other bands, has a built-in, passionate fanbase that will go out of their way to buy the product.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 14 February 2011 13:38 (thirteen years ago) link

coincidentally enough, this album is completely comprised of bathory covers!

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 14 February 2011 13:39 (thirteen years ago) link

Haha how weird. Yesterday right before I went to sleep I was listening to a couple of tracks from In Rainbows and wondering when something new would be released.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 14 February 2011 13:44 (thirteen years ago) link

wow. no tracklisting. clear vinyl. i'm psyched!

i love it when a suggest ban comes together (cajunsunday), Monday, 14 February 2011 13:44 (thirteen years ago) link

x-post But two years later, I bet the data has shifted, no? What someone may have been willing to pay for an album with a novel release scheme a couple of years ago may (and probably is) different from what they're willing to pay today, esp. with so many Amazon MP3 fire sales and whatnot. I mean, the Grammy-winning "Suburbs" is $5 on Amazon.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 14 February 2011 13:49 (thirteen years ago) link

In other words, curious how this works out.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 14 February 2011 13:49 (thirteen years ago) link

Haha how weird. Yesterday right before I went to sleep I was listening to a couple of tracks from In Rainbows and wondering when something new would be released.

I wasn't wondering when something new would be released, but I listened to The Bends for the first time in ages last night when going to sleep. Woke up to find out there's a new album imminent.

Ned and I can make things happen, people!

Johnny Fever, Monday, 14 February 2011 13:50 (thirteen years ago) link

oh man you guys were listening to the wrong albums, now this is gonna suck

iatee, Monday, 14 February 2011 13:55 (thirteen years ago) link

Will Ned and Johnny Fever please listen to the Avalanches tonight before going to sleep.

I'm really excited for this album I still listen to In Rainbows a lot.

Kitchen Person, Monday, 14 February 2011 13:57 (thirteen years ago) link

I am not nearly as excited for this as I would have been before In Rainbows came out.

CAN YOU GULP ANY LOUDER PISS WOMAN (DJP), Monday, 14 February 2011 14:00 (thirteen years ago) link

And so the laughable bullshit begins...

Under Me Smang Tang (Doran), Monday, 14 February 2011 14:21 (thirteen years ago) link

coincidentally enough, this album is completely comprised of bathory covers!

― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 14 February 2011 13:39 (39 minutes ago) Bookmark

Under the Sign of the Thom Yorke

dentarthurdent (dog latin), Monday, 14 February 2011 14:23 (thirteen years ago) link

I'm excited it's a return to form after the disappointing In Rainbows!

acoleuthic, Monday, 14 February 2011 14:41 (thirteen years ago) link

:P

acoleuthic, Monday, 14 February 2011 14:41 (thirteen years ago) link

Exciting news for an otherwise blah Monday, but I'm wishing there was some sort of in-between option that is more than just the downloads and less than super-duper deluxe expensive boxset.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 14 February 2011 14:44 (thirteen years ago) link

Well, if they are going to do it this way, I miss an option a la "In Rainbows" to pay zilch for the downloads and then full prize for the CD when it appears. I did it then, and I also know many others did.

You're Twistin' My Melody Man! (Geir Hongro), Monday, 14 February 2011 14:44 (thirteen years ago) link

i suspect you'll be able to buy a normal CD of it in the store eventually

ciderpress, Monday, 14 February 2011 14:45 (thirteen years ago) link

Can't say that I'm all that excited about this. $48 seems too steep for me. I'll wait for the 12" when it's only $15.

van smack, Monday, 14 February 2011 14:46 (thirteen years ago) link

The regular CD will be in stores on March 28th.

Melissa W, Monday, 14 February 2011 14:47 (thirteen years ago) link

i suspect you'll be able to buy a normal CD of it in the store eventually

Yeah, but that also means that I'd have to wait until the end of March to hear it when the album has already been discussed to death and no one cares anymore. Good job Radiohead on forcing the illegal downloads!

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 14 February 2011 14:49 (thirteen years ago) link

£6 is not exactly an enormous amount to pay if you want to hear in that much!

Psyched for this, although I'm not sure I'm actually going to be able to listen to this on the 19th. Feels weird for an album to have a RELEASE DATE that means something in 2011 - I miss release date excitement far more than the physical CD in this day and age.

Matt DC, Monday, 14 February 2011 14:49 (thirteen years ago) link

See, I would totally be jumping on a, like, $15 for digital download now and get the physical CD when its rleased. I just happen to fall into that gap where I want a physical product, but I don't want to shell out $48 for it.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 14 February 2011 14:51 (thirteen years ago) link

Agree there should be a middle option, with just a compact disc preorder. I don't even have a turntable anymore, and if I did, that still seems a pretty steep price to pay for some fancy packaging and an album I'm not even sure yet whether or not I'll like.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 14 February 2011 14:52 (thirteen years ago) link

In Rainbows = Pay what you want
King of Limbs = sorry, we gotta get paid

van smack, Monday, 14 February 2011 14:55 (thirteen years ago) link

i'd imagine if they could have manufactured the CD/LP themselves and sold it and avoided labels completely, they would have. to think they hadnt thought it through and done the sums is probably naive - i would imagine the amounts they lose in illegal downloads in the month before its in the shops is not comparable to taking on the distro themselves.

matt h, Monday, 14 February 2011 14:55 (thirteen years ago) link

My barrier isn't the price, it's the extra crap I have no space for in my house.

CAN YOU GULP ANY LOUDER PISS WOMAN (DJP), Monday, 14 February 2011 14:55 (thirteen years ago) link

can't believe you're unwilling to make room for 625 tiny pieces of artwork

aerosmith: the acid house years (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 14 February 2011 15:00 (thirteen years ago) link

In Rainbows = Pay what you want
King of Limbs = sorry, we gotta get paid

― van smack, Monday, February 14, 2011

eh, this is more than a little unfair as a criticism, unless you subscribe to the "music years to be free (of charge)" school of thought.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 14 February 2011 15:00 (thirteen years ago) link

radiohead have families to feed, you know.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 14 February 2011 15:01 (thirteen years ago) link

can't believe you're unwilling to make room for 625 tiny pieces of artwork

That has about the same level of appeal as "also included: a really old slice of ham" for me

DJP, Monday, 14 February 2011 15:02 (thirteen years ago) link

^ yes, this

Johnny Fever, Monday, 14 February 2011 15:02 (thirteen years ago) link

i always thought the brilliant bit of the In Rainbows release was not the pay what you want model but the fact that they had complete control of its dissemination, i.e. no leaks, no promos, no record stores opening it early, etc. it's much easier to sell people a record they don't have yet.

ciderpress, Monday, 14 February 2011 15:04 (thirteen years ago) link

The regular CD will be in stores on March 28th.

source?

Damn this thread seems so....different without ilxor (ilxor), Monday, 14 February 2011 15:05 (thirteen years ago) link

I admit I am looking forward to the anguished "WHERE ARE THOSE LAST TWO PIECES OF TINY ARTWORK" blog posts/tweets

DJP, Monday, 14 February 2011 15:06 (thirteen years ago) link

i agree w/ lj and johnny that there should be a "middle option" between the download and deluxe "newspaper album" (lol) box set. but i get why they would delay the standard cd edition. big radiohead fans who want a physical product asap will be more likely to order the box without a lower-priced physical option to trade down to. smart business move imo

Damn this thread seems so....different without ilxor (ilxor), Monday, 14 February 2011 15:06 (thirteen years ago) link

also, this drawing from the radiohead blog should be the album cover imo

http://cdn.sandbag.uk.com/RH/thankyou2.jpg

Damn this thread seems so....different without ilxor (ilxor), Monday, 14 February 2011 15:07 (thirteen years ago) link

They'll make enough money off selling t-shirts with that album cover on them. It seems designed to have the maximum possible appeal to teenage goths.

Matt DC, Monday, 14 February 2011 15:09 (thirteen years ago) link

And so the laughable bullshit begins...

― Under Me Smang Tang (Doran), Monday, February 14, 2011 9:21 AM (39 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

"What's not yet clear is why it's called a "Newspaper Album". But newspapers – it's no secret – are suffering the same sort of woes as the music industry. Is there some hidden clue here for how the print business will find salvation, too?"

Evan, Monday, 14 February 2011 15:10 (thirteen years ago) link

i have nothing to say about this except to register my respect to Melissa W for starting this thread after already starting the 'in rainbows' thread

J0rdan S., Monday, 14 February 2011 15:10 (thirteen years ago) link

That has about the same level of appeal as "also included: a really old slice of ham" for me

was so excited for you to get the pic they commissioned from me :(

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_1zGLaFOzr-E/TQp1U7atOjI/AAAAAAAAESU/FQsl8F_-TJQ/s1600/DSCN9152.JPG

aerosmith: the acid house years (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 14 February 2011 15:11 (thirteen years ago) link

xpost -- Hahah I was thinking that too. A sign of true reliability!

Ned Raggett, Monday, 14 February 2011 15:12 (thirteen years ago) link

btw, yes, former Midwesterners, that's ham with cream cheese on it. I'm going to boil it in 2 gallons of cream of mushroom soup and then serve it on a bed of saltines.

aerosmith: the acid house years (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 14 February 2011 15:12 (thirteen years ago) link

Those scallions look good.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 14 February 2011 15:12 (thirteen years ago) link

[q] The regular CD will be in stores on March 28th.

source?[/q]

The guy who runs the atease news site. Always reliable when it comes to this sort of thing.

Melissa W, Monday, 14 February 2011 15:13 (thirteen years ago) link

Ugh, ignore code fuck-up.

Melissa W, Monday, 14 February 2011 15:14 (thirteen years ago) link

Love Pavement and many of Godrich's productions with Radiohead, but Terror Twilight does nothing for me

Vinnie, Monday, 21 June 2021 11:25 (two years ago) link

It's just interesting to think about stuff like why the Strokes would've wanted to work with him, then. And in the end they put out the famously same-as-their-debut sounding "Room On Fire"... but in my memory it had a much bigger range of sounds than their first.

maf you one two (maffew12), Monday, 21 June 2021 12:51 (two years ago) link

"i was thinking of doing this keyboard thing ..." "Get Radiohead's guy on the phone!"

maf you one two (maffew12), Monday, 21 June 2021 12:52 (two years ago) link

I actually love how TKOL sounds, can’t agree with HTTT hate how thin and crisp everything sounds in that one.

Weird, to me HttT sounds the most like a big modern rock album to me...lots of bass, very compressed, some bigger drum sounds. I really like how it sounds, but it feels like they reacted against it on IR (lots of very dry '70s type drum sounds, like not a lot of room sound or compression-for-effect, with the exception of certain tunes or moments).

change display name (Jordan), Monday, 21 June 2021 14:46 (two years ago) link

not a lot of room sound

I think this is a production problem with both IR and TKOL, though it's more pronounced on the latter. They're both quite "airless" sounding to my ears and it drives me a little nuts. Even on the most outre Kid A/Amnesiac tracks there's a sense of space which grounds the music and makes it feel "live." I think they rectified this a little bit on AMSP. I don't know what exact production techniques contribute to this besides reverb and mixing, but it's interesting to me how different their recordings sound from album to album.

feed me with your chips (zchyrs), Monday, 21 June 2021 15:51 (two years ago) link

Yeah, I always think of the drum sound on IR as being super home record-y and dry, but I guess it leaves room for the lush Ondes & string parts, and the guitars.

But then there's Reckoner, the only one with really bold choices on the drum sound (very compressed and roomy with the drum kit all on the right channel, and that incredibly recorded + verb-ed out tambourine in the left).

change display name (Jordan), Monday, 21 June 2021 16:51 (two years ago) link

When I think of Terror Twilight, I think of The Hexx and how spacey and trippy it sounds. I wouldn't change the production on that at all.

Urbandn hope all ye who enter here (dog latin), Monday, 21 June 2021 16:58 (two years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.