post here if you favor replacing our Suggest Ban system with a Killfile system

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (767 of them)

the ppl who want one of the funniest posters on ilx banned are the real killjoys tbh

markers, Saturday, 5 February 2011 01:10 (ten years ago) link

yeah but Dom's not coming back so hey

Y Kant Torres Red (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 5 February 2011 01:11 (ten years ago) link

hmm idk i am still laughing what are u doing markers? hmm?

plax (ico), Saturday, 5 February 2011 01:12 (ten years ago) link

like, u are killing my joy right now

plax (ico), Saturday, 5 February 2011 01:12 (ten years ago) link

sorry bro ;_;

markers, Saturday, 5 February 2011 01:13 (ten years ago) link

*killing* my *joy*

plax (ico), Saturday, 5 February 2011 01:13 (ten years ago) link

i guess we know who the real killjoy is

plax (ico), Saturday, 5 February 2011 01:13 (ten years ago) link

maybe people should only be able to have their sb against a poster count once, so it they are instrumental in a banning any future sb they give them doesn't count. this would help thwart unprovoked new sbs being dished out as soon as someone returns from a ban.

estela, Saturday, 5 February 2011 01:16 (ten years ago) link

Jesus. I just wanted to say hello. For the love of God.

― from The ends of your fingers (prosper.strummer.), Sunday, 30 July 2006 17:48 (4 years ago)

acoleuthic, Saturday, 5 February 2011 01:17 (ten years ago) link

I agree with this 100% BUT a killfile only blocks the user, not all the responses to that user. So you'd still get all of the clusterfuck but none of the context.

― sexy Santa cosplay (Autumn Almanac), Friday, February 4, 2011 3:09 PM (21 minutes ago) Bookmark

right i get this.

would still rather live in an ILX where ppl have to deal w/ that vs one where that trumps my right to post

gr8080, Saturday, 5 February 2011 01:33 (ten years ago) link

maybe people should only be able to have their sb against a poster count once, so it they are instrumental in a banning any future sb they give them doesn't count. this would help thwart unprovoked new sbs being dished out as soon as someone returns from a ban.

a modest proposal but the time for modest proposals is behind us

gr8080, Saturday, 5 February 2011 01:33 (ten years ago) link

damn why do i always get awesome ideas late on fridays when no one is posting

gr8080, Saturday, 5 February 2011 01:34 (ten years ago) link

urban deeznuts

buzza, Saturday, 5 February 2011 01:42 (ten years ago) link

unban everyone

gr8080, Saturday, 5 February 2011 01:47 (ten years ago) link

^^^

Kerm, Saturday, 5 February 2011 01:52 (ten years ago) link

so for every SB'ed poster, we get a new thread about abolishing SB.

that's like getting a bottle of cyanide with every box of Cheerios

i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Saturday, 5 February 2011 01:56 (ten years ago) link

if you consider awesome posters being banned a box of cheerios

markers, Saturday, 5 February 2011 01:57 (ten years ago) link

WHICH THEY CERTAINLY ARE NOT MY FRIEND

markers, Saturday, 5 February 2011 01:58 (ten years ago) link

uh, which their being banned certainly is not, rather

markers, Saturday, 5 February 2011 01:58 (ten years ago) link

it's night and i'm not making sense, so later

markers, Saturday, 5 February 2011 01:59 (ten years ago) link

no shit, you called whiney one of the funniest posters

plax (ico), Saturday, 5 February 2011 02:00 (ten years ago) link

hey plax i know you're still kind of new here but he is

gr8080, Saturday, 5 February 2011 02:01 (ten years ago) link

markers, thank you for offering your snaxpert opinion.

estela, Saturday, 5 February 2011 02:02 (ten years ago) link

whiney is funny but it's like even though deej should just know when to let it go, there is something pretty annoying about somebody who knows he's going to provoke a clusterfuck response that shits up a thread continuing to do so just for his own amusement.

admittedly it was funny at first but it got to the point where I didn't wanna open up rap threads anymore.

i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Saturday, 5 February 2011 02:05 (ten years ago) link

whiney is nowhere near as funny or as big a board asshole as ethan (whom i sb'd, i'll admit) was.

yet we carry on, however poorer for their absence.

mookieproof, Saturday, 5 February 2011 02:08 (ten years ago) link

http://threadbombing.com/data/media/2/G.smh1.gif

jeff, Saturday, 5 February 2011 02:09 (ten years ago) link

whiney is funny but it's like even though deej should just know when to let it go, there is something pretty annoying about somebody who knows he's going to provoke a clusterfuck response that shits up a thread continuing to do so just for his own amusement.

admittedly it was funny at first but it got to the point where I didn't wanna open up rap threads anymore.

― i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Friday, February 4, 2011 4:05 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark

i wont argue this.

i still think its stupid to ban someone for so long for behaving that way. grow a pair and engage them or just learn to ignore it.

gr8080, Saturday, 5 February 2011 02:10 (ten years ago) link

i don't really like the SB system either fwiw, i'm used to message board mods determining my fate on other boards

i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Saturday, 5 February 2011 02:16 (ten years ago) link

oh we have plenty of that here too

gr8080, Saturday, 5 February 2011 02:17 (ten years ago) link

I know, I've suffered the fates several times, and one SBing!

i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Saturday, 5 February 2011 02:17 (ten years ago) link

but I deserved them all

i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Saturday, 5 February 2011 02:17 (ten years ago) link

echoing gr80, markers, etc. etc. & missing whiney so throwing my opinion in the hat

Damn this thread seems so....different without ilxor (ilxor), Saturday, 5 February 2011 02:37 (ten years ago) link

Imo suggest unban would allow for trolly hateables to get the boot while divisive but lovable rogues will be free to be gangster

fuck wit my dinner with andre day (m bison), Saturday, 5 February 2011 02:39 (ten years ago) link

agree with gr80 that ban unbar should be profile and not post based

fuck wit my dinner with andre day (m bison), Saturday, 5 February 2011 02:40 (ten years ago) link

UNBAN

fuck wit my dinner with andre day (m bison), Saturday, 5 February 2011 02:40 (ten years ago) link

or maybe when you hit 51 you have to beat a benchmark score on Arkanoid to stay

i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Saturday, 5 February 2011 02:42 (ten years ago) link

maybe we could just have a system where you could mysteriously be sent sent to boarding school/bootcamp/juvie/who knows after your mum reads your posts?

http://i56.tinypic.com/xnsu1g.gif (max arrrrrgh), Saturday, 5 February 2011 02:43 (ten years ago) link

Maybe if you get 51 you get to have an avatar?

Catsupppppp Grind (kkvgz), Saturday, 5 February 2011 02:43 (ten years ago) link

maybe the suggest tool could be turned into something absolutely helpful, like if someone posts an ugly pic of themselves in the WDYLL thread, you can 'suggest haircut'

i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Saturday, 5 February 2011 02:44 (ten years ago) link

30 day ban is for low level dickishness, 90 day is for low level dickishness repeated to the point of cluelessness

― plax (ico), Friday, February 4, 2011 7:56 PM (1 hour ago)

lol he really got under your skin huh

originoo gun kl0pper (k3vin k.), Saturday, 5 February 2011 02:45 (ten years ago) link

i'd be *shocked* if modship makes a retarded call like banning a sometimes annoying but ultimately harmless poster for 90 days over some bullshit

originoo gun kl0pper (k3vin k.), Saturday, 5 February 2011 02:46 (ten years ago) link

maybe we should only ban people who are blatantly racist, abusive, posting other ppl's personal info, or non-funny spammers

~re-think banning w/ me~

gr8080, Saturday, 5 February 2011 02:49 (ten years ago) link

Well, to posit a few questions that come up every time this is discussed - where do we draw the line at racist? Abusive?

Would old-time cankles comedy racist posts be considered prejudiced? What about discussing Burzum? What about some Britisher not understanding black people?

Not really talking about myself. Just trying to draw out your whole platform.

Catsupppppp Grind (kkvgz), Saturday, 5 February 2011 03:00 (ten years ago) link

when i say abusive i'm talking about the kind of horrible, un-clever, humorless shit no one ever posts on ILX because as a community we're almost always above it, which is what makes ILX so great compared to most other internets

speaking of cankles, its kind of funny that he's allowed to post again (don't get me wrong, i'm glad this is the case) considering his perma-banning in august of 2008 led to a backlash of posters that resulted in a rollout of the suggest ban function 4 or 5 weeks later.

also as much as mods still have poor judgment wrt non-SB long term bans, its nowhere near how bad it was under TOMBOT and his hair trigger response, making SB's obsolete?

gr8080, Saturday, 5 February 2011 03:17 (ten years ago) link

Draw the line where in real life you would punch them in the face or call the cops. Not where you would throw a drink in their face. Certainly not the SB system where if you're obnoxious 50 times in 6 months you get a month in solitary.

Kerm, Saturday, 5 February 2011 03:30 (ten years ago) link

abolish ban culture

let us post freely

believe with me

gr8080, Saturday, 5 February 2011 03:32 (ten years ago) link

no way dude suggest ban is effing hilarious

am0n, Saturday, 5 February 2011 03:40 (ten years ago) link

This thread has moved into general meta about people who aren't around any more so I'm going to lock it.

Matt DC, Wednesday, 9 February 2011 12:51 (ten years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.