Do you want to learn about fetishes? Enter here.

that's actually another fetish

hahahaha

do have to say when I was in the Crucible the Puritan chicks were looking mighty hawt

So the jeans pony site says that there will be "loads of ass-pugging". Someone please to explain.

and "no pornographie"
also remote controlling the jeans pony

I'm not into Vore, though (which is a fetish where peole enjoy watching fictitious videos of monsters eating women. I don't get it at all).

there is a monster in the computer game "Quake" called the vore, an ugly little 3-legged thing. Years ago, for some reason I wanted to put a pic of it in a thread here, so I did a google image search for "vore". I was like, UH.

remote controlling the jeans pony - and all the other fillies!

i looked up about 5 urbandictionary definitions for pugging and can tell you not one of them applies to anything you'll find on that site

asses, asses, asses!

it has to be a typo - I assumed it should be plugging, right?

From a Stuck Headfirst blog

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_2dWYVOiBbIs/R8uXjJhjSXI/AAAAAAAAAA8/QUJkfgVtLkM/s320/foxy4.jpg

Interesting!

like, butt plugs?

I feel like Jeans Pony is totally into butt plugs.

hahaha
That same image promises "Lingerine" so I am guessing they mean ass-plugging and not like a puppy thing

yea there's no porn at all on J3ans-P0ny -- sexual stuff but no full out sex

xxpost maybe? Their command of English was never very good.

See? I'm too worried about what kind of river creatures could cause that woman some trouble to get off on it at all.

if y'all want to spend the rest of the thread finding out what Freudian device caused these fetishes feel free

I think Freudian devices are another fetish.

Not that I want to talk about my thematic apperception test fetish here.

I'm thankful at least that I am not into the "crushed bug" fetish

which I so happily learned about from Henry Winkler on an episode of The Practice

btw ST if want me to change this thread title so that your username isn't in it let me know

yea maybe just change it to "Do you want to learn about fetishes? Enter here".

sry bout that

the whole crushing animals thing is so fucking weird

man, this stuff is so fascinating to me esp cause I don't really think I have any sort of crazy fetishes. Like it's amazing to me that someone could get off on that headstuck stuff. Pretty interesting. Strange, but interesting.

^^^^looool saw this ep xxxxp

xxxpost lol no worries man, I lol'ed when I saw it, but don't want people to think it's my thread and my thread only!

Abbott - I am the worst mod ever. How do I change a thread title! :(

Stuck headfirst is fascinating. The pictures are captivating.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_S3ZOmtAiDS4/SScXwFAY5VI/AAAAAAAAACU/il3aSp4ZJRk/s320/fayth+pumkin+head+%2847%29.jpg

lol F@yth is actually really funny.

click admin - and then under the thread title - click edit title...iirc//
if you can't get it done I can do it for you!

she has all kinds of fetishes on her site that I don't even get, like headbutting, foot torture, etc...

got it.

The pictures read like slapstick for me, so when I try to impose sexiness on them, my brain gets all jacked up. It's fun.

if you think all this is weird, imagine how I felt when my uber-sexual girlfriend in 09 asked me what kind of stuff I was into.

guarantee you I mentioned none of these!

thanks pash

edit title wasn't one of my options!? I saw all the others but nothing about editing the title. Weird.

xpost of course she had 7 gigs worth of porn on her hard drive so who was she to judge

Suddenly Susan! http://stuckheadfirst.blogspot.com/2008/04/suddenly-susan-headfirst-scene.html

xp- if she was uber-sexual, wouldn't that make her seem more likely to be understanding of unusual fetishes?

I think I've mentioned the dom girl I used to date on here. I wish I would've talked with her more about some of this stuff, because I'm sure she had some stories, but I don't think I really wanted to know at the time.

I should give her a call now, years after the fact, and pry.

I have gone down the rabbit hole looking at this Vore stuff.

Cock Vore

Cock Vore, or CV as it is often referred to, involves using the male penis to swallow someone up through the urethral opening at the tip after which they are pulled down the urethra to the preditor's scrotum. Once in the scrotum, the prey is absorbed or digested inside the testicals somehow, or turned into male cum (sometimes known as Cum Vore) and ejaculated.
A related alternative to cock vore is sheath vore. (see Rarer types of vores).

oh my

sheath vore

voreskin?

http://www.angelfire.com/hi3/taiterland2/voreart.html

This shark woman is blowing my mind

WAHT

http://www.angelfire.com/hi3/taiterland2/newanimatesmall.gif

Has anyone ever read Boston and Shaun? It was some furry webcomic with like either some feeder or pregnancy fetish or something like that going on.

re "m@l m@lloy"

i love this girl, dude. A++ fetish.

my fetishes are all so pedestrian and lame. Like busty women in business suits barely even counts as a fetish really.

MM is sort of not a fetish either, imo. Just a hot voluptuous woman.

ok. A++ taste, then.

CV drawing: http://66.197.149.46/forum/download/file.php?id=9528&sid=3da24a136c0e8683de14a87d4b237b5d

NSFW.

idk, i feel like if you like to have someone shit on you, it's hard not to make, you know, having someone shit on you be the whole fuckin deal

sure yeah but aren't most paraphilia a lot milder than that?

Part of the appeal of some fetishes might be transgression, and if the fetish is the whole thing without context, then the contrast of normal v transgression is lacking. I hope that makes sense.

Or forget "transgression". I just mean that contrast is important. Even in mundane, traditional porn, the set-up of the cable guy visiting causes the subsequent fucking and sucking to stand out.

sure yeah but aren't most paraphilia a lot milder than that?

I debated back and forth on this before deciding that yes, ponyplay is pretty much exactly as bewildering to me as coprophagy

though the stuck headfirst thing is one i just *don't get.*

― bitch u ain't british (the table is the table), Friday, August 12, 2011 1:56 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark

don't want to presume too much about the fetishists but it probably has something to do with rapey fantasies

I mean, it's kind of like walking in a forest and discovering that comely sculpted fir tree over there has a real live, wet vagina in it. And it can't go anywhere.

I believe that would be the point where I would be trying to figure out who gave me acid

lol lol

can ILX ever draw any conclusion where it isn't accusing someone else of rape or rape-like tendencies?

http://gosounders.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/outlook-not-so-good.jpg

"Would you eat an ice cream cone in public?"
"What am I, a rapist?"

xpost

A+

In the past few weeks I've been seeing so much amazing fetish art. It's not always that I like the art technique (much of it I don't) but there's a lot of amazing design sensibilities and things I never associated with fetish art. There's quite a few women artists who depict nothing but warrior women being brutally killed in battle and some of it is incredibly well researched, as if the historically accurate costumes are just as important as anything else to the kink. And this woman who draws and posts photos of women in massive and elaborate dresses. And people who like to see other people struggling in the wind with big fluttery clothes.

I've always been troubled by looking at so much of this art because it isn't wholly consistent with my art tastes. I've drifted away from comics, videogames, anime and movies with lots of cgi to a large degree because I find the roteness of most it unpleasant (and digital coloring). But a lot of the fetish art keeps me coming back despite not liking the technique.
There's a bit of a fear of being around artists whose work I only like parts of but wouldn't champion them; I want to look at their work, be around them and talk to them sometimes but I'm afraid of offending them because I dont like their techniques (I've always been afraid of knowing comedians because I hardly like any comedy even 50%). But there's still so much good in there that I get something important out of it.

It might sound old fashioned but a big part of me will probably always believe that beautiful technique and fresh observation is good for you in the same way as I believe people should be around grass, trees and plants as much as they can reasonably manage. Art needs lots of time spent on it.

Most fetish artists make very commercial looking art and I wish that they would take more time on it, but I think they're sometimes prone to just getting the bare fetish essentials in the work. And some of them have no ambitions to be a great artist, they just want to share their interests. But I can't completely let go of wanting everything to have beautiful technique and fresh observation.

I was also afraid (I've sometimes talked of having 3 terrible years of Pure OCD). I've often wanted to be simpler but I know now that it would just be pretending and I don't think it's healthy anymore to try to be only into unambiguously nice things (some of which would still bother some people). The surface appearances of fetishes can be extremely deceptive and as your interests in these things evolve, their natures can eventually seem very different or become something else entirely. Don't ever think you know for sure what other people's fetishes are really about.
As I've decided to actively explore all the fetishes I'm interested in (many of them I genuinely don't know if I'm actually "into" them), I feel wholer and better than I have in years; and really excited. Fear will always fuck me up far more than any fetish could.

Also: I wonder if it's normal that "I can't get into his/her art style" should be a barrier for looking at certain fetishes.