― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 01:48 (seventeen years ago) link
― milo z (mlp), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 01:55 (seventeen years ago) link
― O'Connor (OConnorScribe), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 15:37 (seventeen years ago) link
― mr. brojangles (sanskrit), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 16:15 (seventeen years ago) link
― O'Connor (OConnorScribe), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 17:50 (seventeen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 18:12 (seventeen years ago) link
― j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 18:13 (seventeen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 18:15 (seventeen years ago) link
Maybe we started ILM as one of many performance benchmark tools/guttersnipe filters we ultimately plan on licensing on a B2B basis for a host of workplace functions. Coming soon: I love TacosTM,I love editing videoTM, I love scalping ticketsTM.
cc:Everyone who's fired and gonna be fired
― New Times Folks (Ian Christe), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 21:22 (seventeen years ago) link
don't search for the momus medical advice column then, either.
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Tuesday, 5 September 2006 21:42 (seventeen years ago) link
ARTS EDITOR. THEposted 06/23/2006Arts Editor. The Washington City Paper needs an arts editor to help us rethink our award-winning arts section from the ground up. We’re looking for someone who’s addled by pop culture, who’s equally comfortable with brows high and low, who can effortlessly absorb our editorial sensibility (hint: Start working on your puns now). You’ll develop and nurture a stable of freelancers and channel the efforts of our own staffers. Your ability to direct and edit coverage across boundaries must be unsurpassed-we need someone who’s conversant about Francis Picabia and Park Chan-wook and can glimpse the eternal in freak folk and Mamet. The ideal candidate will astonish us every week. Send a cover letter and resume to: Arts Editor, Washington City Paper, 2390 Champlain St. NW, Washington, DC 20009; artseditor@washingtoncitypaper.
― cornyrocker (DC Steve), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 02:57 (seventeen years ago) link
"interminable," i think they meant
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 03:01 (seventeen years ago) link
Your name ain't Tom Ewing.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 03:13 (seventeen years ago) link
― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 03:17 (seventeen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 03:21 (seventeen years ago) link
― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 03:21 (seventeen years ago) link
― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 03:22 (seventeen years ago) link
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 03:24 (seventeen years ago) link
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 03:26 (seventeen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 03:31 (seventeen years ago) link
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 03:34 (seventeen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 03:35 (seventeen years ago) link
― j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 03:36 (seventeen years ago) link
http://www.mikedoughty.com/blog/
"I've snarked at him plenty, but ultimately much respect.
Funny that my old alma mater, the NYPress, has been able to maintain its pose--that of the drunken self-destructor--longer than the Voice's progressive-avenger pose. Not that the Press is vital in the least anymore. Both papers lost the people that justified/created those personas years ago.
New York is the city of Time Out. I never would've thought so when it debuted. It seemed so laughably gee-whiz, I thought they'd fold in a month. But New York is like that now. (I really, really don't want to be the "I miss the rats on Rivington Street" guy, OK?) The children move here for fantasies of Sex and the City, expensive shoes and bottle-service clubs, not squats and art and rock and roll.
And I, and I think everybody else, goes looking for their drunken self-destructors and progressive avengers out in the blogosphere. I pass the street corner boxes that distribute the Voice and the Press, and man, they look sad. Moribund."
― curmudgeon (DC Steve), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 03:56 (seventeen years ago) link
― Grey, Ian (IanBrooklyn), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 04:15 (seventeen years ago) link
How nice that his fantasies are more valid, apparently.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 04:16 (seventeen years ago) link
Is there anything genuinely good on the rise in Brooklyn? The Rail?
― A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 04:33 (seventeen years ago) link
They're more egalitarian, at least.
― Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 14:15 (seventeen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 14:45 (seventeen years ago) link
― timmy tannin (pompous), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 15:17 (seventeen years ago) link
― Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 17:39 (seventeen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 17:41 (seventeen years ago) link
― s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 17:43 (seventeen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 17:45 (seventeen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 17:48 (seventeen years ago) link
― shookout (shookout), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 17:54 (seventeen years ago) link
Not that I like the Soul Coughing guy much, but I don't see much ugliness in that bit. Mostly just resignation to the fact that the city's changed.
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 18:02 (seventeen years ago) link
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 18:06 (seventeen years ago) link
Hee hee hee.
I feel like the point of Goldmine was less about the particular genre of music and more about aging. Maybe that's too optimistic though.
― Eppy (Eppy), Wednesday, 6 September 2006 18:20 (seventeen years ago) link
i need to see VG again, i liked it at the time but felt it was only 75% successful (that citizen kane rip thing was not so good). SAFE pwns pretty much everything else he ever did, except maybe the Karen Carpenter-as-doll opus.
― timmy tannin (pompous), Thursday, 7 September 2006 06:05 (seventeen years ago) link
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 7 September 2006 06:21 (seventeen years ago) link
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 7 September 2006 06:31 (seventeen years ago) link
― timmy tannin (pompous), Thursday, 7 September 2006 06:34 (seventeen years ago) link
― j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 7 September 2006 11:02 (seventeen years ago) link
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 7 September 2006 11:53 (seventeen years ago) link
― m coleman (lovebug starski), Thursday, 7 September 2006 12:00 (seventeen years ago) link
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 7 September 2006 12:32 (seventeen years ago) link
2006-09-05: Reports of My Dismissal Have Been Reasonably Accurate
On August 31, I was terminated by the new owners of The Village Voice along with four other senior editors, two gifted designers, and half of the two-person photo department. The mass layoff was characterized as a "restructuring," but I was fired "for taste." Because our union long ago anticipated the possibility of this kind of drastic overhaul, a contractually mandated severance arrangement will give me some time to get my economic future in order. But the specifics of that future probably won't be clear for a while.
The Voice changed a lot over the 37 years I wrote there and 32 years I was employed there. I haven't approved of all those changes, especially over the past decade. But for most of that time, with our unionization when Rupert Murdoch purchased the paper in 1977 a turning point, the Voice paid me to write well. My old bosses always understood that constructing a well-informed essay takes time, and that sorting, grading, and saying something honest and original about an incomprehensible plethora of records takes forever. I am grateful for the support my editors gave me, although I certainly believe I gave them surplus value back. But how my worklife is to proceed remains to be seen. I'll be letting you know in this space when I know myself.
Let me take this opportunity to say how very grateful I am, first simply for the interest all the visitors to this site have taken in my work, but especially for the labor volunteered by a few. Tom Hull's contribution is of course inestimable. The condolence notes Tom has forwarded to me have been much appreciated. I'll be OK. Like they say, it's too late to stop now. Or was that can't stop won't stop? Either way, both ways, I'll be in touch, and I'll be listening.
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 8 September 2006 19:27 (seventeen years ago) link
― don (dow), Saturday, 9 September 2006 04:15 (seventeen years ago) link