Waugh! What Is He Good For?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (36 of them)
I think Waugh quite enjoyed being seen as a reactionary in his latter years. Personally, I think he created this caricature of himself as amusement. See Gilbert Pinfold for details.

A mention for Labels too. A cracking travel book round the Mediterranean. Constantly referenced by later writers treading the same path. A slight volume full of beauty.

MikeyG (MikeyG), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 11:05 (twenty years ago) link

Funny thing is, except for a few passages in "Sword of Honor", I actually enjoy Waugh's high-Toryism. Maybe I'm turning into a reactionary in my old age but maybe, maybe, maybe it's because he's such and entertaining writer and great prose stylist - which is actually what everyone here has been saying all along.

Strange to be called an "irritant" in a thread you started yourself as a gushing fan of the man. But moving along...

LondonLee (LondonLee), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 13:29 (twenty years ago) link

Yeah, but Lee, when was the last time you were mentioned in the same sentence as an Amazonian foreskin tick?

MikeyG (MikeyG), Tuesday, 13 January 2004 14:10 (twenty years ago) link

Take two, then.

So, after meaning to read some Waugh for a long time, I picked up nearly his whole works at a Canadian book fair -- all those lovely 80s Penguin pbks, about $20 the lot.

Not to begin on an insufferably PC note, but what's with the "Chokey" character in DaF? What's he trying to say here?

Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Friday, 23 January 2004 19:44 (twenty years ago) link

five years pass...

does anyone in the current ILB cohort rate waugh's later (brideshead and after) output?

thomp, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 20:19 (fourteen years ago) link

actually, i wish i'd revived the thread without the dodgy pun title

thomp, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 20:20 (fourteen years ago) link

I especially like the Sword of Honour trilogy and The Loved One from the kater stuff--and Gilbert Pinfold is mad, but very entertaiuningly and deliberately so.

When two tribes go to war, he always gets picked last (James Morrison), Thursday, 17 September 2009 00:48 (fourteen years ago) link

I rate brideshead but haven't read anything later

cozwn, Thursday, 17 September 2009 00:52 (fourteen years ago) link

I sort of rate it. In general, it's got lots of virtues: he builds carefully, and the flexibility of his style keeps thing moving: lightly ironic omniscience going into serious melancholy, elegant descriptive detail, and the fragmentary mode is still around in places. Oh, and still brilliant at tricks with dialogue.

So I find the later stuff in general very pleasant to read when I'm in the mood, but it never quite feels like it's got the fun, compression, blank cruelty or young-man sadness of the first four in particular, so I don't really get enthusiastic.

More specifically: The Loved One was fun, but didn't make a huge impression on me. Sword of Honour I remember as his best serious book, but I'm a bit dubious about, or uninterested in, the kind of proper old-school Brit literariness it manages. Brideshead: first time out I raced through it, but it left a bad taste: soapy, toff infatuation. I started again recently but put it down. Same grounds, sort of: so good at pushing buttons - 'melancholy', 'decline', 'gilded youth' - and all in the service of (Enrique OTM upthread) batshit High Toryism and recusant-fetish Catholicism.

Speaking of: I enjoyed Helena when I read it recently. Maybe it's because the historical setting cordons off the craziness, but it didn't wind me up in the way Brideshead does. It's a funny mix of things: legend, historical novel, an extension of his aristo-girl portraiture, an essay on religion and politics, etc. Throws in a few funnies. Strange little book.

And I love Pinfold. It's such a strange self-portrait, honest about and critical of this buffer self he ended up building. And I don't read huge amounts of fiction, but the straight-face narration of deepening madness seems like a really nice piece of work: both funny and terrifying. The voice-transmitting box and conspiracy are made to make sense (personal interest: had a relative with drink issues who after withdrawal/sleep problems also (briefly, thank the lord) went off into lucidly explaining about a conspiracy to drive them mad via a box for transmitting voices into the head, so was fascinated by this.)

woofwoofwoof, Thursday, 17 September 2009 10:14 (fourteen years ago) link

Absolutely. Pinfold is great - written at an age when to all intents and purposes he seemed an ossified parody of reactionary bullshit, without any self-awareness, Pinfold is vulnerable and tolerant, and also very funny. Well, funny and terrifying.

Kinglsey Amis has got a couple of amusing anecdotes about Waugh, which I'll dig out when the person I've lent the book to gets up.

GamalielRatsey, Thursday, 17 September 2009 10:41 (fourteen years ago) link

nine months pass...

did he really call a second son 'septimus'?

thomp, Friday, 9 July 2010 22:02 (thirteen years ago) link

i had forgotten reviving this / not seen the replies / huh

i'd just moved to oxford and was thinking about reading brideshead. also jude. also etc.

i ended up rereading x4 other waugh books and x2 i hadn't before before i got around to brideshead. which has more to it than i'd expected. the stuff about buggery seemed a lot better than the stuff about god.

most of the criticisms of it by purpose seem a little off? because the moments where the objectionable viewpoints come through are the most artistically cack-handed? which goes some way to redeeming it for me? i guess?

thomp, Friday, 9 July 2010 22:06 (thirteen years ago) link

Absolutely. Pinfold is great - written at an age when to all intents and purposes he seemed an ossified parody of reactionary bullshit, without any self-awareness, Pinfold is vulnerable and tolerant, and also very funny.

this also - i feel like i always want to ascribe waugh self-awareness, possibly because i like him, and in my head it is like that redeems him somehow

i read 'noblesse oblige' recently also and he seems to have much more ironic distance from the whole thing than mitford does, although i guess that's not saying a great deal

thomp, Friday, 9 July 2010 22:07 (thirteen years ago) link

eight years pass...

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.