Pit Bulls: What's the appeal?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1263 of them)
grizzly bears are best

http://www.travel-images.com/alaska19.jpg

aleksandr supertramp (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 26 January 2004 22:20 (twenty years ago) link

You obviously have an opinion

Did I ever once claim NOT to have an opinion on this subject matter? Look at the language in the question, for pete's sakes, it quite obviously takes assumes a dismissive/derisive tone towards the animals. That said, I am still honestly and legitimate puzzled by the appeal of owning such an animal. As to why I continue to be puzzled, hasn't there ever been an instance in your life wherein someone handed you an explanation that you SIMPLY DIDN'T BUY? or at least simply didn't fathom?

I don't hide it under the guise of demonization and persecution.

Because Oops was getting frustrated by the mere fact that I still hadn't changed my tune and joined the happy I love Pit bulls club, he resorted to petty character assasination and Luna implied that I'm needlessly argumentative. Maybe "demonization" and "persecution" are too weighty terms for that, but I found it a bit unnecessary.

You're getting this response because people are getting frustrated with trying to discuss this with you (and, uh, certain others on this thread--like I said, if you let one bad experience color your entire perspective on a species, breed, whatever and those that associate with them, that's your own issue to be dealt with, no one else's). You can't possibly tell anyone that you don't enjoy this just a little bit, no?

I don't enjoy being reduced to a cliche, thanks very much. Perhaps I should have titled this thread: DEFEND THE INDEFENSIBLE: PIT BULLS! Would that have made my predisposition about the topic clearer?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 26 January 2004 22:44 (twenty years ago) link

What do you not get about "they are loyal, playful, loving etc"????
No one---including myself---is trying to get you to change your tune and start sucking Pit Bulls' dicks but you continue to deny that they can possibly be appealing to OTHER people, and that's not a matter of not being able to fathom people's explanations but just hard-headedness.

oops (Oops), Monday, 26 January 2004 22:48 (twenty years ago) link

Pit Bulls: What's the appeal?

They're Delicious!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 26 January 2004 22:53 (twenty years ago) link

What do you not get about "they are loyal, playful, loving etc"????

I am suspicious of the categorical nature of that statement when there is ample evidence to suggest otherwise. But, maybe I'm just being Sammy Safety.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 26 January 2004 22:57 (twenty years ago) link

(proof that it must be a reeeeaaally slow day in offices all around the Western world today)

donut bitch (donut), Monday, 26 January 2004 23:00 (twenty years ago) link

Hey pitbull hataz, stop being media-brainwashed whores and read the stats already posted. Irresponsible, abusive pet ownership is the problem not the breeds. Yes irresponsible assholes will walk around with pitbulls trained to fight "like loaded guns" but fact is ANY animal large enough (prob. +50 lbs.) can kill you if it so pleases, so they could be using any breed, and the "power + unpredictability" card isn't really borne out by the stats. Pitbulls probably cause less unprovoked attacks every year than the most popular breeds of all, which I believe are labs and golden retrievers. Where was this horrible epidemic of toddler attacks back in the day when pit bulls were the most popular pet in America? If you have a problem pick on "dog ownership" not "bad pitbulls."

I worked at a kennel for a while and the only injury I had was from a toy poodle. The dog I adopted was a mastiff/pitbull/rottweiler mix mutt, he was the best pet available there.

If you are worried about pit bulls then you will poop a log when you hear this- check it out, a guy I know owns a 600lb Siberian Tiger. He drives it around in a limo, it sleeps in his bed every night. I got to draw it a bunch of times when he brought it to my school as a drawing model. Bringing that in a school full of students dangerous maybe? Well, they did it without worrying about liability and there's even a testimonial letter on the website.
http://qadesh.com/

sucka (sucka), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 00:23 (twenty years ago) link

I rather like the bad person with gun = bad person with pit bull analogy. It strikes me that a lot of the pro pit-bull lobby would be fervently anti-gun.

Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 00:27 (twenty years ago) link

xpost

They're GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRATE!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 00:27 (twenty years ago) link

does your friend with the tiger live in Harlem?

hstencil, Tuesday, 27 January 2004 00:28 (twenty years ago) link

This is a great dog thread... for me to poop on

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 00:31 (twenty years ago) link

hstencil, Tuesday, 27 January 2004 00:33 (twenty years ago) link

Dammn nothing funnier than plastic poop!!!

No Toronto. Who's that guy! Is he who whut I thunk I heard about that dude who tried to keep a tiger in a house without permits or anything?

sucka (sucka), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 00:35 (twenty years ago) link

to answer seriously, anyone I've known who owns/owned a pit bull did so in order to rescue the dog. That is, they either got their pit through an adoption agency/program or found a neglected dog on their own. Despite whatever bad environment/previous owners the dogs might have experience, no friends of mine with adopted pits have had any aggression issues with them. No one on this thread who has a problem with pits has acknowledged what should be done with them, if we can agree that people who raise them to be aggressive are in the wrong. That is, if reasonable people who treat the dogs with kindness and love shouldn't have them, then who should?

Also, for the record, my parents own a German Shepard/Rottweiler mix (we think), and though he can be a little feisty sometimes, he's a generally a sweetheart. They adopted him after finding him abandoned in the woods near their friends' cabin. What would've been a better choice for them? To leave him in the woods where he'd starve? (He was, by the behavior he exhibited, obviously already domesticated.)

hstencil, Tuesday, 27 January 2004 00:41 (twenty years ago) link

which school did he bring it to¿ (curious as i used to attend geroge brown and had several drawing courses there)

also, here is some stuff about dog attacks.

dyson (dyson), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 00:43 (twenty years ago) link

actually stence, i said something about possibly needing a license to own a pit-bull. that could weed out a fair amount of the bad owners the pitlovers are ragging on about.

dyson (dyson), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 00:47 (twenty years ago) link

Full disclosure: I don't mind dogs but pit bulls scare the hell out of me and despite the anecdotal evidence to the contrary I pretty much agree with Alex NYC throughout this thread.

However I was curious as to what the demographic were on dog attacks and then found this handy web page at the Center For Disease Control. There's some interesting reading there - it appears that pit bulls and rottweilers are involved in more biting incidents, however it's potentially that's because of owners/breeders choosing more aggressive dogs than something inherent to the breed. Guess there's just a lot of meth labs out there that need defending.

Some interesting stats from Australia though - I had no idea American pit bulls were banned (maybe just in Adelaide though)

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 00:55 (twenty years ago) link

I'd rather have this Corgi though:

http://www.mrmodels.co.nz/diecast/1_43rdscalediecast/Corgi%20501%20%20Buick-Kojak%20Car.jpg

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 00:58 (twenty years ago) link

the dogs that attacked diane whipple (see "red zone" mention upthread) were half-presa canario/half-bull mastiff dogs they adopted from a white supremacist who was serving time for hate crimes.

a couple months ago (around thanksgiving), a friend of mine witnessed a pitbull (off-leash) attack a policewoman riding a horse in golden gate park in san francisco. the pitbull took a bite out of horses leg and stomach, the policewoman was thrown from the horse, and the dog's owner was kicked in the face by the horse. the horse sprinted off and another police officer chased down the dog and shot it twice in the head.

my main problem with pitbulls is that they attract some of the worst/irresponsible pet owners but that's been mentioned upthread many times.

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 01:04 (twenty years ago) link

Pit bulls are banned all over the country HERE:

http://www.pbrc.net/breedspecific.html


Check it out.

luna (luna.c), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 01:09 (twenty years ago) link

wow, what kind of irresponsible owner would let any dog off-leash in a public park (in a non-dog run area)? That's sad.

Unfortunately, I think that responsible and humane pit bull owners are in the minority, but demonizing the entire breed isn't going to change things.

hstencil, Tuesday, 27 January 2004 01:14 (twenty years ago) link

eh Dyson the school was Sheridan college in Oakville ON.

So the fatal dog attack stats showed an average of 12 a year for the past 36 years, the great majority on little kids left unsupervised with dogs... I can think of much bigger household hazards (drownings in buckets?) but I concede there were no lab or golden retriever attacks listed there and powerful dogs are more dangerous.

sucka (sucka), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 01:31 (twenty years ago) link

Something that jumped right out at me seeing the fatal dog attack stats page:

Overwhelmingly, the dogs involved in fatal dog attacks were unaltered males.

The CDC page, upon a quick glance, seems to have at least one article saying the same thing. Male dogs that aren't fixed are much more aggressive.

Responsible dog owners who aren't planning on breeding get their dogs fixed. For lots of reasons. I have a strong opinion on this obv, and it's a whole separate issue. But it can make a big difference with behavior/aggression.

Some who are otherwise very responsible are total dumbasses about this because they don't want to imagine that snipping process. But I could especially see how those looking for the dog-as-macho-image-enhancer would especially want a male, uncastrated dog.

This whole post doesn't really make much difference, it's just one more angle on the gripe that there are far too many irresponsible people who own powerful breeds of dogs.

JuliaA (j_bdules), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 04:05 (twenty years ago) link

http://www.dapbt.org/photogallery/10005297.jpg

David Beckhouse (David Beckhouse), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 04:40 (twenty years ago) link

my good, oakville sux. i had to live there once. never again.

dyson (dyson), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 04:42 (twenty years ago) link

Uggh yeah but it's wonderful compared to upstate New York.

sucka (sucka), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 05:21 (twenty years ago) link

I grew up in Oakville! MAYBE WE WENT TO THE SAME HIGHSCHOOLWE@#

may pang (maypang), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 05:40 (twenty years ago) link

I am suspicious of the categorical nature of that statement when there is ample evidence to suggest otherwise.

There's also ample evidence for both! However, the negative stories about pits are always going to get all the attention because that's just how media work. You'd never see something like this:

THIS JUST IN: A pitbull was seen in the park today playing gently and acting like a goofball with its owner and his 5 years old son. More news as it develops.

It's the same reason why people overestimate the risk of flying, space heaters, escalators, using drugs, walking around in S Central LA, electric blankets, you name it. If you prefer to error on the side of caution, that's fine and dandy, but don't think you're actually any more knowledgeable or wiser than those who choose otherwise.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 06:17 (twenty years ago) link

Call me cah-razy, but I think that when you're buying a pet, especially a family pet, you should always prefer to error on the side of caution.

may pang (maypang), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 06:24 (twenty years ago) link

So yes, smart parents don't buy pit bulls.

may pang (maypang), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 06:25 (twenty years ago) link

Well if you really wanted to be cautious you wouldn't get a pet at all. And you would never place your child in a car. Cause thousands of people die every year in crashes. And you would keep your baby in a hermetically sealed bubble at all times. All of you who don't are simply bad parents and should be ashamed.
/sanctimonious judgement

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 06:33 (twenty years ago) link

But yeah, thanks for calling Luna a dumb parent, bucko.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 06:34 (twenty years ago) link

If I was a parent, I'd probably do my research and look for a car with the best safety ratings. Ditto for a dog.

I'm no fun, am I?

may pang (maypang), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 06:39 (twenty years ago) link

as with any potentially dangerous situation (car, bathtub, electric sockets, etc), exercise caution with kids and dogs. unless my puppy and child were raised together, i would never leave the latter alone with an animal. it comes down to common sense, which a lot of people unfortunately lack.

lauren (laurenp), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 07:12 (twenty years ago) link

Pit bull owners here say that the pit bull as a breed is not any more aggressive than any other dog, and that the irresponsible owners (made worse by the attraction of the breed to irresponsible people) causes the pit bulls to go bad.

However, dog breeds have been created by selective breeding - owners selecting specific traits, including temperament. Isn't it possible that the irresponsible owners have been irresponsibly breeding - selecting extra aggressive dogs for breeding - thus warping the breed into one that has a more aggressive temperament over the years?

When you buy a breed of dog, you are told that there are risks of genetic problems. I think that Cocker Spaniels have a couple, including a kidney problem and a blindness problem that breeders are specifically trying to eliminate. There is also some sort of 'rage' syndrome in a very small minority of the breed that the breeders are actively investigating and trying to eliminate by not allowing these dogs to breed, and also not allowing dogs related to them to breed. Are pit bull breeders doing any of this?

marianna, Tuesday, 27 January 2004 10:20 (twenty years ago) link

Oh, I see in the text from the pit bull site that the responsible pit bull people recognize that the irresponsible breeding is an issue. Maybe laws banning these types dogs for general ownershop, or having some sort of test for ownership/breeding standard would at least help situation.

marianna, Tuesday, 27 January 2004 10:27 (twenty years ago) link

i agree with your last point marianna, strict controls on breeding should be applied, so that the dog's history can be checked & controlled.

Also, with regards to having dogs 'fixed' is interesting. We were told to 'fix' our first dog to curb his agression, but he became more agressive. Our second dog, a poodle, (not our choice, it belonged to a relative) was the sweetest dog who was boisterous but placid & not agressive at all. We had her spayed as it is healthier for female dogs & have nearly had to have her put down. She has turned completly viscious as she no longer has any female hormone to repress the male agressive hormone in her. I would rather have a bigger dog as in my experience they are not as agressive as smaller dogs. I am keen to get a dog when I have children. Possibly a staffy/doberman/rott but I wouldn't get a pit. I have had nothing at all to do with this breed & maybe if I'd had more contact with them I may feel differently. They can be beautiful dogs & apparently very affectionate. You just don't tend to see pits here at all. I always thought an Amstaff was an apbt. I'd love to actually meet someone who owned a friendly pit so that I could get used to them & get rid of any mistrust that I have in my head.

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 10:57 (twenty years ago) link

what kind of irresponsible owner would let any dog off-leash in a public park?

Have you ever been to Britain, stence? Are you just talking about pit-bulls, or any kind of dog? I am baffled by this comment.

Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 11:11 (twenty years ago) link

Yep, definitely a UK-US divide thing here. There is no law restricting dogs ebing let off in public parks although they are not allowed in specified kid's areas. That said, there arent as many pits in the uk as in the states. That said, there are plenty of other large dogs so that makes no difference whatsoever.

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 11:13 (twenty years ago) link

George wants to know where all the love is?

http://webpages.charter.net/cmvenuti/images/george.jpg

Chris V (Chris V), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 12:12 (twenty years ago) link

Awww what a cutey! *snugglez with the cute dog*

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 12:33 (twenty years ago) link

He loves to snuggle. THats my boy.

Chris V (Chris V), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 13:32 (twenty years ago) link

Awww. I really want a dog. :-(

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 13:39 (twenty years ago) link

http://www.leerburg.com/Photos/babypit1.jpg

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 13:48 (twenty years ago) link

I pretty much agree with Alex NYC throughout this thread.

Well, Jeezum Crowe, Elvis, where in blazes were you yesterday when i was almost fed to the kennel by these frothingly mad-dog-loving zealots?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 15:38 (twenty years ago) link

I was kinda shocked to find that pit bulls are banned here in Winnipeg. Fucking Rottweilers everywhere and I find them way scarier.

Bryan (Bryan), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 15:42 (twenty years ago) link

may - you grew up in the oak¿ that's crazy (+ unfortunate¡). i went to lo¥ola and was a total outcast + all the ginos hated me - so don't believe anything you may've heard 'bout 'ol dys.
although it's prolly true.

dyson (dyson), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 15:45 (twenty years ago) link

fixin' dogs can have odd effects, as previously mentioned. My folks' dog Dexter was fixed, yet afterwards, he transformed into a Happy Humpin' Dog.

Huggy Dork (Kingfish), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 15:47 (twenty years ago) link

I can't believe this thread is still going!!

Kerry (dymaxia), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 16:26 (twenty years ago) link

Haha, I know! I think i just kept it up (ahem) by posting cute pics!

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 16:28 (twenty years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.