ayo lets go phillies get me a fukkin tastykake

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (418 of them)

i'm looking here and getting http://www.philly.com/inquirer/sports/20101215_Phillies_now_favored_to_win_World_Series.html
what am i doing wrong here? 9-5 odds = 5/14 = 35.7% chance of winning?!

i'll do some bad math:

80% chance of securing first or wild card, 75% chance of winning NLDS, 70% chance of winning NLCS, 60% chance of WS victory

even that wildly optimistic scenario comes out to a 25.2% of winning.. will they let you take the other side of that bet?

sanskrit, Wednesday, 15 December 2010 20:04 (thirteen years ago) link

you can always bet all 29 other teams to win. ^_^

i love you but i have chosen snarkness (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 20:15 (thirteen years ago) link

I'm sure they'll be much better this year now that one of their best hitters left.

I Am Kurious Assange (polyphonic), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 20:26 (thirteen years ago) link

The obvious cautionary note for the Phillies' chances: all those World Series won by the Maddux/Glavine/Smoltz Braves (close, but a front three I'd take over the Phillies').

clemenza, Wednesday, 15 December 2010 21:54 (thirteen years ago) link

Something else (seems like I'm knocking the Phillies; I'm not, just trying to look at this realistically): Roy Oswalt's been a great pitcher over his career, but is anyone looking for him to duplicate what he did after he came over to Philadelphia last year? When he left Houston, he was on the third year of a normal mid-career decline (or, if you will, adjustment); after the trade he did something not all that uncommon, which is to pitch lights out for the last couple of months. Who will the Phillies get this year: the guy they saw in August and September, or the guy who left Houston? My guess would be the latter.

clemenza, Thursday, 16 December 2010 02:14 (thirteen years ago) link

2 things: better defense and change of scenery. playing for one of the worst teams in baseball can't be good for the ERA/WHIP in both factors.

i love you but i have chosen snarkness (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 16 December 2010 02:18 (thirteen years ago) link

Agreed, in explaining what happened last year. One of those factors presumably remains, the other's gone--and I think the one that's gone can be pretty huge.

clemenza, Thursday, 16 December 2010 02:23 (thirteen years ago) link

I'm not saying he won't pitch well; even an average year from Oswalt will be pretty good. I'm saying he won't be putting up a 1.74 ERA, and there are reasons to believe he's more inclined to be in the mid-three range or higher.

clemenza, Thursday, 16 December 2010 02:26 (thirteen years ago) link

If you're going to ignore the SABR figures, I'd try not to limit your focus to straight ERA. Something that's telling even in his "off"-first half of the year with Houston is that his WHIP was 1.11 and his BAA was .229. Those #s are in line with your #1-#2 pitchers. He will be fine.

i love you but i have chosen snarkness (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 16 December 2010 02:28 (thirteen years ago) link

yeah is anyone saying roy oswalt is gonna put up a sub-2 era? i must have missed that.

call all destroyer, Thursday, 16 December 2010 02:29 (thirteen years ago) link

I'm watching the Lee press conference and I can't think of any player I've seen in my lifetime who ever wanted to be a Philly as much as he does

Mordy, Thursday, 16 December 2010 02:29 (thirteen years ago) link

yeah is anyone saying roy oswalt is gonna put up a sub-2 era? i must have missed that

Not explicitly, no. But I'm addressing the idea that the Phillies are now overwhelming, off-the-chart favorites to win next year (which is what the past 30 posts have been about)--to believe that, I think one of the assumptions you'd be making is that Oswalt next year will be something close to the Oswalt of August and September. "He will be fine"--sure, no argument. I'm questioning the idea that Halladay + Lee + "He will be fine" = 1970 Orioles.

clemenza, Thursday, 16 December 2010 02:34 (thirteen years ago) link

Let me be even clearer: no one here is saying that about Oswalt--but whoever pegged the Phillies at 5 to 2 to win the Series is.

clemenza, Thursday, 16 December 2010 02:36 (thirteen years ago) link

I think even the phillies fans (like me) think the 5 to 2 number is ridiculous

Mordy, Thursday, 16 December 2010 02:45 (thirteen years ago) link

Another thing I'd be interested in doing is going back over every postseason since '69 and asking two questions: who among the playoff teams was favored to win, and who actually did win? If you eliminated the occasional year where there was no clear favorite, I'd be surprised if even half the favorites ultimately emerge as the WS winner. (I'm just guessing.) And a) it becomes even more a roll of the dice in the wild-card era, and b) all of that presupposes that you make the playoffs in the first place. Winning a World Series is really hard!

But you're right, probably everybody here realizes those odds are crazy.

clemenza, Thursday, 16 December 2010 02:52 (thirteen years ago) link

uhhh you realize vegas sets odds to get action, not because they have an actual opinion?

call all destroyer, Thursday, 16 December 2010 02:53 (thirteen years ago) link

Thanks for the clarification; I assume it's also meant for all the other people upthread who commented on the absurdity of those odds.

clemenza, Thursday, 16 December 2010 02:55 (thirteen years ago) link

Clem, just to back up a bit I think perhaps you are underrating Oswalt's tenure with Houston in 2010. Take a look at some defense independent stats. He had a great YEAR, he was one of the top 15-20 pitchers in baseball (nb: I was his biggest cheerleader on ILB). Yes he was particularly great down the stretch. but take a deeper peak at his season with Houston outside of ERA and you may be surprised...

UNLESS you're going "retro-cool" for ERA like you did for RBIs earlier this year, and in that case, I am just gonna shrug.gif

i love you but i have chosen snarkness (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 16 December 2010 03:04 (thirteen years ago) link

xp yes it is, talking about odds is pointless unless you are gambling

call all destroyer, Thursday, 16 December 2010 03:06 (thirteen years ago) link

Yes he was particularly great down the stretch. but take a deeper peak at his season with Houston outside of ERA and you may be surprised...

I have, and you're quite right; his H/9 and SO/BB with the Astros were very good last year. How about we split the difference between his four months with Houston and two with the Phillies, add a year for age, and say he'll have an ERA around 3.00 next year?

talking about odds is pointless unless you are gambling

And talking about the Academy Awards is pointless, unless you're a marketing executive--but we do, all the time. Most everything we argue about here is pointless. But it's fun, so we do.

clemenza, Thursday, 16 December 2010 03:18 (thirteen years ago) link

i'm not a big gambler, but it seems to me that the odds have a lot more to do with popular conception than some realistic set of facts. like, phillies are probably a very hot bet right now because of this trade and so vegas responds appropriately by giving you far less payout for your bet.

Mordy, Thursday, 16 December 2010 03:19 (thirteen years ago) link

Anyway, I'll admit that I misunderstood the initial origin of these 5:2 odds. I thought they were the opinion of a writer, or someone at ESPN--I didn't realize they were actual Vegas odds.

clemenza, Thursday, 16 December 2010 03:22 (thirteen years ago) link

but you have to factor in the vig.. which at this stage must be pretty steep. perhaps a good 10% more which would wipe out insured profit. and to cad's point, it's largely pr blathering to churn up interest.

sanskrit, Thursday, 16 December 2010 04:19 (thirteen years ago) link

As soon as you start talking about the vig, I'm seeing Morrie the wig salesman getting his head bashed in by Jimmy the Gent.

clemenza, Thursday, 16 December 2010 04:29 (thirteen years ago) link

Another thing I'd be interested in doing is going back over every postseason since '69 and asking two questions: who among the playoff teams was favored to win, and who actually did win?

How often does the team that won the most games in that season go on to win the WS? It's fairly rare (they show these numbers every year during the playoffs).

NoTimeBeforeTime, Thursday, 16 December 2010 06:10 (thirteen years ago) link

http://twitpic.com/2zekv3

i love you but i have chosen snarkness (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 16 December 2010 07:53 (thirteen years ago) link

(They showed the 2010 NLCS replay tonight fwiw)

i love you but i have chosen snarkness (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 16 December 2010 07:54 (thirteen years ago) link

it seems to me that the odds have a lot more to do with popular conception than some realistic set of facts. like, phillies are probably a very hot bet right now because of this trade and so vegas responds appropriately by giving you far less payout for your bet.

Yes, but this has to be balanced against offering too-favourable odds on the other teams, which a boomaker needs to avoid, at least before the betting has really started. Joe Posnanski is baffled the Royals are 125-1, for example. I'm baffled the Dodgers and their sexy new rotation are 30-1 when there's no guarantee the Rockies or Giants will be obviously better in 2011.

Mark C, Thursday, 16 December 2010 11:13 (thirteen years ago) link

James put a new piece up yesterday called "Thirty-Three Rotations." I love the subtitle: "The 33 Greatest Starting Rotations of All-Time in Chronological Order, Apropos Nothing in Particular." The five most recent: '02 Braves, '01 Mariners, '01 A's, '97 Braves, '93 White Sox.

clemenza, Thursday, 16 December 2010 15:52 (thirteen years ago) link

two months pass...

Domonic Brown bwoke his hand

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 6 March 2011 15:39 (thirteen years ago) link

Uh oh! Did he punch his children's grandfather in the face???

jkjk

Apparently he'll be back in like 3-6 weeks.

Mordy, Sunday, 6 March 2011 16:50 (thirteen years ago) link

I'm so excited for new baseball btw -- I just got my MLB.tv package!

Mordy, Sunday, 6 March 2011 16:50 (thirteen years ago) link

ten months pass...

phils top pitching prospect Trevor May answering questions on Reddit:
http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/oa934/iama_top_prospect_in_the_mlb_minor_league_system/

Mordy, Tuesday, 10 January 2012 13:22 (twelve years ago) link

eight years pass...
two years pass...

I am sorry about your loss in the election, @laurenboebert. Who knows what funny business was going on!?Anyhow, I know this must be a difficult time, and just keep in mind that you have someone right here to talk to (or whatever other kind of needs you may have right now). DM me?

— Lenny Dykstra (@LennyDykstra) November 9, 2022

, Wednesday, 9 November 2022 20:46 (one year ago) link

"GET AMERICAN BACK ON TRACK"

Andy K, Wednesday, 9 November 2022 23:28 (one year ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.