New Apple Lust Objects

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (5436 of them)

Oh yeah, they're definitely bringing out new iPods, just hadn't heard the Beatles remastering rumours before.

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 13:06 (sixteen years ago) link

The invitations for the event said "The Beat Goes On...", which was the last line in the Beatles' final press release.

Alba, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 13:30 (sixteen years ago) link

so the question is when are they available? birthday party on saturday, damn it!

Maria, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 13:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Should be from today, after 10am PST

Ed, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 13:55 (sixteen years ago) link

Yellow Submarine iPod. Preloaded with Beatles catalogue.

http://techdigest.tv/beatles-ipod.jpg

onimo, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 13:59 (sixteen years ago) link

That started as a joke "I'm going to start a rumour" from Merlin Mann on the MacBreak Weekly podcast. I think it would actually sell pretty well, with or without the pre-loading. I don't really understand how pre-loaded iPods work - how do they circumvent Apple's model of iTunes Library->iPod being one-way traffic? They did it for U2, right?

Alba, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 14:26 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't think they were preloaded -- you had to download them from iTunes. Same with the Harry Potter ones.

stet, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 15:59 (sixteen years ago) link

$1 to make a ringtone? Jesus.

stet, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:10 (sixteen years ago) link

so stupid

s1ocki, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:11 (sixteen years ago) link

phat nanos:

http://media.arstechnica.com/news.media/500/IMG_7719.jpg

tissp, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:22 (sixteen years ago) link

goddamn that's small.

stet, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:23 (sixteen years ago) link

Quick! Throw a hammer at that screen!!!

Spencer Chow, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:25 (sixteen years ago) link

i don't really like it, but then i never like the style of the new ipods initially

tissp, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:25 (sixteen years ago) link

phat nano? seriously? what?! why?

jed_, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:28 (sixteen years ago) link

160gb iPod Classic!

stet, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:29 (sixteen years ago) link

ipod touch. get in.

tissp, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:33 (sixteen years ago) link

digging the phat nano, actually. Completely useless having video on a screen that small, but it's an interesting look.

milo z, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:35 (sixteen years ago) link

iPod touch, iPhone without the phone

Ed, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:36 (sixteen years ago) link

so it does have Safari +wi-fi?

milo z, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:38 (sixteen years ago) link

It has wifi, ye

stet, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:38 (sixteen years ago) link

http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/applebeat/applebeatgoeson161.jpg
wonder what the missing buttons can be.

stet, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:41 (sixteen years ago) link

whoah

river wolf, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Safari, youtube, Google

man, this would be perfect if I were in school right now (campus-wide WiFi)

milo z, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:43 (sixteen years ago) link

I'm wanting to get an iPhone when they eventually come out here, cos my phone's shit. But no point having both, gah.

stet, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:44 (sixteen years ago) link

wow, presumably it must be the same processor as the iphone, too, to be running safari? i wonder if it's equally hackable?

toby, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:44 (sixteen years ago) link

Everything but the phone? HMMMM.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Dunno if it's evertything but -- there's no Notes icon or Maps icon that I can see.

stet, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:46 (sixteen years ago) link

...will it take 3rd party apps? is this basically going to be an apple PDA??

river wolf, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:47 (sixteen years ago) link

only 16gb storage. Dilemma solved.

stet, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:47 (sixteen years ago) link

I guess it could function that way if you used Google Apps

river wolf, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:48 (sixteen years ago) link

and thus no EDGE, either, which is pretty essential for me (ipod touch won't be much use in a supermarket/out in a car etc for looking stuff up, presumably).

toby, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:48 (sixteen years ago) link

"only"

...am i the only one that has no interest in carrying around all of the musics?

what is EDGE again?

river wolf, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:49 (sixteen years ago) link

i am slightly jealous of 16GB storage though.

toby, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:49 (sixteen years ago) link

neutered iphone... not so interesting to me (160gb ipod for less, though, is)

s1ocki, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:51 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, until I'm convinced that WiFi would work enough (that is, enough places) for it to really be an internet ipod, I'm not sure why I'd buy a 16gb ipod for $399 just 'cause it has a touchscreen.

G00blar, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:53 (sixteen years ago) link

Will the updated UI be available for the 5.5's?

Jeff, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:53 (sixteen years ago) link

no, I'm with you RW. Maybe I'd need 80-160GB if I was going on a months-long trip. But 1000 songs on 16GB will do me just fine for anything else.

milo z, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:54 (sixteen years ago) link

ipod classic is cool in theory but i can't imagine ever needing 160 gigs. the scrunched nanos look fucking ugly and i don't understand why anyone would pay for a 16g phone-less iphone instead of getting a proper 8gb iphone and waiting for an unlock.

nothing here's really that compelling! i'm ipodless at the moment and the one that looks most appealing to me is probably an old-school 8gb nano.

xpost

^@^, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:54 (sixteen years ago) link

and actually my 2GB nano is way more than enough for most things

milo z, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:54 (sixteen years ago) link

rumors of iphone price drops?

toby, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:55 (sixteen years ago) link

is the phat nano a replacement for the old nano or a new line? if it's new, what's the advantage?

jed_, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:58 (sixteen years ago) link

video, I think

milo z, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:58 (sixteen years ago) link

where is ichat for iphone and ipod touches

cutty, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:59 (sixteen years ago) link

i basically keep my entire miusic collection on my ipod so 160g would be cool.

s1ocki, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 17:59 (sixteen years ago) link

-Can now buy whatever song is playing at Starbucks with one tap of a finger
-When you get near a Starbucks, automatically a 5th button will show up in the store with Starbucks logo
-Great partnership with Starbucks that we're announcing today

ew

stet, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 18:00 (sixteen years ago) link

wherein Apple jumps the shark

milo z, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 18:01 (sixteen years ago) link

McCartney's behind that.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 18:02 (sixteen years ago) link

barf

river wolf, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 18:03 (sixteen years ago) link

ha this starbucks thing sucks!

toby, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 18:06 (sixteen years ago) link

Starbucks-Apple-Google your cuddly megacorps.

Ed, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 18:06 (sixteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.