"Beyond the Corner": New Miles Davis Box Set

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (212 of them)
I just wish they would make up their mind about how they want to re-release material and stick to one format.

Hurting 2, Thursday, 1 March 2007 05:48 (seventeen years ago) link

I'll believe this "Live 76" boxed set when I see it. If they can't be arsed to release decent sounding versions of Agharta and Pangaea separately I don't see why they would bother doing a huge box of 'em. I skeptical about this "Beyond The Corner" too, but the tracklist make it seem more hopeful.

Also "He Loved Him Madly" is awesome and I listen to it all the time. The rest of Get Up With It I have less time for.

Alex in SF, Thursday, 1 March 2007 16:20 (seventeen years ago) link

According to my publicity contact at Sony, there are no advances ready on this box or anything close to it, and they're very pissed about whoever (they don't know who) it was leaked the track listing.

unperson, Thursday, 1 March 2007 16:30 (seventeen years ago) link

this looks pretty great. On the Corner is not my favorite electric Miles--cold shit--but still quite fun in its way. "Calpyso Frelimo" rates up there with Jack Johnson in my book, though. This should be interesting, and way too much. But I've found that I get off of almost all the Jack Johnson box, very little of it's boring or unrealized to the point that I can't get up with it.

whisperineddhurt, Thursday, 1 March 2007 16:44 (seventeen years ago) link

I like that -- I'm going to use that phrase more: "I can get up with it."

Hurting 2, Thursday, 1 March 2007 16:46 (seventeen years ago) link

on the corner = the charles mingus of miles davis releases
/vahid

deej, Thursday, 1 March 2007 16:48 (seventeen years ago) link

or maybe, the black saint sinner lady of miles davis releases is what i mean

deej, Thursday, 1 March 2007 16:48 (seventeen years ago) link

now THIS is the one i've been waiting for.

strongohulkington, Thursday, 1 March 2007 16:51 (seventeen years ago) link

Um, yeah. There's this great story of Herbie Hancock going to Columbia studios and hearing music on the PA and asking the secretary what it was — only to be told it was the On the Corner stuff he himself was on. So, the idea of hearing this before it was edited down in post-production? Kind of crazy — particularly when you realize how radically different stuff like "Shhh/Peaceful" already was three years earlier from the master takes...

Naive Teen Idol, Thursday, 1 March 2007 21:15 (seventeen years ago) link

Was that Hancock? That story is in "Miles Beyond" IIRC, but I thought it was someone else.

Alex in SF, Thursday, 1 March 2007 21:30 (seventeen years ago) link

i think that was Zawinul with Bitches Brew. He didn't like it when they were recording it, but heard it playing at the Columbia offices and asked who it was, to be told it was him!

tylerw, Thursday, 1 March 2007 21:39 (seventeen years ago) link

I'll believe this "Live 76" boxed set when I see it. If they can't be arsed to release decent sounding versions of Agharta and Pangaea separately I don't see why they would bother doing a huge box of 'em.

well, they spent years and years issuing crappy-sounding versions of kind of blue before getting it right/releasing a box from that era. like all other miles releases on columbia, first you buy the crappy-sounding version, then you buy the slightly-less-crappy sounding version, then you buy the box. after the box is released, individual cds of said box material are released, with bonus tracks. after those have been out for a while, then you buy the "special editions" of the individual cds, with the bonus "newly discovered!" rare concert recording and/or documentary dvd. it's all a rich tapestry.

Lawrence the Looter, Friday, 2 March 2007 03:35 (seventeen years ago) link

I have a friend, well... a friend of a friend, who worked for Laswell and got to go to Sony to check the vaults in preparation for the Panthalassa set. He said there was an astonishing amount of material there including huge sections that were taped off with signs that said "do not touch". They asked what was in those sections and were told that they were safety copies of the Sony Japan archives and that they (I assume meaning Columbia/Sony) had recorded every gig and rehearsal...

I look forward to this one, and every other scrap they issue.

Like Apple, I don't have to like the company to want the product, and like Apple, thanks, I'll wait 6 months and buy a used copy.

BTW: WTF does [i]this[i/] mean? [i]"on the corner = the charles mingus of miles davis releases"[i/]. Is this recording the big fat psycho misogynist genius of all Miles records? I thought they all were (minus the fat part).

factcheckr, Friday, 2 March 2007 15:54 (seventeen years ago) link

Haha, brilliant Xgau Consumer Guide imitation/parody up there Edd! (A compliment, whether you think so or not.) All it needed was an A- rating right there at the end.

Myonga Vön Bontee, Friday, 2 March 2007 18:22 (seventeen years ago) link

xp re: mingus of miles releases (which i amended to 'black saint' of miles releases) I don't think On the Corner is a particularly representative record of what Miles is good at. But its become for many an entry point to the miles catalogue which i don't quite understand (similarly, black saint has become this mingus entry point despite being probably one of his more difficult to 'get into' and being similarly unrepresentative of what mingus does well)

deej, Friday, 2 March 2007 18:27 (seventeen years ago) link

"But its become for many an entry point to the miles catalogue which i don't quite understand"

It's his cheapest post-1970 (and one of only two studio) album, it's decidedly rockin' (so it appeals to people who want to get their feet wet in electric Miles) and it has a flashy cover. What's hard to understand?

Alex in SF, Friday, 2 March 2007 18:34 (seventeen years ago) link

well in the case of the on the corner, i just don't think its that good

this is where the parallel to black saint breaks down, cuz i think that record is great. just not a v. good entry point either.

deej, Friday, 2 March 2007 18:35 (seventeen years ago) link

the /vahid tag was supposed to imply awkard parallels that make sense to a limited degree

deej, Friday, 2 March 2007 18:36 (seventeen years ago) link

Well whether you think it is very good or not, I think it's pretty clear why a lot of people use it as jumping off point for that period of Miles (because frankly there aren't a lot of other good options.)

Alex in SF, Friday, 2 March 2007 18:38 (seventeen years ago) link

You don't think there are a lot of good starting points for Miles?!?

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 2 March 2007 20:24 (seventeen years ago) link

I can see it as a perfect "entry point"... was kind of the last of his albs I really dug aside from the Pete Cosey solos from the Osaka gigs. And the last one I bought in "real time".

(Nice to see my formatting worked out on my previous post)

factcheckr, Friday, 2 March 2007 20:26 (seventeen years ago) link

there are lots of good ones! better ones
but whatever i know lots of ppl like 'on the corner' more than me so i will concede any points

deej, Friday, 2 March 2007 20:28 (seventeen years ago) link

Seriously, IMO dude has an entry point for pretty much any angle: arrangement fiends, funkheads, groove fans, "pretty background tunes" types, etc.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 2 March 2007 20:31 (seventeen years ago) link

"You don't think there are a lot of good starting points for Miles?!?"

I was speaking of post-72 Miles which yeah I think On The Corner is the cheapest and "easiest" starting point for (even if I probably like almost everything else he released in the same period better.)

Alex in SF, Friday, 2 March 2007 21:17 (seventeen years ago) link

I'm a massive Miles freak and On the Corner was the one record I never got into. The frantic stereo panning always irritated me.

Brakhage, Friday, 2 March 2007 21:26 (seventeen years ago) link

Ah see I didn't get the "post-72" from the context. I find your self-paraphrase OTM.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 2 March 2007 21:42 (seventeen years ago) link

haha, Myonga, I take that as a compliment...I think. am I alone in thinking that On the Corner just doesn't work very well, that it's cynical where the best Miles 'lectric is, I dunno, inclusive and bleak and all that, but not cynical? what I found listening to the Jack Johnson box is that the conception was so terse, pinched, scratchy, rarely expansive (inclusive)? the way all that got edited together seemed to open it up, but the individual pieces came across as less, somehow. and I mean it as a compliment to Davis and Teo and all that the music remains as unsettling and brave as it (didn't) seem(ed) to be back in the day. what other major jazz artist discarded so much and got with funk so well? I ask this in all seriousness--and I mean major jass artist, which doesn't include Herbie Hancock, of whom I am a fan. Has anybody else approached Davis in his '70s project, or is that music truly unique? I give my post a bleedin' B, though, I be a Turkey, shoot me.

whisperineddhurt, Friday, 2 March 2007 21:51 (seventeen years ago) link

Has anybody else approached Davis in his '70s project, or is that music truly unique? I give my post a bleedin' B, though, I be a Turkey, shoot me.

whisper, nuff respect, but I have no idea what your post means.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 2 March 2007 21:54 (seventeen years ago) link

I forget what ILMer it was who pointed out that On The Corner almost sounds like a Can record, but he was massively OTM.

Hurting 2, Saturday, 3 March 2007 00:24 (seventeen years ago) link

I do remember a discussion about whether or not Miles had been listening to Can before OTC, the consensus was that if he had been we'd know about it because he was "very proud" of his European listening habits.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 3 March 2007 00:26 (seventeen years ago) link

I bet it was Dom Leone...

Naive Teen Idol, Saturday, 3 March 2007 04:26 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh man I'm listening to the Cellar Door Session improv #1 and just heard Jarrett hit a bunch of the melodic figures he uses throughout the Koln concert. Freaked me out.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 00:41 (seventeen years ago) link

so should I buy the Jack Johson box for $40? what sayeth ILM jazz DB's? I saw it today used.

sleeve, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 01:46 (seventeen years ago) link

Probably. I've been eyeing that box for a while myself.

Hurting 2, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 01:48 (seventeen years ago) link

BUY IT! [I got mine used for $30! In fact, thanks to a certain local record store, i got Bitches Brew and In a Silent Way for that much too. I paid full price for Cellar Door Sessions.]

fukasaku tollbooth, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 01:56 (seventeen years ago) link

I think I need to get Cellar Door before Jack Johnson. I want as many versions of What I Say and Honky Tonk as possible.

Hurting 2, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 02:15 (seventeen years ago) link

Haha yes!

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 6 March 2007 03:50 (seventeen years ago) link

two months pass...
Let's revive this.

I stand by my assertion that In Concert: Live At Philharmonic is terribly underrated...

Naive Teen Idol, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 19:14 (sixteen years ago) link

well it ain't underrated by me

Milton Parker, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 19:18 (sixteen years ago) link

"Rated X" live! LIVE!!!

Naive Teen Idol, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 19:19 (sixteen years ago) link

for anyone who's interested, BMG Jazz Club members can get ridiculous deals on these Miles box sets -- Jack Johnson for $10, Bitches Brew and Silent Way for $15, and others too. You have to sign up for their sketchy deal and they sort of screw you on shipping, but you get free CDs -- still worth it in the long run I think.

tylerw, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 19:34 (sixteen years ago) link

"Rated X" live! LIVE!!!

Whoa.

Bill in Chicago, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 19:35 (sixteen years ago) link

I don't think the live version of Rated X stands up to the Studio.
Miles isn't playing the organ on it, for one thing. It's just not nearly
as frantic. But it's still a cool record.

Trip Maker, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 19:38 (sixteen years ago) link

The live version is cool because it slowly comes together piece by piece, as compared with the studio version which attacks you like a steak-knife-wielding octopus from the first second all the way to the end.

unperson, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 20:33 (sixteen years ago) link

attacks you like a steak-knife-wielding octopus

That's a great sensation, though.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 21:20 (sixteen years ago) link

The live "Rated X" is very, very good. And unperson is right: the thing that makes it so interesting is that instead of blasting on, full-tilt right away like the (seriously awesome) studio version does, it sort of slowly coheres. By contrast the Laswell version is kind of toothless.

To my ears, In Concert (w/ "Rated X" and the epic, 27-minute "Ife") has more of the tribal, African thing Miles was going for in this era than any of his other 70's releases. It's more polyrhythmic, percussive and varied in texture, and in general has a bit more space w/o the second guitar.

It's a bit ironic, given Miles himself (or Quincy Troupe, anyway) wrote that he was getting deeper into that sort of thing as he went along.

Naive Teen Idol, Tuesday, 8 May 2007 22:23 (sixteen years ago) link

three months pass...

Holy mutha 'o' God!

$120!!!

Gah!

Weep for my unborn children's future.

JN$OT, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 14:35 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, why is it so much? Everything I've said says it's 6 cds. But at full price ($140, before the discount), that comes out to $23 a cd. Even at $120 that's $20 a cd. I guess they've thinking that anyone still buying Miles in 2007 has serious cash flow?

Euler, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 14:45 (sixteen years ago) link

it's SO GREAT

Matos W.K., Wednesday, 5 September 2007 15:03 (sixteen years ago) link

maybe because it's crazy expensive?
anyway, yeah, i love hearing the uncut jams from the various bands from this era. but in the end, i think it makes me appreciate the albums even more. teo macero and miles were really onto something incredible when they constructed the LPs.

tylerw, Monday, 30 April 2012 13:50 (eleven years ago) link

Ordered this used for $85 just a coupla weeks ago, looking forward to seeing it in the mailbox anyday now (except it probably won't fit)!

Race Against Rockism (Myonga Vön Bontee), Monday, 30 April 2012 23:14 (eleven years ago) link

nine months pass...

Where do people come out on Teo Macero?Listening to this box on Spotify, I'm struck by how little editing there actually seems to have been on On the Corner. Listening to the "unedited master" of the title cut, you're almost ten minutes in before you hear something different from the edited master (McLaughlin soloing, organ noodling, Miles with the quiet introduction when the band brings it down a bit). As a college student when I first heard this stuff, I had been under the impression that Teo was splicing whole rhythm sections under solos from different tracks. What seems to be revealed here is that far more of the magic happened live in the studio (or at an overdub session) -- certainly compared to Bitches Brew anyway, where Teo was looping whole phrases to create melodies and the like.

I'd be interested to see Bob Belden's "tribute" to Teo Macero in the box. Given how disparaging Bill Laswell has been about Teo's work, and Macero's displeasure with these "complete sessions" boxes being released at all, it makes me wonder if Belden's essay was a substantive rebuttal or more a matter of politics.

Naive Teen Idol, Friday, 15 February 2013 23:18 (eleven years ago) link

Didn't know Laswell was disparaging about Teo's work!

Tarfumes The Escape Goat, Friday, 15 February 2013 23:29 (eleven years ago) link

Where do people come out on Teo Macero?Listening to this box on Spotify, I'm struck by how little editing there actually seems to have been on On the Corner. Listening to the "unedited master" of the title cut, you're almost ten minutes in before you hear something different from the edited master

huh? there's an edit right at the beginning. The album version actually starts at about 0:47 of the unedited master, but it's an alternate mix with the solo turned down. you can hear the bleed faintly in the background. Then at about 0:32 on the album version you can hear the edit where it goes back to what's actually the beginning of the unedited master (about 3 secs in to be precise).

wk, Saturday, 16 February 2013 00:50 (eleven years ago) link

http://open.spotify.com/album/4ORrWT9p5FH1jhTCATKEcj

Brad C., Saturday, 16 February 2013 01:24 (eleven years ago) link

huh? there's an edit right at the beginning. The album version actually starts at about 0:47 of the unedited master, but it's an alternate mix with the solo turned down. you can hear the bleed faintly in the background. Then at about 0:32 on the album version you can hear the edit where it goes back to what's actually the beginning of the unedited master (about 3 secs in to be precise).

Correct you are. The groove seems to obscure them a bit. I'm still stunned when I look at Bob Belden's explanations of the edits to "Pharaoh's Dance" -- in some ways, I was disappointed by that box, because I'd have loved to have heard the actual working tapes of those tracks, which I suspect may not have sounded much like the final product at all.

Naive Teen Idol, Saturday, 16 February 2013 05:29 (eleven years ago) link

Also, on the Bitches Brew box, they used a digital remix instead of the original analog masters. This means that they re-created every edit. I haven't noticed any differences myself, but there are those that swear some of the edits are a hair off -- or missing altogether.

Tarfumes The Escape Goat, Saturday, 16 February 2013 05:50 (eleven years ago) link

I never even heard the edits on pharaoh's dance before I knew they were there but it's funny how clumsy some of them are.

wk, Saturday, 16 February 2013 05:56 (eleven years ago) link

funny in the sense that it's interesting how easy edits are to overlook if you're not listening for them

wk, Saturday, 16 February 2013 05:57 (eleven years ago) link

Yeah, totally. I never realized how many edits I missed in In A Silent Way until I heard the unedited takes on the box.

Tarfumes The Escape Goat, Saturday, 16 February 2013 06:07 (eleven years ago) link

Yeah, "Shhh/Peaceful" was basically looped from a handful of material culled from a 19-minute track and overdubbed from what I can tell.

"Pharaoh's Dance" on the box is missing loops and so forth. I'm not entirely sure how you assemble a box of that magnitude and miss stuff like that.

I would just love to hear what the Bitches Brew stuff would've sounded like had they done a Jack Johnson-esque box with the working tapes. Obviously it wouldn't have been nearly as listenable -- but far more educational.

Naive Teen Idol, Saturday, 16 February 2013 18:41 (eleven years ago) link

Listening to the unedited "Shhh/Peaceful," I was floored when that organ chord happened: it's only there for a couple of seconds near the end, but Macero was brilliant/astute enough to hear it as the perfect starting point.

It's baffling why they didn't use the original mix for the BB box; even the 40th Anniversary edition has the digital remix on the CDs (but the original mix on the LPs). I have no idea what their logic/justification for that was.

Tarfumes The Escape Goat, Saturday, 16 February 2013 19:22 (eleven years ago) link

Obvious guess would be that either the master tapes were missing or damaged.

Naive Teen Idol, Sunday, 17 February 2013 19:47 (eleven years ago) link

I wondered about that too, especially there were no such issues (iirc) with any of Miles' other (and older) records/reissues.

But this piece by Paul Tingen more-or-less answers the question(s).

(although it sounds like Sony insisted on a remix and "oh, the tapes are no good" was a convenient -- and not easily verifiable -- justification)

Tarfumes The Escape Goat, Sunday, 17 February 2013 20:36 (eleven years ago) link

Re-reading passages from the Tingen book now (good book, btw) I love how Paul Buckmaster came in with all these über-"heavy" charts to create some Stockhausen/Sly Stone hybrid only to be in the middle of describing the drum fills he'd composed for the band when Miles cut him off and was like, "Yeah, play that" -- blowing off the rest of Buckmaster's charts and leaving the final groove on "On the Corner" almost comically unfunky.

I still find most of Teo's edits on this one kind of unnecessary btw.

Naive Teen Idol, Sunday, 17 February 2013 23:10 (eleven years ago) link

Miles, like Teo, was an incredible genius at editing. "Shhh/Peaceful," in its unedited form, prominently features Josef Zawinul's theme, but Miles and/or Teo knew exactly what to leave on the cutting room floor. I think part of Miles' genius, cruel though it might have been at times, was to say, "That thing you labored on for hours/days/weeks/months? Yeah, we don't need that."

And with On The Corner, I think Teo did some brilliant work. I don't think his edits are unnecessary; I think they add focus and cohesion.

Tarfumes The Escape Goat, Monday, 18 February 2013 00:35 (eleven years ago) link

live albums from this era are great, so all of the editing is technically unnecessary, right? It's not like Macero's editing was saving recordings that were otherwise unlistenable in their raw state. He just added that 10% extra structure that makes things a little more interesting. And the opening of On the Corner is a great example of that because the album version begins in a much more exciting way than the unedited track. It's funny because the supposedly unedited track actually sounds like you're dropping into the middle of something that's already in progress while the edited version sounds like a proper beginning.

wk, Monday, 18 February 2013 01:47 (eleven years ago) link

I guess I would agree with that. The editing is generally just a lot more subtle on OTC than on Bitches Brew, where whole compositions are rendered from the end of Teo's razor blade. Generally, tho, OTC doesn't really "function" like a composition the same way even BB's cuts did. There are very few variations, the dynamics are considerably reduced and the melody is, "Black Satin" notwithstanding, pretty much nonexistent. As a result, I just feel like Teo's edits tighten it up more than "re-compose" the thing.

Does anyone else think "Bitches Brew" is a thirty-minute "Spinnin' Wheel" variation, btw?

Naive Teen Idol, Monday, 18 February 2013 03:00 (eleven years ago) link

the blood sweat and tears song?

wk, Monday, 18 February 2013 06:32 (eleven years ago) link

Yup

Naive Teen Idol, Monday, 18 February 2013 13:07 (eleven years ago) link

Was flipping through John Szwed's (highly recommended) Miles bio last night, and it says that Miles was indeed consciously riffing on "Spinning Wheel" (as well as one of Betty Davis' demos). So I guess that song's existence is finally justified.

Tarfumes The Escape Goat, Wednesday, 20 February 2013 15:54 (eleven years ago) link

< pats self on back>

Naive Teen Idol, Thursday, 21 February 2013 03:24 (eleven years ago) link

(actually, I figure I must've heard that info somewhere before)

Naive Teen Idol, Thursday, 21 February 2013 03:38 (eleven years ago) link

oh yeah, I hear it now. interesting.

wk, Thursday, 21 February 2013 04:30 (eleven years ago) link

nine years pass...

It might be the best thing ever made (the box).

― Andy K, Wednesday, September 5, 2007 11:20 AM (fourteen years ago) bookmarkflaglink

OTMMM

"One and One (Unedited Master)" = peak music. It's hard to believe they had that in the can and it didn't make the original album. And "Mr. Foster" is maybe the single most beautiful electric Miles recording...except for this one, recorded at the same 1975 session as "Minnie" and unacceptably left off the box because Miles doesn't play on it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZobpwLTTow

J. Sam, Wednesday, 2 March 2022 15:42 (two years ago) link

I want that box so bad, but I'm not willing to pay $400+ for it. They've got the Bitches Brew, IASW and Jack Johnson boxes for sale on his official site but sadly not this one.

a superficial sheeb of intelligence (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 2 March 2022 15:53 (two years ago) link

I paid $200 for my copy in 2016, which felt slightly insane at the time but which I don't regret at all. $400+ is beyond the pale though. I almost grabbed another one when it briefly became available again at list price a couple years ago, but it was either gonna sit on my shelf gathering dust or be predatorily flipped for profit, neither of which would have felt great.

J. Sam, Wednesday, 2 March 2022 16:02 (two years ago) link

Yeah, I missed that window when it became available again. I placed an order, but it got canceled, annoyingly. Guess the oversold that box. Fingers crossed it comes up again.

a superficial sheeb of intelligence (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 2 March 2022 16:06 (two years ago) link

Agreed that the On the Corner set is one of the best ones in the series (In a Silent Way the perennial favorite, of course).

This outtake is stunning, J. Never heard it before. Have always thought Miles the balladeer was as alive and potent as ever in the fusion era, just not as prolific. Seems he was leaning on the organ a bit in this one, so even if he's not playing trumpet, I can't help but think there's still that undeniable haunting Miles quality to it.


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.