Linguistic Discussion Of European Languages of Obscure origin

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (143 of them)
Well, Dadaismus, I found much stuff on the web to support the original idea that Finno-Urgic is, indeed non-I-E.

(What would that make Finnish and Maltese? Safari and Netscape?)

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:34 (nineteen years ago) link

Also P-Celtic = Breton

Also Q-Celtic = Manx

Not sure where Sarkese fits in

Dadaismus (Dada), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:37 (nineteen years ago) link

Maltese is what, Phoenecian or Punic or sumthin'? With heavy Arabic and Latin influences?

Dadaismus (Dada), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:39 (nineteen years ago) link

Phoenecian I believe.

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:41 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, it's interesting to see that the Picts were P-Celtic because the P-Celtic wave was *later* (Iron Age) than the Q-Celtic wave (Bronze Age). (At least that's my understanding.)

Trying to remember what Maltese was... I think Arabic. There was another Mediteranean (island?) language which was basically Turkish, but I can't remember where that was.

Will look it up!

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:41 (nineteen years ago) link

The only possible link left for Basque is something or other in Armenia, so say the experts. There was going to be an expedition to investigate the link a few years ago, but it was postponed/cancelled.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:42 (nineteen years ago) link

Maltese is related to Arabic....it is the only one of such languages to be written in the Roman alphabet.

a few words in English have recognisably Sanskrit origins - apple is 'apul' in Sanskrit.

MarkH (MarkH), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:42 (nineteen years ago) link

Maltese was originally Punic, but since the 11th Century or so, it is an independant branch of an Arabic-related language.

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:43 (nineteen years ago) link

Someone once tried to convince me that Finnish, Estonian and Hungarian were related to Korean. It all sounds highly implausible.

Tag (Tag), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:44 (nineteen years ago) link

the big link in all indo-european languages ama - maman - mama - mother etc. OK so in indiamn languages ama often means older woman to whom I show respect rather than strictly mother but its the strongest continuity.

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:45 (nineteen years ago) link

I used to work in an office with a Finnish girl (don't ask) and on the phone she did sound slightly Oriental

Dadaismus (Dada), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:46 (nineteen years ago) link

It's actually more plausible than it sounds. Finno-Ugric languages are related to Siberian languages, so the Northern bit of Korea possibly might have some intersection.

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:46 (nineteen years ago) link

The languages originated in Siberia, as did the tribes who settled in Finland - hence why Finland is characterised as non-Scandinavian. Hungarian more difficult to pinpoint.

Dadaismus (Dada), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:49 (nineteen years ago) link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altaic_languages

talks about the Central Asian languages and their possible links to both Finno-Urgic languages and East Asian languages like Japanese and Korean.

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:55 (nineteen years ago) link

"The whole is world is just a great big onion"

Dadaismus (Dada), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:57 (nineteen years ago) link

I still need a good site/explanation of the Basque language!

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:02 (nineteen years ago) link

There is no adequate explanation for it as yet

Dadaismus (Dada), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:05 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, someone could TRY! It's someone else's turn to google and post a link.

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:07 (nineteen years ago) link

No, what I mean is even among academics I don't think there's one yet - so Googling cannot help us here!

Dadaismus (Dada), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:07 (nineteen years ago) link

the atlantis explanation is more than adequate! (just wrong) (probably)

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:08 (nineteen years ago) link

Alright, alright, here is a tedious (I suspect from his not wanting to hear any Atlantaen theories) academic site on it:

http://www.cogs.susx.ac.uk/users/larryt/basque.html

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:08 (nineteen years ago) link

Isn't there a theory that it is indigenous? If this is discussed above, please ignore me. I struggle when the subject matter isn't football.

Mikey G (Mikey G), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:08 (nineteen years ago) link

I like Basque! It's all Z's and K's! Which are the two coolest letters, anyway!

A quote from this site:

Q17. Are the Basques genetically different from other Europeans?

A17. Apparently, yes. It has long been known that the Basques have the highest proportion of rhesus-negative blood in Europe (25%), and one of the highest percentages of type-O blood (55%). Recently, however, the geneticist Luiga Luca Cavalli-Sforza has completed a gene map of the peoples of Europe, and he finds the Basques to be strikingly different from their neighbors. The genetic boundary between Basques and non-Basques is very sharp on the Spanish side. On the French side, the boundary is more diffuse: it shades off gradually toward the Garonne in the north. These findings are entirely in agreement with what we know of the history of the language.

Q18. Does this mean the Basques are directly descended from the earliest known human inhabitants of Europe, the Cro-Magnon people who occupied western Europe around 35,000 years ago?

A18. Nobody knows. This is possible, but we have no real evidence either way. The only evidence we have is negative: the archeologists can find no evidence for any sudden change in population in the area for thousands of years before the arrival of the Celts and later the Romans in the first millennium BC.

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:11 (nineteen years ago) link

what a square!

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:11 (nineteen years ago) link

Basque numbers:

1 bat
2 bi ~ biga
3 hiru ~ hirur
4 lau ~ laur
5 bost ~ bortz
6 sei
7 zazpi
8 zortzi
9 bederatzi
10 hamar

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:12 (nineteen years ago) link

bost(a) ryme

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:13 (nineteen years ago) link

Hey, I'm vindicated!

As a footnote, the football club Athletic Bilbao will only field Basque players and yet, miraculously have won the league a number of times. Real Socieded (based in San Sebastian) will only field Basques or foreignors and not Spanish players. The other Basque teams are not so selective.

Knew I could work a football reference in somehow.

Mikey G (Mikey G), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:15 (nineteen years ago) link

OI! NO FOOTIE ON MY THREAD!

Another weird language: Celtiberian!!!

In Spain, the linguistic position was rather complicated. Much of central and northern Spain was occupied by the Celtic people who we call the Celtiberians. These Celts had writing, and they left behind some written texts, including the famous bronze tablet of Botorrita, which we can read only partly. The Mediterranean coast of Spain (and also a small part of southern France) was occupied by a quite different people who we call the Iberians. The Iberians too had writing, and they have bequeathed us a sizable number of written texts in their Iberian language. For a long time we could make no sense of these, but, in the first half of the 20th century, the Spanish linguist Manuel Gómez Moreno succeeded in figuring out the phonetic values of the characters, and so we can now read Iberian to the extent of being able to pronounce it. However, we still can't make the slightest sense of the texts, because Iberian has turned out to be a completely unknown language: it is certainly not Indo-European, and in fact we are confident that Iberian is not discoverably related to any other known language (including Basque -- see below).

I *knew* there was a Celtic language which was non-I-E!

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:16 (nineteen years ago) link

Catalan is a pretty weird/neat language, especially in terms of punctuatio.n

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:17 (nineteen years ago) link

But I'm pretty sure that Catalan, although pronounced and written strangely, is a Latinate language, is it not?

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:18 (nineteen years ago) link

Isn't Galician based on Celtic too? Or is that covered under the post above? It sounds like a cross between Welsh and Portugese. The pictorial references are also similar to Celtic symbolism.

They play bagpipes too and Galician folk music is hauntingly lovely.

Mikey G (Mikey G), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:19 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah, Catalan's certainly got plenty in common with French and Spanish. But there is a weird Germanic aspect to it too.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:20 (nineteen years ago) link

Galician is apparently also a Latinate - to be precise, a Western Ibero-Romance - language.

How about Galatian, an extinct Celtic language once spoken in Asia Minor (modern Turkey)?

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:22 (nineteen years ago) link

(Languages which are mixtures are generally attributed to whichever mixture is more prevalent. I mean, despite the huge inlux of French and Latinate vocabulary, English is still classified as a Germanic (Specifically Low Germanic) language.)

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:23 (nineteen years ago) link

About Fenno-Ugrian languages: they indeed include Finnish, Estonian (which is quite similar to Finnish), Hungarian (which isn't, though the structure is similar: case endinds instead of pre/postpositions etc.), and some very small minority languages in Russia. The prominent theory is that our ancestors came here from the east, beyond the Volga river. I've never heard of a connection between Korean and the Fenno-Ugrian languages, but the eastern connection makes it possible, I guess. The impact of Sweden on us is quite big anyway (Finland was a part of the Swedish empire for centuries): there are many Finnish words borrowed from Swedish, and Finns don't quite look like Hungarians or Russians, generally we have a fairer skin and hair.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:32 (nineteen years ago) link

Yay! I was waiting for Tuomas to turn up!

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:33 (nineteen years ago) link

check ethnologue
thats pretty much the best resource for langauge family type questions.

catalan is more like a mixture of french and portuguese than spanish, in my experience. not genetically, but just in terms of what it looks like, it sounds like spanish being spoken by people with no teeth, to my ears. its a romance language though. there's no genetic connection to basque, galician or celtic.

ambrose (ambrose), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:38 (nineteen years ago) link

The funny thing about Basque is, at first glance it looks somewhat like Finnish, because of the lack of "short" words (articles and pre/postpositions) and the prominence of k's. But except for the use of case endings, I think they have little in common.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:39 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah, I probably should've counted Portugeuse in there, whoops.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:42 (nineteen years ago) link

Learn us about Finnish verbs, Tuomas.

Dickerson Pike (Dickerson Pike), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:57 (nineteen years ago) link

Oh wait, I was confusing Bulgarian, a South Slavonic language with like 28 cases, with Finnish. Oops.

Dickerson Pike (Dickerson Pike), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 13:59 (nineteen years ago) link

I always thought the Finno-Ugric languages were related to Altaic languages. Is this no longer the case?

yeah, Catalan's certainly got plenty in common with French and Spanish. But there is a weird Germanic aspect to it too.

Originally 'Goatalonia', Catalonia means land of the Goths, the Goths in question being the West Goths known as the Visigohts. All the western romance languages have some germanic influence due to Lombard, Goth, Vandal, Frank, Burgundian, and others invasions.

Michael White (Hereward), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 14:07 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah, although what's cool about Catalan is that the Germanic influence seems more pronounced, at least to me. Didn't know it was called Goatalonia, that's cool. I need to study up on this shit.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 14:10 (nineteen years ago) link

Goatalonia is just about one of the coolest country names ever. Why did they ever dispense with it?

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 14:11 (nineteen years ago) link

According to a Brazilian friend of mine, Galician is pretty much a dialect of Portuguese. She said she could understand Galician pretty easily when she was there.

thing of thing, Wednesday, 28 April 2004 14:19 (nineteen years ago) link

is manx dead ?
how is it related to galiec

anthony, Wednesday, 28 April 2004 14:24 (nineteen years ago) link

Goatalonia is just about one of the coolest country names ever. Why did they ever dispense with it?

'Cause they didn't know how to spell.

Michael White (Hereward), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 14:39 (nineteen years ago) link

One theory puts suggests the stem of Andalusia is from the Vandal occupation. It seems odd to me that such a fleeting invasion would leave that legacy when the Romans, Visigoths and Moors stayed around centuries longer.

Mikey G (Mikey G), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 14:47 (nineteen years ago) link

I've heard that. Place names can be a little inscrutable. The Vandals were brutal enough to imprint their name into the several Western languages, so maybe they just insisted harder than anybody else that the place be named after them. Or maybe they insisted more strenuously because of the tenuous hold on the place.

Michael White (Hereward), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 15:01 (nineteen years ago) link

Perhaps. I still go with the Islamic name. To suggest that prefixing a Vandal name (that somehow survived the Visigoths) with the Arabic definite article is unlikely. I forget what the Arabic word is supposed to represent but it is similar enough to be plausible. When you add the context of Islamic rule in Iberia (and its relative independence from the Caliph in Baghdad), it suggests a new start, a new name.

Mikey G (Mikey G), Wednesday, 28 April 2004 15:10 (nineteen years ago) link

Hey, if it's on the World Service, I take it to be the Queen's English. I'm switching to "globble."

briania, Thursday, 29 April 2004 12:38 (nineteen years ago) link

Actually, back to the original topic, I've reread the chapter of my current book on linguistics which discussed the Finns, and I misinterpreted what it said.

Apparently, Finnish is a phonetically conservative language - words tend to be pronounced the same way for hundreds, even thousands of years.

He did not say that it *was* an Indo-European language, but that it borrowed heavily from its Indo-European neighbours. Recently borrowed words were phonetically intact Medieval Swedish, while older words were phonetically intact Old Norse, meaning that the really old borrowings can be counted on to provide likely examples of the original proto-Germanic branch of Indo-European. (Which produced German, Scandinavian languages and English.)

Hence, a non-I-E could provide examples of an ancient and now lost branch of Indo-European!

Finns! Conservative! Well I never!

(No one likes my Busted analogy, boo hoo. Well, it took 92 posts before there was a fart joke! I was good!)

Super-Kate (kate), Thursday, 29 April 2004 12:52 (nineteen years ago) link

I can only imagine a Scottish presenter pronouncing it "globbal". As I say, there is no such thing as the "Queen's English" - it's a myth. And BBC English ain't much better - they've decided that it's "an hotel" - not "a hotel". What rollocks.

dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 29 April 2004 13:19 (nineteen years ago) link

Oh dear lord, I am NEVER going into that bookshop by ULU Ever. Again. I went there cause I thought they would have good, academic quality books on linguistics. And I came out having spent WAY too much money and bought way too many books. On linguistics.

I looked at Sassaure (or however you spell his name) and decided that it looked very dry and academic and slightly too proto-post-modern for me, and then I saw... THE ATLAS OF LANGUAGES which had colour glossy pictures and maps and diagrammes and shaded map diagrammes which showed every language and language family in the world mapped in full colour glossy images of the continents and I fell in love with it before looking at the price, ouch.

I also got Tore Janson's "Speak" and yet another History Of English Words (I am such a sucker for the maps and diagrammes, I am...)

Oh, but this history of English words has a wonderful diagramme of swearing from 1350 to 1909. Odsbodikins!

Super-Kate (kate), Thursday, 29 April 2004 14:54 (nineteen years ago) link

man, i never read the books they prescribed me on my course but Kate's last post made me want to go out and get some more! If anyone wants some linguistics/language books I am selling them dirty cheap.

dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 29 April 2004 15:00 (nineteen years ago) link

I also got Tore Janson's "Speak"

This is a great little book. I was looking for my copy yesterday so that I could contribute to this thread without getting things wrong.

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 29 April 2004 15:02 (nineteen years ago) link

man, i never read the books they prescribed me on my course but Kate's last post made me want to go out and get some more! If anyone wants some linguistics/language books I am selling them dirty cheap.
-- dog latin (doglati...), April 29th, 2004.

did you have to read "The Language Instinct" that one was good.....other than that, I didn't pay much attention to my classes. Grammar trees are lame.

waxyjax (waxyjax), Thursday, 29 April 2004 17:35 (nineteen years ago) link

Ah, grammar trees. If my aborted linguistics degree had been half as good as this thread, maybe I wouldn't have switched out after all.

the krza (krza), Thursday, 29 April 2004 18:12 (nineteen years ago) link

Maybe I should have followed my 9th Grade Latin-teaching nun's advice and become a linguist. My classes would have been fun!

(My big atlas of languages has thrown up about half a dozen strange, displaced, languages unrelated to the ones around them. There seems to be one on every continent! Except two near Japan!)

Super-Kate (kate), Thursday, 29 April 2004 18:29 (nineteen years ago) link

I thought it'd be fun, Kate, but I don't think linguists these days are so hot on historical linguistics (at least my school's department wasn't), which to me is the most fascinating.

the krza (krza), Thursday, 29 April 2004 18:35 (nineteen years ago) link

Also, as for isolates, according to this, it seems like there's an inordinate number in the Americas. It kind of makes sense, given the long migration, separations due to ice ages, and so forth, but I don't think that completely explains it. Under those circumstances, you'd still expect to see at least some similarity.

the krza (krza), Thursday, 29 April 2004 18:43 (nineteen years ago) link

I seem to remember being told that California's native population had a linguistic variety as great as any similarly sized region on earth.

Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 29 April 2004 18:46 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah, i think everyone gets into linguistics because the historical, anthropological and sociological aspects are so fascinating....then they get suckered into analyzing "deep structures" and other chomskyan ideas...which in a broad sense were revolutionary discoveries, but in the classroom were incredibly boring.

waxyjax (waxyjax), Thursday, 29 April 2004 19:06 (nineteen years ago) link

well, that's what happened to me anyway waxyjax - i kind of regret not doing anthropology in many ways.

dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 29 April 2004 23:08 (nineteen years ago) link

It was semantics that killed it for me, but I'd had my share of "deep structures," sentence trees and the like by that point, too. Phonetics was really interesting, but that's probably because so much of the historical work is based on it in a way.

the krza (krza), Thursday, 29 April 2004 23:40 (nineteen years ago) link

even though it is a slavic language ... and, hence, indo-european (and outside of this thread's purview) ... there are still about 100K people in the middle of the former east germany who speak sorbian (or wendish). sorbian is a western slavic language (more akin to polish or czech, as opposed to russian or serbo-croatian), and even though there are barely 100K sorbs there are at least TWO sorbian dialects -- east sorbian and west sorbian!

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 30 April 2004 01:20 (nineteen years ago) link

Cool! I didn't realize any other language had the Polish ³, but there it is. Weirdly, in Sorbian they call themselves "Serbs." I wonder if this has a similar meaning to the Serbian "Serb"...

the krza (krza), Friday, 30 April 2004 02:07 (nineteen years ago) link

um, that ³ should be the Polish (and Sorbian, I guess) crossed l

the krza (krza), Friday, 30 April 2004 02:08 (nineteen years ago) link

The Great Vowel Shift probably didn't have a proximate cause. It can be explained by the fact that languages exist in a state of flux. Drastic changes like the GVS are the rule for language, not the exception.

I'm not sure I'd want to say there is any current vowel shift happening in English on par with the Great Vowel Shift. That took about two hundred years and involved a major reshuffling of vowels. Due to widespread literacy and a huge corpus of English texts, modern English speakers have a much stronger concept of our language as being something that exists by itself independent of what people actually speak. This acts as a check against the natural tendency of our language to undergo changes. The 15th and 16th centuries were much less literate. Language has been around a lot longer than writing so the effect of writing on language change isn't something I'd call natural but it's there.

For the past several decades, we have had standarising (or de-standarising as the case may be) accents beamed directly into our homes by the media. This *is* going to change our accents.

Be careful here... the research I've seen about the effect of TV, radio and film on dialects finds it has almost zero impact. Counterintuitive yes but language quite often is.

What books are you reading, Kate?

(the krza)I thought it'd be fun, Kate, but I don't think linguists these days are so hot on historical linguistics (at least my school's department wasn't), which to me is the most fascinating.

I think it depends on where you're studying. At the University of Texas there wasn't a huge emphasis on syntax and semantics. I loved historical, and a big thing in linguistics today is documenting the world's languages before a lot of them go away, and to do that properly you need a pretty good handle on phonology, phonetics, and how languages change.

fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Friday, 30 April 2004 02:14 (nineteen years ago) link

twelve years pass...

What the fuck?

Larry 'Leg' Smith (Tom D.), Thursday, 19 May 2016 21:38 (seven years ago) link

The Basque people fished in north Atlantic waters for many, many centuries and may have been the first group to systematically fish for cod and herring off the Newfoundland coast, but they didn't share this information with other groups because of its commercial value. Iceland was probably a good place to do ship repairs and to resupply while out on fishing expeditions.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, 19 May 2016 21:45 (seven years ago) link

The phrases all sound like trading phrases, which makes sense.

www.ramenclassaction.com (man alive), Friday, 20 May 2016 01:46 (seven years ago) link

three years pass...

In many parts of rural northern England, a system of counting sheep based on ancient Brittonic persisted until relatively recently. In the Dales, 1-10 was yain, tain, edderoa, peddero, pitts, tayter, leter, overro, coverro, dix (or variants thereof). https://t.co/F0ZjxB9pXG

— History of Leeds | James Rhodes (@rh0desy) July 9, 2019

calzino, Tuesday, 9 July 2019 22:10 (four years ago) link

See also: Jake Thackray - Molly Metcalfe

https://youtu.be/TiXINuf5nbI

ShariVari, Tuesday, 9 July 2019 22:22 (four years ago) link

Yeah, that's pretty well known - and not confined to Yorkshire by any means.

Orpheus Knutt (Tom D.), Tuesday, 9 July 2019 22:33 (four years ago) link

My immediate thought was Jake Thackray, that's how I knew about this. I really like the song, too.

emil.y, Tuesday, 9 July 2019 22:34 (four years ago) link

... or the North... or England...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yan_Tan_Tethera

Orpheus Knutt (Tom D.), Tuesday, 9 July 2019 22:35 (four years ago) link

a Thackray wormhole on you tube is a very good hour spent.

calzino, Tuesday, 9 July 2019 23:03 (four years ago) link

Jake was The Man.

Orpheus Knutt (Tom D.), Tuesday, 9 July 2019 23:22 (four years ago) link

Beautiful song. I never knew there were so many variants of Yan Tan Tether Mether (the version I knew, which according to the wiki, turns out to be the Swaledale variant!).

Uptown VONC (Le Bateau Ivre), Wednesday, 10 July 2019 10:20 (four years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.