an open letter to the mods from Whiney G. Weingarten

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (462 of them)

the length of these bans is straight ridiculous

J0rdan S., Thursday, 4 November 2010 05:02 (ten years ago) link

Uh yknow pretty sure nothing I've said on this thread is up to par snarkwise with repeatedly talking about how the mods love rape jokes so whatever dude.

O_o-O_0-o_O (jjjusten), Thursday, 4 November 2010 05:03 (ten years ago) link

do THE MODS LOVE RAPE JOKES?

ice cr?m, Thursday, 4 November 2010 05:03 (ten years ago) link

so this is 27 days because that's all the system will allow? what happened to three day temp bans?

J0rdan S., Thursday, 4 November 2010 05:08 (ten years ago) link

do THE MODS LOVE RAPE JOKES?

no

so this is 27 days because that's all the system will allow? what happened to three day temp bans?

temp bans are automatically made longer by the system each time

disco stfu (electricsound), Thursday, 4 November 2010 05:09 (ten years ago) link

Wow jhosh yknow it actually really bums me out that we used to get along on this site but then I became a mod and now you seem to go out of your way to be a dick to me.

O_o-O_0-o_O (jjjusten), Thursday, 4 November 2010 05:10 (ten years ago) link

oh xp

J0rdan S., Thursday, 4 November 2010 05:10 (ten years ago) link

jj

1. i do like you and i reget and apologize for any previous excessively feeling hurting behavior, but that was clearly an hilarious text formatting based joke

2. if you dont want people to give you shit re being a mod, just dont be a mod, easy

ice cr?m, Thursday, 4 November 2010 05:15 (ten years ago) link

anyway imo this is a ridiculous ban but whatever

J0rdan S., Thursday, 4 November 2010 05:15 (ten years ago) link

i feel like unperson should be banned for even being collateral damage in this dust up

ban unperson

J0rdan S., Thursday, 4 November 2010 05:16 (ten years ago) link

come unpeople now, smile on your brother

51 tyson (crüt), Thursday, 4 November 2010 05:34 (ten years ago) link

xp - as mod of 1p3 you can ban ph1l from that board - granted he doesn't post there - but maybe it'd make you feel better?

sarahel, Thursday, 4 November 2010 06:02 (ten years ago) link

if he posted on 1p3 i would ban him

J0rdan S., Thursday, 4 November 2010 06:04 (ten years ago) link

i.e. i banned princess tamtam

J0rdan S., Thursday, 4 November 2010 06:04 (ten years ago) link

could you pretend to post as him and then ban him?

sarahel, Thursday, 4 November 2010 06:05 (ten years ago) link

Yeah this is an awesome direction to take this thread

O_o-O_0-o_O (jjjusten), Thursday, 4 November 2010 06:12 (ten years ago) link

it was going so well before

51 tyson (crüt), Thursday, 4 November 2010 06:12 (ten years ago) link

in the interest of science, can't he just be banned for three days?

sarahel, Thursday, 4 November 2010 06:13 (ten years ago) link

three days is a pretty limp, non-threatening ban tbh

51 tyson (crüt), Thursday, 4 November 2010 06:14 (ten years ago) link

yeah but Whiney likes indie rock womanhood, doesn't he?

sarahel, Thursday, 4 November 2010 06:15 (ten years ago) link

i have irl fondness for whiney and take no pleasure in sharing this, but y'all should be aware (and whiney has already been made aware) that dude is perched right at 51 and he is likely going to be taking a three month ban extremely shortly so this is all kind of a moot point

a pun based on a popular ilx meme (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 4 November 2010 06:28 (ten years ago) link

wait, why would he be taking a 3 month ban?

sarahel, Thursday, 4 November 2010 06:36 (ten years ago) link

102 = 3 month

J0rdan S., Thursday, 4 November 2010 06:38 (ten years ago) link

but Kate got 102'ed and got let back in 30 days!

sarahel, Thursday, 4 November 2010 06:38 (ten years ago) link

why don't captainlorax's bans get progressively longer ;)

buzza, Thursday, 4 November 2010 06:39 (ten years ago) link

why are you trying to get rid of the capn

max, Thursday, 4 November 2010 06:39 (ten years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyF5J7au1jE

buzza, Thursday, 4 November 2010 06:41 (ten years ago) link

^^ unperson's a big fan of the Railroad

sarahel, Thursday, 4 November 2010 06:41 (ten years ago) link

but Kate got 102'ed and got let back in 30 days!

― sarahel, Thursday, November 4, 2010 1:38 AM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark

for real? *scratches chin*

also i don't think jagger was gone for three

J0rdan S., Thursday, 4 November 2010 06:43 (ten years ago) link

they're a colombian band
xpost

buzza, Thursday, 4 November 2010 06:43 (ten years ago) link

nah LJ only got another 30 - but he's kinda the ilx equivalent of a made guy imo

sarahel, Thursday, 4 November 2010 06:43 (ten years ago) link

guys, i don't keep up with the ban bylaws; all I'm saying is that he's at 51. Whatever the stand-in-the-corner time is with that.

a pun based on a popular ilx meme (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 4 November 2010 06:44 (ten years ago) link

guys, i don't keep up with the ban bylaws; all I'm saying is that he's at 51. Whatever the stand-in-the-corner time is with that.

― a pun based on a popular ilx meme (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, November 3, 2010 11:44 PM (2 seconds ago)

you had me worried there - this could seriously derail our ultra-scientific study

sarahel, Thursday, 4 November 2010 06:45 (ten years ago) link

it's also convenient that whiney got banned on the cusp of 51 so when he comes back from his 27 (lol) day ban he'll post for like 2 days & then get a 30 day

J0rdan S., Thursday, 4 November 2010 06:49 (ten years ago) link

Well except for the fact that some of his sbs would expire and he'd be less likely to accrue new ones but feel free to roll on w/yer none dare call it a conspiracy vibe

O_o-O_0-o_O (jjjusten), Thursday, 4 November 2010 07:14 (ten years ago) link

ha, i'm not saying it's a conspiracy! just that if he was that close to being sb'd maybe just wait until he gets sb'd or just incur his sb on this ban but whatever idk about the mechanization of the sb

J0rdan S., Thursday, 4 November 2010 07:17 (ten years ago) link

Sorry then, misread how u meant convenient.

O_o-O_0-o_O (jjjusten), Thursday, 4 November 2010 07:24 (ten years ago) link

but j0rdan, what would happen if Dan went back on his word and unbanned Whiney? I mean, wouldn't that make mods look weak or soft or something?

sarahel, Thursday, 4 November 2010 07:58 (ten years ago) link

I have learned absolutely nothing from this experience and when I return in 27 days, I will continue to post as I always have

kind of loling at the idea that whiney would have magically 'reformed' if he had been 30 day'd by via the more traditional route

dayo, Thursday, 4 November 2010 08:15 (ten years ago) link

I mean, it's clear that the dudes is going down the road of cankles recidivism and will never change. one hug it out thread does not a reform make

dayo, Thursday, 4 November 2010 08:17 (ten years ago) link

who is this "ph1l" btw

Introducing the Hardline According to King Boy Pato (King Boy Pato), Thursday, 4 November 2010 08:39 (ten years ago) link

fr33m4n

Ain't Gonna Play "Fist City" (sic), Thursday, 4 November 2010 08:47 (ten years ago) link

i'm backin dp/jj re-election ticket in 2012 tbh, even though i'm always in the press enclosure watching them like a hawk

cant believe you sb'd me for that (darraghmac), Thursday, 4 November 2010 10:00 (ten years ago) link

Whiney was actually on 49 SBs even before that ban and as a result of that thread has since gone up to 52, so nature would have taken its course anyway and the end result would have been much the same. Except without this sense of perceived persecution and Sarahel meta-concern trolling.

Pretty sure Whiney would have come back with an identical posting voice whatever happened. He doesn't seem to want to post in any other way.

I have to lol that at least four of the people attacking this ban clicked the SB button themselves for Whiney. I know it's not exactly the same but still.

Matt DC, Thursday, 4 November 2010 10:07 (ten years ago) link

peoples got a right to know matt, even if sarahel's usually the first to ask. That's why, imho, there's a comments field in the admin log.

cant believe you sb'd me for that (darraghmac), Thursday, 4 November 2010 10:10 (ten years ago) link

Well actually what Sarahel did was revive this thread to say the temp ban was harsh and THEN go and read the Rollins thread to find out why he was tempbanned. Disingenuous as hell.

Matt DC, Thursday, 4 November 2010 10:15 (ten years ago) link

well tbh i skimmed rollins thread and still aint sure but i'm a concepts not a details man

cant believe you sb'd me for that (darraghmac), Thursday, 4 November 2010 10:19 (ten years ago) link

ice cr?m killin it itt tbh, these things need to be treated with the appropriate levity

cant believe you sb'd me for that (darraghmac), Thursday, 4 November 2010 10:20 (ten years ago) link

^ sb

caek, Thursday, 4 November 2010 10:20 (ten years ago) link

h8 u

cant believe you sb'd me for that (darraghmac), Thursday, 4 November 2010 10:24 (ten years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.