look, ok this is the party I visited: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Party_of_Great_Britain
and this is the (MUCH bigger) one you're probably weary of: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Party_(England_and_Wales)
but yeah today I rolled with the Small Party of Good Boys :D
― acoleuthic, Friday, 15 October 2010 23:12 (thirteen years ago) link
can we just have a devoted 'l0u1s jagg3r joins trot sect' thread?
― ENRRQ (history mayne), Friday, 15 October 2010 23:17 (thirteen years ago) link
well u really seem to have struck gold here loujag i look forward to it continuing in as successful a manner for many years.
seamus coleman looks like the real answer to lyfe's tough questions, tbh
― cant believe you sb'd me for that (darraghmac), Friday, 15 October 2010 23:28 (thirteen years ago) link
like, as far as he's concerned there's enough iniquity in the world for right-minded people to want a different way of living, outside the restrictive right-left democratic battlefield, without them being unrewarded beggars - although i'd be interested to know which branch of the left DOES think thatnot that this is really left-wing or any wing at all - it's dependent on a system with positions of responsibility but no outright leadership
not that this is really left-wing or any wing at all - it's dependent on a system with positions of responsibility but no outright leadership
you sound addled, or will to them. 'not that this is really left-wing'... dude. get a freakin' grip.
idk if i were young and ambitious and had nothing to do and had the right background -- as you do, lj -- i'd get in on the labour party.
― ENRRQ (history mayne), Friday, 15 October 2010 23:34 (thirteen years ago) link
the labour party has been receding REALLY damn fast from what I want it to be (lol manifesto upthread)
― acoleuthic, Friday, 15 October 2010 23:36 (thirteen years ago) link
There is, to be sure, a connection with the autonomy of the individual. By virtue of the displacement into the domain of the aesthetic, however, the concept of autonomy, which is essentially moral, is completely changed, and all such distinctions are dissolved. In every romantic, we can find examples of anarchistic self-confidence as well as an excessive need for sociability. He is just as easilymoved by altruistic feelings, by pity and sympathy, as by presumptuous snobbery.But all this has nothing to do with either autonomy or heteronomy, and it moves entirely within the sphere of romantic subjectivity. An emotion that does not transcend the limits of the subjective cannot be the foundation of a community. The intoxication of sociability is not a basis of a lasting associationIrony and intrigue are not points of social crystallization; and no societal order can be established on thebasis of the need, not to be alone, but rather to be suspended in the dynamic of an animated conversation..............Viewed romantically, injustice is only a dissonance that is aesthetically resolved "in a sacredmusic, an endless feeling of the higher life." This is not spoken in a metaphorical sense, but rather in the only category that is accessible to the experience of the romantic. That is why there is neither a romantic law nor a romantic ethics, just as it would be confused to speak of a lyrical oa musical ethics. There is a political romanticism in the same sense that there is a political lyric.
But all this has nothing to do with either autonomy or heteronomy, and it moves entirely within the sphere of romantic subjectivity. An emotion that does not transcend the limits of the subjective cannot be the foundation of a community. The intoxication of sociability is not a basis of a lasting associationIrony and intrigue are not points of social crystallization; and no societal order can be established on thebasis of the need, not to be alone, but rather to be suspended in the dynamic of an animated conversation....
..........Viewed romantically, injustice is only a dissonance that is aesthetically resolved "in a sacredmusic, an endless feeling of the higher life." This is not spoken in a metaphorical sense, but rather in the only category that is accessible to the experience of the romantic. That is why there is neither a romantic law nor a romantic ethics, just as it would be confused to speak of a lyrical oa musical ethics. There is a political romanticism in the same sense that there is a political lyric.
that's cribbed from carl schmitt's 'political romanticism', his attempted diagnosis of a political-affective disposition among ppl he didn't like
he was a terrible person but i think he might have been onto something
― ilxinho (nakhchivan), Friday, 15 October 2010 23:42 (thirteen years ago) link
most highbrow zing ever :D
also you and I need to talk abt political shiz IRL
― acoleuthic, Friday, 15 October 2010 23:46 (thirteen years ago) link
not that I'd have anything to teach you :(
― acoleuthic, Friday, 15 October 2010 23:47 (thirteen years ago) link
just that as one of ilx's most prolific posters, you are seldom seen on the politics threads (i think?)
and judging by yr posts on the nij thread, you have a great reservoir of feeling for injustice etc, maybe a nascent enrapturement w/ ~politics~ itself, preceding any variety thereof, tho obviously trot splinter groups have always done a roaring trade among entrylevs
i dunno enough about politics itself, but i suspect it's deathly as hell, whether the clegg-eichmann adjudants, or the more sepulchral osborne-mugabe types
― ilxinho (nakhchivan), Saturday, 16 October 2010 00:08 (thirteen years ago) link
god i sound pretty fucking sure of myself for someone with none of the answers
wd be up for a chairman mao ilx reading group tho
― ilxinho (nakhchivan), Saturday, 16 October 2010 00:10 (thirteen years ago) link
oh, socialists. they have an answer for everything.
unlike them however, we have the RIGHT answers for everything.
― Brother Spartacus (banaka), Saturday, 16 October 2010 01:21 (thirteen years ago) link
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v165/noodle_vague/killer-robot.jpg
― I'm the type of ilxor that SBuilt to last (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 16 October 2010 01:24 (thirteen years ago) link
we are curious: how is that robot holding the gun? are those tubes vacuum-powered?
― Brother Spartacus (banaka), Saturday, 16 October 2010 01:31 (thirteen years ago) link
I don't really bother with the politics threads because I'd get laughed off them. I know a little more than it first appears. I was genuinely pleasantly surprised with how cool this HQ and its inhabitant were and I'm by no means a completely impressionable (quite QUITE the opposite) - the whole shebang was really appealing and I say this as someone who's been repulsed by virtually every political faction he's known (aforementioned two ghastly camps indeed).
Your tone is a teeny bit patronising but I'll let it pass as you clearly DO know what yr talking about. But I'm not QUITE entrylev - I'm just really, really fucking antagonistic towards mainstream political parties and the mainstream media and this combined with my highly excitable conversational style means I'm frequently found with my pants around my ankles.
Have been given a free copy of the academic writings of Marx and an overview of socialism. Will devour. I have not disengaged skepticism, rest assured. Perhaps this isn't for me either. But I'm fucked if I know what else is.
― acoleuthic, Saturday, 16 October 2010 01:45 (thirteen years ago) link
"a completely impressionable" fuck it's time for bed isn't it
― acoleuthic, Saturday, 16 October 2010 01:49 (thirteen years ago) link
[excuse me for any incoherence / completely missing points, I am somewhat inebriated] Louis are you familiar with the theory of accelerationism? It's basically the idea that capitalism allowed to run wild will tear itself apart and as such that's what 'we' communists/socialists should do. To me it's an essentially awful idea (if we do that then capitalism will certainly end, but only with humanity as a whole), but if you're feeling theory-inclined then it may have points of interest based on what you're saying here.
― Antoine Bugleboy (Merdeyeux), Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:05 (thirteen years ago) link
not really heard that. this is more the theory that without violence the world's people will reject by consensus the capitalist ethos. very hard to imagine, but compelling. will possibly require SIGNS of the Great Collapse - or at least, enough evidence that it's imminent, before it actually happens.
― acoleuthic, Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:08 (thirteen years ago) link
ah that's something I accept, although by that point I'm sure it will be too late. As much as I'd like to believe it, I'm an utter pessimist about serious positive revolution (fuck a Badiou and such), and so have no fundamental political beliefs beyond "we're fucked", which isn't the best place to be.
― Antoine Bugleboy (Merdeyeux), Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:14 (thirteen years ago) link
I dunno if I really buy the idea that the transition to socialism would ever come about through, like, a collective drift leftwards in the opinions of a voting public -- feels like conscious 'political identifications' are still too intimately tied to class positions and ways of life for such a thing to happen without the kind of massive economic hardship that would have people taking the revolution into their own hands... and then u probably just end up with fascism :(
― rmde and dangerous (bernard snowy), Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:20 (thirteen years ago) link
that's why organization and agitation starts pre-opening-of-the-seals
― some droopy HOOS in makeup (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:22 (thirteen years ago) link
the clock comma it is ticking
― some droopy HOOS in makeup (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:23 (thirteen years ago) link
btw no joke I have just been reading exit mundi again
money's on....um...umm...
― acoleuthic, Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:26 (thirteen years ago) link
would be pretty cool if they all marvellously coalesced in one moment.
― Antoine Bugleboy (Merdeyeux), Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:27 (thirteen years ago) link
wait don't pull the plug yet I wanna check out this fucking enormous tsunami while the meteor streaks across the sky and a mushroom cloud ascends
― acoleuthic, Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:29 (thirteen years ago) link
just really, really fucking antagonistic towards mainstream political parties and the mainstream media
they don't get a lot of love round here tho! a really enthusiastic ED4LYFE labourite would be an interesting addition to dem not..... (assuming tories and libs wd get chased off pretty quickly)
― ilxinho (nakhchivan), Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:30 (thirteen years ago) link
wouldn't it be funny if the world ended now
I'd have a split-second of really wishing I'd not decided to be platonic friends with that girl after all, at least for toni...
― acoleuthic, Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:31 (thirteen years ago) link
xpost to HOOS: right... I'm just saying, the idea of "rejecting by consensus the capitalist ethos", while nice and certainly not implausible, is basically an empty gesture outside the context of a democratic system that specifically attaches value to consensus, which system as it presently exists is so thoroughly intertwined with/compromised by capitalism that I can't really imagine how it would retain its legitimacy and control during the period where such a consensus is emerging -- and if democracy has collapsed by the time everyone finally agrees that capitalism sux, then you're sort of back to square 1
― rmde and dangerous (bernard snowy), Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:32 (thirteen years ago) link
ok nakhchivan maybe my dilettantish charms will invigorate the british politics thread and spur it to yet greater heights of fulminating discontent
― acoleuthic, Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:32 (thirteen years ago) link
bernard snowy I think localised consensus would have to surrogate for a wider global socialism in the early stages, I'm talking people literally together in a barn wondering what the fuck the world is coming to, raising their hands to vote
― acoleuthic, Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:34 (thirteen years ago) link
we could be doing with a bitter LibDem, although the excuse-making LibDem would be even more fun.
I am not entirely opposed to Zizek / Badiou / etc in their particular revolutionary thoughts, besides the fact that they're at heart disgusting fascists, which I'm not very down with. Therefore I resort to the 'we're fucked' line of thinking.
― Antoine Bugleboy (Merdeyeux), Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:38 (thirteen years ago) link
t's basically the idea that capitalism allowed to run wild will tear itself apart and as such that's what 'we' communists/socialists should do
that is, do nothing, tho capitalism will probably right itself for the time being, as acephalic world-devouring colossi are wont to do
srsly tho i've read the blogs on acclrtnsm, and it's a huge improvement on most leftism cuz it's ~avowedly~ fanciful and quietistic
― ilxinho (nakhchivan), Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:40 (thirteen years ago) link
hahaha the group whose HQ I stormed today subscribe to something called 'impossibilism' which is kinda awesomely apt
― acoleuthic, Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:41 (thirteen years ago) link
ok, lol
― ilxinho (nakhchivan), Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:43 (thirteen years ago) link
de leon!! xp
― some droopy HOOS in makeup (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:43 (thirteen years ago) link
i did not know people still fucked w/dude
xposts to nakh ya that sounds about right. I don't know how much credit we can give to something for being 'interesting' when it's also utterly and dangerously wrong, but hey. I'm pretty lazy, I'm all for things that don't involve any effort.
― Antoine Bugleboy (Merdeyeux), Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:44 (thirteen years ago) link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impossibilism
cornerstone of the 100-strong buncha tricksy british dudes whose internationalist movements appeal so
― acoleuthic, Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:45 (thirteen years ago) link
sometimes in moments of difficulty, when the true flame of the dialectic offers no hope, i turn to the sky and ask, 'what would pol pot do?'
― ilxinho (nakhchivan), Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:46 (thirteen years ago) link
so anyway why are you guys still awake.
― Antoine Bugleboy (Merdeyeux), Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:48 (thirteen years ago) link
Socialist Party of Great BritainLeader noneFounded 1904Headquarters Clapham, LondonIdeology Impossibilism
― ilxinho (nakhchivan), Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:48 (thirteen years ago) link
See also
Possibilism
irl lol
― some droopy HOOS in makeup (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:48 (thirteen years ago) link
now you see why I like it so much xp also lolling
― acoleuthic, Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:49 (thirteen years ago) link
Socialist Party of Great BritainLeader noneLJFounded 1904Headquarters Clapham, LondonIdeology Impossibilism
― ilxinho (nakhchivan), Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:49 (thirteen years ago) link
even a "localized consensus" against capitalism is only really progressive if it's also a consensus around some concrete positive program or organization... seems less important to me that everyone be on the same page about who the enemy is and why shit is so fucked than that they agree on WHAT IS TO BE DONE, i.e. finding new egalitarian methods to organize a relatively open collective existence outside of the capitalist system
― rmde and dangerous (bernard snowy), Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:50 (thirteen years ago) link
btw the SPGB has made a short film! and here it is (first US stream works): http://socialist-tv.com/
will watch it tomorrow and report back
nakhchivan the idea of a leader is ttly anathema to this crowd!! although maybe they just haven't met the *right* leader yet
― acoleuthic, Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:51 (thirteen years ago) link
that's what i'm saying
― ilxinho (nakhchivan), Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:51 (thirteen years ago) link
like I would gladly let some hippie burnout or obama voter eat some of my vegetables and make me shoes out of hemp -- I just wouldn't trust them with the keys to my tank
― rmde and dangerous (bernard snowy), Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:52 (thirteen years ago) link
r u suggestin that LJ = Stalin 4 the Skins era?
― Antoine Bugleboy (Merdeyeux), Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:52 (thirteen years ago) link
(to nakhchivan)
WHAT IS TO BE DONE, i.e. finding new egalitarian methods to organize a relatively open collective existence outside of the capitalist system
this is pretty much 95% of what this guy discussed - each infrastructural and governing system would be run differently by a committee of field experts I think - gift economy, surplusses offered to other regions, etc etc
military to be reduced and converted to a troubleshooting natural disaster cracksquad
― acoleuthic, Saturday, 16 October 2010 02:54 (thirteen years ago) link
and this is how Cambridge educated ilx poster got recruited by MI6?
― Thus Spoke Darraghustra (Oor Neechy), Tuesday, 13 August 2019 15:20 (four years ago) link
erm I forgot to post the link I was reviving the thread for.
http://www.mangalmedia.net/english//is-genocide-denial-anti-imperialist-now-how-tankies-are-taking-over-leftbook-and-the-london-student-scene
― Thus Spoke Darraghustra (Oor Neechy), Tuesday, 13 August 2019 20:25 (four years ago) link
Later we all go to The Lexington, there’s a pub quiz where the team with the funniest name wins a bag of Doritos. When the names are handed in, the man with the microphone is astounded that 6 out of 10 are called Crimea River. It’s weird and almost as disappointing as the Doritos being fucking Cool Original.
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 13 August 2019 20:49 (four years ago) link
the least interesting part to quote
― Thus Spoke Darraghustra (Oor Neechy), Tuesday, 13 August 2019 21:32 (four years ago) link
drag him neech
― mark s, Tuesday, 13 August 2019 21:34 (four years ago) link
what did you think of the article, Mark? Have you encountered many tankies in London?I've never met one irl and have only seen some due to a certain non-ilxor FB friends wall where he argues with them (you know who I mean)
― Thus Spoke Darraghustra (Oor Neechy), Tuesday, 13 August 2019 21:49 (four years ago) link
haven't read it yet, the FB extract didn't look very convincing
― mark s, Tuesday, 13 August 2019 21:53 (four years ago) link
Maybe I picked the least interesting part too ;)
― Thus Spoke Darraghustra (Oor Neechy), Tuesday, 13 August 2019 21:59 (four years ago) link
Also btw I had no idea LJ used to/still is? a trot
― Thus Spoke Darraghustra (Oor Neechy), Tuesday, 13 August 2019 22:00 (four years ago) link
not sure he's into reds, but ruthless amoral pols are definitely his thing:p
― calzino, Tuesday, 13 August 2019 22:11 (four years ago) link
Has anyone told him?
― Euripedes' Trousers (Tom D.), Tuesday, 13 August 2019 22:13 (four years ago) link
No need. He knows.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 13 August 2019 22:29 (four years ago) link
LJ do you still have the trots?
― Thus Spoke Darraghustra (Oor Neechy), Tuesday, 13 August 2019 22:47 (four years ago) link