taking sides: single, childless men in their mid-thirties vs single, childless women in their mid-thirties

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (229 of them)
Yes it makes sense to the degree that I am not sure why I even posted. Its the bit that keeps the - well its unlikely that I will have kids so therefore best enjoy what I'm doing argument going.

Pete (Pete), Friday, 7 April 2006 14:04 (eighteen years ago) link

I personally am entirely in favour of randomising children, every baby should be given to the next chronological mother to birth.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 7 April 2006 14:18 (eighteen years ago) link

in a few years everyone will be downloading iKids anyway, set to Shuffle.

Konal Doddz (blueski), Friday, 7 April 2006 14:21 (eighteen years ago) link

"The International Committee for Population Control, in association with Nintendogs..."

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 7 April 2006 14:25 (eighteen years ago) link

[Dave and Kevin stand side-by-side in front of a suburban house, with a young boy next to Kevin. We see the scene through a television camera, as a press conference takes place.]
Dave: We've called this press conference today to announce publicly what is already a growing rumor in the community - that we are disappointed both in our child and in the experience of parenting. Now, we feel a certain sense of responsibility in that when our baby was born, we were often heard to encourage other couples to have children, describing it as, and I quote, "the most incredible experience in the world." We would now like to retract that statement, and for all those who have only recently been stirred to conceive, we offer a word of advice - don't.

Scott: Are you gonna get rid of the child?

Dave: No, no, of course not. We're just gonna go one with our lives, but openly and honestly. Thank you.

[Dave, Kevin, and the boy turn and go into the house. As they do, the reporters yell questions and take pictures, and Dave and Kevin mutter replies back.]

Scott: Tommy! A little smile there, Tommy?

Dave: [quietly] C'mon, Tommy.

Kevin: No more photos, please.

Scott: Tommy! Can you smile still, Tommy? Do they treat you well?

Dave: [muttering] Treating him very well.

Scott: Just let me just see the kid, just one little picture.

Kevin: You've had enough.

[Dave, Kevin, and the boy go into the house, closing the storm door behind them. Scott follows them up the steps and squats, peering through the door into the house.]

Scott: Hey c'mon, c'mon, c'mon, hey Tommy? Whoa, what's that, that's just a black and white TV in there! Hey Tommy!

Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 7 April 2006 14:28 (eighteen years ago) link

iPop and iMom

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 7 April 2006 14:44 (eighteen years ago) link

SCWITMT>SCMITMT obv

Tim (Tim), Friday, 7 April 2006 14:51 (eighteen years ago) link

Hmm I read a sci-fi story not that long ago about midwestern farm-y parents going into the city to what appears to be a gay pick-up bar...only they're trying to find a SON, to replace the one they drove away. And all the unattached kids know they're in demand, that they have the edge, so they go to bars like this one and parlay their way into families.

Laurel (Laurel), Friday, 7 April 2006 14:53 (eighteen years ago) link

(Hey L! Did you get my mail?)

Tim (Tim), Friday, 7 April 2006 14:58 (eighteen years ago) link

(I did!! Schedule looks good, my sofa free as always. Will find a way to put you in touch w/ our Nashville correspondent. Much love,)

Laurel (Laurel), Friday, 7 April 2006 15:02 (eighteen years ago) link

Hooray! Sorry for interrupting, everyone.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 7 April 2006 15:06 (eighteen years ago) link

You're getting in between me and Barry's glowering: never a good idea.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 7 April 2006 15:09 (eighteen years ago) link

Please, Andrew -- glower away.

Laurel (Laurel), Friday, 7 April 2006 15:09 (eighteen years ago) link

I thought you were smouldering, but I've never been very good at working out that sort of thing.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 7 April 2006 15:13 (eighteen years ago) link

less glower more....um, Bauer?

Konal Doddz (blueski), Friday, 7 April 2006 15:14 (eighteen years ago) link

I haven't glowered for howers.

Markelby (Mark C), Friday, 7 April 2006 15:16 (eighteen years ago) link

the best thing about having an adopted kid would be that if they acted up you could always threaten to go and exchange them.

at least until they were thirteen or so, the threat would probably seem pretty plausible.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 7 April 2006 15:23 (eighteen years ago) link

I've never thought of myself as the type who wanted kids. I've always wanted to spend my time and money on education/travel/fun etc and didn't see how a kid would fit into that. This is the selfish part of me putting myself first, but it's also the non-selfish part of me realizing that my lifestyle would be incompatible with adequately raising a child, in terms of putting their needs first. Theoretical musings aside, I've never been in a position (financial, partner, etc.) where I would feel responsible enough to have a kid. Also, I have my own problems dealing with life in general and hesitate to pass along this negativity to a child. I think my parents shouldn't really have had kids, but they did, so here we are.

This wasn't really a problem in NY, where none of my friends were baby makers, but now that I live in VA (temporarily) I'm in a much more conservative environment, and I think it is a bit of a mystery to my coworkers now as to why I am not married and making babies. If/when I move back to a large city this will hopefully change.

Also, now I work with a lot of kids and parents and I think the kids are so charming and wonder if I shouldn't embark on my own little vanity project after all. But I like to come home to peace and quiet and I wonder how I could deal with raising a child and being peppy and not cranky. Because I realize how depression in parents easily manifests itself (somewhere down the line) in depression in children. Luckily, there's no sperm donor in the picture so I don't have an opportunity to test my recent musings.

FInally, dealing with my mom's health now makes me think about who will look after me when I get older...and maybe I should have a child as a form of security. But again, this is fear speaking.

So childness for now and for the forseeable future, but not ruling out possible changes of mind, as circumstances permit.

Also very disturbed with why someone would state point-blank that childness women are somehow going against their nature. If you feel that you are not going to be a good mother, or don't have the wherewithal to raise a child, or simply aren't interested in having children, surely it's better to realize that than to blindly go along and have a child for the sake of it?

I also respect those who do have children, whatever their motivations, the delivery process itself seems massive, and all of those minutes and hours and days dedicated to childcare. I wonder how people entertain their children all day? I think I was just put in front of the tv or left with a good book, but I feel like it's important these days to be stimulating baby's brain at every moment.

Mary (Mary), Saturday, 8 April 2006 02:18 (eighteen years ago) link

ALL of the women in this category are neurotic

Way to generalise!

-- ailsa (ailsa.watso...), April 6th, 2006.

Whoa there, Alisa. You sound a little neurotic

Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Saturday, 8 April 2006 03:13 (eighteen years ago) link

Hoho.

For Markelby:

(I'm kind of playing devil's advocate here a bit. I have no *desire* to give birth to a child. I'm not going to rush out and adopt a kid either. If I were to find myself pregnant, it wouldn't be the worst thing in the world. I'm only thinking about the issue right now because this thread is here.)
-- ailsa (ailsa.watso...), April 6th, 2006 4:44 PM. (ailsa) (later)

And, as Andrew F pointed out, I wasn't extrapolating to the whole world. Basically, *I* don't have the desire to experience pregnancy, give birth, etc. And I don't really understand this urge in others. I do get that it's there, but without having experienced it, I can't understand how it would drive, for example, Nathalie to question Trayce's decision to not bring another child into the world, given that Trayce is a grown-up intelligent woman who has, presumably, given this matter a bit of thought.

I *do* understand that everything changes when you have a kid (I do have a mother, after all, and she didn't really want kids either, but has managed more than OK). I just don't understand this rampant biological ticking clock stuff. I can't imagine a point ever in my life where I'll go, "oh, what I need now is a baby". I'm 33, I've been happily married for five years. If I was going to do it, now would be as good a time as any. I JUST DON'T WANT TO.

I think I have stuff I could pass on to the next generation (I do "mother" problem teenagers for a living, you know) and I have considered fostering, as it's not so *final* as adopting and having a kid, but it can be... (my big brother was fosterered by us when he was 11, he's now in his late 30s and very much part of the family).

ailsa (ailsa), Saturday, 8 April 2006 09:13 (eighteen years ago) link

Cheers Ails, great post.

Markelby (Mark C), Saturday, 8 April 2006 10:40 (eighteen years ago) link

I can't even tell if you are being sarcastic or not :-/

ailsa (ailsa), Saturday, 8 April 2006 11:39 (eighteen years ago) link

it seemed sincere enough to me. nice thoughtful post from Mary too.

Konal Doddz (blueski), Saturday, 8 April 2006 11:53 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm not!

Markelby (Mark C), Saturday, 8 April 2006 12:02 (eighteen years ago) link

Haha "fosterered". Obviously teh typing isn't something I'll be passing on.

Sorry, Mark, you called me a robot (and you know me well enough, I hope, to know that I'm not) so I just wasn't sure. Also because I use "cheers" in a sarky voice more often than not. Thanks :-)

Seconded on Mary's post. Much more eloquent than my ramblings.

ailsa (ailsa), Saturday, 8 April 2006 15:16 (eighteen years ago) link

Aww, I'm blushing, or maybe that's just the heat from my malfunctioning biological clock.

Mary (Mary), Saturday, 8 April 2006 19:26 (eighteen years ago) link

the problem with working in any kind of arts/media job these days is that it's completely dominated by childless workaholic witches and their gay-male flying monkeys, both of whom despise people with families - especially the dads.

i'm in for it now, Saturday, 8 April 2006 20:05 (eighteen years ago) link

Oh god no, he's back.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Sunday, 9 April 2006 08:10 (eighteen years ago) link

Wow Nath, I thought I'd been pretty clear about my stance on being a parent. It ain't gonna happen. Ive felt this way since I can ever remember and ffs I am 35; this isnt like going "hm maybe I do want to go on a holiday this year after all", its a fundamental biological thing. I dont have any maternal urges. And it is people who, like you did, say "oh you'll change your mind" as if me being this way is WRONG somehow that saddens me, really. I've always been happy and congratulatory and undersdtanding of parents even though I dont wish to join their ranks. I am amazed how often I'm not extended the same courtesy.

If it helps - I have fallen pregnant before. I had an abortion. No regrets. Sorry. Not going to apologise for it.

Trayce is not a guy! (trayce), Sunday, 9 April 2006 09:54 (eighteen years ago) link

fifteen years pass...

?

there is nothing inherently wrong with either group

sarahell, Sunday, 24 October 2021 19:22 (two years ago) link

i just found out my mom smoked throughout her pregnancy with me. thanks mom!
― the man from mars won't eat up bars where the tv's on (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, April 6, 2006 11:54 AM (fifteen years ago) bookmarkflaglink

she did look cool tho
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Thursday, April 6, 2006 11:55 AM (fifteen years ago) bookmarkflaglink

Hahahaha

Halfway there but for you, Monday, 25 October 2021 00:20 (two years ago) link

sarahell otm. the thread title sets up a pointless opposition that the OP then blithely ignores in order to make a blandly 'trenchant' observation. bfd.

more difficult than I look (Aimless), Monday, 25 October 2021 03:35 (two years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.