that is the meanest thing I've ever seen written about The Cell
― Monkeys? Um, no. (HI DERE), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 18:22 (thirteen years ago) link
ha - I'm pretty sure it isn't.
― raging hetero lifechill (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 18:24 (thirteen years ago) link
"scena del cavallo"
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 18:48 (thirteen years ago) link
"but this scene is worth 4 stars!"what i meant was 'this scene is worth HORSE stars!'
i can't think of a single scene in star wars that's worth 3D-izing more than a cross-sectioned horse.
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 18:52 (thirteen years ago) link
^^^ list thread
― Monkeys? Um, no. (HI DERE), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 18:53 (thirteen years ago) link
he should make jar jar 3-d and keep everything else in 2-d
― ('_') (omar little), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 18:53 (thirteen years ago) link
I wonder if this is happening because someone complained the characters in the prequels "were two-dimensional" and Lucas got confused.
― Doctor Casino, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 20:31 (thirteen years ago) link
calling them two-dimensional is being generous
― pro bono toilet snaking (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 20:33 (thirteen years ago) link
How come every fucking scene in these movies involves someone standing in front of a window with a million fucking things happening in the background.
― Your heartbeat soun like sasquatch feet (polyphonic), Wednesday, 15 July 2009 19:22 (1 year ago)
Well now Lucas can remake the films so that there's a million things flying around in the foreground right in front of your face.
― Les centimètres énigmatiques (snoball), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 20:36 (thirteen years ago) link
STAR WARS 3-D: THEY FLY @ U FACE
― a seminar on ass play for kids or something (Phil D.), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 20:40 (thirteen years ago) link
Especially that scene with the shapeshifter assassin and Obi-Wan is hanging onto that flying droid and Anakin is chasing after them. You know that scene is just going to be five minutes of shit and wacky aliens in flying clown cars careering towards you constantly.
― Les centimètres énigmatiques (snoball), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 20:43 (thirteen years ago) link
I hope we'll be able to smell Watto's burps.
― funky house skeptic (polyphonic), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 20:45 (thirteen years ago) link
And Jabba's farts!
― Les centimètres énigmatiques (snoball), Wednesday, 29 September 2010 20:49 (thirteen years ago) link
George Lucas does not exist - he never did. He is manage by a robo-star in manner of #2536. He will soon introduce something for you - THE CHOMPING DUCK GETS HIS FATTY OUT FOR VADAR
― Latham Green, Wednesday, 29 September 2010 21:01 (thirteen years ago) link
can this be the thread where we just recycle complaints from red letter media? because seriously why did the shape-shifting assassin need to hide its face with a veil.
― it sucks and you all love something that sucks (reddening), Thursday, 30 September 2010 02:18 (thirteen years ago) link
If the assassin was shape-shifting why didnt it just become Padame and kill itself?
― Latham Green, Thursday, 30 September 2010 02:38 (thirteen years ago) link
The senate chamber will look pretty dope, tho.
― Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 30 September 2010 04:48 (thirteen years ago) link
truu dat!
― Latham Green, Thursday, 30 September 2010 22:05 (thirteen years ago) link
This pretty much sums up the prequels:
http://i.imgur.com/95WpR.gif
― Princess TamTam, Sunday, 24 October 2010 08:38 (thirteen years ago) link
By the way, the Red Letter Media guy's Star Trek reviews are hilarious, maybe better than the SW ones (depending on whether or not you're a Trek fan)
― Princess TamTam, Sunday, 24 October 2010 08:56 (thirteen years ago) link
Lucas now forced to shill for PC World, just to make a bit of money.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVjTBHEnj04
― like an ant to a crumb (DavidM), Sunday, 24 October 2010 18:00 (thirteen years ago) link
(actually it's quite well made, and feels old school Star Wars-y. I like the scene wipes, or whatever they're called. Despite that, it still somehow leaves a bad taste)
― like an ant to a crumb (DavidM), Sunday, 24 October 2010 18:03 (thirteen years ago) link
That's going to be in the 3D version of ANH. The inside of the Jawa transport is going to look like a branch of PC World.
― Les centimètres énigmatiques (snoball), Wednesday, 27 October 2010 08:48 (thirteen years ago) link
Totally always wished they had made Star Wars graphic adventures back in the day. Those two based on Indiana Jones were great. The Fate Of Atlantis was 1000x better than the new movie too....
― Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 27 October 2010 18:27 (thirteen years ago) link
http://www.redlettermedia.com/sith.html
the episode 3 review is finally up... 2 hours long!
― Princess TamTam, Sunday, 2 January 2011 19:03 (thirteen years ago) link
but it just flies by!
― we could play games, idk (ledge), Sunday, 2 January 2011 21:22 (thirteen years ago) link
Yes, it does. Pretty good, but not as good as the ep 2 review. Really like how he pointed out certain things that were spoiled because of the over-reliance on green screen, like Obi-Wan's non-reaction at a four-armed robot unsheathing multiple lightsabers right in front of his face. Also the bit about how unimaginatively the talking scenes were shot.
― Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 3 January 2011 17:29 (thirteen years ago) link
Yeah I thought that bit was pretty illuminating.
― WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Monday, 3 January 2011 18:36 (thirteen years ago) link
I had a dream last night that Peter Jackson decided to do Lucas-style re-releases of all the LOTR movies that included new footage of new characters, a corsair played by Nic Cage in an eyepatch and an evil witch played by Andie McDowell.
― assorted curses (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 3 January 2011 18:44 (thirteen years ago) link
a corsair played by Nic Cage in an eyepatch
I would watch a film about this.
― A brownish area with points (chap), Monday, 3 January 2011 18:50 (thirteen years ago) link
I think that Star Wars III review (review!?) is tremendous - it took me an age to watch but then really made me think. Real insight, comparative analysis and a passion for the original pictures, as well as laughs and some OTT maybe self-publicizing digressions.
― the pinefox, Monday, 3 January 2011 19:43 (thirteen years ago) link
i like this series. baby han solol!
but i think the original trilogy films have a lot of shit in them too. i don't like he holds them up as great filmmaking.
― a nan, a bal, an anal ― (abanana), Monday, 3 January 2011 19:50 (thirteen years ago) link
"evil witch played by Andie McDowell"
there's this movie with a bond girl who looks just like andie mcdowell playing some flying witch called her majesty's secret elements or something like that.
― Philip Nunez, Monday, 3 January 2011 19:51 (thirteen years ago) link
is there really a baby Han Solo in the prequels? how did that work
― assorted curses (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 3 January 2011 19:58 (thirteen years ago) link
its a joke in the video shakey
"even ray charles could see that coming... and he doesn't know anything about Star Wars!"
― Princess TamTam, Monday, 3 January 2011 20:02 (thirteen years ago) link
LOL @ that one!
― Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Monday, 3 January 2011 20:21 (thirteen years ago) link
love when he asks 'is it something that should've been done' about a story element and then answers with the clip of vader screaming NOOOOOO
― Princess TamTam, Monday, 3 January 2011 20:38 (thirteen years ago) link
I think what's great about these is how much it digs past the superficial reasons I thought these movies sucked and really gets into the mechanics of it - - - it's like a master's course in the ways and means of dullness. The discussion of the limitations created by green screen and the incredibly lazy blocking is soooooooooooo OTM.
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 4 January 2011 04:19 (thirteen years ago) link
Totally agree, the amazing thing is they make you realize that the movies are even worse than you had previously thought. It illuminates The sheer totality of their crapness
― Number None, Tuesday, 4 January 2011 04:36 (thirteen years ago) link
it isn't specifically a focal point of the video, but it reminded me of how drama-free a giant war between soulless, faceless clones and robots is. Couldn't they have made one side humans? Couldn't they have made the robots fearsome?
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 4 January 2011 04:40 (thirteen years ago) link
Yeah really, the sheer lameness of what "the clone wars" turned out to be is a big problem, the EPIC BACKDROP for the character story is totally devoid of any interest whatsoever.
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 4 January 2011 05:06 (thirteen years ago) link
Dude who does RedLetterMedia really should get his own TV show. In the vein of MST3K, maybe.
― heh (kelpolaris), Tuesday, 4 January 2011 05:56 (thirteen years ago) link
is this one as rapey as the others? there isn't really anything for me to do at work but you know if it is p rapey i won't get away with watching it.
― irish xmas caek, get that marzipan inta ya (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 4 January 2011 09:53 (thirteen years ago) link
no
― Princess TamTam, Tuesday, 4 January 2011 10:01 (thirteen years ago) link
the key is he's not just a star wars fanboy whose childhood has been crushed by lucas's foibles - he also understands script and story, and how they work, and that lucas's skills in these areas have painfully eroded between trilogies.
― this guy ☜ (stevie), Tuesday, 4 January 2011 10:03 (thirteen years ago) link
The funny thing is that after the first two prequels, which were total shit, the third one at the time seemed tolerable. But this epic takedown reveals just how wrong I was.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 4 January 2011 13:00 (thirteen years ago) link
and that lucas's skills in these areas have painfully eroded between trilogies.
Lucas' script and story skills really not so prevalent in the first trilogy, tbh
― assorted curses (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 4 January 2011 16:20 (thirteen years ago) link
the first star wars tells a pretty compelling story
― Princess TamTam, Tuesday, 4 January 2011 16:26 (thirteen years ago) link
yeah and Lucas didn't write the other two (at least, not by himself)
― assorted curses (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 4 January 2011 16:31 (thirteen years ago) link
this is super interesting but i think the guy is just cacked out by now. there is only so many ways to say that lucas sucks at story telling, his cgi, fight scenes and lack of acting (not the same as bad acting), stilted dialogue, bad plot points etc.
― irish xmas caek, get that marzipan inta ya (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 4 January 2011 16:31 (thirteen years ago) link