banaka are fielding questions

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (147 of them)

onimo, that chart is amazing!!

Aimless, Saturday, 18 September 2010 20:21 (thirteen years ago) link

http://i52.tinypic.com/105aaae.jpg

what are these for? are the special underwear

i'm gonna be straight with y'all, my name is banaka jones (Z S), Thursday, 23 September 2010 03:28 (thirteen years ago) link

The blue one in the upper right appears to be covered with charms against the evil eye.

Aimless, Thursday, 23 September 2010 03:38 (thirteen years ago) link

but what is the purpose of the jock strap? that is my question, for banaka. banaka, what is the purpose of the jock strap?

i'm gonna be straight with y'all, my name is banaka jones (Z S), Thursday, 23 September 2010 03:40 (thirteen years ago) link

banaka's silence speaks volumes

harbl madness (latebloomer), Thursday, 23 September 2010 05:19 (thirteen years ago) link

None of these are appealing to us in any aesthetic, philosophical, political, or practical way.

banaka, Thursday, 23 September 2010 07:25 (thirteen years ago) link

Starting with the top left image:

1. Romanticization of Nature is to be avoided.
2. Thumbs down. The celebration of feudalism, monarchies or other obsolete modes of existence is despicable.
3. This is the only one we approve of in any way, but it is still not desirable.
4. We do not condone bandanas, rubber gloves are acceptable however. Very acceptable.
5. See number 1.
6. Frilly, decorative, useless.
7. Our distaste for this religious imagery is well understood by now.
8. A failed attempt at eliciting a visceral "gag" response. Reactionary.
9. No.

banaka, Thursday, 23 September 2010 07:39 (thirteen years ago) link

What are the ways in which the 'aesthetic' is not a comfort of the kind which you oppose diametrically in your vision of the future?

i dont love everything, i love football (darraghmac), Thursday, 23 September 2010 09:04 (thirteen years ago) link

also do you take milk and sugar in ur tea y/n

i dont love everything, i love football (darraghmac), Thursday, 23 September 2010 09:04 (thirteen years ago) link

banaka, where is it appropriate to find beauty?

beej (crüt), Thursday, 23 September 2010 09:10 (thirteen years ago) link

Beauty is in that which serves the needs of the collective and establishment of the New Society. All of our value judgments reflect this.

banaka, Thursday, 23 September 2010 12:31 (thirteen years ago) link

Ah, beauty in the efficiency of one undisputed truth. 's a good one, that one.

i dont love everything, i love football (darraghmac), Thursday, 23 September 2010 12:53 (thirteen years ago) link

banaka, Should ILX Have an "I Love Football" Board?

meta the devil you know (onimo), Thursday, 23 September 2010 13:43 (thirteen years ago) link

oh shit, real talk.

i dont love everything, i love football (darraghmac), Thursday, 23 September 2010 13:45 (thirteen years ago) link

banaka:

favorite death metal album of the last 5 years?

*lets go* (gr8080), Thursday, 23 September 2010 17:20 (thirteen years ago) link

When the banaka collective needs to urinate or defecate, how is it accomplished?

Aimless, Thursday, 23 September 2010 18:24 (thirteen years ago) link

one year passes...

how does banaka feel about robert williams' death

http://www.wired.com/thisdayintech/2010/01/0125robot-kills-worker/

Nilmar Honorato da Silva, Thursday, 30 August 2012 01:57 (eleven years ago) link

three months pass...

banaka, do you feel that there is any human work, be it technical, literary, or artistic that I may be able to study or experience that will make me understand your ways better?

I'm starting to lose interest in humanity.

mh, Friday, 14 December 2012 21:23 (eleven years ago) link

three weeks pass...

requesting banaka's critique of this, thx.

http://io9.com/5973551/this-classical-music-was-created-by-a-supercomputer-in-less-than-a-second

arby's, Monday, 7 January 2013 16:53 (eleven years ago) link

three months pass...

http://lareviewofbooks.org/article.php?type=&id=1581&fulltext=1

As robotic technology develops and insinuates itself further into everyday life, what counts as a robot is becoming more slippery, drifting further away from the C-3POs and the Twikis and the other box-of-bolts robot buddies of science fiction. Should we see robots simply as useful machines? Is a garage-door opener a robot? Do they have to be self-propelling? (A Roomba seems far more robotic than a laptop, but a laptop is far more useful.) Must a robot think “for itself,” as if it actually has a “self”? Do they even have to be machines at all? Are RFID sensors robots? Are networks? Do I become a robot when I use my smartphone? When some asshole puts on Google Glass and looks at me on the street, do we both become robots?

j., Thursday, 18 April 2013 00:53 (eleven years ago) link

three years pass...

banaka, will you ever post in a WDYLL thread?
― dyao, Monday, August 23, 2010 8:42 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

who says we haven't
― lord goo goo (latebloomer), Monday, August 23, 2010 8:48 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

j/k
― lord goo goo (latebloomer), Monday, August 23, 2010 8:48 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Neanderthal, Monday, 16 January 2017 23:41 (seven years ago) link

false flag op

mh 😏, Tuesday, 17 January 2017 20:25 (seven years ago) link

two years pass...

Banaka we need u

When I am afraid, I put my toast in you (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 10 September 2019 22:12 (four years ago) link

* yall

j., Tuesday, 10 September 2019 22:15 (four years ago) link

Their home planet needed them

Conceptualize Wyverns (latebloomer), Tuesday, 10 September 2019 22:47 (four years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.