Maybe it's not strictly necessary, KK, but when confronted with a four-word noun phrase like that (or like "four-word noun phrase," for that matter), I figure it can't hurt to be given a bit of word-grouping help. It just reads more smoothly, is all.
― jaymc, Friday, 10 September 2010 20:45 (thirteen years ago) link
we used 2 hyphs for "health-care-reform bill"
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 September 2010 20:49 (thirteen years ago) link
Things I really ought to know by now, No.1 in a probably long series:
enquiry vs inquiry...
― Background Zombie (CharlieNo4), Thursday, 16 September 2010 15:20 (thirteen years ago) link
eh
in british i think there's a subtle difference, where enquiry is a query, and an inquiry is like a formal inquest.
don't know about US- favours just use of 'inquiry' i think?
― k¸ (darraghmac), Thursday, 16 September 2010 15:22 (thirteen years ago) link
yeah we don't fuck with "enquiry" much here
― k3vin k., Thursday, 16 September 2010 17:42 (thirteen years ago) link
LinkedIn profiles have a bit at the bottom where you can say "interested in"... and they have 'job inquiries' as an option. Drives me insane.
From Wiktionary: According to Fowler's Modern English Usage (1926), inquiry should be used in relation to a formal inquest, and enquiry to the act of questioning. Many (though not all) British writers maintain this distinction; the Oxford English Dictionary, on the other hand, lists inquiry and enquiry as equal alternatives, in that order. Some British dictionaries, such as Chambers 21st Century Dictionary [1], present the two spellings as interchangeable variants in the general sense, but prefer inquiry for the "formal inquest" sense. In Australian English, inquiry represents a formal inquest (such as a government investigation) while enquiry is used in the act of questioning; (eg: the customer enquired about the status of his loan application); both spellings are current in Canadian English, where enquiry is often associated with scholarly or intellectual research. (See Pam Peters, The Cambridge Guide to English Usage, p. 282.)
American English usually uses inquiry.
― Not the real Village People, Thursday, 16 September 2010 23:31 (thirteen years ago) link
The following documents are to be submitted as soon as possible, if not done so already
― illiterate mods are killing ilx (darraghmac), Monday, 20 September 2010 15:27 (thirteen years ago) link
i mean usually i could do this, but for ref i just searched for 'grammer fiends' so obv not operating at 100% right now.
― illiterate mods are killing ilx (darraghmac), Monday, 20 September 2010 15:28 (thirteen years ago) link
if they have not been already?
― ledge, Monday, 20 September 2010 15:42 (thirteen years ago) link
oh i dunno if that's any better?
― illiterate mods are killing ilx (darraghmac), Monday, 20 September 2010 15:44 (thirteen years ago) link
"Please submit the following documents as soon as possible, if you have not done so already." Switching from passive to active usually solves that stuff for me.
― Shock and Awe High School (Phil D.), Monday, 20 September 2010 15:45 (thirteen years ago) link
yes, i like that.
back to you ledge, can you beat that?
― illiterate mods are killing ilx (darraghmac), Monday, 20 September 2010 15:46 (thirteen years ago) link
CAN YOU HUH?
^ switch from passive to aggressive
fuck you all
― ledge, Monday, 20 September 2010 15:46 (thirteen years ago) link
yeah i've zung better
― ledge, Monday, 20 September 2010 15:49 (thirteen years ago) link
oooh while we're on the right thread can i get a second opinion on 'zung'
― illiterate mods are killing ilx (darraghmac), Monday, 20 September 2010 15:49 (thirteen years ago) link
stung sung zung
― ledge, Monday, 20 September 2010 15:51 (thirteen years ago) link
^ zinged beast
― illiterate mods are killing ilx (darraghmac), Monday, 20 September 2010 15:55 (thirteen years ago) link
Is this grammatically correct?
"He posted a new question to ILX, typing as fast as he could."
Do you always have to have a "while" in there? Would a long dash work instead, or is this construction simply grammatically incorrect?
― wk, Monday, 20 September 2010 20:24 (thirteen years ago) link
You don't need a 'while' in there, I think, the end of your sentence is an adverbial describing the way in which he posted rather than a separate activity.
― Running the Gantelope (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Monday, 20 September 2010 21:09 (thirteen years ago) link
Ah, an adverbial. Thanks! Are adverbial phrases considered a fiction writing faux pas on the level of adverbs?
― wk, Monday, 20 September 2010 21:29 (thirteen years ago) link
depending on which linguist you ask almost all clauses can be described as having adverbial components
― dayo, Tuesday, 21 September 2010 00:01 (thirteen years ago) link
This is causing huge arguments in work:
1. "It was a pleasure to walk past the building"
OR
2. "It was a pleasure to walk passed the building"
I say 1. Everybody else says 2. Which is correct, and why?
― nate woolls, Friday, 24 September 2010 14:50 (thirteen years ago) link
are you serious?
― progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Friday, 24 September 2010 14:52 (thirteen years ago) link
I sense a trap.
Hmmm.
It's like that time in primary school I had to draw the water in a bottle turned on its side and go it wrong. I know it is.
Wait.
Is 'It was a pleasure to walk' the name of someone where you work, nate?
― the too encumbered madman (GamalielRatsey), Friday, 24 September 2010 14:52 (thirteen years ago) link
go it wrong got it wrong
― the too encumbered madman (GamalielRatsey), Friday, 24 September 2010 14:53 (thirteen years ago) link
I am serious. I thought it was obviously PAST, I can't see any way on earth it could be PASSED, but a bunch of people have got me doubting myself. People who I previously thought were reasonably intelligent.
― nate woolls, Friday, 24 September 2010 14:54 (thirteen years ago) link
#1. Anything else is total lunacy.
Also recently found in a book at work: "pho-hawk." Apparently the author has a particular attachment to that horror. Should such people be killed and eaten?
― I've got ten bucks. SURPRISE ME. (Laurel), Friday, 24 September 2010 14:55 (thirteen years ago) link
God, nate, you must have thought you were going mad. Like the end of Invasion of the Body Snatchers.
― the too encumbered madman (GamalielRatsey), Friday, 24 September 2010 14:56 (thirteen years ago) link
I work with a load of idiots, obviously.
― nate woolls, Friday, 24 September 2010 14:59 (thirteen years ago) link
you don't understand! my dog, who i have named "it was a pleasure to walk", had just eaten a building!
― progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Friday, 24 September 2010 15:29 (thirteen years ago) link
Most amusing.
I don't understand 'pho-hawk' - what is that supposed to be?
― Running the Gantelope (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Friday, 24 September 2010 16:16 (thirteen years ago) link
faux hawk?
― teddy penderecki (c sharp major), Friday, 24 September 2010 16:23 (thirteen years ago) link
as in, the dude haircut also known as the hoxton fin
― teddy penderecki (c sharp major), Friday, 24 September 2010 16:25 (thirteen years ago) link
Faux, yes. I don't even....
― I've got ten bucks. SURPRISE ME. (Laurel), Friday, 24 September 2010 17:13 (thirteen years ago) link
Grammar folks,
What are your feelings on the tendency to refer to "a politics" or even "a politic"? Is one more correct than another? Or is it just inflated? The phrase in question is "an acerbic sexual politics".
― Dan I Wish I Was Your Lover (admrl), Sunday, 26 September 2010 16:59 (thirteen years ago) link
It has become accepted useage to say, for example, "I like his sense of humor, but not his politics." Given this useage, the phrase passes muster, but I'd suggest that if it sounds awkward in its context, change the phrase or the context to something you don't find jarring.
― Aimless, Sunday, 26 September 2010 18:18 (thirteen years ago) link
i don't understand why 'an' would go into the context given, admrl.
― i dont love everything, i love football (darraghmac), Sunday, 26 September 2010 18:31 (thirteen years ago) link
think such useage occurs frequently as part of cultural studies jargon
― dude (del), Sunday, 26 September 2010 18:39 (thirteen years ago) link
Thanks guys. I'm correcting someone else's text, which is always a little difficult. I agree about "an", though
― Dan I Wish I Was Your Lover (admrl), Sunday, 26 September 2010 18:46 (thirteen years ago) link
"Over the past 20 years, ABC Company has helped many businesses in __________ (improve) their brand."
this is for a verb conjugation exercise. obviously that "in" means it will be "improving", but...why? is it just some phrasal convention? without "in" it would be just "improve" which to me seems a bit clearer, and could also be easily understood in grammar terms.
― rent, Monday, 27 September 2010 07:11 (thirteen years ago) link
wd just go with 'to improve' myself
― i dont love everything, i love football (darraghmac), Monday, 27 September 2010 08:03 (thirteen years ago) link
Verb forms tend to be verb+ing after a preposition, but as Darragh says, there's no real need to go down that route here.
― Running the Gantelope (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Monday, 27 September 2010 10:49 (thirteen years ago) link
The rough linguist's answer is that a preposition always takes a noun phrase as argument; "improve their brand" is a (non-finite) verb phrase but "improving their brand" acts more or less like a noun phrase (e.g. "improving their brand is fun"). There some caveats and subtleties to this: nominalisations behave more idiosyncratically than other nouns, you have to accept that "to" in "to improve" is not a preposition...
― seandalai, Monday, 27 September 2010 13:43 (thirteen years ago) link
you're right, darragh, of course. missed that. prob wouldn't say the "to" in conversation tbh. totally agree it's clumsier than necessary, but that's how it appears in the gap exercise. but great explanation, thanks very much.
― rent, Tuesday, 28 September 2010 07:56 (thirteen years ago) link
you're right, darragh, of course.
^ most under-used grammatical term on ilx
― i dont love everything, i love football (darraghmac), Tuesday, 28 September 2010 09:13 (thirteen years ago) link
argh, note that this contains my biggest ongoing peeve -- businessES have brandS, plural
― oɔsıqɐu (nabisco), Tuesday, 28 September 2010 16:15 (thirteen years ago) link
Maybe ABC has helped companies improve ABC's brand.
― http://tinyurl.com/vrrr0000m (Pleasant Plains), Tuesday, 28 September 2010 16:34 (thirteen years ago) link
by being an awesome client!
― progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 28 September 2010 16:36 (thirteen years ago) link