Batman carries on beginning in ... The Dark Knight

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (3049 of them)

what were you expecting in a comic book movie, David Mamet?

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Friday, 1 August 2008 04:19 (fifteen years ago) link

no, not at all. but you can't call it a great movie on one hand and then turn around and say of course it's lightweight nonsense what-do-you-expect on the other. (which maybe you aren't saying, i don't know, it's a long thread.)

tipsy mothra, Friday, 1 August 2008 04:26 (fifteen years ago) link

hay i seen a hollywood movie (that really horrible bit of dialogue where he has to explain his scars) atleast X 2 yu mean

Sébastien, Friday, 1 August 2008 04:28 (fifteen years ago) link

just dropping by without context. can someone pls link to that thread that resume long threads%?

Sébastien, Friday, 1 August 2008 04:29 (fifteen years ago) link

i expect comic-book movies to be incoherent nonsense, i just hope for them to be better-made and less overbearing.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 1 August 2008 04:30 (fifteen years ago) link

"yes he was lying. he always lied! or did he! he was just like us, but more honest. or was he? so meta."

huh??

i really want to take my by now probably typical 'youre getting way too philosophical & ignoring the viscerality that is this formats best & primary means of speaking to its audience' tack but id get accused of being a rube

in defense of that line of argument though: the first scene wasnt about depth or explaining the jokers origins (maybe, to some extent, it was intended to be deceptively so) - it was about making us wonder what the fuck he was about to do to this dude, & keeping us on the edge of our seats while we waited to find out. the second scene (iirc, there mayve been another in between or after) was meant to do the same as far as maggie g's charcter was concerned, while expanding the complexity of the joker - if youre so intellectually distant from the movie that you didnt give a damn about its more visceral aspects, i dont know why you bothered to pay for it, except to tell people as much

deeznuts, Friday, 1 August 2008 04:36 (fifteen years ago) link

if youre so intellectually distant from the movie that you didnt give a damn about its more visceral aspects, i dont know why you bothered to pay for it, except to tell people as much

because everybody including my brother, ilx and manohla dargis told me it was better than it is. and i love my brother, i like ilx and i don't have anything against manohla dargis. i just ain't feel it. i don't begrudge warner bros. my $11, but having spent it i'm allowed to say it's a pretty dull event.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 1 August 2008 04:49 (fifteen years ago) link

well, it was no Goodbye, Dragon Inn...

rockapads, Friday, 1 August 2008 05:00 (fifteen years ago) link

fewer steamed buns, for one thing.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 1 August 2008 05:03 (fifteen years ago) link

i do agree that this movie was too long. the hong kong sequence was nifty but will probably be fast forwarded when i buy the DVD.

another big issue i had, and i hope this isn't any kind of spoiler alert at this point in the thread, is that the whole plan with the bombs on the ferries is just impossible to plan in advance. i try really hard to suspend my disbelief for villainous schemes in comic book adaptations, but the idea that he knew the city would be evacuated on these ferry boats, and had the manpower and foresight to load hundreds of barrels of gas or whatever it was onto them was so ridiculous i found myself wanting to rewind to figure out what i missed. i guess the bus backing into the bank thing was pretty bad that way, too.

rockapads, Friday, 1 August 2008 05:03 (fifteen years ago) link

i liked both this and BB, but agree that they don't touch the Bourne movies. and frankly they didn't come close to bringing me the kind of joy I felt the first time i read Batman: Year One and The Long Halloween, either.

rockapads, Friday, 1 August 2008 05:06 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't really understand needing to compare the Bourne vs. the Batman films - beside that they came out during the same era, are of high overall quality and star power, and have some absurdly overdirected fight scenes, they don't exactly live in the same universes, you know?

And dear Lord, don't ever pay attention to Manohla Dargis, she is terrible.

Nhex, Friday, 1 August 2008 08:15 (fifteen years ago) link

another big issue i had, and i hope this isn't any kind of spoiler alert at this point in the thread, is that the whole plan with the bombs on the ferries is just impossible to plan in advance. i try really hard to suspend my disbelief for villainous schemes in comic book adaptations, but the idea that he knew the city would be evacuated on these ferry boats, and had the manpower and foresight to load hundreds of barrels of gas or whatever it was onto them was so ridiculous i found myself wanting to rewind to figure out what i missed. i guess the bus backing into the bank thing was pretty bad that way, too.

compare and contrast "no, I shoot the bus driver" and a bus immediately ploughing through the wall vs trying to blow up a hospital with the detonator in his hand and it not going off and him mashing the keys over and over and looking really stupid

MPx4A, Friday, 1 August 2008 09:27 (fifteen years ago) link

the latter still raises questions about his ability to make explosives be everywhere tho

MPx4A, Friday, 1 August 2008 09:28 (fifteen years ago) link

When he drove out of the bank into the convoy of other buses, didn't one of the other drivers think "hey there's a bus driving out of a bank, and lookie here's a load of police cars coming towards the bank, that's a bit sus..."?

Could've done the boat thing with a more modest and undetectable bomb, instead of a whole engine room full of oil barrels.

ledge, Friday, 1 August 2008 10:36 (fifteen years ago) link

Hadn't the Joker mined the tunnels leading out of the city (or done something to them, at any rate) so he knew the ferries would have to be used for the evacuation. Of course, how he arranged to get one ferry full of convicts and another full of civilians was the major leap of logic for me.

Stone Monkey, Friday, 1 August 2008 11:59 (fifteen years ago) link

It wasn't neccessary to prove his point that it was so, would've worked as well with two ferries of civilians. It was a nice bonus I suspect.

chap, Friday, 1 August 2008 12:01 (fifteen years ago) link

I think the key thing people are forgetting is that this is a film.

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 1 August 2008 12:29 (fifteen years ago) link

I knew if this thread went on long enough all the joy would be sucked out of this movie.

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Friday, 1 August 2008 12:46 (fifteen years ago) link

A thread either dies a hero or lives long enough to suck all the joy out of a movie.

Alba, Friday, 1 August 2008 13:07 (fifteen years ago) link

i try really hard to suspend my disbelief for villainous schemes in comic book adaptations, but the idea that he knew the city would be evacuated on these ferry boats, and had the manpower and foresight to load hundreds of barrels of gas or whatever it was onto them was so ridiculous i found myself wanting to rewind to figure out what i missed.

-- rockapads, Friday, August 1, 2008 1:03 AM

Hadn't the Joker mined the tunnels leading out of the city (or done something to them, at any rate) so he knew the ferries would have to be used for the evacuation. Of course, how he arranged to get one ferry full of convicts and another full of civilians was the major leap of logic for me.

-- Stone Monkey, Friday, August 1, 2008 7:59 AM

Yes, when the Joker makes his announcement, you see a bunch of people sitting in a bar watching it on TV, and they all start to run out in a panic, then he says that perhaps he's mined the tunnels and bridges, and everyone comes to a stop, not knowing how to proceed.

Do people just get instant amnesia when they leave theaters these days, or do they not pay attention if something isn't exploding?

Pancakes Hackman, Friday, 1 August 2008 14:15 (fifteen years ago) link

yes

David R., Friday, 1 August 2008 14:16 (fifteen years ago) link

Do people just get instant amnesia when they leave theaters these days, or do they not pay attention if something isn't exploding?

to be fair, it is easy for details to get lost in overlong movies with nonsensical, convoluted plots in which characters repeatedly do dumb things for no good reason except to set up the next nonsensical, convoluted action set-piece.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 1 August 2008 14:43 (fifteen years ago) link

GO WATCH A MIKE LEIGH FILM, BORING PERSON

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 1 August 2008 14:43 (fifteen years ago) link

i like action movies. (that's why i mentioned the bourne films in comparison, so as to avoid directives to go watch mike leigh films.)(although i like some mike leigh films, it's true.) but this is just a fitfully entertaining brainless big-budget jumble. it's your basic 2-star movie.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 1 August 2008 14:52 (fifteen years ago) link

the one voice of honest reason amid the blind hyperbolic masses

Just got offed, Friday, 1 August 2008 14:54 (fifteen years ago) link

Alfred Soto: I just caught up with with this thread and your recent thoughts and I agree mightily with your comments on Nolan's disinterest in Wayne/Batman and a lot of other things you've mentioned. I think that Nolan is uninterested in probing character motivation in films, generally.

Well, thanks! tipsy mothra also OTM.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 1 August 2008 14:56 (fifteen years ago) link

GO WATCH EVIL FRENCH / ASIAN SHLOCK MOVIES, STUDENT PERSON

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 1 August 2008 14:56 (fifteen years ago) link

scik i agree with you more or less utterly about this movie, i was doing something there known as "holding up a mirror"

Just got offed, Friday, 1 August 2008 14:57 (fifteen years ago) link

I was taking the piss, Louis. I know yr a graduate now.

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 1 August 2008 15:00 (fifteen years ago) link

the one voice of honest reason amid the blind hyperbolic masses

ha. no. it's just, this is a long thread about this movie, i saw this movie yesterday, i like talking about movies. i'm just doing the same thing as the other 150 people here who have commented on it. i don't share the consensus enthusiasm and find it a little puzzling, but i'm sure the consensus will somehow survive that shock.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 1 August 2008 15:00 (fifteen years ago) link

this movie looks like some old bullshit to me

and what, Friday, 1 August 2008 15:03 (fifteen years ago) link

well fair enough! just wish you'd made your subjectivity a bit more obvious y'know. :P xpost

Personally, I thought it flew by, and the lack of a formula worked in it favour. It was like an (awesome) extended television drama in its pacing.

Just got offed, Friday, 1 August 2008 15:03 (fifteen years ago) link

ive seen tipsy comment on other movie threads & he's always insightful as fuck, which is why i'm sorta taken aback by how BORING (no offense meant srsly, but SM is right) his criticisms are: tips i think maybe you unfortunately bought the line that this movie is truly beyond its genre, when its not, it just does it really really fucking well. i get the idea that this kind of movie isnt really yr cup of tea (could be totally wrong) but that you were led to believe this one was truly special or something, & it is (imo), but if youre not willing to buy into the spirit of the genre youre still going to hate it. thats sort of my take on yr criticism anyway, i dunno.

i would like to hear more about how everyones decision making is non-sensical & stupid outside of the set pieces tho, ill probably hate what you have to say & roll my eyes but i dont remember feeling that right now

deeznuts, Friday, 1 August 2008 18:11 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't know jack about comics but this movie inspired me to buy "batman:year one" and "the long Halloween" and "the killing joke" from amazon! I don't think I've read a comic in 15 years.

ryan, Friday, 1 August 2008 18:29 (fifteen years ago) link

all three of those are really good, Moore one is probably the silliest

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 1 August 2008 18:31 (fifteen years ago) link

Year One probably the best thing Miller ever did imho (good thing he didn't draw it)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 1 August 2008 18:31 (fifteen years ago) link

Ah really? I thought Moore was like the comic genius dude?

ryan, Friday, 1 August 2008 18:33 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah he is and the book is good but its pretty tossed off. it is not representative of his work in general at all.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 1 August 2008 18:38 (fifteen years ago) link

(beyond its reliance on narrative/graphic symmetry - a trick he uses fairly consistently)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 1 August 2008 18:39 (fifteen years ago) link

Killing Joke is really good as a non-Moore comic, I think. It's just that with Moore's name attached, fans get really disappointed.

Mordy, Friday, 1 August 2008 18:58 (fifteen years ago) link

as Moore says "its just a Batman Annual"

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 1 August 2008 19:09 (fifteen years ago) link

Pretty much with tipsy here. I thought it was an okay film, but by no means a great one (speaking as someone who has no strong feelings either way about the superhero genre). Plot was an incoherent string of implausible schemes; Dent/Two-Face was a pointless character who contributed nothing more than a nice piece of gross-out SPFX; Bale as Wayne was okay, Bale as Batman was laughable; fight scenes were inept and far too plentiful; the oppressive brutality and seriousness made the comic-book contrivances seem glaringly ridiculous; and the last hour was a slog. The film does raise some interesting philosophical and political questions, and a lot of the acting was top-notch (fine work from the supporting players and a star turn from Ledger), but that's all I got out of it. Want to see it again, but mostly 'cuz I'm sure I must have missed something.

Felt the same way about the LotR movies, though, so maybe it's just that I don't like fun.

contenderizer, Friday, 1 August 2008 20:12 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm more or less with you, contenderizer. It occurred to me a few days ago that I didn't discuss Dent/Two-Face much in my review; but a "nice piece of gross-out FX" plus (I'd add) "most purely symbolic figure in the film" is a good way to go.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 1 August 2008 20:19 (fifteen years ago) link

incoherent, pointless, laughable, inept, ridiculous, brainless, nonsensical, embarassing...these are the problems with the movie?

ok, that's just a bit hyperbolic, don't you think? you can dislike a movie without actively insulting everyone who did like it!

ryan, Friday, 1 August 2008 20:41 (fifteen years ago) link

i mean i dont really get why everyone has to either think it's a genius perfect masterwork or a brainless incoherent mess. surely it's a work of art/commerce that deserves at least a slightly more measured response?

ryan, Friday, 1 August 2008 20:42 (fifteen years ago) link

yes, maybe a few thousand more posts

goole, Friday, 1 August 2008 20:43 (fifteen years ago) link

i will MURDER those who dislike it with my bare fucking hands

omar little, Friday, 1 August 2008 20:43 (fifteen years ago) link

Wet Nap?

David R., Friday, 1 August 2008 20:45 (fifteen years ago) link

You can dislike a movie without actively insulting everyone who did like it!

-- ryan

Ummm, nothing personal? Wasn't calling you pointless and far too plentiful, ryan. Just, you know, the movie...

contenderizer, Friday, 1 August 2008 20:50 (fifteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.