Sorry - was slotting in other words to replace the real ones and cocked up.
― Alba, Thursday, 3 July 2008 15:27 (fifteen years ago) link
(ie forget about racial and racism. It's just the was/were thing.)
1930s = plural decade = singular
this happens a lot. it's ok.
― CharlieNo4, Thursday, 3 July 2008 15:31 (fifteen years ago) link
While I do consider myself a Grammar Fiend, I am a little bit confused over the usage of "its" and "it's".
o_O
― jhøshea, Thursday, 3 July 2008 16:47 (fifteen years ago) link
haha yeah i know, that's like the #1 question in the Are You a Grammar Fiend pass/fail test
― rrrobyn, Thursday, 3 July 2008 17:19 (fifteen years ago) link
That's because its a stupid test.
― Autumn Almanac, Thursday, 3 July 2008 22:44 (fifteen years ago) link
HAH I typed 'it's' correctly by habit and had to go back and change it.
― Autumn Almanac, Thursday, 3 July 2008 22:45 (fifteen years ago) link
Another disagreement with my French Canadian supervisor. Please pick one:
"The odds are against us demonstrating..."
or
"The odds are against us to demonstrate..."
― caek, Saturday, 5 July 2008 16:07 (fifteen years ago) link
numba one
― G00blar, Saturday, 5 July 2008 16:35 (fifteen years ago) link
I don't think the odds are actually against 'us'. They're against our having success in demonstrating something.
― G00blar, Saturday, 5 July 2008 16:36 (fifteen years ago) link
the odds against OUR demonstrating
― Zelda Zonk, Saturday, 5 July 2008 16:45 (fifteen years ago) link
The odds are against us in demonstrating?
― Autumn Almanac, Saturday, 5 July 2008 21:14 (fifteen years ago) link
Zelda OTM.
― jaymc, Sunday, 6 July 2008 02:17 (fifteen years ago) link
From the NYTimes Estelle Getty obit:
In the show, Sophia was the mother of Dorothy Zbornak, played by Bea Arthur who, in real life, was older than Ms. Getty.
Not exactly a copyeditor and grammar fiend question, but: am I wrong to think that the phrase 'in real life' is one of those casual, almost childish, expressions that shouldn't see their way into print?
― G00blar, Wednesday, 23 July 2008 16:32 (fifteen years ago) link
Iit's certainly redundant there. Was that writer paid by the word?
― Autumn Almanac, Thursday, 24 July 2008 03:00 (fifteen years ago) link
i don't know, i think it helps keep things clear. but i guess you could shorten it and lose a clause by just writing "who was actually older than ms. getty."
― tipsy mothra, Thursday, 24 July 2008 04:03 (fifteen years ago) link
bea > estela
― Autumn Almanac, Thursday, 24 July 2008 04:14 (fifteen years ago) link
http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/lifestyle/chi-typo-guys-0521may21,0,6902266.story
Insufferable douches or fearless crusaders or, y'know, just a bit of harmless fun?
― ledge, Sunday, 3 August 2008 23:19 (fifteen years ago) link
hello.
can it be said of someone that they are effronterous, or temeritous even. if not why not - an man of audacity is audacious, plainly.
thanks in advance.
― r|t|c, Tuesday, 19 August 2008 21:00 (fifteen years ago) link
temericious? no.
― r|t|c, Tuesday, 19 August 2008 21:01 (fifteen years ago) link
Imagine some marketing spiel for a company going on about "our firm, our designers, as we go forward..." for three paras, and then ending "I hope you enjoy our new brochure! (signed) Mr Head Honcho". Is the switch from "we" to "I" ok, or a bit off?
― ledge, Monday, 25 August 2008 08:29 (fifteen years ago) link
I always thought 'typo' as in 'typographical error' referred to genuine finger-slippage or similar when typing e.g. 'teh' instead of 'the' - where you didn't mean to type what you did. Most of the examples given in this story I'd be hard pushed to call typos. Maybe the Millwaukee one seeing as they got it right one time. The rest of them would appear to be actual mistakes, e.g. not understanding how to use apostrophes. But obviously you can't actually tell for sure. Can you make such a distinction between typos and stupid mistakes?
― Not the real Village People, Monday, 25 August 2008 12:57 (fifteen years ago) link
But a grocery store that can't spell grocery [as he encountered in California] makes you question the food they sell.
No, no it doesn't.
― libcrypt, Monday, 25 August 2008 17:01 (fifteen years ago) link
(a) That guy in the picture looked to me like Jaymc for a second
(b) I have often dreamed of going around correcting things, actually, although to be honest it's my conviction that I'm not alone in that impulse that's prevented me from thinking it'd be that cool to be a grammar-pedant graffitist
― nabisco, Monday, 25 August 2008 17:06 (fifteen years ago) link
(b.2) And the correcting impulse was usually just a matter of taking the train home from proofreading work and still being in proofreading mindspace and wanting to mark up every ad in the car
― nabisco, Monday, 25 August 2008 17:08 (fifteen years ago) link
i know this is v impt, but could people stop using "schwag" for "swag"? kthxbye.
― gabbneb, Saturday, 30 August 2008 15:02 (fifteen years ago) link
Is there a thread expressly for whinging about English language transgressions? I'm hissing like a pressure cooker.
― the usual olfactory abuse (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 08:08 (fifteen years ago) link
When you require an overhead activity to be undertaken, ...
^ Subjunctive mood? Or should I start the sentence again?
― You are wrong (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 19 September 2008 06:31 (fifteen years ago) link
WAHT DOES THAT EVEN MEAN?
― quincie, Friday, 19 September 2008 15:19 (fifteen years ago) link
Wanky business talk. I think I rewrote it in the end.
― You are wrong (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 19 September 2008 21:03 (fifteen years ago) link
Where do we stand on blog vs weblog, (noun) bloggers (noun), to blog, blogging (verb) blog post vs blog posting (noun) etc.
In a linguistically conservative economics publication.
What do the newspapers do?
I don't like blog as a verb, myself, but I'm not sure what else to use,
― Jamie T Smith, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 13:49 (fifteen years ago) link
bloggingblog (noun) collection of articles, (verb) action of publishing an article to the blog: "I just blogged about that"
^^^ Guardian style guide.
― Raw Patrick, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 13:55 (fifteen years ago) link
Yeah. Thanks. The Times don't even have it in theirs.
― Jamie T Smith, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 14:06 (fifteen years ago) link
post wins vs. posting i'd think
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 14:17 (fifteen years ago) link
I don't like blog as a verb, myself, but I'm not sure what else to use
You'd have to add words, basically, so that "he blogs about the election" becomes "he maintains a blog about the election" or "he covers the election on his blog" or similar ...
I think the issue with this isn't linguistic so much as, like, philosophical -- i.e., do you really think of blogging as a form of writing that just happens to be done on a blog, or do you think of blogging as a distinct activity that is functionally different from, e.g., "she writes about the issue on her blog." I like blogging as a verb because I think it really is a distinct activity in a distinct context, and it's nice to have a word that captures that.
― nabisco, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 17:50 (fifteen years ago) link
Considering 'blog' is a recently made-up word, it probably doesn't matter.
― You should be an artist, in in your shower. (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 24 September 2008 21:25 (fifteen years ago) link
Cf. "journal" as a verb.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 24 September 2008 21:41 (fifteen years ago) link
do you really think of blogging as a form of writing
no.
― synaptic knob (grimly fiendish), Wednesday, 24 September 2008 21:54 (fifteen years ago) link
which is right?
The ___ project was conceived in the late 1980s as a “multimedia-based ___ experience,”
The ___ project was conceived of in the late 1980s as a “multimedia-based ___ experience,”
the latter seems correct but also awkward, i guess because it's in passive voice? i can't just say it was conceived, right, because it means baby-makin'?
― metametadata (n/a), Thursday, 25 September 2008 20:36 (fifteen years ago) link
____s are specific details i took out for no particular reason
Whether you can conceive an idea is perhaps debatable, although I would argue that #1 is totally legit.
#2, however, is a big NO NO NONO BOXCAR to me.
― Vampire romances depend on me (Laurel), Thursday, 25 September 2008 20:38 (fifteen years ago) link
why not rephrase it?
― Aimless, Thursday, 25 September 2008 20:39 (fifteen years ago) link
there isn't really a group or person listed as having created the project, so can't really shift it into active tense
― metametadata (n/a), Thursday, 25 September 2008 20:43 (fifteen years ago) link
transpose to: 'proposed', or perhaps 'initiated'
― Aimless, Thursday, 25 September 2008 20:45 (fifteen years ago) link
yeah that'll work fine. i typed "intitiated" at first
― metametadata (n/a), Thursday, 25 September 2008 20:45 (fifteen years ago) link
I don't see that second one as quite the calamity Laurel does -- it was conceived of in the late 80s, no big. (There's nothing particularly wrong or unusual about winding UP WITH two prepositions in a row, and I'm not sure who'd balk at, say, "the project was dreamed UP IN the late 80s" or whatever) -- in any case the easier rewriting route for avoiding it would be just changing the verb
xpost AND THAT WAS DONE, HOORAY
― nabisco, Thursday, 25 September 2008 20:47 (fifteen years ago) link
xp Is what you're objecting to the two prepositions next to each other ("of in")? I wouldn't say that's wrong per se, just not totally elegant.
― jaymc, Thursday, 25 September 2008 20:48 (fifteen years ago) link
yeah, it just read awkwardly, then i got confused about whether "conceived" was ok instead of "conceived of" or if i was saying something dirty by accident
― metametadata (n/a), Thursday, 25 September 2008 20:50 (fifteen years ago) link
Weren't we just talking a while ago about how the double prepositions thing is so American, that it sounds really weird to British-Englishers?
― Vampire romances depend on me (Laurel), Thursday, 25 September 2008 20:52 (fifteen years ago) link
What about Churchill's famous retort "This is the kind of arrant pedantry up with which I will not put"? Or are you going to claim it's because his mom was American?
― jaymc, Thursday, 25 September 2008 21:01 (fifteen years ago) link