British Folk (and Revival)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (554 of them)
they sold out the day they started using electricity

Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 11:29 (eighteen years ago) link

They should have stuck to candles and peat fires

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 11:31 (eighteen years ago) link

No - "they" should just know what they're singing about. "They" should look to the real stuff instead of having this empty notion of 'weirdness', which is based on some naive, romanticised, sentimental conception of the rural, not grounded in anything of genuine psychological/metaphysical/social importance, from which genuine magic/otherness/bizarreness/uncanniness/Unheimlichkeit stems.

I love electricity too.

is, Tuesday, 28 February 2006 11:43 (eighteen years ago) link

"They" should look to the real stuff instead of having this empty notion of 'weirdness', which is based on some naive, romanticised, sentimental conception of the rural

But don't you think that some great art can come out of romanticism?

NickB (NickB), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 12:00 (eighteen years ago) link

And don't you think that's how a lot of people you probably respect got involved in folk music in the first place too?

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 12:02 (eighteen years ago) link

they sold out when they started living in houses and wearing clothes.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 12:04 (eighteen years ago) link

"is" does have some kind of point w/r/t this whole "wyrd folk" term though, I think. As I posted upthread (I think) it does kind of smack of someone trying to impose their meaning on something.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 12:06 (eighteen years ago) link

OK so a lot of this nu stuff is dilettantish rubbish from people who were trying to sound like a Krautrock band the week before, but the idea that you have to listen to a wax cylinder of some whiskery old geezer from the turn of the century wheezing away before you properly "get it" is bollix

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 12:10 (eighteen years ago) link

they sold out at the exact point when the first amino acid was formed in the primordial soup

Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 12:13 (eighteen years ago) link

"but the idea that you have to listen to a wax cylinder of some whiskery old geezer from the turn of the century wheezing away before you properly "get it" is bollix"

This comment speaks volumes about your ignorance. You will miss out on some good stuff if this continues to be your attitude.

is, Tuesday, 28 February 2006 12:17 (eighteen years ago) link

Are you for real?

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 12:18 (eighteen years ago) link

You're Bill Drummond aren't you?

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 12:18 (eighteen years ago) link

Can we avoid getting into an argument on this (otherwise great) thread please?

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 12:21 (eighteen years ago) link

Well, I'm partly for real, but I'm partly being contentious.

A lot of the people you disparage (probably without having listened to them properly) as 'whiskery old geezers' from the 'turn of the century' (which century?) are AMAZING singers. It's a shame that you won't be open-minded enough to find that out.

Of course there is a lot of great music and a lot of great singers nowadays too. But not in the field of 'folk' music or 'new folk' music.

is, Tuesday, 28 February 2006 12:22 (eighteen years ago) link

Of course, you know everything about me and what I've been listening to all my life from a couple of posts on a message board

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 12:24 (eighteen years ago) link

Don't worry. It's just a message board, not real life. I'd probably like you as a person, for what it's worth.

is, Tuesday, 28 February 2006 12:25 (eighteen years ago) link

I might find it difficult to reciprocate if you turned round to my face and called me ignorant and narrow-minded

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 12:26 (eighteen years ago) link

Can you get to that?

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 12:27 (eighteen years ago) link

Anyway, coincidentally, I listened to "House Full" last night, which is the live album by the post-Sandy Fairports, playing live at the l a troubadour. God it's a mighty album. One of the most powerful & rocking live recordings I've ever heard! Trying to remember if this is the lineup that does 2 numbers on the old (mostly rubbish) "Glastonbury Fayre" movie. I wonder if there's any film footage of them playing...

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 12:28 (eighteen years ago) link

I know, it's like the Mahavishnu Orchestra in places!

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 12:29 (eighteen years ago) link

"I might find it difficult to reciprocate if you turned round to my face and called me ignorant and narrow-minded"

I apologise. It's just that appreciating, say, Fairport or Steeleye Span etc but then not appreciating the source singers from whom they got a lot of their material... well, that just don't add up to me.

is, Tuesday, 28 February 2006 12:31 (eighteen years ago) link

Why not? Is there a rulebook somewhere that tells you how you're supposed to appreciate art?

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 12:33 (eighteen years ago) link

Not at all. Note the words "...to me" at the end of my last post. That means it's MY OWN OPINION. You don't have to share it.

is, Tuesday, 28 February 2006 12:37 (eighteen years ago) link

Anyway, how did we get into this argument? I don't like arguing. I call a truce.

is, Tuesday, 28 February 2006 12:44 (eighteen years ago) link

This is a folk compilation I've recently enjoyed, and that doesn't seem to have been mentioned much...

Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 12:59 (eighteen years ago) link

"Your best best is to go back to the field recordings, the proper singers"

Can you recommend some titles on CD? ie pre-1960s revival?

bham, Tuesday, 28 February 2006 13:06 (eighteen years ago) link

OK, I am a casual listener of folk at best, however, I spent a lot of my teens bouncing around the folk scene because of my father. A couple of things to say about this "go back to the original source material" direction of thinking.

First, it really comes down to a question of taste, and for me, music is all about the arrangement. Ed (of this parish) recently copied me a bunch of Nu Folk - mainly Bellowhead and John & John. Predictably, I enjoyed the Bellowhead a great deal more, even though it covered a lot of the same material, (same songs in a couple of incidences) because I just enjoyed listened to an 11 piece band with multiple harmonies more than I enjoyed listening to just two blokes, with more limited arrangements.

But that brings back to the notion of "authenticity" and which is more "authentic" - listening to some "turn of the century crackly voiced bloke on an old record" and field recordings or listening to more modern people reinterpreting or "romanticising" it.

Well, folk has *always* been a participatory artform. It's not just about one bloke with a guitar, it's about everyone down the pub, or on the village green, or wherever, getting together to sing songs they all know. The second point I wanted to make is that folk has always been about co-opting traditional songs, changing them to suit your conditions or your needs - every person who performs a song adds something of their own to it. That's what the folk tradition is. Not slavishly recreating whatever someone else used to do.

Anyway, that's just my 2p. I should get my dad in here to comment further because he knows what he's talking about more than I do.

Cuair Crithlonracha (kate), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 13:15 (eighteen years ago) link

For field recordings of unaccompanied singers and such like, check out Topic Records 'Voice of the People' series. Also Veteran Records.

is, Tuesday, 28 February 2006 13:17 (eighteen years ago) link

My 2p is that, just because something is "old" and closer to "the source", whatever that may be, then it doesn't automatically mean it's good. In English folk music, in particular, a lot of those older singers weren't actually "amazing" singers, they just happened to be the only ones left who remembered and sang the songs.

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 13:23 (eighteen years ago) link

In a more "living" tradition like Scots and Irish folk music, you often found more accomplished singers and musicians - probably not professional musicians but far from being amateurs

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 13:25 (eighteen years ago) link

Of course, when I say that it's worth checking the old stuff out, I'm not at all suggesting that people nowadays should 'slavishly recreate' it- just that some might find it helpful to be aware of it and to use it to inform their own listening and/or production of modern music!

With regard to the vocal qualities of some of the old singers - the important thing was the songs they sang, not the singers... and anyway, I'd rather listen to an unpolished singer than some Radio Two-friendly 'folk' singer like... won't name any names.

Also, the only way to avoid refashioning the past (in the mistaken belief that you're doing something 'new' - i.e. Espers, Tunng, etc) -is to be aware of the past.

is, Tuesday, 28 February 2006 13:26 (eighteen years ago) link

the important thing was the songs they sang, not the singers...

Exactly. So is it really necessary to listen to unaccompanied field-recordings?

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 13:29 (eighteen years ago) link

... listen to them if you want of course! I just don't think you have to

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 13:30 (eighteen years ago) link

Those singers were aware that it was the song that was important, not themselves. Could be argued that a lot of singers nowadays have that the other way round - they use songs as mere forums for their displays of vocal prowess.

Of course you don't HAVE TO listen to anything.

is, Tuesday, 28 February 2006 13:33 (eighteen years ago) link

Those singers were aware that it was the song that was important, not themselves.

Were they really "aware" of that? Or were they just people who weren't very good singers?

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 13:35 (eighteen years ago) link

Depends how you define a "good" singer. F'rinstance, I think that David Berman or Ian Curtis or Daniel Johnston or The Shaggs are better singers than Celine Dion or Whitney Houston or etc... agree?

is, Tuesday, 28 February 2006 13:38 (eighteen years ago) link

I doubt this was thier "point", but Espers' Rosemary Lane - and music in general - is what turned me on to British folk music. I was so taken by thier version of that song that I searched it out, bought albums suggested to me, etc. If passing on a music to new ears has "no point", espescially stuff being called folk music of some sort, that would suck.

I'm not a folk expert, but to my ears thier version of that song sounds very much like thier own. They claim to have lifted it right off of Jansch who lifted it right off of Clive Palmer. When you read interviews with those guys, they seem pretty deep into the traditions and roots off all sorts of music, espescially British folk. I'm going to listen to it now!

peter x (bucksbreeze), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 13:40 (eighteen years ago) link

To me, those singers I named above, in common with a lot of old field-recorded folk singers I love, sound like they sing because they enjoy it, because they have conviction in what they're singing and why they're singing, rather than just to prove their vocal chops.

is, Tuesday, 28 February 2006 13:42 (eighteen years ago) link

Yeah, Espers' version sounds like their 'own', but I just don't think it's very interesting, and there were probably hundreds of bands playing extremely similar versions of the song in folk clubs in the sixties and seventies. It's just retro music.

is, Tuesday, 28 February 2006 13:44 (eighteen years ago) link

Fair enough. Still a wonderful band.

peter x (bucksbreeze), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 13:45 (eighteen years ago) link

I just think the song is overdone, that's all - soon people are going to be doing old chestnuts like 'She Moved Through the Fair' and thinking they're being dead original because they've added, like, a synth to it or something.

is, Tuesday, 28 February 2006 13:47 (eighteen years ago) link

It must be really amazing, being a mind-reader, and knowing exactly what musicians are *thinking* as they record songs!

Cuair Crithlonracha (kate), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 13:49 (eighteen years ago) link

I understand where you are coming from. I guess it's just a matter of tastes. I have seen that band live three times now and was actually suprised at how unlike thier records they sound. Friends said they used to be more acoustic and "folky", but they were just really dark, cosmic and really mesmerizing. So maybe thier new stuff will do it for you.

peter x (bucksbreeze), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 13:51 (eighteen years ago) link

To me, those singers I named above, in common with a lot of old field-recorded folk singers I love, sound like they sing because they enjoy it, because they have conviction in what they're singing and why they're singing, rather than just to prove their vocal chops

The problem I have is that this is like the Lomax blues recordings, where Lomax seemed to purposefully seek out amateurs and field-hands and whatever thru some notion that they were more "authentic" - adn in doing so produced a distorted picture of what was actually going on. Actually expression or "chops" play a pretty big part in living folk traditions

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 13:51 (eighteen years ago) link

Believe it or not, being technically "good singer" (or a good fiddle player etc) has always been pretty highly regarded in most traditions!

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 13:53 (eighteen years ago) link

"Actually expression or "chops" play a pretty big part in living folk traditions"

Definitely... take, for example, Roscoe Holcomb. Technically dazzling banjo playing. And Jeannie Robertson could have been an opera singer! I love them both - but not necessarily for their technical abilities - but for their abilities to make me feel things.

The best singers/musicians make it sound effortless, as the above-mentioned do. They're technically accomplished but not show-offy.

is, Tuesday, 28 February 2006 13:56 (eighteen years ago) link

And I strongly disagree that either Lomax sought out ineptitude.

is, Tuesday, 28 February 2006 13:58 (eighteen years ago) link

There's a lot of "show-offiness" in folk music!

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 14:00 (eighteen years ago) link

... try being in a room with a half a dozen fiddle players!

Rotatey Diskers With Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 28 February 2006 14:01 (eighteen years ago) link

I don't deny it. But it seems like you're just arguing for argument's sake now.

I've never really liked show-offs in any sphere.

is, Tuesday, 28 February 2006 14:03 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.