Book Group: They're reading Helen DeWitt's "The Last Samurai" (nothing to do with the Tom Cruise movie!) over at Conversational Reading - Maybe we should do the same here?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (117 of them)

(sidenote: she recommended Bernardo Moraes' Minimundo a while back and even though it's only available in Portuguese, it's really quite wonderful in a Borges/Lynch/WTF sort of way. if you have french or spanish you should be able to hack it.)

http://bernardomoraes.wordpress.com/downloads/

Alex in Montreal, Monday, 19 July 2010 23:34 (thirteen years ago) link

(when it's not a source of it-sounds-like-it's-been-genuinely-horrible-but-please-stop-talking-about-your-former-agent)

oligopoly golightly (c sharp major), Monday, 19 July 2010 23:35 (thirteen years ago) link

Although I have not read the book, and have no plans to, I would be happy to discuss it to the best of my ability. (... nods enthusiastically... and grins idiotically)

Aimless, Monday, 19 July 2010 23:36 (thirteen years ago) link

well, YES this is true. BUT when it's a source of transitive properties of arabic verbs or portuguese short stories and so on it's worth it.

Alex in Montreal, Monday, 19 July 2010 23:37 (thirteen years ago) link

Let's stop derailing the thread, though.

Alex in Montreal, Monday, 19 July 2010 23:37 (thirteen years ago) link

~copy ordered~

from local used bookstore (tho they only had it available online?)

be told and get high on coconut (gbx), Monday, 19 July 2010 23:45 (thirteen years ago) link

Looks interesting. I've just ordered a copy from Amazon. Conv Reading schedule doesn't start for ages - maybe follow their chunks over Aug/Sept?

(I'm not very book groupy, btw. I may go silent if I decide I don't like it, or don't have much useful to say. But I'm intrigued)

tetrahedron of space (woof), Monday, 19 July 2010 23:50 (thirteen years ago) link

Yeah, I've never done a book group-y reading thing before BUT conversation about this is so rare except when I force friends of mine to read it, and then the expectations are v. built in re: me insisting how good it is, that we don't usually end up talking about the book itself and its ideas - just if they liked it and why.

Alex in Montreal, Tuesday, 20 July 2010 00:05 (thirteen years ago) link

So even if not scheduled, I'm pretty excited at the idea of a bunch of smart ppl I know on the internets getting their teeth into this.

Alex in Montreal, Tuesday, 20 July 2010 00:05 (thirteen years ago) link

excellent. glad some people have ordered it already. AiM and c-sharp can feel free to discuss the book as long as they don't give too much away or tell us what, exactly, to expect - it seems like one of the joys of this book is that it takes unexpected turns.

once a few people are on board we can set a schedule and that may end up being the conversational reading one although people on here read FAST for the most part.

and i'll probably start a dedicated thread for the actual discussion. thanks all.

jed_, Tuesday, 20 July 2010 02:08 (thirteen years ago) link

I'll be up for it. A couple of thoughts:

* schedule is essential, maybe set it a bit in advance to allow to clear the decks of other reading, and to allow me to get round to ordering the thing

* I like the conversational reading schedule, slower is generally better - the listening club ideas were kind of similar and I could join in for a bit, but I just got swamped and had to bow out when it came to four albums a week. There'd be no fun clocking in after a few days to find keener types already discussing the ending. Fast readers will just have to enjoy savouring it instead.

Ismael Klata, Tuesday, 20 July 2010 09:39 (thirteen years ago) link

Slowish schedule makes sense to me - but maybe ppl who like it can burn through it & vow not to drop spoilers or make 'ah, but that's important later on' comments.

tetrahedron of space (woof), Tuesday, 20 July 2010 09:51 (thirteen years ago) link

I feel like I'm up for this. Agreed on a Conversational Reading type schedule is good and its just now a question of seeing when we could start.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 20 July 2010 10:16 (thirteen years ago) link

I'm tentatively interested, although am dreadful at keeping this sort of thing up, I'm afraid. Initial burst of enthusiasm followed by promises of more developed thoughts actually followed by buggery fuck.

GamalielRatsey, Tuesday, 20 July 2010 10:56 (thirteen years ago) link

i'm in.

ledge, Tuesday, 20 July 2010 11:03 (thirteen years ago) link

annoyingly i can only find (at a reasonable price) the vintage edition with the crappy cover.

ledge, Tuesday, 20 July 2010 11:13 (thirteen years ago) link

i like that cover although the us one is probably a better edition.

jed_, Tuesday, 20 July 2010 11:42 (thirteen years ago) link

I'm all in

dyao, Tuesday, 20 July 2010 11:53 (thirteen years ago) link

my copy arrived today. I've a pile of stuff to read so i can wait until we're all in and on board. i'm thinking we should stick to the conversational reading schedule, yes?

so there's me, dyao, gbx, ledge,

possibly xyzzzz__, ismael, GamalielRatsey, woof, Alex and c-sharp for a re-read?

and aimless who won't read it but will contribute thought provoking non sequiturs ;-)

anyone else? the more the merrier.

jed_, Friday, 23 July 2010 14:27 (thirteen years ago) link

Hmm, I just got this out from the library, though I really should be reading Bros K, but sure, I'm theoretically in.

"the English sweat" (a new disease) (clotpoll), Friday, 23 July 2010 14:35 (thirteen years ago) link

Mine turned up a couple of days ago, started reading and enjoying last night - I'll put it aside for a bit, and I reckon I'm in.

tetrahedron of space (woof), Friday, 23 July 2010 14:38 (thirteen years ago) link

My copy should have arrived - I'll check tomorrow morning. Yes, I'm in.

Hide the prickforks (GamalielRatsey), Friday, 23 July 2010 14:44 (thirteen years ago) link

yeah, i'm in, and don't mind a) waiting until everyone's ready to start (whether we go with conversational reading or not) and also b) refraining from spoilering.

a sharp minor (c sharp major), Friday, 23 July 2010 14:46 (thirteen years ago) link

I've ordered a copy and guess I'll get it in a few weeks. So, I'm in. I can't promise that I'll have a damn thing to say, though I might have poor enough judgment to say it anyway.

Øystein, Friday, 23 July 2010 14:50 (thirteen years ago) link

when do i need to get hold of a copy for? my 'current reading/to read' 'pile' would actually now reach the ceiling if i were to turn it back into a single pile, i have realised

thomp, Friday, 23 July 2010 14:56 (thirteen years ago) link

as long as I am able to get it i am def in.

xyzzzz__, Friday, 23 July 2010 15:11 (thirteen years ago) link

thomp, we may wait till early September to start or slighty , but not much, sooner. have a look at the link in the first post, we may use that schedule.

jed_, Friday, 23 July 2010 15:32 (thirteen years ago) link

I'm in for early Sept.

franny glass, Friday, 23 July 2010 15:54 (thirteen years ago) link

cool, let's go for that. any objections.

jed_, Friday, 23 July 2010 16:02 (thirteen years ago) link

wth i ordered my copy on monday and it still hasnt shipped

doubly infuriating since the used bookstore i ordered it from is literally two blocks from my house

be told and get high on coconut (gbx), Friday, 23 July 2010 16:12 (thirteen years ago) link

can you not pop round and be like 'hi, any chance i could pick the book up that you haven't shipped yet?'

a sharp minor (c sharp major), Friday, 23 July 2010 17:15 (thirteen years ago) link

don't think so---they said it was available online only, which probably means it's shipping from some warehouse in the burbs or w/e

still it is just weird/hilarious to me to mail order something from someplace so close

be told and get high on coconut (gbx), Friday, 23 July 2010 17:16 (thirteen years ago) link

Just ordered a copy. I will be on dis ting.

Ismael Klata, Friday, 23 July 2010 19:28 (thirteen years ago) link

great.

jed_, Friday, 23 July 2010 20:56 (thirteen years ago) link

a copy of this is waiting for me at the library, so as soon as i finish up avoiding whatever it is i'm currently meant to be reading i'm gonna take a look. i don't know if i'll be in sync with everyone but i'm definitely watching.

Ok, got my copy. Spent the weekend at a wedding full of colossally pompous cvnts who liked talking about their cars and in general commenting on the world around them in the manner of people who feel they are absolutely right and life is a fvcking competition to prove you are the rightest person of all. (Bray if you agree). That sour-minded buffoon J Clarkson's evil spawn.

Talking about books is good. Bring it on.

Hide the prickforks (GamalielRatsey), Tuesday, 27 July 2010 18:57 (thirteen years ago) link

My copy arrived this morning. First impression is that it's incredibly fragmented - every page I've opened is on a different topic and in a different style. I'll put it aside for now, but am ready to go.

Ismael Klata, Friday, 30 July 2010 17:13 (thirteen years ago) link

I stalled 100 pages into this a few months back, after the missus raved about it, so this might give me some impetus to crack on with it...

Stevie T, Friday, 30 July 2010 19:26 (thirteen years ago) link

ordered; has not arrived yet; will not start, probably, until others do

thomp, Friday, 30 July 2010 19:28 (thirteen years ago) link

the UK ans UK editions have a different number of pages so we'll have to determine how the pages relate for the reading schedule. i commented on the conversational reading thread so hopefully Scott, who runs the blog, will get back to me with the info i need to find the UK page numbers.

good to have so many people on board for this.

jed_, Monday, 2 August 2010 11:47 (thirteen years ago) link

jed_, does your webmail work? sent you the necc info.

cis-dur (c sharp major), Monday, 2 August 2010 12:22 (thirteen years ago) link

some lovely ilxor just emailed me the chapter breaks etc for the US edition

user was cis-dur (i'm not sure who that is!) so thanks, mysterious stranger.

i'll look these out later and post the info, thanks.

xpost!

thanks c-sharp, i got it.

jed_, Monday, 2 August 2010 12:23 (thirteen years ago) link

my copy arrived. i then found a copy, in a box, at work.

thomp, Tuesday, 3 August 2010 18:41 (thirteen years ago) link

got my copy

pies. (gbx), Tuesday, 3 August 2010 18:42 (thirteen years ago) link

ditto. it's heftier than i was expecting!

ledge, Tuesday, 3 August 2010 19:29 (thirteen years ago) link

does anyone need a copy?

thomp, Tuesday, 3 August 2010 20:37 (thirteen years ago) link

i do.

xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 3 August 2010 22:04 (thirteen years ago) link

ok this is cheating but I'm 20 pages in and v v pleased already

pies. (gbx), Tuesday, 3 August 2010 22:28 (thirteen years ago) link

have we decided on a schedule yet? i'm finding it physically difficult to restrain myself from reading this

pies. (gbx), Friday, 6 August 2010 19:12 (thirteen years ago) link

perhaps we could do the conversational reading schedule, but a month earlier.

the dialectic of specs (c sharp major), Friday, 6 August 2010 20:47 (thirteen years ago) link

I've never bought a thing on amazon (lammm___e, I know). Might get round to finally doing it.

xyzzzz__, Thursday, 19 August 2010 19:05 (thirteen years ago) link

5th is fine by me.

ledge, Saturday, 21 August 2010 19:06 (thirteen years ago) link

xyzzzzz, email me yr address - tom dot west at gmail dot com

thomp, Sunday, 22 August 2010 11:40 (thirteen years ago) link

thomp - check yr email.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 22 August 2010 20:14 (thirteen years ago) link

can i just clear something up, since i've never really done anything like this, but if i set week one as 5th-12th of august, for example, does that mean we read the book during that week and post while we read - or read the book that week and post at the end of that week - or that we have all read the first section by the 5th and discuss it afterwards?

jed_, Monday, 23 August 2010 11:06 (thirteen years ago) link

I'll be off-internet for much of September, but should be able to check in once or twice a week. I'll try to drop in my thoughts on scheduled sections, but may not be able to get into discussion.

tetrahedron of space (woof), Monday, 23 August 2010 11:31 (thirteen years ago) link

I've never book grouped either. It's up to you I guess, jed_, though I'd favour the first option (reading the first bit during the first week of discussion) because:

- gives me a little more time to clear the decks
- allows posting in real time as interesting thoughts occur
- means the discussion isn't necessarily just backwards-looking
- spoilers are easily avoided by avoiding the thread
- whereas spoilers might actually be useful, if that's your reading style

(why must my iPhone autocorrect 'reading' to 'Reading'? It's very annoying)

Ismael Klata, Monday, 23 August 2010 13:10 (thirteen years ago) link

why must my iPhone autocorrect 'reading' to 'Reading'? It's very annoying

Drives me nuts.

Hide the prickforks (GamalielRatsey), Monday, 23 August 2010 13:14 (thirteen years ago) link

Plus it's kind of creepy when you do mean Reading. It shouldn't know.

tetrahedron of space (woof), Monday, 23 August 2010 13:20 (thirteen years ago) link

xyz&c., spare copy in the mail to you today

thomp, Monday, 23 August 2010 13:30 (thirteen years ago) link

Thanks thomp!

xyzzzz__, Monday, 23 August 2010 20:21 (thirteen years ago) link

like… is today the day?

j., Sunday, 5 September 2010 06:22 (thirteen years ago) link

Yes. Will be cracking on and hopefully get a comment or two in as the week goes on.

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 5 September 2010 09:51 (thirteen years ago) link

what kind of schedule are we looking at? the one in the first post is ~ 100 pages a week. could be tough - might end up reading it in one and then just going back over.

ledge, Sunday, 5 September 2010 09:56 (thirteen years ago) link

from jed above:

ok, starting on the 5th with a 4 week schedule rather than a 6 week one.

so you can take a knife to your copy and divide it by four parts of equal size?

xyzzzz__, Sunday, 5 September 2010 10:00 (thirteen years ago) link

will do :) my copy is 480 pages so ~ 120 each week.

ledge, Sunday, 5 September 2010 10:17 (thirteen years ago) link

I can't decide whether this should have a new thread or not

Ismael Klata, Sunday, 5 September 2010 10:25 (thirteen years ago) link

if we're doing it in four parts i'd approx suggest (us edition)

1-98
99-189 (chapter titled 'i. we never get off at sloane square for nebraska friend chicken')
191-358 (donald richie quote, chapter starts '20 march 1993')
358-end (chapter starts 'i decided not to apply')

this is top-light end-heavy but the thing is there's a natural break at p190 which one might as well go with.

(tbh it's easier to break into thirds than quarters)

czyczyczyczy comparative (c sharp major), Sunday, 5 September 2010 12:45 (thirteen years ago) link

sorry! i'll start a new thread later today & link up the schedule with c-sharps info. thanks.

jed_, Sunday, 5 September 2010 12:52 (thirteen years ago) link

think I've got a weird edition - it's the hardcover, clocks in at 530 pages.

dayo, Sunday, 5 September 2010 13:11 (thirteen years ago) link

us paperback is 530 pages as well?

ps that's 'nebraska fried chicken', not 'friend chicken', i cannot type

czyczyczyczy comparative (c sharp major), Sunday, 5 September 2010 13:27 (thirteen years ago) link

oh okay - just saw the 480 pager upthread and assumed that's what everybody had. well, guess I'll get started reading!

dayo, Sunday, 5 September 2010 13:28 (thirteen years ago) link

are we agreed on a 4 week schedule starting NOW?

jed_, Sunday, 5 September 2010 13:40 (thirteen years ago) link

Yep, fine by me.

GamalielRatsey, Sunday, 5 September 2010 13:44 (thirteen years ago) link

Yep, go for't

Ismael Klata, Sunday, 5 September 2010 13:49 (thirteen years ago) link

Is this book about Samurai?

I saw some trailer for the film once and I thought it was. But whenever I see a quotation from it here it seems to be about modern Britain or something!

the pinefox, Sunday, 5 September 2010 18:11 (thirteen years ago) link

Book Group: They're reading Helen DeWitt's "The Last Samurai" (nothing to do with the Tom Cruise movie!) over at Conversational Reading - Maybe we should do the same here?

jed_, Sunday, 5 September 2010 18:34 (thirteen years ago) link

pinefox, the samurai are <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/books/00/10/15/reviews/001015.15goldbet.html";>the movie samurai serving as substitute father-figures</a> for the main character. the book is full of LANGUAGES and TRANSLATION, maybe you will think it is neat.

j., Sunday, 5 September 2010 22:13 (thirteen years ago) link

couldn't open that last link; clearly misread the thread title; think I have been somewhat misled by conversation at rare ILX FAP the other week where I thought all the ILB people were saying this novel WAS the same as that Cruise film.

the pinefox, Monday, 6 September 2010 16:56 (thirteen years ago) link

whoops, here you go:

nyt review of 'the last samurai'

j., Monday, 6 September 2010 17:13 (thirteen years ago) link

come on board, pinefox. it would be good to have your input.

jed_, Monday, 6 September 2010 18:56 (thirteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.