Apparantly they should get their arty friends to publish articles in a magazine that make reference to their retard friends.
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 14 October 2002 18:49 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 14 October 2002 18:53 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Jody Beth Rosen, Monday, 14 October 2002 18:58 (twenty-one years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 14 October 2002 18:59 (twenty-one years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 14 October 2002 19:01 (twenty-one years ago) link
Vice makes me laugh, which is more than most things do these days.
― geeta (geeta), Monday, 14 October 2002 19:03 (twenty-one years ago) link
I 'love' a white guy living in Japan telling black guys in New York that they're wrong to object to these white guys using the word 'nigger' and trying to act like the black men are being patronising! Hilarious irony!
My best gay friend likes and uses the word faggot, but the wrong person uses it the wrong way, in the wrong tone, he's liable to break them in half.
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 14 October 2002 19:04 (twenty-one years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 14 October 2002 19:05 (twenty-one years ago) link
― geeta (geeta), Monday, 14 October 2002 19:05 (twenty-one years ago) link
― geeta (geeta), Monday, 14 October 2002 19:06 (twenty-one years ago) link
(actually I just posted that because I wonder where I fall)
[also I tried to call you a "f-g" as a joke right here and I couldn't do it, not evern doubly or triply ironically or whatever the hell it would be at this point].
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 14 October 2002 19:07 (twenty-one years ago) link
sterl, if you have to ask you'll never know, etc etc.
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 14 October 2002 19:08 (twenty-one years ago) link
so wouldn't that sort of cycle be eventually repeated if the arguments momus espouses hold true -- and wouldn't the underlying message of these mass-marketed uses of these words, then, also mutate into an affirmation of already-existing prejuidices that are held by the majority of americans, for the simple purpose of making as many dollars as possible?
― maura (maura), Monday, 14 October 2002 19:26 (twenty-one years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 14 October 2002 19:28 (twenty-one years ago) link
― geeta (geeta), Monday, 14 October 2002 19:30 (twenty-one years ago) link
i don't know how this fits with maura's statement but i don't want the dream lost forever. (her coochie is still burned into my memory.)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 14 October 2002 19:32 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 14 October 2002 19:34 (twenty-one years ago) link
Uh anyway, back to Vice...I don't think that made any sense.
― geeta (geeta), Monday, 14 October 2002 19:53 (twenty-one years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 14 October 2002 19:55 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Andy K (Andy K), Monday, 14 October 2002 19:55 (twenty-one years ago) link
― geeta (geeta), Monday, 14 October 2002 19:59 (twenty-one years ago) link
also, as maura just brought up in conversation with me, it's equating purchase with a creative act which is one of the things that's made american culture so fucking vacuous to begin with.
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:02 (twenty-one years ago) link
second, wouldn't you argue though that the original sentiment and the mass-marketed version of it have two very different public connotations? this is important, because the provocations that these word-images would have on their viewers were essential to their being scrawled in the first place.
also, a hypothetical: if a girl bought this mass-marketed shirt and wore it to school unadorned, and then ran into 1 or 3 or 5 people wearing that shirt in the same way, since it is, after all, mass-marketed, how would her 'empowering' wearing of the shirt come across? so much of the way messages are looked at is rooted in context -- would this 'more empowered' 11-year-old then change the rest of the shirt's context (including, perhaps, the shirt itself) to make herself and her intentions stand out?
― maura (maura), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:05 (twenty-one years ago) link
(spoken in a non-normative tone of voice)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:06 (twenty-one years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:07 (twenty-one years ago) link
I also read way too many Japanese fashion magazines.
― geeta (geeta), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:14 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:15 (twenty-one years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:16 (twenty-one years ago) link
― maura (maura), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:18 (twenty-one years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:19 (twenty-one years ago) link
― geeta (geeta), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:19 (twenty-one years ago) link
― boxcubed (boxcubed), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:21 (twenty-one years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:21 (twenty-one years ago) link
― geeta (geeta), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:23 (twenty-one years ago) link
― maura (maura), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:24 (twenty-one years ago) link
(unless bc meant my beat digger analogy which i also thought was on point)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:25 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:27 (twenty-one years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:28 (twenty-one years ago) link
but Vice started in Canada!
― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:29 (twenty-one years ago) link
― maura (maura), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:31 (twenty-one years ago) link
haha Dave Q to thread!
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:33 (twenty-one years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:33 (twenty-one years ago) link
To relate this back to Vice, it's perfectly fine for them to ironically fling epithets back and forth under the guise of changing the world but they should be cognizant of the fact that the majority of the people who wander across them aren't going to buy their interpretation and be prepared to deal with the consequences of it (ie, my family beating your ass).
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:40 (twenty-one years ago) link
(and then they all lez up)
― Some jokes NEVER get old... (Dan Perry), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:41 (twenty-one years ago) link
― i love you. (dubplatestyle), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:42 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:44 (twenty-one years ago) link
― jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 14 October 2002 20:46 (twenty-one years ago) link
Wednesday night at about 1 AM I was riding my bicycle home from [work] when I met a red light about 15 or 20 blocks away from my house. Sometimes if there are absolutely no cars or anything I'll run a red light, but if I see headlights I assume they belong to a cop car containing a cop who will give me a 200 dollar ticket and probably harass me to boot. So, I decided to stay put. It's a long light, and I sat there and sat there.
A car coming down the road I was waiting to cross suddenly stopped at the green light and a man opened the door and got out of the driver's seat. He was black, probably between 20 and 30 years old. That's all I know and will ever know about this person. He was approaching me rather quickly and purposefully. I had a feeling that he was going to fuck with me in some way, and was sort of waiting to see how.
He said "what up nigga?" and before I responded said "Where you from, nigga?" I can't remember exactly but I think what I did was look back and gesture vaguely down the street in the direction I'd come from - I didn't really know what he could mean by asking me where I was from - "I'm from Long Island" is maybe what I should have said but why would he care? Anyway, as I turned back to face him and began to say...something, I don't even know...I got punched in the face, hard, at least once and fell down. I sat there in the road with my bike lying next to me and heard the guy get back in his car and drive away. I think he said something else but I'm not sure.
I couldn't see very well because a) I had just been punched in the face and b) my glasses weren't where they should have been. I didn't want to put my glasses on because I was sure they were broken, but they weren't. I sat there for a bit longer, and touched my lip with my hand and my tongue to see how badly it was fucked up. I slowly picked myself and my bike up and continued to ride home.
What was running through my head as I rode home was "What am I supposed to do now?" I felt like there must be some kind of appropriate reaction. I didn't want to call the police because the police in my neighborhood are fucking assholes (there's another long, much worse story I could tell here...). I didn't remember anything about the car or the guy so there was no way I'd be able to give the cops any information anyway. I wondered if this was some sort of lesson, like, O.K. it's now unsafe to ride home at night, but that's bullshit. I've been riding home from [work] late at night for a year and I've never even felt uncomfortable before. What managed to cross my mind for a second was: maybe I don't belong in that neighborhood, like, getting punched by this guy was some kind of message to move to a different part of town. That was the most fucked thought of all. Thinking rationally, would you deduce that this guy was acting as an authorized representative of the neighborhood?
I was just in the wrong place at the wrong time. I'm lucky that I didn't get hurt more. I mean, if the guy had wanted to keep on kicking me or some shit he could've just gone ahead and had his way with me. At least I was just randomly punched - people get randomly stabbed and shot, too. I still kind of can't believe it, but, it also makes sense in a weird way. I mean, if I were driving around looking for somebody to punch, I would probably would have punched me too.
I don't know what to make of the semiotics and/or semantics of this man's referring to my friend (who is, as you probably inferred, white) as a "nigga"; it seems bizarre to me, to be frank: was he using it primarily as a term of denigration? As a way of totally confusing my friend and making him feel uncomfortable? Is it what he calls everybody? I've no idea.
(I do know, however, what I probably would've done to that man had I been there and been suitably armed. My friend is a sweetheart who would never hurt anyone.)
As for the "N-word", unless I'm quoting something or otherwise making reference to a statement not my own, I never use it, whether ending in "-er" or "-a". Getting in the habit of using it in everyday speech strikes me as a very dangerous game -- the risk/benefit ratio is pretty atrocious.
― Phil (phil), Monday, 14 October 2002 21:06 (twenty-one years ago) link
― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 14 October 2002 23:09 (twenty-one years ago) link
Jess says 'no sound is innocent'. Race stuff is 90% of what makes Dan despair of humanity. The thread seems mostly to have concluded that re-casting meanings is a guilty activity. Indeed it is. But that doesn't mean we shouldn't do it. The brave will do it, despite threats of a beatdown.
Dan again:
This goes back to my distinction between acts and deeds, and my first point on this whole thread. By all means be enraged (or encourage your family to be enraged) by transvalued epithets. After all, no interpretative act can be innocent, whatever the intended outcome of the transvaluation. But don't forget (and don't let your violent family forget) to judge by acts too. Vice employs homosexual and black contributors and promotes their perspectives and their terms. In the subculture Vice addresses, those people actually have considerably more cultural capital (ie cool) than straight and white people. It's by those deeds, and in that context, that you should judge the mag's editors.
― Momus (Momus), Monday, 14 October 2002 23:59 (twenty-one years ago) link