yeah so
― flapjackin (gbx), Tuesday, 22 June 2010 21:41 (thirteen years ago) link
thinkin about sucking it up and buying another cam
now the q is: used GF1, new GF1, or wait another six or so months for the GF2 to come out (which apparently will have an in body EVF???)
― flapjackin (gbx), Tuesday, 22 June 2010 21:42 (thirteen years ago) link
Still coveting the GF1+20/1.7; if I had the money I'd snap a used one up like a shot. There's always going to be a better model round the corner (unless you really missed the EVF?), I'd just go with what you know. Though the original Oly Pen (EP1) is now half-price in some places (though inferior in most ways).
― Michael Jones, Tuesday, 22 June 2010 23:19 (thirteen years ago) link
I'd just go with what you know
yeah this makes sense. i'd just gotten comfortable with the thing when it got nicked.
gonna do some financial soul-searching here
― flapjackin (gbx), Tuesday, 22 June 2010 23:23 (thirteen years ago) link
Def used if you can find one right? Built like a fine-precision brick.
― idm@hyperreal.org (lukas), Tuesday, 22 June 2010 23:26 (thirteen years ago) link
next q:
never bought anything from abroad on ebay (there are CHEAP NEW GF-1s in like taiwan) except for the $15 faux-leather skin for my old one (from Japan, from the manufacturer).
slightly nervous about wiring $700 overseas and not having much recourse if they are shady. is it worth $100 for, uh, transactional insurance, or am i just a) a noob or b) some kinda racist
― flapjackin (gbx), Tuesday, 22 June 2010 23:28 (thirteen years ago) link
the E-PL1 can be had new for as low as $525 on amazon... and it takes the olympus vf-2 evf, which by all accounts is better than the gf-1's EVF... and the AF speed is nearly on par with panasonic cams after the latest firmware.
― crüt it out (dyao), Tuesday, 22 June 2010 23:31 (thirteen years ago) link
as for q2 IME it's better to stay local when buying, check out photography forums for sale sections. these cameras in general are cheaper in the states than in Asia, believe it or not. for example this GF1 body is only $400 shipped. lots of gear forums out there, check out getdpi, fred miranda, mu-43, four thirds forum, etc. etc.
― crüt it out (dyao), Tuesday, 22 June 2010 23:38 (thirteen years ago) link
i have it now :D
― flapjackin (gbx), Friday, 25 June 2010 13:58 (thirteen years ago) link
Hurrah!
― Michael Jones, Friday, 25 June 2010 14:20 (thirteen years ago) link
inexplicably brought it to work. like, just to have it nearby or something.
― flapjackin (gbx), Friday, 25 June 2010 16:57 (thirteen years ago) link
i usually keep mine nearby tbh
― idm@hyperreal.org (lukas), Friday, 25 June 2010 17:00 (thirteen years ago) link
http://www.cosina.co.jp/seihin/voigt/v-lens/micro-ft/index.html
― dayo, Thursday, 26 August 2010 07:31 (thirteen years ago) link
http://www.cosina.co.jp/seihin/voigt/v-lens/micro-ft/25-0.95-top.jpg
gf1 on its way 2 me
― (ㅅ) (am0n), Wednesday, 1 December 2010 01:10 (thirteen years ago) link
=D
what lens u get?
― .\ /. (dayo), Wednesday, 1 December 2010 01:13 (thirteen years ago) link
20mm package + 8gb card
― (ㅅ) (am0n), Wednesday, 1 December 2010 01:14 (thirteen years ago) link
i don't really know anything about the lenses :/
― (ㅅ) (am0n), Wednesday, 1 December 2010 01:18 (thirteen years ago) link
it was between that and a 14-45 lens
― (ㅅ) (am0n), Wednesday, 1 December 2010 01:19 (thirteen years ago) link
you made the right choice
― .\ /. (dayo), Wednesday, 1 December 2010 01:43 (thirteen years ago) link
one of us
― BIG MUFFIN (gbx), Wednesday, 1 December 2010 04:33 (thirteen years ago) link
good to know but why is it better? the 14-45 is a zoom right
― (ㅅ) (am0n), Wednesday, 1 December 2010 18:40 (thirteen years ago) link
i'd been wanting one of these for awhile thx to this thread btw. can't wait
― (ㅅ) (am0n), Wednesday, 1 December 2010 18:42 (thirteen years ago) link
better glass, according to CW
― BIG MUFFIN (gbx), Wednesday, 1 December 2010 18:46 (thirteen years ago) link
― (ㅅ) (am0n), Thursday, December 2, 2010 2:40 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark
faster lens (2-3 1/2 stops faster depending on what zoom length)
better image quality
― .\ /. (dayo), Thursday, 2 December 2010 00:19 (thirteen years ago) link
smaller, doesnt look like your camera has a chubby
lighter
― .\ /. (dayo), Thursday, 2 December 2010 00:20 (thirteen years ago) link
its pretty awesome but.. maybe i should have waited for the gh2 since its got the viewfinder and high iso capability. the viewfinder for gf1 is like $150!
― (ㅅ) (am0n), Friday, 3 December 2010 18:16 (thirteen years ago) link
the lack of a VF is the only thing that bugs me about the gf1. i keep holding out hope that they'll upgrade the EVF but i have a feeling that'll never happen
― BIG MUFFIN (gbx), Friday, 3 December 2010 18:18 (thirteen years ago) link
do you have the current one
― (ㅅ) (am0n), Friday, 3 December 2010 18:19 (thirteen years ago) link
nope. and have never tried it out, either, mostly because THE INTERNET says its subpar. then again, i think there's a heavy helping of camera dork perfectionist at work in the reviews i've read where dudes are all "it can't do fine manual focusing" because i use AF basically all the time. i just want it for framing and bright light situations that glare out the screen
have considered getting an optical VF (like a voigtlander or oly). they're cheaper and look hella classy
― BIG MUFFIN (gbx), Friday, 3 December 2010 18:22 (thirteen years ago) link
thinking about this
http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-7-14mm-Micro-Four-Thirds/dp/B0028Y5GKK
wait, no I'm not, it's almost a bill
― just woke up (lukas), Friday, 3 December 2010 18:31 (thirteen years ago) link
I had that 7-14mm, had a bitch of a time selling it on the used market. you can find them for like 7-800 nowadays
― .\ /. (dayo), Saturday, 4 December 2010 01:04 (thirteen years ago) link
― BIG MUFFIN (gbx), Saturday, December 4, 2010 2:22 AM (6 hours ago) Bookmark
if you only use the VF for framing, there won't be a big diff between the GF1 EVF and the GH1 EVF. if you're always using it to check critical focus on your flower shots or w/e then yeah it might be a big deal. but yeah $150 for the GH1 EVF is kinda a big deal.
optical VFs are pretty good, I used on on my E-P1, no complaints
― .\ /. (dayo), Saturday, 4 December 2010 01:05 (thirteen years ago) link
errr $150 for the GF1 EVF.
― .\ /. (dayo), Saturday, 4 December 2010 01:06 (thirteen years ago) link
why'd ya sell the lens?
― just woke up (lukas), Saturday, 4 December 2010 01:18 (thirteen years ago) link
cause I sold my E-P1! I'm shooting film atm
― .\ /. (dayo), Saturday, 4 December 2010 01:20 (thirteen years ago) link
it was a great lens. but atm I have a voigtlander 12mm which is even wider
― .\ /. (dayo), Saturday, 4 December 2010 01:21 (thirteen years ago) link
but yeah $150 for the GH1 EVF is kinda a big deal.
right, esp if all i need it for is framing. i've heard the Oly optical VF mates with the 20mm lumix lens pretty perfectly, and can be had for half the price.
i won't be getting any other lenses for my lumix for a v long time (if at all, tbh), so optical is a-ok in my book
― BIG MUFFIN (gbx), Saturday, 4 December 2010 01:25 (thirteen years ago) link
http://grab.by/7IAP
― .\ /. (dayo), Saturday, 4 December 2010 01:25 (thirteen years ago) link
yeah the oly is good because it's in 4:3 ratio, I used the voigtlander 35mm metal one which was good but displayed brightlines in a 3:2 ratio, I never really cared about what I caught in the edges of my pictures though so ~shrug~
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2687/4134711827_e14bb34d0f.jpg
― .\ /. (dayo), Saturday, 4 December 2010 01:26 (thirteen years ago) link
ultra wides are def specialist lenses though, I only use mine like once or twice a month
― .\ /. (dayo), Saturday, 4 December 2010 01:28 (thirteen years ago) link
also have been thinking that if my gf-1 is just gonna be a lo-pro fixed lens job, i should sell it and get that fujix100
― BIG MUFFIN (gbx), Saturday, 4 December 2010 01:28 (thirteen years ago) link
how did we post at the same time O_O
yeah the fuji x 100 looks sexy, I would wait to see what reviews say
― .\ /. (dayo), Saturday, 4 December 2010 01:29 (thirteen years ago) link
O_O
― BIG MUFFIN (gbx), Saturday, 4 December 2010 01:29 (thirteen years ago) link
oh for sure. if the glass isn't better than the lumix, there's no point.
― BIG MUFFIN (gbx), Saturday, 4 December 2010 01:30 (thirteen years ago) link
― .\ /. (dayo), Saturday, December 4, 2010 9:28 AM (0 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― BIG MUFFIN (gbx), Saturday, December 4, 2010 9:28 AM (0 seconds ago) Bookmark
attention stet we broke ilx
― .\ /. (dayo), Saturday, 4 December 2010 01:30 (thirteen years ago) link
yeah I would also see about responsiveness, AF speed, menu interface, etc.
― .\ /. (dayo), Saturday, 4 December 2010 01:31 (thirteen years ago) link
oh for sure. i'm not just gonna do it on an impulse anyway. probably can't afford it anyway!
― BIG MUFFIN (gbx), Saturday, 4 December 2010 01:32 (thirteen years ago) link
i sent it back for an exchange :/
― am0n, Wednesday, 8 December 2010 22:59 (thirteen years ago) link