Ladies and gentlemen....the 1990s ILX SINGLES POLL RESULTS

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1803 of them)
FAIRLY = ACCURATELY in that case, ya dork.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:35 (nineteen years ago) link


OK all I'm trying to say is, diversity in poll results look nicer, but the lack of it does not necessarily make them ridiculus and stupid. And don't say you didn't say that!

daavid (daavid), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:48 (nineteen years ago) link

Kevin I'm not saying we should have an all-black list either! Just saying that race IS obviously an issue (among other social issues) in how a poll like this turns out. Consensus does not identify individual issues of race but it does show a group trend with regards to how race is treated and which kinds of music will be accepted and which wont, and what black music (mostly) white people are aware of and which they arent - an issue of exposure which is also in many ways an issue of the ways our societies fail when it comes to racial issues! Were was "Come on (Ride the train)" and "Da Dip" and assorted other musical moments?

To dan: can you expound on that? I'm not quite sure what you'd mean, i'd be interested to know why some black american music is accepted in the UK and some isn't ("accepted" = "popular")

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:49 (nineteen years ago) link

Basically I'm attacking the reaction that people are having because race was brought up, just because race wasn't a decisive factor on one level doesn't mean that it didn't have an affect at all!!!

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:50 (nineteen years ago) link

No, I said that. And I think 10% taken up by two bands makes it automatically pretty ridiculous and stupid.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:53 (nineteen years ago) link

Yes. My point wasn't about an all black or all white list, (I wasn't claiming 'reverse racism' or anything) just that if we put aside ideas of intentional racism, then all lists of all types are equally products of a racist society because the people making them are. It's an obvious point, sorry. Race certainly isn't irellevant in music, but in this poll, without any evidence someone is actively racist it's a silly thing to bring up.
(x-post)

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:54 (nineteen years ago) link

crybaby ;o)

x-post dammit

Porkpie (porkpie), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:55 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm surprised some people haven't taken their ball from ILX and gone home.

miccio (miccio), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:57 (nineteen years ago) link

I know it's a lame thing to say, but for fuck's sake, stop taking it so seriously, it's only music for crying out loud

Porkpie (porkpie), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:59 (nineteen years ago) link

I think some of them have - it's been kind of quiet recently.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:59 (nineteen years ago) link

(x-post)

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:00 (nineteen years ago) link

It's definitely a more respectable way of responding to the discovery that people don't share your sense of "rules".

miccio (miccio), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:00 (nineteen years ago) link

I still disagree. You're being dogmatic. Criticize St. Etienne or Pulp or whatever, not the fact that they took 10% of the poll!

daavid (daavid), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:00 (nineteen years ago) link

I meant 'categoric'. Sorry, English isn't my first language

daavid (daavid), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:03 (nineteen years ago) link

"It's definitely a more respectable way of responding to the discovery that people don't share your sense of "rules"."

Somehow I don't see myself taking advice on respectability from Anthony Miccio anytime soon.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:11 (nineteen years ago) link

Kevin - I think its perfectly fine to complain about the fact that so many Brits haven't heard a lot of great American (black) music do to societal issues (both race-related and not)! (and had the brits NOT been the ones to have 2 artists representing 10% of the list, I think they could claim the reverse).

My point is that it may be obvious "we are all a product of society, what we're exposed to, and how we learn to engage with 'other' music" but I think its OK to complain about that fact when it is confirmed by a list like this!

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:12 (nineteen years ago) link

"I still disagree. You're being dogmatic. Criticize St. Etienne or Pulp or whatever, not the fact that they took 10% of the poll!"

I'm baffled why I should do that. I don't care about Pulp or St Etienne except that they tolk 10% of the poll.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:15 (nineteen years ago) link

I do take offense at the statement that "becase i voted for St Et and Pulp" that i'm somehow inherently racist - whether intentional or not. i'm a huge fan of dub, roots, techno, drum n bass, booty, crunk, hip hop, soul, r&b, disco, ska, jazz, afro and all kinds of other music that is portrayed as "black" (even though to be honest i couldn't care less what someone's race is - a good song/musician is just that).

cases in point:

one of my favorite bands - long fin killie (ROCK -inherently "white" according to our "non-racist friends dee and AlexSF - as played by a band led by a non-white)

or the beastie boys (HIPHOP - inherently "black"? oh i forgot they're white - therefore they've just co-opted someone else's culture and our "non-racist" friends tend to dismiss them.)

good thing djdee and Alex in SF are so colorblind and UNRACIST! *cough*

seriously, i think the most racist people in this thread are the very ones who started trying to pull the race card bullshit because they weren't pleased with the results of the thread

i voted the songs i liked because i liked them, not because of the race of the artists, the amount of "racial" music i've been exposed to, or any ulterior motive. to suggest that votes were cast according to people's races is simply bullshit and embarassing to the accusers. or at least it should be, if they were intelligent enough to realize how insulting they were being to any non-whites in the poll (actually to pretty much EVERYONE in the poll).

now fuck off and go listen to some music

rentboy (rentboy), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:22 (nineteen years ago) link

When did I pull the race card?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:23 (nineteen years ago) link

Okay I read this board daily but almost never post and this thread is a great example as to why.

I think you all are smart enough to realize that (almost) nobody here is racist or sexist. They like what they like. And yet, thread after thread ends up turning into a race war (despite the fact that there are few actual black people here)

In the end, there's something everyone here has in common. Not many people in the world would spend so many hours of their lives arguing about a fucking LIST. Get over it.

mister lurker, Friday, 12 November 2004 00:27 (nineteen years ago) link

also, in response to someones post upthread, concerning what music we are exposed to:

the music that we are exposed to depends on our parents. i know that my parents along with many other parents dont want their kids listening to music with parental advisory stickers. since i was a teenager or less all of the 90's, i could not possibly be exposed to those artists.

thats all i suppose

todd swiss (eliti), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:28 (nineteen years ago) link

No. I am bored at work and until I find something else on the web to occupy my time for these hours of the day I will continue to argue banally about bullshit like this 90s. So suck it up and fuck off.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:28 (nineteen years ago) link

Hey rentboy you clearly didn't read a single thing I said so yeah fuck off yourself.

Me:

cinniblount made a mistake arguing that people are racist for liking Pulp or St. Etienne which is obviously not fair.

I'm talking about the way our social upbringing and exposure to diversity affects what music we are aware of and such. As much a criticism of nationalistic taste as racism as geographic focus as "hometown pride" or whatever other social tendencies result in limiting our engagement with other forms of music, the kind of engagement that lets 10% of the list be dominated by a rather specific aesthetic. I'm also not accusing any individuals of doing anything "wrong," just wishing that as a group ILM was engaging with a wider range of music.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:29 (nineteen years ago) link

I mean, look at the hip-hop threads, they're almost all started by a very small circle of people.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:31 (nineteen years ago) link

Alex: apologies if i incorrectly branded you as sharing djdee's ridiculous racial accusations. if i was wrongly accusatory, then let me be the first to say "sorry"

djdee: i read all of your posts, you've yet to say much of anything that doesn't literally render you a racist of the worst degree

rentboy (rentboy), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:32 (nineteen years ago) link

I second that, I actually really enjoy having long discussions about this sort of "unimportant" things.

daavid (daavid), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:38 (nineteen years ago) link

In previous post I was refering to what Alex in SF wrote.

daavid (daavid), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:46 (nineteen years ago) link

hey rentboy, how about you explain yourself. If you're going to accuse me of "racism" first off this is a message board so you're not being creative, and secondly you actually have to make an argument as to WHY I'm being racist.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Friday, 12 November 2004 00:51 (nineteen years ago) link

tick-tock-tick-tock.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Friday, 12 November 2004 01:03 (nineteen years ago) link

I think you all are smart enough to realize that (almost) nobody here is racist or sexist. They like what they like. And yet, thread after thread ends up turning into a race war (despite the fact that there are few actual black people here)

SORRY EVERYONE IT'S MY FAULT

To dan: can you expound on that? I'm not quite sure what you'd mean, i'd be interested to know why some black american music is accepted in the UK and some isn't ("accepted" = "popular")

I would argue very much that The Geto Boys were "an act of their time" who were not going to get the same type of exposure as a political act like Public Enemy or KRS-One, a completely over-the-top controversial group like NWA/Ice Cube/Dr Dre/Eazy E/The DOC or 2 Live Crew, or a positive hippy-esque group like A Tribe Called Quest/De La Soul. They had an edge and were definitely on the dark side but their main hook was that one of their members was a dwarf and since there was no comedy angle to that, there wasn't anything for The Acceptable Face Of Radio Music to hook into.

It's disingenuous to say it's not a racial issue but it's equally disingenuous to say it was solely a racial issue; you're talking about a group who reached their peak right before the music busines figured out that people all over the world really, really, really like all forms of hip-hop.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 12 November 2004 01:11 (nineteen years ago) link

It's disingenuous to say it's not a racial issue but it's equally disingenuous to say it was solely a racial issue; you're talking about a group who reached their peak right before the music busines figured out that people all over the world really, really, really like all forms of hip-hop.

I agree with this statement 100% incidently.

And the first paragraph is probably right too, although I imagine it could be fleshed out a bit more...but regardless, my criticism of the list is simply an extension of my criticisms of the way some acts are recieved and some are not, regardless of relative "goodness".

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Friday, 12 November 2004 01:17 (nineteen years ago) link

djdee, you hate area codes? you are dead to me. and also racist.

Shmool McShmool (shmuel), Friday, 12 November 2004 01:38 (nineteen years ago) link

he's a damn dirty monogamist too!

cinniblount (James Blount), Friday, 12 November 2004 01:41 (nineteen years ago) link

haha so when do we do the eighties list?

cinniblount (James Blount), Friday, 12 November 2004 01:42 (nineteen years ago) link

GOD ID SO LOVE TO DO IT, PICK ME

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 12 November 2004 01:56 (nineteen years ago) link

If we do an 80s one I'm gonna vote for 30 Smiths songs just to spite these fucks.

Hi, I am a genius. a big one. (AaronHz), Friday, 12 November 2004 01:57 (nineteen years ago) link

Haha we are like Red Sox's fans though! If the list were GOOD I'd be disappointed that I didn't have nuthin' to complain about!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 12 November 2004 02:05 (nineteen years ago) link

Actually, I didn't join the complaints about too much st. etienne because I know my 80s singles ballot is probably going to be 50% smiths and prince.

Shmool McShmool (shmuel), Friday, 12 November 2004 02:13 (nineteen years ago) link

rentboy sucks at life.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Friday, 12 November 2004 02:40 (nineteen years ago) link

I want to do the 80s list (as I really wanted to do the 90s list but was forced to concede) but will settle for doing the year-end list.

Gear, Stevem and I will have to discuss.

The Good Dr. Bill (Andrew Unterberger), Friday, 12 November 2004 03:27 (nineteen years ago) link

the 80s list is all yours, mang

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 12 November 2004 03:44 (nineteen years ago) link

I'll do the 2010s list

Mike O. (Mike Ouderkirk), Friday, 12 November 2004 04:57 (nineteen years ago) link

my criticism of the list is simply an extension of my criticisms of the way some acts are recieved and some are not, regardless of relative "goodness".

but dj this list is not about how some acts *are* received now, it's about how they were received in the 90s, when hip-hop was not the ubiquitous cultural force it is now and when many people here, for various reasons which have little to do with race, weren't listening to very much hip-hop.

if we did a 00s poll in like 2014 and Missy Elliott placed ridiculously low, you'd have far more of a point.

the Geto Boys had a DWARF member? wow.

The Lex (The Lex), Friday, 12 November 2004 10:10 (nineteen years ago) link

Yes, Bushwick Bill is a dwarf.

Hi, I am a genius. a big one. (AaronHz), Friday, 12 November 2004 10:12 (nineteen years ago) link

My work network has decided ilm is the enemy so I haven't been on since the nominations thread and voting, and wow, that was a long read.

Anyway, some thoughts: There were two distinct versions of britpop inthe 90s. The first, which actually reflects the word, was bands like St Et and Pulp and World of Twist (and erm... Cud) who tried to create an alternative pop universe (where their records were anti matter number ones, every copy bought in an anti-matter Woolworths) while not actually selling that much in the real world. (To characterise this as british rock revivalism is weird and wrong.) Me, I loved it all 'cos it was the anti grunge. Faced with all that plaid, who wouldn't want gold lame and glitterballs?

In the meantime we had a rockist, regressive sound (beatles>jam>smiths>oasis) pushed by the music press in two failed incarnations ( The "mod revival", the "new wave of new wave") before they finally hit paydirt with Britpop TM.

While it is somewhat ridiculous for someone to place 5 pulp songs or whatever in their poll(didn't you listen to anything else?), it is way cool that this other britpop is getting the props here. Nice one!

Obviously, the real action was dance music in the UK and hip-hop in th US, but still, if we're going to have some brit pop, then lets have St Etienne et al.

Jamie T Smith (Jamie T Smith), Friday, 12 November 2004 11:54 (nineteen years ago) link

Ah! Just found the opinions on 90s poll thread - should have posted there. Sorry.

Jamie T Smith (Jamie T Smith), Friday, 12 November 2004 12:02 (nineteen years ago) link

well you snarked about popist tendencies on the last singles poll for motherfucking instance. see also: every comment you've ever made about hip-hop. o and this thread too.
-- cinniblount (littlejohnnyjewe...), November 11th, 2004.

I honestly don't know what you're talking about. I don't see how what you are describing translates into "snarking about popist tendencies." I don't like a lot of pop or hip-hop, and I do comment on that sometimes.

meanwhile if you wanna keep harping on how i say something instead of what i'm saying maybe i can send you an e-cuddle or something or whatever it'll take to get the sand out of your vagina
-- cinniblount (littlejohnnyjewe...), November 11th, 2004.

High-five, dude! You're so clever with the grade school taunts.

Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Friday, 12 November 2004 16:19 (nineteen years ago) link

And I don't think there is a completely clean line between what you say and how you say it.

Rockist_Scientist (rockist_scientist), Friday, 12 November 2004 16:24 (nineteen years ago) link

the love is back again starting tomorrow: TEH 1990s ALBUM POLL RESULTS

BE TEHRE

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 22:09 (nineteen years ago) link

Re Bushwick Bill: Chuck Eddy has a great line in Accidental Evolution to the effect of, "People are always complaining that there aren't enough female musicians in the Pazz & Jop poll, but there's hardly any one-eyed midgets in there, either."

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 17 November 2004 22:15 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.