Rush: Classic or Dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2269 of them)

Well, it actually is their biggest hit.

Filmmaker, Author, Radio Host Stephen Baldwin (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 28 May 2010 17:43 (thirteen years ago) link

yeah i was PUMPED when they did between the wheels

yeah i'd rather see a lot of albums in their entirety rather than moving pix

hell i'd be pysched for like farewell to kings or something

m@tt (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 28 May 2010 17:44 (thirteen years ago) link

Or even Presto.

Johnny Fever, Friday, 28 May 2010 17:45 (thirteen years ago) link

I'm excited to hear all of Moving Pictures just because I've been wanting to see them play The Camera Eye for a long time. Otherwise I could take it or leave it. The played 5 out of 7 tracks off Moving Pictures on their last tour, so they were practically doing the whole album already.

I'm hoping that they will pull out some other obscurities on this tour. That seems to be the direction they've been headed recently. I read one rumor that they'll be playing Jacob's Ladder, which should be pretty cool.

Between The Wheels was definitely a highlight of their last tour. They did a bunch of other really great tracks pulled from the vault as well including Digital Man, Entre Nous, Mission, Circumstances, Ghost of a Chance, Witch Hunt, and Passage To Bangkok. I hope this trend continues with Time Machine.

Moodles, Friday, 28 May 2010 17:55 (thirteen years ago) link

Yeah, I mean, how many Rush fans only own that one album? How many people in the world only own one Rush album, for that matter? They're sort of an all-in kind of band. It's not like they wouldn't have sold out their tour if they were doing "Presto" or whatever. Like it was said above, it's spending too much time on an album that gets pretty well represented every show, anyway, and this from a band that no longer has opening acts to make room for more songs people want to hear. And having seen Mr. Big open for the group on the "Presto" tour, I'm doubly glad it's been "A Night with Rush"-mode from there on out.

"Ghost of a Chance" very underrated. "Presto" and "Roll the Bones" really marked the band's transition into secular humanist territory, no doubt enhanced by Peart's personal double whammy.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 28 May 2010 17:59 (thirteen years ago) link

and it's def. no better than "Permanent Waves" or "Signals."

^ you're crazy. Moving Pictures blows both of those out of the water.

Bill Magill, Friday, 28 May 2010 18:07 (thirteen years ago) link

I love "Ghost of a Chance"; the change from piledriving verses to mellow, weary chorus (buttressed by remnants of eighties echo) is beautifully executed. Nice piano part too.

Filmmaker, Author, Radio Host Stephen Baldwin (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 28 May 2010 18:07 (thirteen years ago) link

Moving Pictures blows both of those out of the water.

I can imagine preferring it, but blowing them out of the water? Nah.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 28 May 2010 18:10 (thirteen years ago) link

Shit, man your right. I thought I read "Grace under Pressure", not Permanent Waves. I rescind on that one, Waves rules. My bad.

Bill Magill, Friday, 28 May 2010 18:13 (thirteen years ago) link

I guess I look at it like this: Rush are pretty much never going to play a show that does not include Tom Sawyer, Limelight, and YYZ. Most tours they also play Red Barchetta. That right there is half of Moving Pictures. Witch Hunt was a highlight of their last tour and I'd love to see them play it again. That leaves The Camera Eye and Vital Signs, both amazing songs that I've always wanted to see live.

That adds up to about 40 minutes worth of music, they'll probably perform for upwards of 3 hours, so there's lots of room for other great stuff.

Moodles, Friday, 28 May 2010 18:17 (thirteen years ago) link

And having seen Mr. Big open for the group on the "Presto" tour, I'm doubly glad it's been "A Night with Rush"-mode from there on out.

The two times I've seen them (1992 & 1994), the openers were Primus and Candlebox respectively. Now, in 1992, seeing Primus and Rush on the same bill blew my 18 year old brains right out the back of my head. 20 year old me was well aware that Candlebox sucked pretty hard.

Johnny Fever, Friday, 28 May 2010 18:20 (thirteen years ago) link

Ditching the opening bands was probably one of the smartest things they ever did. Their tours got way better once they did that.

Moodles, Friday, 28 May 2010 18:22 (thirteen years ago) link

I love Presto and Roll The Bones and Hold Yr Fire with a passion that is inscrutable to me. I think of it as their Police-ish atmospherock period and I am a sucker for the (even more) earnest turn the lyrics take during those. Signals and Grace Under Pressure def fall into a different 80s Rush basket, more of a heavy new wave power synth kind of thing. I need to go to this tour man, I wonder if the NY/NJ dates are already sold out...

minor thread (Jon Lewis), Friday, 28 May 2010 18:23 (thirteen years ago) link

geddy makes me squirm
busy pretentious songcraft
but tom sawyer's good

ImprovSpirit, Friday, 28 May 2010 18:23 (thirteen years ago) link

Pretty sure "Tom Sawyer" was the first Rush song I ever heard, but the first Rush tape I ever bought was Hold Your Fire. "Time Stand Still" is an impressively structured pop song (complete with Aimee Mann's contributions). But it was Presto that really cemented me as a raging fan (at least for a brief moment in time). I bought all the albums and listened to them constantly. By the time of Counterparts, I was kind of over it all. Test For Echo is the last one I bought, and I can't even remember a thing about it, except there was a song on there that mentioned "email."

Johnny Fever, Friday, 28 May 2010 18:27 (thirteen years ago) link

Fun Rush fact: "Test for Echoes" is the only Rush album I've never owned or even heard once. Wikipedia should be updated ASAP to reflect that.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 28 May 2010 18:36 (thirteen years ago) link

Josh you going to either of the Notherly Island shows? i'm going on the 5th

Stormy Davis, Friday, 28 May 2010 18:41 (thirteen years ago) link

Hold Your Fire, Presto, and Roll The Bones are kind of a low point for me. Hold Your Fire and Presto both have a bunch of good tunes, and Roll The Bones a few, but the overall sound and production values are just terrible. So jangly and trebly, with like zero low-end or guitar crunch. I much prefer their "return to rock" albums that they've put out since then.

Moodles, Friday, 28 May 2010 18:50 (thirteen years ago) link

well i think the rap on the song "roll the bones" is THE low point

but i like hold your fire quite a bit actually...time stand still is great...i like new wave 80s/synchronicity-jocking rush

m@tt (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 28 May 2010 18:53 (thirteen years ago) link

If you're behind, Snakes and Arrows is their best album since Counterparts. To my ears, it's their best album since Signals, but most would not agree because they either have a nostalgic fondness for late 80s Rush, or they won't be able to appreciate Rush produced in a modern way. I think it sounds great, though all those new songs are even better live.

It's been a treat liking that record because obviously they play a lot of it in concert. So when a badass new track like Spindrift starts, and 1500 dudes start heading to the concessions stand to buy another $14 beer, I'm just rocking out and smiling.

Nate Carson, Friday, 28 May 2010 20:07 (thirteen years ago) link

i did enjoy the songs off S&A live when i saw them a couple years ago...

the recording from what i heard was too modern metal sounding i thought, but i guess that's rush, they usually try to keep up w/the times

m@tt (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 28 May 2010 20:08 (thirteen years ago) link

I actually think Snakes and Arrows is their best since Presto. As big a fan as I am, they'd sounded creatively stagnant on record for the longest time, so that album really blindsided me. It still holds up well today.

A. Begrand, Friday, 28 May 2010 20:31 (thirteen years ago) link

the song title "workin' them angels" drives me UP A WALL for some reason

m@tt (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 28 May 2010 20:33 (thirteen years ago) link

Tour dates are here: http://www.rush.com/

Those bastards play every other day. Must be nice :)

Nate Carson, Friday, 28 May 2010 20:40 (thirteen years ago) link

they've earned it!

did you read that "roadshow" book where peart did a tour by motorcycle (he would follow the tour vans and make his own route)....i thought it was pretty entertaining.

m@tt (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 28 May 2010 20:42 (thirteen years ago) link

It's on the back of my toilet right now.

Nate Carson, Friday, 28 May 2010 20:52 (thirteen years ago) link

^^^yet another perfect ILM board description

minor thread (Jon Lewis), Friday, 28 May 2010 21:17 (thirteen years ago) link

Rob, I'll prolly go to one of them, if I can get in for free, especially now that U2 has been scuttled til '11.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 28 May 2010 21:52 (thirteen years ago) link

Charter One Pavilion will be a great place to see Rush. I saw Dio with Heaven & Hell last year -- it was small enough that none of the seats were bad. There were fold-out metal chairs and hs-style bleachers, the stage facing the lake. There had just been a storm with 90+mph gusts of wind earlier, and the sky was still swirling with quick moving clouds, and Dio's hair blew dramatically like an 80s video.

I hope they do it like The Cult's Love tour -- after they played the complete album, they did "hits" from Electric and later. With Rush the question is do they stick to one era (Permanent Waves to Power Windows would seem cohesive to me) or not.

Fastnbulbous, Saturday, 29 May 2010 15:00 (thirteen years ago) link

Well, considering the album runs less than an hour and a typical Rush set closer to three (including intermission), I hope they just pack the rest with goodness. I mean, Rush has a lot more to draw from than the Cult. I love "Love" but hated that show.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 29 May 2010 15:21 (thirteen years ago) link

I don't think I can handle 3 hours! I thought the Cult show was great up through Electric. I left not long after they got into their sucky albums.

Fastnbulbous, Saturday, 29 May 2010 15:26 (thirteen years ago) link

"did you read that "roadshow" book where peart did a tour by motorcycle (he would follow the tour vans and make his own route)....i thought it was pretty entertaining."

That's a great book. His other ones are pretty good too.

Bill Magill, Saturday, 29 May 2010 16:12 (thirteen years ago) link

True story:

Daniel Richler's parked
Illegally at Shopper's
Then Geddy Lee hops in!

Sean Carruthers, Saturday, 29 May 2010 16:15 (thirteen years ago) link

Whoops, drop the "Lee" from that last line to make it fit haiku form.

Sean Carruthers, Saturday, 29 May 2010 16:17 (thirteen years ago) link

New Rush single is out today - Caravan b/w BU2B - and it rocks!

Some crazy instrumentals going on in Caravan, and BU2B is super heavy.

Moodles, Tuesday, 1 June 2010 20:47 (thirteen years ago) link

hmmm not really feeling this....

it's like they are just jamming random riffs together, no memorable melodies or songwriting...

these songs remind me of what ppl often say about rush like they are some kinda math rock band, when in reality they always used to write really great songs, great hooks...

why are they trying to be so "heavy", this is arguable "heavier" than they ever were, at the expense of the stuff i actually loved about rush.

m@tt (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 1 June 2010 20:59 (thirteen years ago) link

Yeah, not feeling the new one. Reminds me a bit of the "Counterparts" comeback, when the band was all, hey, we can be heavy, too! But this seems almost Primus at times in its herky-jerkiness.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 1 June 2010 21:07 (thirteen years ago) link

Yeah, the vocal melodies seem a bit generic TBH (although maybe not that much worse than many other hard rock/metal bands) but I think the music, especially on "Caravan", is very good. Surprisingly metal for them. Have they been listening to Mastodon or something?

xpost

Sundar, Tuesday, 1 June 2010 21:10 (thirteen years ago) link

I did think of Primus too, actually, but not in a bad way.

Sundar, Tuesday, 1 June 2010 21:10 (thirteen years ago) link

The new songs are pretty good if you ask me. Very heavy at times, but still willing to toss in some synths every now and then. I think it's very similar to what they did on S&A.

A. Begrand, Tuesday, 1 June 2010 21:17 (thirteen years ago) link

You guys are scaring me shitless with the Primus comparos.

it takes a lot to laugh, it takes a crane shot to 'NOOOOOO' (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 1 June 2010 21:52 (thirteen years ago) link

doesn't sound like primus to me. no rubbery bass riffery at least. something else that might be worrisome though is what BU2B might have to do with bono

kamerad, Tuesday, 1 June 2010 21:57 (thirteen years ago) link

There's no Primus going on. Nice psych groove on "Caravan", though. Not unlike the new Cathedral.

A. Begrand, Tuesday, 1 June 2010 22:18 (thirteen years ago) link

Ha NOW you're talkin'!

it takes a lot to laugh, it takes a crane shot to 'NOOOOOO' (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 1 June 2010 22:18 (thirteen years ago) link

Off to download now. This is my first official purchase of music from ITunes, lol!

Nate Carson, Tuesday, 1 June 2010 22:52 (thirteen years ago) link

I suppose I've always liked this neither fish nor fowl quality of the band. Is it metal? Well, no. Prog? Not really. Hard rock? In the most generic sense, yes, but ...

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 1 June 2010 22:52 (thirteen years ago) link

I just became a Yes convert, and I can feel Rush on the horizon..what is happening to me??!!

iago g., Tuesday, 1 June 2010 22:57 (thirteen years ago) link

Cathedral is probably a better comparison, actually.

Sundar, Tuesday, 1 June 2010 23:50 (thirteen years ago) link

Can't stress enough how much a new Rush fan will get out of Sam Dunn's new documentary. Watch it asap Iago G :)

Nate Carson, Wednesday, 2 June 2010 00:09 (thirteen years ago) link

I want to watch it BADLY but it's not in wide release yet is it???

it takes a lot to laugh, it takes a crane shot to 'NOOOOOO' (Jon Lewis), Wednesday, 2 June 2010 00:10 (thirteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.