Ladies and gentlemen....the 1990s ILX SINGLES POLL RESULTS

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1803 of them)
It's from the 00s.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 11 November 2004 21:00 (nineteen years ago) link

well you snarked about popist tendencies on the last singles poll for motherfucking instance. see also: every comment you've ever made about hip-hop. o and this thread too.

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 11 November 2004 21:11 (nineteen years ago) link

meanwhile if you wanna keep harping on how i say something instead of what i'm saying maybe i can send you an e-cuddle or something or whatever it'll take to get the sand out of your vagina

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 11 November 2004 21:12 (nineteen years ago) link

ps. you did the same thing on the last singles thread too only then it wasn't with me ie. you're the constant.

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 11 November 2004 21:12 (nineteen years ago) link

Has RS not been careful with his pocket pussy?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 11 November 2004 21:13 (nineteen years ago) link

the thing's been broke since he heard david banner

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 11 November 2004 21:14 (nineteen years ago) link

I had assumed that the high St Ets and Pulp presence was due to people voting for their songs who *aren't* in to revivalist rock. These two acts always struck me as the two "britpop" artists of choice if you fucking hate britpop. Or am I just assuming that everyone thinks the same way I do?

At a distance this poll appears to resemble Tom's 90s list (which was hugely formative for me) - which also had a strong Saint Etienne and Pulp presence.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 11 November 2004 21:41 (nineteen years ago) link

I think "sand in your urethra" would be a good twist on an old favorite.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Thursday, 11 November 2004 21:42 (nineteen years ago) link

Also: JayMC OTM and "Area Codes" isn't even that great a song.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Thursday, 11 November 2004 21:45 (nineteen years ago) link

I thought the St Et/Pulp thing was more an indication that, on ILM, there's a sort of bedrock consensus w/r/t indie, in a way that there isn't with hip-hop or dance or pop. So a lot of peoples' indie-ish votes clustered around St Et, Pulp, B&S etc, but their hip-hop votes diverged more, their pop votes diverged more, their country votes (if they voted for country) diverged more...

But, you know, I could just be trying to put a different spin on it.

(also, ffs, the fact that a lot of people on ilm like nineties brit indie does not make it a bastion of rockism, it makes it a bastion of corny indie fuxx0rism. rock-orientation is, after all, not automatically rockism. (this in brackets because, you know, just wanted to make objection known etc.))

cis (cis), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:05 (nineteen years ago) link

man oh man wait til you fuckers see the album poll, holy fuck. I'm just gonna drop that bomb into ILX like Jim Brown dropping grenades on Nazis at the end of The Dirty Dozen and then run away.

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:10 (nineteen years ago) link

Oh snap.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:22 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm looking forward to it Gear!

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:26 (nineteen years ago) link

Hahaha if all five Stereolab albums make it, I am going to laugh my fucking ass off.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:28 (nineteen years ago) link

ALBUMS POLL SNEAK PREVIEW

1. Loveless
2. OK Computer
3. Different Class
4-26 Radiohead albums, bootlegs and interview picture discs
27. Neutral Milk Hotel -- In the Aeroplane Over the Sea
28. Dr. Dre -- The Chronic
29 - 48. Various albums produced by Dr. Dre
49 - 100. Saint Etienne demo tapes

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:29 (nineteen years ago) link

"29 - 48. Various albums produced by Dr. Dre"

Dream the fuck on.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:32 (nineteen years ago) link

"how to seduce a wispy indie girl in 7 mixtapes: ILM's 100 greatest albums of the '90s"

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:33 (nineteen years ago) link

I actually haven't finished the tallying but I'm not entirely sure, based on preliminary numbers, that StEt will place more than one album on the top 100. Could be wrong.

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:35 (nineteen years ago) link

My main problem with the St. Etienne/Pulp rants is with the argument that the results are dull and/or not balanced because 5 songs of each made the Top 100. I think the real reason most of these people are upset is that they do not believe St. Etienne or Pulp deserved that many entries. I, for instance truly believe that all 5 St. Etienne nominations were among the best singles on the 90s and I wouldn't take them out of my personal list just for the sake of fairness and balance. Why does everybody accept all-time albums lists with 3 Beatles entries in the Top 10? Considering the number of albums ever recorded, that seems pretty dull/unbalanced to me.

daavid (daavid), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:37 (nineteen years ago) link

who says we accept that?????

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:39 (nineteen years ago) link

I doubt I'd accept a list with ONE Beatles album in the top ten

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:40 (nineteen years ago) link

"Why does everybody accept all-time albums lists with 3 Beatles entries in the Top 10?"

I don't accept that either. I think it is lazy fucking bullshit. Don't make stupid generalizations about what "everybody accepts" and then try to apply to people who think that 100% of a poll going to two bands (and as I said before ANY two bands, although yes obv I would be less irritated if I love the bands in question) is fucking stupid.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:41 (nineteen years ago) link

100% should be 10%.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:41 (nineteen years ago) link

and 10% should be 2%

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:43 (nineteen years ago) link

Limiting the number of noms for any one artist is something to consider for future polls.

-- MindInRewind (brune...), November 11th, 2004 1:43 PM. (later)

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:44 (nineteen years ago) link

who says we accept that?????

Well yeah I didn't mean it is "accepted" but its hardly surprising or shocking, its is expected.

daavid (daavid), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:45 (nineteen years ago) link

But no less worthing of revulsion.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:47 (nineteen years ago) link

Worthing? WTF? Hahaha.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:48 (nineteen years ago) link

"...10% of a poll going to two bands (and as I said before ANY two bands, although yes obv I would be less irritated if I love the bands in question) is fucking stupid."

Would you say it is stupid if you truly believed those ten songs are among the best 100 songs of the '90s?

daavid (daavid), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:52 (nineteen years ago) link

No, then I would say the person who thinks that is stupid.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:53 (nineteen years ago) link

29 - 48 are going to be live Pearl Jam albums.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:55 (nineteen years ago) link

So to believe, in any circumstance, that 5 of the best songs of a decade were made by the same artist, no matter who that artist is, is stupid?

daavid (daavid), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:58 (nineteen years ago) link

There is no decade or EVEN year where two artists/bands/whatever released 10% of the best 100 songs released during that time period. Given the massive amount of music released EACH week for basically the past 50+ years, I think it requires an almost willful desire to limit one's taste/listening habits to believe otherwise.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:58 (nineteen years ago) link

Being eclectic is a virtue to be prized above all other concerns.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 11 November 2004 22:59 (nineteen years ago) link

I'd prefer to say diversity is a virtue to be prized above all other concerns, but yeah actually I do think that's basically a true statement, Dan.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:01 (nineteen years ago) link

That said I only voted for rave and hip hop tracks in my top 30 haha so I am also a total hypocrite.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:02 (nineteen years ago) link

ALEX IN SF'S BALLOT:

MOBB DEEP - "Shook Ones Pt 2"
MOBB DEEP - "Shook Ones Pt 3"
MOBB DEEP - "Shook Ones Pt 4"
MOBB DEEP - "Shook Ones Pt 5"
MOBB DEEP - "Shook Ones Pt 6"
MOBB DEEP - "Shook Ones Pt 7"
MOBB DEEP - "Shook Ones Pt 8"
MOBB DEEP - "Shook Ones Pt 9"
MOBB DEEP - "Shook Ones Pt 10"
MOBB DEEP - "Shook Ones Pt 11"
MOBB DEEP - "Shook Ones Pt 12"
MOBB DEEP - "Shook Ones Pt 13"
MOBB DEEP - "Shook Ones Pt 14"
MOBB DEEP - "Shook Ones Pt 15"
MOBB DEEP - "Shook Ones Pt 16"
MOBB DEEP - "Shook Ones Pt 17"
MOBB DEEP - "Shook Ones Pt 18"
MOBB DEEP - "Shook Ones Pt 19"
MOBB DEEP - "Shook Ones Pt 20"
OMNI TRIO - "Renegade Snares"

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:09 (nineteen years ago) link

...diversity is a virtue to be prized above all other concerns..."

I agree with this, but if you were to make a list of your favourite songs, scrificing your own taste for the sake of diversity is a huge dishonest mistake.

daavid (daavid), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:10 (nineteen years ago) link

Haha wait "Verbal Intercourse" doesn't sound EXACTLY like "Shook Ones"!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:13 (nineteen years ago) link

You agree with this and yet somehow you think that a list with 10 songs by two acts fairly represents that?!?!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:15 (nineteen years ago) link

Also Gear! you forgot:

Omni Trio "Renegade Snares (Foul Play Remix)"

and

Omni Trio "Renegade Snares (Foul Play VIP Remix)"

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:16 (nineteen years ago) link

Alex, aren't you just complaining about what people like? If someone likes those songs in the proportion discussed, why shouldn't they vote for them? Or do you doubt such people exist?

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:20 (nineteen years ago) link

1) No.

2) It results in lame stilted lists (like this one for example.)

3) Obviously these people exist (see list.)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:22 (nineteen years ago) link

So people shouldn't vote for what they like but vote for what would make a good poll instead?

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:23 (nineteen years ago) link

YES EXACTLY

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:23 (nineteen years ago) link

(You have to remember that Alex is a dirty dirty Commie.)

(ps plz Alex don't hurt me)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:24 (nineteen years ago) link

Dan, don't make me go Stalin on you!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:26 (nineteen years ago) link

But yeah obv I think that should be a consideration (not the only one obv.)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:27 (nineteen years ago) link

The list fairly represents peoples tastes, I think that should be pretty evident. Like you, I think a more diverse outcome would look better. But I don't think that the fact that this was not the case, makes the outcome less fair.

daavid (daavid), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:29 (nineteen years ago) link

Where did I say the result was unfair? I said it ridiculous and stupid, but yeah democracy spoke and people's tastes suck.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 11 November 2004 23:30 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.