"Excelsior: The Book"

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (28 of them)

Why do any of you honestly think someone would have bought the stupid book anyway?

And i think a more prudent point is stinking this whole thing up - Mark G has effectively come in, done a shit and left again, and everyone else is left dealing with the smell.

Did it occur to anyone else he might just have dropped this stinkbomb on purpose?

― Trayce (trayce), Thursday, 24 June 2004 00:58 (nineteen years ago) link

(to whit: is anyone going to give him a metaphorical slaparound for this? Cos the reactions he's caused is far worse than any silly little chapbook ever would be)

― Trayce (trayce), Thursday, 24 June 2004 00:59 (nineteen years ago) link

At least Andrew got his $2000 out of it.

― TOMBOT, Thursday, 24 June 2004 02:21 (nineteen years ago) link

Tom, do you remember when that guy used to post about how terrible we were and he was glad he wasn't posting anymore? And everyone made fun of him for it?

― Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 24 June 2004 02:27 (nineteen years ago) link

Am I still posting?

― TOMBOT, Thursday, 24 June 2004 03:03 (nineteen years ago) link

You Goddamn Motherfucking Whippersnappers!!! Tricked Again!!!

― TOMBOT, Thursday, 24 June 2004 03:05 (nineteen years ago) link

The *overreaction* to Mark's thread has actually made me want to leave ILX more than anything posted by Calum or JW ever. But, unlike Calum and JW, I know that Mark is ultimately a decent person who will actually *STOP* doing something which is upsetting people, if you merely ask him. Which neither Calum or JW have ever done.

― People love Gravity and Evolution! (kate), Thursday, 24 June 2004 07:55 (nineteen years ago) link

Yes, Mark has apologised and retracted the book, and I in turn have apologised for my troll suggestion, which was spurious at best, I feel stupid for having said as much.

― Trayce (trayce), Thursday, 24 June 2004 09:56 (nineteen years ago) link

I can't believe J0hn left over something so silly. I'm sorry, but it was obviously not a malicious act, and as such, asking politely for the book to be removed would have sufficed. I can't believe so many ILXer are such babies about this kind of shit.

― Think Rationally (King Kobra), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 22:17 (nineteen years ago) link

isn't this language revealing?

― Vic (Vic), Wednesday, 30 June 2004 09:44 (nineteen years ago) link

You Goddamn Motherfucking Whippersnappers!!! Tricked Again!!!

-- TOMBOT (postin...), June 24th, 2004.

― Vic (Vic), Wednesday, 30 June 2004 09:45 (nineteen years ago) link

No not that, er. Nevermind

― Vic (Vic), Wednesday, 30 June 2004 09:45 (nineteen years ago) link

Hello Andrew,
Could you confirm that we have removed the images in question in accordance
with your letter? If not, please let us know what we may do to assist in
this matter so that we may expediately.
Thank you and we apologized for any inconvenience you may have had.
Sincerely,

Nancy
Intellectual Property Rights Assistant
CafePress.com

― Andrew (enneff), Thursday, 1 July 2004 00:11 (nineteen years ago) link

This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.