early-90s alt-rock vs. late-90s alt rock

I am under 30 and all music is garbage

I am trying to answer this but my answer keeps coming back to "mid 90s"

p much exactly on the age boundary too, so that is probably why ;_;

late-90s alt rock (younger than 30)

I am an old guy, and I prefer the late 90s. Note that I am counting UK indie, if this was all about American alt.rock, the first half of the 90s would be better.

yeah, WFNX, WBCN and WAAF (there were also selected shows on WZBC, WHRB and WERS)

of course now WFNX and WAAF are gone (RIP)

― Have a slice of wine! (HI DERE), Monday, May 17, 2010 4:15 PM

WAAF isn't gone?

honestly I kinda feel challopsy and wanna vote mid-90s cuz by then a lot of 80s-era dreck had been cleared away, embarassing rap-rock hybrid were losing their hip-ness quotient

http://everydaymusic.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/10-linkin-park-hybrid-theory.jpg

It isn't? I thought they radically changed their format?

WBCN is "gone" as a rock station, iirc, but not WFNX & WAAF, which I've been listening to off & on forever

right?

http://www.waaf.com/
http://wfnx.com/

Linkin Park never had any hipness quotient FYI

lol I guess they didn't

I guess when the dude I knew of via a friend of a friend said he got fired because their format changed, he was actually lying completely through his ass

early-90s alt rock (younger than 30)

although i like lots of stuff from both options and tbh the '97-'99 stuff I hate most is probably completely different from what a lot of people here hate on

also lol apparently I confused WBCN and WFNX

the moral of the story is that I never listen to anything besides 94.5 and KISS 108 these days

picked second half btw, under 30, loved Californication a lot

embarassing rap-rock hybrids are still with us TODAY (thx Weezy) - what's changed is that the blending of rap and rock in and of itself is no longer seen as a cutting edge or interesting thing. this was already becoming clear by the mid-90s, where rap-rock hybrids were at once all over the place and also totally boring.

xp

lol I guess they didn't

I guess when the dude I knew of via a friend of a friend said he got fired because their format changed, he was actually lying completely through his ass

― Have a slice of wine! (HI DERE), Monday, May 17, 2010 4:30 PM (14 seconds ago)

pretty sure it was just WBCN that changed radically, b/c AAF has a bunch of the same ppl they've had since I was in 7th grade, and WFNX still plays alt rock

wanna reiterate:

the moral of the story is that I never listen to anything besides 94.5 and KISS 108 these days

"early-90s alt rock (and I am 30 years old+)," but pop and R&B were more interesting than either early or late nineties alt rock. Mid nineties R&B not so much.

I am going to go with early 90s here because I like early smashing pumpkins; other than that any music that was popularly referred to as "alternative rock" in the 90s is not rly my thing. but I did not really listen to rock radio at all during the 90s so I am probably an unusual case.

the moral of the story is that I never listen to anything besides 94.5 and KISS 108 these days

― Have a slice of wine! (HI DERE)

i still listen to WAAF sometimes, but the presets in my car are now set to 94.5, KISS 108, WBUR, and FNX. really, i try to listen to WAAF as little as possible. used to be my favorite station back from, like, 1999-2003/4

embarassing rap-rock hybrids are still with us TODAY (thx Weezy) - what's changed is that the blending of rap and rock in and of itself is no longer seen as a cutting edge or interesting thing. this was already becoming clear by the mid-90s, where rap-rock hybrids were at once all over the place and also totally boring.

oops sorry

I'm not even sure what contemporary bands are considered alt rock atm. I guess whenever U2, Pearl Jam or Red Hot Chili Peppers come out with a new album. Are there any big bands right now that became successful through the alt rock format?

there are no big bands anymore

I'm not even sure what contemporary bands are considered alt rock atm.

Go here.

Joanna Newsom, alt-rock auteur

I was thinking less indie bands (tho clearly those bands break through) and more like AltPress/Hot Topic style bands? Gaslight Anthem, Against Me! etc sound like they'd be at home on an alt rock format. And of course newish Green Day (MCR, Fallout Boy, Paramore) have had tremendous success there.

lol there's nowhere to break through to anymore. I doubt the guys in the National are millionaires, knowhutimean

I'm pretty sure Radiohead have done well for themselves, and Vampire Weekend will turn in a tidy profit.

I was thinking more like Modest Mouse, I guess. The National, or even LCD Soundsystem or whoever aren't even having big radio success even compared to the current musical climate -- let alone historical success.

I'm not even sure what contemporary bands are considered alt rock atm.

IMO think GAPDYX + Vampire Weekend, Death Cab For Cutie and LCD Soundsystem

like, the whole concept of alt-rock requires a thriving, well-funded "mainstream". which is gone.

Radiohead's been around since the early 90s tho. Be curious to see what Vampire Weekend's income is like, or how their album sales stack up to previous decades' indie darlings. Like, how many albums have they sold compared to a similarly charting band from 1996? A lot less, I'd bet.

(x-posts)

Early 90s 30+. Soundgarden rule.

some big modern rock radio bands right now that weren't already huge in the '90s: Muse, 30 Seconds To Mars, The Killers, Kings Of Leon

how the hell is U2 alt rock?!

black hole sun
won't you come
and wash away the horchata

Pretty sure Grizzly Bear + Animal Collective aren't getting a ton of radio play. Phoenix + Yeah Yeah Yeahs probably getting some, Death Cab (do they have new music?), Vampire Weekend for sure. Dirty Projectors not sure. How has LCD Soundsystem charted in the US? (Can only find UK chart info -- could mean US chart info is non-existent.)

fwiw, i can recall hearing Pheonix, YYYs, Death Cab, and VW on the fairly big alt station here

U2 are alt rock in the sense that the Cure are alt rock

only they have the added stadium rock/AOR-approved factor

Yeah, doesn't look like an LCD Soundsystem single has ever charted in the US.

it's kind of a different metric now; I don't think you can use radio play as the one true indicator, you kind of have to merge it with filtered-by-some-undetermined-algorithm data from internet sources

like my personal metric is "appears in my music video on-demand menu"

i think the joke on 'n american scum' is that they were 'big in the uk'

selling your music to commercials is a far more common option these days.

black hole sun
won't you come
and wash away the horchata

LOL IRL!!

Yeah, doesn't look like an LCD Soundsystem single has ever charted in the US.

― Mordy, Monday, May 17, 2010 10:45 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark

genuine q: did pixies or husker du or sonic youth ever chart in the u.s.?

yeah these Pitchfork bands you guys are mentioning definitely are popular in many senses -- but again there are (less cool) youngish alt-rock bands that have ten times their sales and ten times their radio spins, if we're really talking about actual mainstream success stories.

yeah i wasn't conflating rap metal and nu-metal, just saying that RATM only ever got described as anything + metal when being lumped in with the biggest existing rap/rock trend.

I know FNM & Helmet kinda got blamed (unfairly) for nu-metal, but they definitely were not nu-metal.

a lot of the beefs against nu-metal, if i remember correctly, centered on (a) the whiny/juvenile/dumb lyrics (see especially Fred Durst) -- though emo/crabcore has taken over as the whipping boy in that regard nowadays; (b) the hip-hop influences were really badly executed (lyricists who couldn't rap to save their lives, shitty beats, etc.); and (c) the simple fact that this shit was inescapable.

D) and was shit

music aside, the early 90s (by which i mean 1990-1995) was more classic/exciting not just because i liked the alt-rock music better than the stuff that came out from 1996-1999. there was also the excitement of hearing stuff that my friends and i NEVER would've thought would make it onto mainstream radio end up precisely there -- and not just Nirvana. i was thrilled as a teen when stuff like the Cure and Depeche Mode finally got through to the mainstream in 1989-1990 (and wished that other favorites of that time like the Smiths or Echo and the Bunnymen would've stuck it out just a bit longer to enjoy the same kind of success) and they (along with Faith No More) kind of paved the way. i still remember the time when my friends and i were walking near Frat Row on our college campus circa 1992 and hearing Nirvana, the Pixies and Nine Inch Nails blasting therefrom. it seemed like it meant SOMETHING to us (esp. since in the not-too-distant-past all you'd hear from such quarters was either buttrock or dance-pop).

obviously, the thrill wore off when alt-rock became the NEW mainstream and you'd have to wade through the Stabbing Westwards, the Candleboxes, the Collective Souls etc. to get to the good stuff.

It's also no coincidence that the rise of the Internet happened at the same time as major labels lost interest in "alternative" (nicely chronicled in Dean Wareham's memoir) and returned to boy bands and hip-hop. In 1992 I would've heard The Raincoats on my local college station; in 2000 I had to download them through Napster.

can you explain the connection there?

i think he means that from Napster onwards you didn't have to rely on college/weirdo-commercial radio stations anymore to hear stuff like the Raincoats. i also imagine that there wasn't much (if any) profit to the record companies from stocking up on stuff like the Raincoats anyway (lol remember all of those cut-out bins full of the breeder's last splash?).

it's certainly no accident that it took a band like Metallica to take on Napster. who the hell would've bankrolled a legal challenge to Napster lead by the Raincoats or the Breeders (assuming that either band would've even wanted to sue in the first place)?!?

Eisbaer otm -- I was finishing my reply before you posted.

the real surprise is the age breakdown?

not w/r/t what they voted for, but that ilm is now majority 30+

I still feel like The Youngest ILXor sometimes and I'm almost 27 now.

ilm is ilxors who care enough about 90s alt-rock to click on a thread entitled "early-90s alt-rock vs. late-90s alt rock" are now majority 30+

(though I was surprised too)

i'm not surprised -- really, i've always kind of taken it as an article of faith that the first half of the 90s was the better one wr2 music than the second and not surprised about the age either. it is kind of interesting and shocking to be reminded that lots of us are now old folk, though.

you guys seem to be overlooking
early-90s alt rock (younger than 30) 35

So it's clearly not just 30+ ilxors who think it was better

Of course, an 80s alt-rock vs 90s alt-rock would almost definitely be a win for the 80s, since the 80s is ILM's canonic decade.

pfunk, was mostly talking about the #s of over 30s vs. under 30s, not their choices

it will be interesting to watch the 90s become more lionized over the course of the next decade or so. assuming that the 20-year lag still applies.

we already have a (rather great) ace of base sounding-ass song in the billboard top ten so

i wonder what would win early vs late 90s polls for pop, rnb, hip hop,metal etc

I'll do the metal one
Early 90s Metal Vs Mid 90s Metal Vs Late 90s Metal