Is it remotely possible that Sha Na Na might have been good?

A larger image for better WTFs:
http://webspace.webring.com/people/bd/divamagenta/snnow.jpg

Guy far left looks like he's just been kicked in the nuts. There's an underage Henry The Eighth upper right. And if you look carefully behind the bronzed fella lower right, there's a phantom pair of legs behind him, that belong to no torso.

http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f185/PappaWheelie/1987NWA-PanicZone12front.jpg

http://www.tampabay.com/music/woodstock-was-a-myth-sha-na-nas-henry-gross-who-played-before-hendrix-wants-to-bust-it-20190807/

“I submit to you that Sha Na Na should have been one of the first people, if there were a legitimate Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, to go into it,” he said. “If you want entertainment, the original Sha Na Na cannot be beat.”

Sorry Henry, sorry Chuck--that is some kind of ludicrous. (Just posting this is taking the bait, I know--he's probably half-kidding.) I do like the idea that Sha Na Na was a people.

Maybe he just never got over the dog dying.

Great article

https://www.college.columbia.edu/cct/archive/sep_oct08/features1?fbclid=IwAR0cYnFspm0ZlLdPKPqd6x_ssKgBLkZ0dqTzqScrFY1rR7fMSsW0WV8tlVY

I am a fan of their 1972 single "Bounce in Your Buggy," which sounds more like the Archies than Danny and the Juniors.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7nQtuWuY9Y