Board ownership

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (64 of them)

the way i personally see it is thus: Nobody owns a thread, nobody owns a board, the only people who own ILX are those who pay for it's servers. As long as everybody acts decent, it's cool. But even boards specifically made for people (77, 1p3, TMI, The Cape, heck I had the underused ILG Players Club) are not those people's boards. Mods aren't usurping anyone's power, they're serving to make an attempt to keep the dialogue neutral and open and posi and they'll prune anything/one required to keep that the status quo, up to and including board and site mods.

but i'm just a guy

forksclovetofu, Monday, 5 April 2010 22:10 (fourteen years ago) link

^^^this is fine and all but its kinda boring, mod terrorism on the subboards can b kinda fun. just feel like iltmi is a special case bc it has a specifici function wrt things ppl obviously wanna have real convs abt that other ppl might wanna avoid bc of nsfw/squeamish/prudishness w/e

plax (ico), Monday, 5 April 2010 22:14 (fourteen years ago) link

i owned a board once. i gave it away. we cool.

✌.✰|ʘ‿ʘ|✰.✌ (Steve Shasta), Monday, 5 April 2010 22:15 (fourteen years ago) link

plax is right, no one talks about anything very serious on 1p3 and no one gets seriously butthurt when they are occasionally lolbanned or their threads are locked. on the other hand, for whatever reason, people really were into discussing the color of their poop, so kate's totaliatarian leanings are a little less endearing and she shouldn't be a mod unless she can chill out a little

maderator (k3vin k.), Monday, 5 April 2010 22:29 (fourteen years ago) link

"Mod terrorism" as practiced on IRE, IP3, ITR, etc still promotes and encourages discourse and, as such, isn't contradictory towards anything Forks said.

I disagree that donating money buys you a stake in ILX btw.

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 5 April 2010 22:54 (fourteen years ago) link

serving to make an attempt to keep the dialogue neutral and open and posi

not even sure about this as a stated aim tbph

Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:43 (fourteen years ago) link

nega 4 life

rip sarah silverman 3/19/10 never forget (history mayne), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:46 (fourteen years ago) link

I disagree that donating money buys you a stake in ILX btw

Damn straight and I don't feel it shd really be brought up to back any opinion ever

Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:06 (fourteen years ago) link

^ did not give

Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:09 (fourteen years ago) link

ilx plc.

niminy-piminy cricket (Upt0eleven), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:13 (fourteen years ago) link

iirc the last fundraiser we had happened real fast and some people who wanted to contribute didn't get a chance, but those issues aside it's an irrelevance - ILX has always been much more than the sum of the regrettably necessary dirty finance it occasionally has to dabble with

Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:13 (fourteen years ago) link

ILX IS A FEELING

Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:14 (fourteen years ago) link

You have tried to insert a duplicate message.

Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:14 (fourteen years ago) link

v did not give either, tbf v

Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:15 (fourteen years ago) link

oh i missed your first ^ lol

Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:16 (fourteen years ago) link

"You have tried to insert a duplicate message"

has potential as a meme, with the right decisions made early on in the effort

Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:18 (fourteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.