Modding of I love TMI

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (315 of them)

I'm going to bed, talk among yourselves if you want, but I'm not changing anything.

― Delia & Daphne & Celeste (Masonic Boom), Sunday, April 4, 2010 7:12 PM (14 minutes ago)

☀ ☃ (am0n), Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:28 (fourteen years ago) link

*throws popp*

☀ ☃ (am0n), Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:29 (fourteen years ago) link

imo you were completely nasty and rude to kenan, don't give it if you can't take it. kenan is nothing if not a bit of an 'oddball' poster, but he's also the first to apologize if he says stuff that's out of line - often calling himself out on it before anyone else even does - which is more than i can say for you, kate.

just1n3, Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:29 (fourteen years ago) link

*throws popp*

― ☀ ☃ (am0n), Sunday, April 4, 2010 7:29 PM (28 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

dying

max, Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:29 (fourteen years ago) link

I stopped caring about anything anyone says about me on this board quite some time ago.

― Delia & Daphne & Celeste (Masonic Boom), Sunday, April 4, 2010 11:26 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark

unless it is abt whether you were a girl early in the womb or not

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:30 (fourteen years ago) link

**Proposal**

Start a new board and call it "I Love chill TMI" and make me the mod, I won't ban anyone for anything no matter what!

biologically wrong (Z S), Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:30 (fourteen years ago) link

i mean, is the mod of ILNFL going to start deleting threads every time someone posts a negative comment about his/her favorite team? bottom line, if there is a board like 1p3 that isn't dedicated to a specific topic and is more of a playground for a group of ilxors, then fine, treat it like "your" board, etc. but a board that was made for discussion of certain topics shouldn't be subject to the personality swings and intolerance of the mod, and if it is, the mod should be removed.

i really shy away from board lawyering like this, but ffs, i like reading the ILTMI forum, and it sucks to have it hijacked by it's self-proclaimed "owner."

a bold plan drawn up by assholes to screw morons (ytth), Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:30 (fourteen years ago) link

poppage-throwing monkeys

still driving steen, banning deez, gettin my dick xhuxked (Curt1s Stephens), Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:30 (fourteen years ago) link

Unless someone talks about plants, I HATE THAT and will ban without mercy for any mention of plants

biologically wrong (Z S), Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:30 (fourteen years ago) link

kate, no problem w/you going to bed obv, but i do think this needs to get discussed. btw i am completely serious about the idea of setting up your board again and giving you mod privs there, if that is a workable option for you.

HOT DISH THYME MACHINE (jjjusten), Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:31 (fourteen years ago) link

http://i50.tinypic.com/a0jgp0.jpg

kate, 14 mins ago

k3vin k., Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:31 (fourteen years ago) link

ffs kate everybody knows i'm admiral kip up in this but do you not have the perspective to see how and why people are up in arms about this? and that your response of NYAH MINE FUCK U JJ is completely juvenile?

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:31 (fourteen years ago) link

i am all for z_s as mod!!!

just1n3, Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:32 (fourteen years ago) link

what the fuck, if bed and breakfast owners don't want homosexuals in their homes why must they welcome them?

This is all in regards to an internet message board about norgs and knobs iirc

all the pure blonde you could drink (King Boy Pato), Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:33 (fourteen years ago) link

i feel like one thing that would help ILTMI is more threads about people shitting

max, Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:33 (fourteen years ago) link

WHO GIVES A SHIT?

a bold plan drawn up by assholes to screw morons (ytth), Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:34 (fourteen years ago) link

not him, apparently.

a bold plan drawn up by assholes to screw morons (ytth), Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:35 (fourteen years ago) link

WHO GIVES A SHIT?

^^ should be the board descrip

all the pure blonde you could drink (King Boy Pato), Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:36 (fourteen years ago) link

lol

☀ ☃ (am0n), Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:36 (fourteen years ago) link

I think about the only response I have to this is "really?" like, it's Easter, have a nice dinner with friends and don't have brain dead stupid ILX drama for a change

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:44 (fourteen years ago) link

strip kate of mod privs or turn another board into iltmi & let kate have i don't mind everything back & it's bevy of posters and interesting threads

jihad mane (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:44 (fourteen years ago) link

i for one am jewish

jihad mane (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:44 (fourteen years ago) link

way to assume everyone here believes jesus is our lord and savior

harbl, Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:45 (fourteen years ago) link

& yeah it's not kate's board -- idme was kate's board -- iltmi is not kate's board -- when the church gets changed to "i love british football" it's not gonna be rev and abbott's board anymore

jihad mane (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:45 (fourteen years ago) link

u will pry ask dr. freud from my cold dead hands

harbl, Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:46 (fourteen years ago) link

by kate's reasoning, the church is actual chaki's board, may he rest in peace

jihad mane (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:48 (fourteen years ago) link

never knew people "owned" boards until today

ksh, Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:51 (fourteen years ago) link

Holy shit dude. If chaki is dead... then this guy on AIM is... a ZOMBIE!

*runs*

kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:51 (fourteen years ago) link

If I'm guilty of anything, it's assuming that people will take an excuse to have fun

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:52 (fourteen years ago) link

Ask Chaki!

velko, Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:52 (fourteen years ago) link

feel like we should think abt the lyrics to colors of the wind by vanessa williams right now

plax (ico), Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:52 (fourteen years ago) link

It is what it is. It's my board and it always has been.

― Delia & Daphne & Celeste (Masonic Boom), Sunday, April 4, 2010 7:08 PM (46 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

gangsta! gangsta!

~cankles~ (ice cr?m), Sunday, 4 April 2010 23:56 (fourteen years ago) link

when the church gets changed to "i love british football" it's not gonna be rev and abbott's board anymore

Is this going to happen? Would be sooooooo down with Balkanizing that shit.

kingkongvsgodzilla, Monday, 5 April 2010 00:02 (fourteen years ago) link

i was joking cuz i think it was bandied about a few weeks ago

jihad mane (J0rdan S.), Monday, 5 April 2010 00:03 (fourteen years ago) link

ILTMI is sometimes interesting and that has nothing to do with Kate's involvement. Strip her of mod privileges or give her another board, whatever, but it's NAGL for mods to be throwing temper tantrums and deleting threads for no reason.

a cross between lily allen and fetal alcohol syndrome (milo z), Monday, 5 April 2010 00:13 (fourteen years ago) link

hopefully kate will cool down tomorrow, i think it's probably best to wait til then at least

k3vin k., Monday, 5 April 2010 00:17 (fourteen years ago) link

whoa i'm real late to this thread but don't wanna read it all, can someone give me the scopp?

iiiijjjj, Monday, 5 April 2010 00:18 (fourteen years ago) link

opps didn't see that thread

iiiijjjj, Monday, 5 April 2010 00:34 (fourteen years ago) link

hang on I thought Kate locked that thread and called Kenan's gender obsolete for lolz? and that it was pretty funny if that was her intention? and that the discussion was restarted anyway, with little time lost or pain incurred?

william mcgonadal's tay ridge disaster (acoleuthic), Monday, 5 April 2010 00:35 (fourteen years ago) link

and then she deleted the new thread, and threw a hissy fit when confronted

maderator (k3vin k.), Monday, 5 April 2010 00:36 (fourteen years ago) link

ok well I went upstairs to talk about music (lol newfound love of hip-hop) + chill w/ frankie j for nearly 2 hours and missed everything

william mcgonadal's tay ridge disaster (acoleuthic), Monday, 5 April 2010 00:43 (fourteen years ago) link

also guys Kate is having it pretty rough atm (I know this, from the Twitters) and I think maybe in this instance a pile-on isn't the sensitive or proper thing to do? we usually have little trouble from her ILTMI modding...one little episode that wasn't exactly malicious while the poor gal's in a seriously depressed phase ain't doing anyone favours. I say drop it, lock thread, etc

william mcgonadal's tay ridge disaster (acoleuthic), Monday, 5 April 2010 00:57 (fourteen years ago) link

that's true, whenever i'm having a rough time of things, the LAST thing i ever do is apologize for throwing temper tantrums. sorry lj, if mb wants to make it public (or at least ilx-public) that she's going through a rough patch and that she had a bad day, then fine, i'll take it at face value. but a third party defense that her twitter feed indicates depression or whathaveyou doesn't make me any less annoyed about the situation.

a bold plan drawn up by assholes to screw morons (ytth), Monday, 5 April 2010 01:07 (fourteen years ago) link

Public content indicates that she's not happy, and that this farrago has been an aggravating factor - it's directly referenced - and as she's directly said that ILX troubles (i.e. this) are getting her down, I think we should respect that

william mcgonadal's tay ridge disaster (acoleuthic), Monday, 5 April 2010 01:13 (fourteen years ago) link

maybe she should stop modding then?

call all destroyer, Monday, 5 April 2010 01:35 (fourteen years ago) link

i mean if this is "she's having a rough go, let's give her a wide berth" vs "she's having a rough go, maybe she shouldn't be making these kinds of calls," i know where i stand on that ish

call all destroyer, Monday, 5 April 2010 01:37 (fourteen years ago) link

She should stop modding ILTMI because the actions from earlier today were ridiculous and childish. Just give her her old board back and let me mod ILTMI. I don't give a shit what y'all have to say about gender or poop or whatever else so you should just let me do it. Why? Because I'd be awesome.

t(o_o)t (ENBB), Monday, 5 April 2010 01:44 (fourteen years ago) link

So no one has visibility as to whom banned Kenan or K?

queen of the toilets, which is in some ways the worst branch of royalty (Trayce), Tuesday, 7 September 2010 03:14 (thirteen years ago) link

considering her last post to that thread, my suspicion is that she banned herself

sarahel, Tuesday, 7 September 2010 03:16 (thirteen years ago) link

no. no one can tell who executed admin actions -- even mods, even for actions that are logged.

tehresa, Tuesday, 7 September 2010 03:16 (thirteen years ago) link

I didnt know that, interesting.

queen of the toilets, which is in some ways the worst branch of royalty (Trayce), Tuesday, 7 September 2010 03:33 (thirteen years ago) link

A secret cadre of übertrolls engineered that thread to back kate into a corner and leave her no choice but to take actions that would appear controlling, paranoid, and crazy to any outside observers unfamiliar with their devious machinations.

Kerm, Tuesday, 7 September 2010 04:02 (thirteen years ago) link

misread machinations as machete - carry on

sarahel, Tuesday, 7 September 2010 04:03 (thirteen years ago) link

rip magical supermod menu

buzza, Tuesday, 7 September 2010 04:03 (thirteen years ago) link

I've been down with the flu, so I haven't really paid attention to ILTMI for the last couple of days. I haven't banned or unbanned anyone.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 7 September 2010 06:47 (thirteen years ago) link

ban l0u1s jagg3r

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 7 September 2010 06:48 (thirteen years ago) link

Okay, I read the thread that apparently lead to all this, so here's my two cents:

Kate, I know that Kenan can sometimes make insensitive comments, and I understand the need to have a women-only spaces, or threads. (I'm all for the "No boys allowed" thred on 1P3.) And I have nothing against deleting pointless "funny" remarks from a serious thread. However, in this case it didn't look like Kenan had actually done anything wrong yet (it's not like he's always insensitive), so pre-emptively banning him from the thread was unnecessary. And it didn't look like the other female posters on the thread wanted it to be women only, so their wishes should've been respected too.

Basically, I don't think Kate should be banned from ILTMI, but at this point she shouldn't be an ILTMI mod. I thought that already happened when ENBB was made a mod, but apparently not. I'm sorry if this sounds harsh Kate, but it looks like the consensus on what ILTMI should be like goes against you mod decisions. I completely understand the need to have a forum to discuss stuff safely, with no fear of any unwanted comments, but ILTMI is still supposed to be an open forum. (Though I have to say the discussion there has mostly been quite good-natured, with little need for moderation.) There are other places on the net where you can have safe discussions. In fact, I'm all for you having your own subboard again, where you are the single mod, and can regulate the threads differently than on ILTMI. ILTMI was never supposed be like IDME, but if the site mods can create a new IDME, I think that would be a reasonable solution to this whole problem.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 7 September 2010 07:25 (thirteen years ago) link

A measured and diplomatic post... thankyou T.

queen of the toilets, which is in some ways the worst branch of royalty (Trayce), Tuesday, 7 September 2010 09:23 (thirteen years ago) link

Measured and diplomatic, with a hint of Finnish faux-naive troll.

gr8080 State (King Boy Pato), Tuesday, 7 September 2010 09:31 (thirteen years ago) link

lol

(b)clam(/b) (crüt), Tuesday, 7 September 2010 14:29 (thirteen years ago) link

eh maybe lock thread?

k¸ (darraghmac), Tuesday, 7 September 2010 14:31 (thirteen years ago) link

free dom

am0n, Tuesday, 7 September 2010 14:36 (thirteen years ago) link

K de-modded and removed herself from TMI because the mods she contacted didn't reply to her explanations of why she mods ILTMI the way she does. There's an angry and depressed post on her blog entitled "burn the witch" which you're not going to like if you don't like that kind of thing so I'm not going to link to it here.

StanM, Tuesday, 7 September 2010 14:40 (thirteen years ago) link

I still want to know if the software behind the board was working properly when the thread ban was attempted. I know it's glitched for me in the past and I want to rule out that it glitched here.

feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Tuesday, 7 September 2010 14:44 (thirteen years ago) link

kenan was just banned from thread iirc

if you ban yourself or are banned while you have mod privileges you can come back and ban others, at least on subboards, or at least you used to be able to, but thats all you can do

sorry if this has been covered already

proprietor of gib (roxymuzak), Tuesday, 7 September 2010 14:54 (thirteen years ago) link

Assuming the software was working correctly, one of three things happened:

- Another ILTMI mod unbanned Kenan; I don't see what either would gain from it, plus both have explicitly stated they didn't and I believe them.

- A sitemod unbanned Kenan; so far, no one is taking credit for this. If someone DID do this, IMO that person should not be a sitemod anymore. No exceptions.

- Someone's figured out how to hack the site. Kind of can't do anything about that unless we can actually prove it and recreate how it was done.

Basically, because the admin log was turned off for ILTMI, there's no record of who did what on the board. The simplest explanations are either a software failure (ie, the site gave the incorrect impression that Kenan was banned, or some subsequent action intended to do something else cleared out Kenan's ban), a user error (ie, when Kate attempted to ban Kenan, she mistakenly clicked off of the confirmation page) or a sitemod failure (a sitemod decided to rescind the ban without, at a bare minimum, notifying the other sitemods as to the reasoning behind the decision). At the moment, we don't have enough information to investigate the first two and no one is fessing up on the third option.

Board policy in recent years has shifted away from giving people private sub-boards. I am not against the idea of a women-only board but I would like to see more support for it from the community before creating it. I have no real opinion on who would moderate it; that should be decided by the people using it.

feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Tuesday, 7 September 2010 15:15 (thirteen years ago) link

hmm

proprietor of gib (roxymuzak), Tuesday, 7 September 2010 15:17 (thirteen years ago) link

hackers, def hackers

am0n, Tuesday, 7 September 2010 15:18 (thirteen years ago) link

kenan was just banned from thread iirc

Who unbanned him from that thread is the question, I think. Kate, ENBB and Tuomas were the ILTMI mods, and they didn't do it. None of the sitewide mods know who did it. It was his unbanning from that thread that upset Kate. I, for one, did not jump in and re-ban Kenan from that thread because I prefer to find out what's going on in a situation before I take any action, unless there's an obvious urgent need. Right now the "who unbanned Kenan" mystery still has the sitewides baffled. I regret that we don't act quickly enough or communicate quickly enough to suit Kate, but frankly, she has a hair-trigger and there's no such thing as moving quickly enough or communicating quickly enough to suit Kate.

Mods don't do, or fail to do, anything in order to spite any ILXor.

xposts, was composing that while HI DERE posted.

Donovan Dagnabbit (WmC), Tuesday, 7 September 2010 15:19 (thirteen years ago) link

- A sitemod unbanned Kenan; so far, no one is taking credit for this. If someone DID do this, IMO that person should not be a sitemod anymore. No exceptions.

i do not share y.o.

k¸ (darraghmac), Tuesday, 7 September 2010 15:19 (thirteen years ago) link

surely k8 was acting capriciously, not the mod who restored things. isn't this whole thread pointing out that ILTMI is a board to be modded in an impersonal fashion like ILE or ILM & not according to whims like Stickwaving: The Chinatown of ILX :: The Chinatown of ILX.

zvookster, Tuesday, 7 September 2010 15:20 (thirteen years ago) link

i unbanned kenan and throw myself on the mercy of the court

The sulky expression from the hilarious "Aubrey Plaza" persona (history mayne), Tuesday, 7 September 2010 15:22 (thirteen years ago) link

Taking a mod action on a board that isn't being tracked and not telling anyone, including the other other sitemods, about what you are doing is bad modding. If there was a reason behind it, if it had been written up the mods Kate contacted could have communicated better with her. She may still be angry, but there would be answer. As it stands right now, we have nothing to say other than "we don't know what happened". That doesn't help anyone.

feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Tuesday, 7 September 2010 15:23 (thirteen years ago) link

If 'who unbanned kenan' is a big question, then 'when/how did kate get ILTMI mod powers back' is another one, i think

k¸ (darraghmac), Tuesday, 7 September 2010 15:24 (thirteen years ago) link

as of right now, I am not 100% convinced they were ever actually taken away

feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Tuesday, 7 September 2010 15:25 (thirteen years ago) link

actually I wonder if there's some weird cache interaction happening here where attempting to do something at a certain time gets ignored because the site is running maintenance tasks

feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Tuesday, 7 September 2010 15:26 (thirteen years ago) link

How long is this clusterfuck going to go on for?

1) I banned Kenan (and a couple of other guys who had posted) from the thread because, as stated, several people on the thread (myself, Nijoli and someone else) said that they felt uncomfortable sharing intimate details of their personal lives for fear of mockery, among other things. Kenan, to give him credit, at least tried to contact me about this, though I was unable to respond, as he did not provide an email address where we could discuss it further.

2) Someone removed the ban. I contacted several moderators asking what the policy on this was. I asked, if I was not going to be allowed to moderate, to have my moderation privileges revoked and to be removed from the board. Only one mod replied, saying that he was too busy with personal issues to get involved (fair enough). There was no other response.

3) When there was no response, I banned both of my accounts from TMI. If anyone had been curious or concerned about that, well, NOT ONE PERSON bothered to webmail or email me or ask me what had happened, they just went straight to opening up the old clusterfuck thread yet again.

4) I yet again wrote to several more mods, explaining my actions yet again, and asking for this thread to be locked. I have been removed from moderation, I have been removed from TMI. I do not know what else you want? A public execution?

I do not understand this thread is kept being kept open for the usual round of clusterfuck, character assassination, grandstanding and just all around fucking drama that gets dragged out whenever my name is even *mentioned* on the mod board, whether I am involved or not. I gather you lot seem to enjoy doing this, because I certainly do not.

I am asking yet again for this thread to be locked since none of the moderators have responded to any of my emails. Enough is enough.

propranoLOL (Masonic Boom), Tuesday, 7 September 2010 15:26 (thirteen years ago) link

I only just saw the email you sent me after reading this post.

Thread is locked.

feel free to answer my Korn Kuestion (HI DERE), Tuesday, 7 September 2010 15:28 (thirteen years ago) link


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.