Jedward
― The Reverend, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 12:34 (fourteen years ago) link
(serious answer: Spectrum City)
if my personal tastes were dictating, it would likely be a toss-up between T. Rex and ELO. Cheap Trick & Public Enemy would be great. (i mean insofar as RnR Hall of Fame induction is "great")
but dude, Rush deserves this.
― king willie style (will), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 13:15 (fourteen years ago) link
wouldn't be suprised if the Rock Hall was just consideringYo! Bum Rush The ShowNation Of Millions their recorded debut and are waiting until20122013
― kornrulez6969, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 13:31 (fourteen years ago) link
Did that above thing make sense? What I'm trying to say is PE will get in without question, but 25 years after Nation Of Millions.
so elegibility is 25 years after group/band/artist inception or 25 years after breathrough landmark work?
― Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 13:39 (fourteen years ago) link
If the Stooges made it in, Alice Cooper and Kiss can't be far behind, give 'em another year or so. I'll bet Rush and PE will make it in time too. And anyways, this really isn't about who deserves admission, assuming induction is even a desirable thing, which nobody on this thread really thinks it is. So, based on my impression of the HoF, I think the most truly surprising (not surprising enough to be "shocking") omission is Chicago.
― Half lies and gorilla dust (Myonga Vön Bontee), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 14:18 (fourteen years ago) link
tbh the only band on here whose inclusion in a hall of fame would surprise me is RHCP
― smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 14:21 (fourteen years ago) link
What about Yes? Blue Oyster Cult? Of the crew in the poll, I gotta go with Rush.
― Bill Magill, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 14:40 (fourteen years ago) link
Really? I think their inclusion would be one of the least surprising. According to Wikipedia, RHCP have sold 55 million albums ... who on that list has sold more? Kiss, Frampton, and Bon Jovi maybe?
xpost
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 14:41 (fourteen years ago) link
CHEAP FUCKING TRICK
― akon/family (Curt1s Stephens), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 14:45 (fourteen years ago) link
Aside from the ones you mentioned
Depeche Mode: 100 million albums/singlesChicago: over 120 million albumsHall and Oates: over 60 millionELO: over 100 millionJourney: 75 million
― smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 14:55 (fourteen years ago) link
That's probably how it will work for inductees going forward. So the Chili Peppers will most likely get voted in 25 years after Blood Sugar...
― kornrulez6969, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 14:55 (fourteen years ago) link
Of the acts where I could find numbers, The Cure (27 million as of 1994) and Heart (over 30 million) hit the low end
― smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 14:56 (fourteen years ago) link
Between Alice and T-Rex... but Alice it is
― The Oort Locker (Tom D.), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 14:59 (fourteen years ago) link
... LOL, I didn't notice Public Enemy!!!!!!
― The Oort Locker (Tom D.), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 15:00 (fourteen years ago) link
Of the names listed here, only 2 have ever been nominated before: Kiss and RHCP. None of the others have ever been nominated. And Public Enemy aren't eligible yet. Of the names listed, I can say for sure that Frampton, Journey, Bad Company and Foreigner have little to no chance of ever getting in.
― jetfan, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 15:02 (fourteen years ago) link
John Huston, in Chinatown: "'Course I'm respectable. I'm old. Politicians, ugly buildings, and whores all get respectable if they last long enough." Bad '70s rock bands, too--he forgot bad '70s rock bands.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 15:05 (fourteen years ago) link
RHCP are as establishment (rubber-stamped four star RS reviews of every new album, Gramy AOTY nod) as any band of their generation gets. they may not get in before some of those older bands, but they'll get in.
― some dude, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 15:12 (fourteen years ago) link
― The Oort Locker (Tom D.), Tuesday, March 16, 2010 11:00 AM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark
That's what Jann Wenner said.
― kingkongvsgodzilla, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 15:13 (fourteen years ago) link
that's true, I guess I keep thinking of them as being the same band I encountered on their first three albums and therefore seeing them listed with "the greats" seems (unfairly) bizarre
― smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 15:14 (fourteen years ago) link
By personal taste, I'd vote for Hall & Oates or ELO. By "significance", I guess I'd pick Public Enemy.
― o. nate, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 15:15 (fourteen years ago) link
I notice that the Beastie Boys didn't make the CNN.com list.
― o. nate, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 15:17 (fourteen years ago) link
All right, point taken on the sales figures for the other bands on the list. ELO sold 100 million albums? WTF???
I guess I keep thinking of them as being the same band I encountered on their first three albums and therefore seeing them listed with "the greats" seems (unfairly) bizarre
Yeah, me too. Still, I can't deny that: huge sales numbers + being one of the world's most popular rock bands going on 20 years + RS-approved = easy HOF selection
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 15:23 (fourteen years ago) link
Beastie Boys were nominated in 2007, but not last 2 years.BTW- I voted for Hall & Oates.
― jetfan, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 15:25 (fourteen years ago) link
keep thinking of them as being the same band I encountered on their first three albums and therefore seeing them listed with "the greats" seems (unfairly) bizarre
Yeah, me too. I'm all "what're they gonna do, show up for the HoF ceremony with socks on their cocks"? (The "they totally suck" factor works into it too, probably.)
― xhuxk, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 15:26 (fourteen years ago) link
I will ride for the first 3 RHCP albums until the day I die
― smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 15:33 (fourteen years ago) link
No KC & the Sunshine Band is a travesty.
― o. nate, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 16:16 (fourteen years ago) link
Hall & Oates and Public Enemy are my tops, Cheap Trick pretty great, esp. live up through the '90s, Foreigner's "Urgent" makes up for anything else they did, RHCP just uhg despite a few good songs on first couple albums, and the rest mostly off my map except whatever hit radio, though I'm open. Can/should a 40-year-old get into Alice Cooper and Rush this late?
― Pete Scholtes, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 18:09 (fourteen years ago) link
yes to both IMO
― smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 18:10 (fourteen years ago) link
in fact, if you are 40+ and aren't into at least one of either Rush or Alice Cooper, I am not sure you can be trusted
Me = untrustworthy.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 18:15 (fourteen years ago) link
There's a good thread: What is the musical equivalent of the endlessly recycled and misattributed quote to the effect that anyone who isn't a socialist at 20 has no heart, and anyone who isn't a conservative at 40 has no brain?
― Pete Scholtes, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 18:21 (fourteen years ago) link
Me too. Lee's voice is just too annoying though I loved 'Subdivisions' once upon a time.
― Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 18:21 (fourteen years ago) link
― smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:10 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
^Amen
― Bill Magill, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 18:23 (fourteen years ago) link
Pete
I love Rush to death. I listened to Power Windows last night actually.
But here's the thing, I think being a Rush fan is sort of like homosexuality...some people are just born Rush fans, but it might take you a while to discover that about yourself...but if you wanna give it a shot, try like 2112 and Moving Pictures. Some people just can't like Rush.
WRT Alice Cooper, the original Alice Cooper band albums (especially the run of Easy Action through School's Out) are pretty much the most mindblowing musical discovery I made in the last 5 years.
Those albums contain elements of pretty much every single thing that's great about rock music. Great pop hooks, ratty punk energy, awesome riffs, funny stupidity, grand ambition, art rock set pieces, awesome rhythm section playing, great guitar solos, etc etc.
if you end up listening to like, Killer or Love it to Death and aren't impressed...I'd kinda question if you like rock music.
― Deuce Bigalow: Male Juggalo (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 18:26 (fourteen years ago) link
hahaha
I am Rush-curious
― smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 18:30 (fourteen years ago) link
That's the key for me: "once upon a time." Once upon a time, e.g. back in grade 6 in 1973, when Mr. Weedmark brought the School's Out album to music class, Alice Cooper was this really grown-up, scary, endlessly mysterious entity, and "School's Out" itself was a blast. The idea that almost 40 years later, after all the bad music and celebrity foolishness and general Spinal Tap downward spiral, that one moment would be enough to convince me that Alice Cooper belongs in any kind of HOF strikes me as absurd.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 18:31 (fourteen years ago) link
I believe you can make that exact same argument for every single act currently in the Hall of Fame.
― smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 18:34 (fourteen years ago) link
Possibly, but at a certain level of achievement--Dylan, the Rolling Stones, Neil Young, etc.--the downward drift doesn't much matter, any more that it matters that Willie Mays or Steve Carlton or Rickey Henderson hung on too long too. But you can't turn Alice Cooper into Willie Mays; at best he's Mike Cuellar, great for two or three years and then nothing. (And let me say pre-emptively that the Velvet Underground's or Sex Pistols' "two or three" years are a whole different matter.)
― clemenza, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 18:39 (fourteen years ago) link
being a Rush fan is sort of like homosexualitylol
― tylerw, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 18:41 (fourteen years ago) link
"And let me say pre-emptively that the Velvet Underground's or Sex Pistols' "two or three" years are a whole different matter."
Bullshit. Why? because that's what you're supposed to think? It sure isnt because they made better music than Alice Cooper.
― Bill Magill, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 18:42 (fourteen years ago) link
But here's the thing, I think being a Rush fan is sort of like homosexuality...some people are just born Rush fans, but it might take you a while to discover that about yourself...
OTM. I discovered this abt myself at age 36, everything just felt so right.
Rush, BOC and Current 93 stand as the biggest new enthusiasms of my thirties (though I still have 4 months to go)
― heck bent for pleather (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 18:43 (fourteen years ago) link
No homo.
i'm not crazy into Rush, but you know, a couple drinks, the right situation ... who knows?
― tylerw, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 18:45 (fourteen years ago) link
Bill Magill: Yes, yes, I always place great importance on what I'm supposed to think...If you count Alice Cooper's body of work as being the equal of the Velvet Underground's or the Sex Pistols', well, have at it. That's kind of a hard argument to enter into.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 18:46 (fourteen years ago) link
The idea that almost 40 years later, after all the bad music and celebrity foolishness and general Spinal Tap downward spiral, that one moment would be enough to convince me that Alice Cooper belongs in any kind of HOF strikes me as absurd.
you know what strikes me as being absurd? a hall of fame for rock and roll. i mean. . . it's crazy!
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 18:46 (fourteen years ago) link
"That's kind of a hard argument to enter into."
How come? Here, I'll win it easily: I think Alice Cooper made better music than the Sex Pistols and the Velvet Underground. Not such a hard argument. Mike Cuellar, my ass.
― Bill Magill, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 18:49 (fourteen years ago) link
Good--we've settled that Alice Cooper were superior to the Velvet Underground and the Sex Pistols. Thanks!...I think I half-agree with Mr. Que about the redundancy of the whole enterprise. If you go back to the very first inductees, though, they started off doing a good job--admittedly, it was a lot easier wading through the upper echelon. At some point they lost their way, and now I have no idea what the criteria are.
― clemenza, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 18:53 (fourteen years ago) link
in fairness, almost everyone made better music than The Sex Pistols, including pretty much everyone they inspired and musical projects taken up by Pistols members after the band broke up
― smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 18:53 (fourteen years ago) link