Gang Gang Dance LP

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (497 of them)

xp and those guitar licks that breeze in around the middle of the first song are more than edging towards studio territory, no?

lucas pine, Thursday, 30 October 2008 02:18 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah there's that same corny spanish guitar sound (see also the last track on the Lindstrom album).

Tim F, Thursday, 30 October 2008 02:21 (fifteen years ago) link

man the transition from the first track into the second one i could listen to on repeat for hours.
also the production on this is like shimmering prisms in flight. haha i need to stop, bottom line is this a great fucking record.

oscar, Thursday, 30 October 2008 02:22 (fifteen years ago) link

""itll be awesome when theres a band w/gang gang dance/excepter style sensibilities that has more conventional awesome songs and singing - this is by no means a criticism of said bands - btw are there any bands like that"

whoever it ends up being they had better have some uncommon surnames

noizez duk, Thursday, 30 October 2008 04:52 (fifteen years ago) link

saw these guys with of montreal tonight. was pretty awesome all-around.

s1ocki, Thursday, 30 October 2008 04:58 (fifteen years ago) link

Seriously, one of my favorites for the year.

― Bomb Bomb Iran (san frandisco), Wednesday, October 29, 2008 7:04 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

^^ this

jaxon, Thursday, 30 October 2008 06:37 (fifteen years ago) link

by the way who were the djs that night?? holy trainwrecks. painful.

mostly leo fitzpatrick, i think.

― mizzell, Thursday, October 30, 2008 12:52 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

^^ lolz

jaxon, Thursday, 30 October 2008 06:37 (fifteen years ago) link

"itll be awesome when theres a band w/gang gang dance/excepter style sensibilities that has more conventional awesome songs and singing - this is by no means a criticism of said bands - btw are there any bands like that"

This is basically what I'm always looking for. I do like that there are several bands (Gang Gang Dance, Animal Collective, Air France) that are closing in on this space from different directions. But I don't know of anything right in that interzone just now.

― Tim F, Wednesday, October 29, 2008 8:38 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

^^ el guincho

jaxon, Thursday, 30 October 2008 06:38 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah I thought of mentioning El Guincho. I think he's slightly subtler in his use of zany rainbow coloured samplestuff than the others - or perhaps the better way to put it is that side of him is more subtly blended into his other influences.

Tim F, Thursday, 30 October 2008 06:41 (fifteen years ago) link

The better parts of The Beta Band LP catch this vibe a bit, I think.

Tim F, Thursday, 30 October 2008 06:41 (fifteen years ago) link

El Guincho is kind of shit live compared to Panda Bear

Kramkoob (Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃), Thursday, 30 October 2008 07:01 (fifteen years ago) link

love how amazingly clear the production is on this

t_g, Thursday, 30 October 2008 08:54 (fifteen years ago) link

Probably worth mentioning High Places as falling into this area as well. Their album is v. pretty.

Tim F, Thursday, 30 October 2008 14:46 (fifteen years ago) link

is the el guincho worth listening to? you know, considering my tastes.

i love the gang gang dance album - the word springing to mind is crystalline, it just seems to have endless angles and facets to it, plus it's crystal clear sonically, you can hear EVERYTHING - but i pretty much hate all the comparisons here...beta band, panda bear, animal collective ugh. don't see the similarities at all, they're all so bloodless while GGD is full of life.

lex pretend, Thursday, 30 October 2008 15:02 (fifteen years ago) link

Chromatics maybe?

I KNOW WHAT YOU'RE UP TO (Colonel Poo), Thursday, 30 October 2008 15:03 (fifteen years ago) link

So am I the only person who thinks their new album is a lot duller than their earlier ones? (Haven't read the thread, so maybe I'm not...)

xhuxk, Thursday, 30 October 2008 15:04 (fifteen years ago) link

i've never heard their earlier albums and really want to now! have been meaning to check them out for years now

lex pretend, Thursday, 30 October 2008 15:06 (fifteen years ago) link

El Guincho album is great

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 30 October 2008 16:03 (fifteen years ago) link

the vocals are a deal breaker for me on this one, they seem silly, not very thoughtful, quite annoying

futuristic vacuum cleaner adaptor (later arpeggiator), Thursday, 30 October 2008 16:34 (fifteen years ago) link

lex I think the el guincho record is really good, but if you didn't like person pitch it's probably not for you

dmr, Thursday, 30 October 2008 17:00 (fifteen years ago) link

I think it depends on why you don't like Person Pitch frankly.

Alex in SF, Thursday, 30 October 2008 17:01 (fifteen years ago) link

i didn't like person pitch because...well, for one there are those awful wimpy vocals, so hand-wringing and timorous. beach boys harmonies leave me cold at the best of times but these are even more of a drag, so slow and irresolute, refusing to resolve into anything attractive. also i'm sure like the entire album is out of tune? or at least disorientating in a really unpleasant way, like you're hearing it underwater. i don't care if this was the intent, it sounds shitty. the music just sounds like muddied-up found sounds, not even arranged well, it's a total mess. and there's nothing else, it's all detail and no groove, cake decorations (the kind that taste really horribly sweet if you try to eat them) without any cake. it actually made me feel nauseous to listen to and is seriously one of the worst things i've ever heard, my dislike isn't just reaction against the baffling praise for it.

which is why i'm confused that it's being brought up here... st dymphna is so bold and clean and precise, everything which person pitch wasn't.

lex pretend, Thursday, 30 October 2008 17:31 (fifteen years ago) link

I suspect you might like El Guincho. In a lot of ways it's Person Pitch minus the Beach Boys plus groove.

Alex in SF, Thursday, 30 October 2008 17:35 (fifteen years ago) link

especially since both st dymphna and el guincho are both very percussive

jordan s (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 30 October 2008 17:36 (fifteen years ago) link

Hmmm, I guess I need to listen to El Guincho again.

jaymc, Thursday, 30 October 2008 17:40 (fifteen years ago) link

ok well a friend told me to give el guincho a chance a couple of weeks ago so i guess once i make copy deadline tonight (hollow laugh) i'll dig out the promo

lex pretend, Thursday, 30 October 2008 17:42 (fifteen years ago) link

listening to st dymphna now, is it that feeling of randomness which makes people compare it to person pitch? both have a load of ingredients but st dymphna uses its random/unexpected quality in completely different ways, every new sound is an extra spark which builds on what was already there to good effect, as opposed to just something else to throw haphazardly into the mix

lex pretend, Thursday, 30 October 2008 17:45 (fifteen years ago) link

Honestly I haven't spent much time with this new one yet so I won't comment on it, but everyone who hasn't heard "God's Money" should go listen to it.

matt2, Thursday, 30 October 2008 18:35 (fifteen years ago) link

i've enjoyed Saint Dymphna over the last couple of days. They way they akwardly stack sounds is super appealing, however 'crass' some of them are (this in terms of pitch wheel keyboards and weird casio bass). Im not all too keen on the girls bizzaro-accent yells, but that is countered beautifully by tinchy stryder using a robo filter.
My only other prev. contact with them came in the form of that Retina Riddim DVD/disc, which i thought was great. The audio disc with that, btw, runs to the exact playing time as Music For 18 Musicians. Im yet to figure the significance of that tho.

siskin/skulls, Thursday, 30 October 2008 20:25 (fifteen years ago) link

"is it that feeling of randomness which makes people compare it to person pitch? both have a load of ingredients but st dymphna uses its random/unexpected quality in completely different ways, every new sound is an extra spark which builds on what was already there to good effect, as opposed to just something else to throw haphazardly into the mix"

Well obv I don't hear Person Pitch that way at all, that album feels obsessively structured to me (any shifts in sound are quite deliberate and really there's not many of them, where the track changes directly completely it's more in the sense of it effectively becoming an entirely new song), whereas Saint Dymphna has this sort of frenzied chaos that could end disastrously but doesn't, not because there's a secret structure but because by glorious happenstance none of their moves fuck up. They're like an insane gambler who really should lose a round just to learn a lesson, but for some reason always wins.

The comparisons spring not from any strict similarity but because kaleidoscopic, dance-not-dance hippie-dippie sample-pop seems to have turned into a miniature movement within indie over the last twelve months after having been out in the cold for about seven years (the elephant in the room is The Avalanches); for better or worse, Person Pitch is the flashpoint for this development.

Lex I'd say the likelihood of you liking El Guincho (who I really really like, though not as much as Saint Dymphna) could depend on what you think of Manu Chao.

Tim F, Thursday, 30 October 2008 21:01 (fifteen years ago) link

"itll be awesome when theres a band w/gang gang dance/excepter style sensibilities that has more conventional awesome songs and singing - this is by no means a criticism of said bands - btw are there any bands like that"

This is basically what I'm always looking for. I do like that there are several bands (Gang Gang Dance, Animal Collective, Air France) that are closing in on this space from different directions. But I don't know of anything right in that interzone just now.

― Tim F, Wednesday, October 29, 2008 8:38 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

^^ el guincho

― jaxon, Thursday, October 30, 2008 2:38 AM (14 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

I disagee because it seems that songwriting and singing are the two things that el guincho is weakest at. I haven't heard the record much, but I def wouldn't consider it having more conventional awesome songs and singing than the others listed here.

mizzell, Thursday, 30 October 2008 21:05 (fifteen years ago) link

Agreeing with the opinion of El Guincho's weak singing up in here. Oh my god, that dude's half assed yell is so detrimental to my enjoyment. His vocals follow the same kind of pattern (you know the one) that feature so heavily on AC's 'Feels', but just sound so fucking LAZY.

siskin/skulls, Thursday, 30 October 2008 21:10 (fifteen years ago) link

tim, i really wouldn't place gang gang dance in that mini-movement at all - they seem much more to be in the NYC punk-funk tradition, the comparisons springing to mind are out hud, !!! and liars (and ESG too? i don't know a huge deal about them but for some reason i've conflated ESG and GGD for ages). really can't see how they could be classed more with animal collective and their ilk - the scope of their music is so different, macro not micro.

lex pretend, Thursday, 30 October 2008 21:45 (fifteen years ago) link

i can def see the avalanches/panda bear connection, if only cuz i have a v similar visceral negative reaction to both, but surely that places GGD at even more of a remove from this continuum?

lex pretend, Thursday, 30 October 2008 21:46 (fifteen years ago) link

Yes there's obv a punk-funk resemblance. And Gang Gang Dance are taking ideas from grime, reggaeton etc. whereas I think Animal Collective/Panda Bear are now vibing off techno primarily. But Animal Collective circa 2007/2008 are very different to Animal Collective circa 2003, 2004 or 2006. The live show I saw last year in particular sounded a lot like Gang Gang Dance in places.

If you're thinking of Animal Collective in generalist terms (i.e. "their ilk" - Rings, Ariel Pink etc.) then the comparison wouldn't make sense.

By way of comparison, it's a bit like saying "No way is Bjork glitch techno, have you actually listened to "Army of Me"?" - the question is basically: "which version of this artist are we talking about?"

GGD don't really sound like ESG, who are totally minimal (though not "minimal").

x-post Lex you're in danger of implying that liking something and disliking something else is clear evidence that they're stylistically dissimilar. When often we can have wildly divergent attitudes towards quite similar music. It's okay to say "Gang Gang Dance are a bit like Panda Bear and The Avalanches in places but I like them." Also the only Avalanches song you like is the worst song on their album so I don't trust you on them.

Tim F, Thursday, 30 October 2008 21:59 (fifteen years ago) link

I mean, I can totally see why you would like Gang Gang Dance and not Panda Bear or Animal Collective, but that's more about the constellation of your tastes rather than the constellation of these stylistic approaches in some objective sense.

Tim F, Thursday, 30 October 2008 22:00 (fifteen years ago) link

i meant that GGD are even less like the avalanches than they are like panda bear, and that i can see the avalanches/panda connection cuz i dislike them in much the same way.

i don't hear any techno ideas in panda bear? like, at all?

lex pretend, Thursday, 30 October 2008 22:13 (fifteen years ago) link

Ha if "I'm Not" was on a Total comp no-one would bat an eyelid. But the AC live show I went to was much more electronic - Tobias in another thread compared the show to Underworld. I wouldn't go quite that far myself but I can see what he's getting at. The new AC album due in a couple of months is supposed to run entirely with that sound, although you can already hear it on several stretches of Strawberry Jam.

(again, I suspect you're operating on a slightly - and quite legitimately - outmoded notion of what Panda Bear/AC's aesthetic is. It would be like if I assumed all Digital Mystikz was crappy slow-slow-slow dirge-step because I'd only heard Loefah and Coki tracks. Which would be a reasonable assumption but not actually correct)

Re The Avalanches, I think stuff like "Dust", "House Jam" (if you ignore the vocals), "Interlude" and "Blue Nile" are very much in the vein of Since I Left You - loose, dancey grooves, lots of overlaid trebly samples and sounds, a general stardusted feel...

Again, the comparisons here aren't meant to be "oh my god they are the same thing" and more about sketching out a loose phenotype of PLUR sample-pop inclinations in what we might call "indie" in an expansive sense (i.e. stuff that's not totally dance, not totally hip hop, not totally chart-pop) - I'm throwing Air France in there as well who I think you really would like Lex (if you don't already).

Tim F, Thursday, 30 October 2008 22:26 (fifteen years ago) link

To put it in reverse terms, would we be astonished to hear stuff like The Avalanches' "Electricity" or "Extra Kings" or "This Flight Tonight" on Saint Dymphna? I don't think so.

Tim F, Thursday, 30 October 2008 22:28 (fifteen years ago) link

it's been at least three years since i listened to any animal collective so you may well be right! and i only ever listened to the avalanches album twice, when it came out, and don't recall any of the track names, sorry - i just think the difference is that GGD's production is cleaner, you can hear everything going on, whereas my visceral problem with the avalanches and panda bear is how messy and cluttered the music is, it ends up as discordant mush. which is why i can't hear it as techno at all, it's not pristine enough.

lex pretend, Thursday, 30 October 2008 22:35 (fifteen years ago) link

Lizzi's wish for Gang Gang to score a douche commercial will be realized, mark my words.

sexyDancer, Thursday, 30 October 2008 22:38 (fifteen years ago) link

tampon commercial i thought, not douche commercial
do they even make douche commercials anymore?

ian, Thursday, 30 October 2008 22:45 (fifteen years ago) link

garret morris to thread

sexyDancer, Thursday, 30 October 2008 22:46 (fifteen years ago) link

http://www.discogs.com/image/A-193237-1129499104.gif

micarl, Thursday, 30 October 2008 23:45 (fifteen years ago) link

Tinchy Stryder?

micarl, Thursday, 30 October 2008 23:46 (fifteen years ago) link

For some reasons parts of this album also make me think of the first Isolee album. And not just because both have tracks that reference Loveless.

Tim F, Friday, 31 October 2008 00:49 (fifteen years ago) link

not sure what the question is but yeah tinchy stryder is on the track Princes

dmr, Friday, 31 October 2008 01:11 (fifteen years ago) link

And that picture is of Tinchy Stryder as well.

Alex in SF, Friday, 31 October 2008 01:12 (fifteen years ago) link

oh I get it. for some reason that image doesn't show up for me

dmr, Friday, 31 October 2008 01:56 (fifteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.