Nathan Barley comes to TV

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1029 of them)
why have you avoided The Office pash?

Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Saturday, 12 February 2005 13:40 (nineteen years ago) link

Dom Joly is not, and never has been even remotely funny.

(x-post because I haven't got a television, Stevem)

Pashmina (Pashmina), Saturday, 12 February 2005 13:42 (nineteen years ago) link

you mean because you have no desire to own a TV?

Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Saturday, 12 February 2005 13:43 (nineteen years ago) link

At the moment, I don't have any desire to own a TV, no.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Saturday, 12 February 2005 13:45 (nineteen years ago) link

"the Simpsons episodes shown by C4 lately leave just as nasty a taste in the mouth as Barley does (oo-er)"

OTM. Homer was always lovably stupid, but there was a point when the writers decided to make him a jerk. It seems they were trying to catch up with South Park by injecting some cruelty, but Homer isn't Cartman. The heart has gone from these episodes and the jokes aren't all that great either.

stew, Saturday, 12 February 2005 13:54 (nineteen years ago) link

the simpsons prob = they are v.patchy rather than uniformly awful

out of the recent C4 run two or three (out of what, ten?) have been pretty funny (eg i quite liked run lisa run) (tho actually i wz on the phone for half of it), but this just sets you up for sadness :(

what i disliked abt ned's themepark to maude wz that misplaced "heart" rather than the absence of it

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 12 February 2005 14:11 (nineteen years ago) link

That's a fair analysis Mark. The only Simpsons episodes that didn't make me chuckle at least once are the one where Homer becomes a missionary and the awful Prisoner episode. It wasn't even a good parody of the Prisoner. Really poor. Most of these have been at least watchable.
As for the heart - I agree, it was misplaced in that episode; jarred with the cruel and absurd humour. The problem is one of writing - the emotional moments tend to be mawkish and sentimental as opposed to genuinely touching (compare the death of Maude to the early one where Granpa Simpson's girlfriend passes away). Similarly the absurd plots are absurd for their own sake, lacking wit or skewed logic. There's been a tendency to rely on absurd situations at the expense of character. You just need to watch the vintage episodes on weekdays to see the difference.

stew, Saturday, 12 February 2005 15:03 (nineteen years ago) link

I wouldn't write this off just yet - the problem was that it was a scene-setting episode that tried to cram far too much into the space of half an hour. It was like non-stop babble, there was no comic timing to speak of, none of the sense of space that you got in an episode of The Office.

Dan Ashcroft is obviously the raging voice in Cunt, hopefully we'll see him blow up properly at some point. Pingu could be a good character as well but they just need to slow it the fuck down.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Saturday, 12 February 2005 15:57 (nineteen years ago) link

none of the sense of space that you got in an episode of The Office.

disagree somewhat and would cite Dan's slow agonising 'death' at the meeting with the Weekend On Sunday - and we know Nathan is all about the non-stop babble so the comparisons to The Office can't stretch too far because it's a totally different situation

Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Sunday, 13 February 2005 00:03 (nineteen years ago) link

i liked it. i thought the first episode was entertaining, even if it was just introducing us to the characters.

haven't seen enough of morris's MEAN SPIRITED side yet, though.

cutty (mcutt), Sunday, 13 February 2005 00:31 (nineteen years ago) link

On the speed/space issue, I think it's nice there's a certain amount of parodying of 'yoof edit fascism' -- the 'Magenta Divine'/Sigue Sigue Sputnik style of cramming in as many impactful edits, references, and in-jokes as possible. Barley, after all, sees his whole life as a series of edited episodes: pranks that he frames with his video-capturing 'speechtool'. Even Dan's punching fist becomes, for Barley, a 'scratch ending... good, I do those a lot'.

Just like those 1980s yoof shows that flashed tons of text on the screen for a second, encouraging otaku viewers to freeze frame the (analogue) video afterwards and read it all, "Nathan Barley" has a wealth of satirical graphic design just begging to be (digitally) pause buttoned: magazine articles, posters, T shirt slogans... It also has an audience (well, if they're like me, anyway) which cares enough about such things to freeze a frame to read the 'Anorexic Bitch' T shirt or check whether Pingu is wearing Bathing Ape.

Momus (Momus), Sunday, 13 February 2005 00:35 (nineteen years ago) link

(I seem to be totally confirming that this show appeals mainly to the people it seems to be attacking... which is also lovely dramatic irony, since it's Dan Ashcroft's main dilemma: how to hold a mirror up to The Idiots without them loving what they see?)

Momus (Momus), Sunday, 13 February 2005 00:42 (nineteen years ago) link

momus is so OTM here.

cutty (mcutt), Sunday, 13 February 2005 00:59 (nineteen years ago) link

I think I feel so positive about this production not just because I recognise the world it's satirising, but because I'm a big fan of stuff like Hogarth's 'The Rake's Progress', Moliere's 'The Misanthrope' and even the rock opera 'Hair': satire that has an ambivalent relationship to the foppish demimonde it's mocking. I've always felt that satire is actually the best way to pickle a culture and put it in aspic. This is a very astute summation of a certain post-'Cool Brittania' London. A coroner's report or a museum display (perhaps at the costume department of the V&A). If you have any affection for pretension whatsoever, it's pretty easy to read it affectionately, no matter how much Morris and Brooker seem to loathe The Idiots. (I'm not even convinced they do. Perhaps their attacks on this culture are like Barley's attacks on Pingu. They want to see it piss its pants, sure, but they work in the same loft.)

Momus (Momus), Sunday, 13 February 2005 01:52 (nineteen years ago) link

Sorry to keep banging on, but I've just thought of something else this reminded me of: 'A Clockwork Orange', Especially the way Anthony Burgess came up with a subcultural language, and the way his satire pushed the subculture to new extremes. The thing is, this can actually end up assisting the very people it seeks to attack. The satirist is an intelligent moralist who fails, sometimes, to see the glamour of his subject. By exaggerating its style and pushing it to new extremes of pretension, violence, flamboyance, he unwittingly increases its glamour and charisma. Bowie has said that Alex and his Droogs were a big influence on Ziggy Stardust. So a dystopian nightmare scenario, a moralistic satire on ultraviolence, actually ended up on British streets in the early 70s as a new and much more extreme fashion look. Rather than making people recoil in horror, the extremism of Burgess' vision of delinquency gave everyone a hard-on.

Momus (Momus), Sunday, 13 February 2005 02:06 (nineteen years ago) link

The more I think about this program the more it seems to fall apart in my mind. I only laughed out loud once at the "Freddie Starr; original Bill Hicks" line. For some reason the smart secretary character really bugged me, she seemed to serve a very obvious function at the expense of actually being a character. That goes for a lot of the cast, but then it was the first episode. I'm not so bothered about the (lack of) relevance of the satire or whatever, simply it wasn't funny enough. Entertaining yes but thats not really what I want from Morris. I want great cynical, agressive, sureal, satirical but most of all rat burstingly funny comedy (or non comedy as Jam was) not kind of entertaining kind of clever sitcoms... I mean isn't that what Simon Pegg is for? (Though I guess Morris can do what he likes but if your gonna do the Spaced / Office thing you need heart, or at least some empathy, and thats not exactly his strong point is it? Whats the point of humilation embarrasment comedy if you don't care about the characters?)

elwisty (elwisty), Sunday, 13 February 2005 02:15 (nineteen years ago) link

maybe morris should have kept his name off of the project entirely, and then you would enjoy it?

cutty (mcutt), Sunday, 13 February 2005 03:28 (nineteen years ago) link

Awful review of N. Barley here, fairly dispiriting as I'm quite a fan of the author. I do approve of his bigging-up of Victoria Wood's Christmas special from a few years ago, though.

retort pouch (retort pouch), Sunday, 13 February 2005 05:11 (nineteen years ago) link

"I think The Housemartins would back me up when I say..." is not the best way to start a deconstruction of anything.

Momus (Momus), Sunday, 13 February 2005 05:31 (nineteen years ago) link

To clarify: by 'awful review' I meant 'horribly written'.

Personally, I thought the first ep of 'Nathan Barley' was pretty good. Wasn't quite as vitriolic as I was expecting, but I guess the 'Cunt' listings from TVGoHome wouldn't really translate to broadcast telly that well.

That one-second shot of the guy wearing the miniscule hat was the biggest laugh I've had from TV from quite a few years.

retort pouch (retort pouch), Sunday, 13 February 2005 05:35 (nineteen years ago) link

from/for

retort pouch (retort pouch), Sunday, 13 February 2005 05:36 (nineteen years ago) link

maybe morris should have kept his name off of the project entirely, and then you would enjoy it?

Well sort of, the key theme of all this would seem to be the conflict between stupidly high expectations and less impreesive reality. If I didn't know Morris and Brooker were behind it I'm not sure how I would feel about it, as I sid the more I think about it the worse it seems.

elwisty (elwisty), Sunday, 13 February 2005 10:31 (nineteen years ago) link

I wouldn't write this off just yet - the problem was that it was a scene-setting episode that tried to cram far too much into the space of half an hour. It was like non-stop babble

The Nathan Barley piece in yesterday's Guardian Guide featured lots of characters that weren't in episode one, which doesn't bode well for it from this aspect.

caitlin (caitlin), Sunday, 13 February 2005 10:31 (nineteen years ago) link

i've never found Morris huge on the lol factor after The Day Today though. i watched Brass Eye again at Christmas but most of the chuckling was internal only, and i don't even know the show inside out like the Morris-worshippers as i avoided it when it was first shown and have only seen it a couple of times since. it's just cleverer than it is funny, almost like Rory Bremner/Bird & Fortune at times in that the satire is just so exquisite the appreciation of this leaves you with no energy left to actually laugh (also true of The Simpsons at times). for me anyway.

Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Sunday, 13 February 2005 12:21 (nineteen years ago) link

Pingu is adorable, I'm interested to see whether he develops at all (that muttered 'yeah' when Barley says 'he's gonna get me back one day, aren't you...?') or whether he's just there to be the relentlessly tragic joke-butt.

I think Armando Ianucci's stuff is similar on the not-lol-funny thing, his stuff's just compelling as a sort of mixture of absurd/chuckle-funny/oddly poignant.

Michael Philip Philip Philip Philip Annoyman v1.0 (Ferg), Sunday, 13 February 2005 18:13 (nineteen years ago) link

momus is otm throughout this thread.

the show reminded me of the Sleazenation offices so badly i thought i was living through a flashback.

stevie (stevie), Sunday, 13 February 2005 19:53 (nineteen years ago) link

> I nearly switched off when Broadcast came on.

why? the Broadcast was being, er, broadcast by Pingu, the only sympathetic character in the whole thing.

are Banksy and the rathergood videos people going to be happy being lumped in with this lot? do you think they agreed to it or is it just another case of NB stealing / doing bad versions of things that are (were) innovative?

(teardrop explodes' sleeping gas in there right at the very end too.)

koogs (koogs), Monday, 14 February 2005 08:34 (nineteen years ago) link

I liked it a lot. i thought it was true. dan ashcroft is a tragic figure because although he is bright enough to know they're all idiots, he has nothing better to say than that (iow he = charlie brooker). pingu is the typical graduate intern-guy and is as hateable as everyone else.

that one of morris's touchstone themes seems to be "fuck the world for it is infested w.ppl self-convinced they're at the cutting-edge-of-where-it's-at but not (=A), at the expense of the ppl who ARE at the cutting-edge-of-where-it's-at (=B)" - but actually the overlooked victims are all the ppl nowhere near the CEoWIA (i mean, whether or not you grant this mythical beast walks the earth anyway, or is worth seekin out) (=C)

ie it (unintentionally) fosters a dubious gradient B » A » C

otm, but isn't the gradient is more c>b>a??

Henry Miller, Monday, 14 February 2005 10:05 (nineteen years ago) link

So what's the signifigance of CAB (Cookd and Bombd)?

Masked Gazza, Monday, 14 February 2005 10:12 (nineteen years ago) link

to me the engine of barleyism is class, the mandarin class of barley allows him connections and money that ordinary people don't have access to, hence his ability to survive and prosper in a creative industry without suffering the consequences of his total mediocrity. hence also brooker's rage (with brooker here cast as the 'ordinary people' without the opportunities and privileges, who can't just 'play' at having jobs).

and class is seemingly absent from this series. everyone has a normal south eastern accent, not really posh, not really not; just that some of them mysteriously have more money than others. so straight away the great big thumps morris throws in the direction of barley are great big thumps at nothing very substantial.

the bikes were good though

debden, Monday, 14 February 2005 10:42 (nineteen years ago) link

posh people don't all have posh accents though. some of the most media-privileged people with the best connects didn't go to public school. they just mysteriously have money and connections. i did think barley himself needed a slightly posher accent but dan ashcroft is spot-on.

Henry Miller, Monday, 14 February 2005 10:44 (nineteen years ago) link

Something just clicked in my mind about this show while I was reading this thread. I think it might be about boredom. Someone mentioned Pingu and why he stayed at this place when Nathan was being nasty to him. And I twigged - it's because he hasn't got anything else to do. He gets to play with shockwave and while away the hours. Being in a pit of despair is preferential to boredom.

Then I thought about Ashcroft. He's also bored with his life - surrounded by fevered egos, yet a fevered ego himself. The only difference is that he's aware of it, which makes it more tragic. The boredom of his own existence saps his energy, making it impossible for him to leave, yet loathing himself since he has to stay. He lurches from vitriolic attacks at everyone around him, to BECOMING like those around him.

And then I thought about NB. He's bored, so he tries to make everyone's life more interesting, including his own. He's in a state of blissful ignorance, and sees himself as above the grey soup he looks down upon, not realising that it's just greyness that he spits out himself.

Momus makes a point about there being so much going on in the frames - the clever little design points, the split-second in-jokes. Now imagine if your whole life was like that - everything you saw, heard or did was loaded and marked for your attention. In the same way that if everything is marked in Bold, nothing is highlighted, if everything is interesting, nothing interests you. Which can only lead to boredom. Maybe that's at the heart of it all.

Or maybe they are just caricatures of 5yr old stereotypes, monkey-dancing for our amusement in a tirade of cheap shots and barely funny metaphors, looking up from a mud splattered face as the dotcom-bashing zeitgeist zooms into the past. I guess time will tell.

Johnney B (Johnney B), Monday, 14 February 2005 10:46 (nineteen years ago) link

also, the world of barley is not an inclusive one, as we see in the series with the rather gentle example of him refusing to make his assistant coffee. the TVGoHome barley is a cruel, selfish little twerp rather than the likeable prat of morris's series. he visits eastern european prostitutes in their 'tear stained boudoirs'. there is a very nasty world of social hierarchies that doesn't seem to be evident in the channel 4 barley; the barley of TVgoHome would not put up stickers in a newsagent, even as a sub-banksy trick; too democratic, not exclusive enough.

debden, Monday, 14 February 2005 10:48 (nineteen years ago) link

why didn't Dan's sister walk horrified out of Trashbat Towers after seeing poor Pingu electrocuted is what i'm wondering

Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Monday, 14 February 2005 10:51 (nineteen years ago) link

xxpost
Bring back national service.

Masked Gazza, Monday, 14 February 2005 10:52 (nineteen years ago) link

I liked the bikes too, and Nathan Barley greeting everyone as "my nigga". Also I'm bored with vitriol and nastiness so the fact that this was comparatively gentle was a bonus. Fuck all that "Nighty Night", oooooooooohhh we're so dark and scary shit.

Dadaismus (Dada), Monday, 14 February 2005 10:59 (nineteen years ago) link

the other point is that nathan barley is not actually that succesful. in tvgohome he constantly flits, like a braying dog in a manger, between creative projects which, under his aegis, will never take off or succeed.

i didn't want this to be dark and scary, agreed, that is quickly becoming very undergraduate. i thought it might be more of a chance for some good satirical class war, though, which it wasn't. i have a feeling the character of barley will become increasingly objectionable as the series goes on, though.

debden, Monday, 14 February 2005 11:04 (nineteen years ago) link

i actually thought ashcroft was the most annoying character of all; sympathising with style journalists who are weary of all the froth is about as easy as feeling sorry for ageing rock stars who make albums about how empty fame is.

debden, Monday, 14 February 2005 11:06 (nineteen years ago) link

the TVGoHome barley is a cruel, selfish little twerp rather than the likeable prat of morris's series

I didn't think he came across as likeable at all on the TV.

caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 14 February 2005 11:08 (nineteen years ago) link

i suppose i liked the incidental things: a sunday newspaper running 'what's on michael portillo's ipod?'.

Miles Finch, Monday, 14 February 2005 11:10 (nineteen years ago) link

... which is exactly what sunday newspapers do run

Dadaismus (Dada), Monday, 14 February 2005 11:11 (nineteen years ago) link

it's funny cuz it's true

Miles Finch, Monday, 14 February 2005 11:13 (nineteen years ago) link

Some of the reviews in the papers were funny because it was obvious the critics were a bit uneasy about how accurate it was about their lives/work and their friends/colleagues' lives/work

Dadaismus (Dada), Monday, 14 February 2005 11:15 (nineteen years ago) link

I actually twigged the other day exactly what I didn't like about the programme. Like I said, it wasn't even Nathan Barley or any of the "Idiots" who offended me - they were too comic to have any emotional loadedness. The person who irritated me the most was actually Dan Ashcroft - the person I suppose we're supposed to identify with or something.

People have talked on this thread about his "banging his head against the glass ceiling" or brought up class issues or whatever. And I'm sure that Ashcroft went away from his Weekend on Sunday "death" with the same ideas that ILXors have about what caused his downfall - when really, it was nothing to do with the Class Ceiling or whathaveyou at all - it was his own bloody hubris! Going in to an interview woefully unprepared, as if all he has to do to get a job is Make The Decision To Sell Out - and his reputation from his column/blog/fanzine and the Powers That Be will just Be Recognised as genius.

Rather than that he was asked to Pitch, and he just *couldn't*. Even a media dummy like me knows that going to a paper or magazine interview without a Pitch is like going to an office job interview and refusing to take a test in Excel. What did he expect?

So without anyone to actually empathise with in the experience, it just becomes like The Office - an exercise in pointless cruelty which just isn't particularly funny or enjoyable to me.

Kate Kept Me Alive! (kate), Monday, 14 February 2005 11:17 (nineteen years ago) link

... all that "this might make for uncomfortable viewing in the weeks ahead"..................... errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, maybe for you mate but not for the rest of us (xpost)

I don't see the class thing at all, with regard to Dan Ashcroft - why are people assuming is he a more working class character, just because he has a Northern accent?!?!??!

Dadaismus (Dada), Monday, 14 February 2005 11:21 (nineteen years ago) link

kate, dan is not a class warrior, he's clearly one of them (his old university friend is fixing him a job at the weekend on sunday). why do you need to identify? it's satire. who was there to be identified with in 'the day today'?

Henry Miller, Monday, 14 February 2005 11:23 (nineteen years ago) link

Because that is how I read/watch texts. If I can't find someone to empathise or identify with, it's quite difficult for me to become engaged with the story. If something is just wall to wall unpleasantness, I don't have much incentive to carry on watching. It becomes meaningless and relentless if I can't sympathise with anyone in a story.

Kate Kept Me Alive! (kate), Monday, 14 February 2005 11:36 (nineteen years ago) link

> why didn't Dan's sister walk horrified out of Trashbat Towers after
> seeing poor Pingu electrocuted is what i'm wondering

this was the disappointing thing about her, that she seemed to fall for NB's self promotion and sub-dirty sanchez japes.

> it just becomes like The Office - an exercise in pointless cruelty

i saw it as someone who was so cocksure of himself getting hoist by his own petard. comeuppance rather than cruelty. the whole series seems to be full of people full of themselves and oblivious to how people outside their small social groups see them.

the pinball machine / office chaos thing hit a nerve - every hour or so someone here will start throwing foam footballs around. nothing more disturbing than things flying through your peripheral vision when you're trying to concentrate.

koogs (koogs), Monday, 14 February 2005 11:39 (nineteen years ago) link

The sister character is totally lame and unbelievable (so far)

Dadaismus (Dada), Monday, 14 February 2005 11:41 (nineteen years ago) link

people assume ashcroft is less posh cos he has no money ("i'll get this... lend me a tenner?"). kate otm, though, he is irritating cos he's so passive and shiftless, and you sense a certain arrogance behind it. maybe he will be galvanised into brutal reprisals in future episodes, though.

xpost

debden, Monday, 14 February 2005 11:41 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.