Blistering Reviews

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (28 of them)
he is really old...

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 20 January 2007 04:56 (seventeen years ago) link

hahaha Mailer's always been crazy! and I doubt he gives a flying fuck abpyt the nobel prize. anyway he made some threatening/racist comments re: Michiko Kakutani after his last few NYT reviews so it's "intersting" to see Janet M reviewed this one. for a certain generation of critic, Mailer is like Martin Amis -- a stationary target or so they seem to think.

lovebug 2.0 (lovebug starski), Saturday, 20 January 2007 11:44 (seventeen years ago) link

I do agree that Mailer is a stationary target. He's built a career from being contrary, and that gets old after 30-40 years. But if you doubt his obsession with the Nobel, read the opening scene of "Prisoner of Sex".

silence dogood (catcher), Saturday, 20 January 2007 15:59 (seventeen years ago) link

fourteen years pass...

holy shit this is a murder https://t.co/CwsF0sZ9sZ

— Julia Carrie Wong (@juliacarriew) January 1, 2022

mookieproof, Sunday, 2 January 2022 02:26 (two years ago) link

ILX posting style fifteen years ago: a blistering review is quoted in full.

ILX posting style today: a six word tweet referencing a blistering review.

more difficult than I look (Aimless), Sunday, 2 January 2022 03:38 (two years ago) link

some things, however, never change

mookieproof, Sunday, 2 January 2022 03:44 (two years ago) link

C’est toujours la même rengaine.

A Little Bit Meme, a Little Bit URL (James Redd and the Blecchs), Sunday, 2 January 2022 03:46 (two years ago) link

one year passes...

among the worst book reviews i've ever seen:

UPSIDE DOWN
A PRIMER FOR THE LOOKING-GLASS WORLD

Galeano (The Memory of Fire Trilogy, etc.) has set to paper an astonishingly straight-faced indictment of yanqui capitalism that—for all its freshness and wit—could well have been freeze-dried at about the time of Che Guevara's assassination.

The author views the world as essentially a matter of conflict between North and South, rich and poor, First World and Third World, big business and the small guy, and man against nature. Big business pollutes the Third World, uses their cheap labor, and sells them Big Macs, unleashing its power (and power is everything to Galeano) on the poor and voiceless. Galeano sees the US as heavy-handed and heavily armed—using its might to quell any uprising it doesn't like and to impose any government it prefers. The North he holds responsible for most social injustices—“free trade" being his euphemism for the slave trade. He also believes that whites were responsible for the annihilation of Jews, Gypsies, blacks, and gays during the Holocaust. Hitler, he points out, sterilized Gypsies—not very different, he believes, from the sterilizations performed in America during the 1930s on criminals, blacks, and alcoholics. Yet Americans, he believes, feel inexplicably superior. Blacks have been treated poorly in both the northern and southern hemispheres; dark-skinned black or Indian Brazilians form an underclass, rarely seen in the media or at universities. The author writes of the Argentine death squads, and he sees drug trafficking as a plot of the banks and gun manufacturers: "An illegal industry of death thus serves the legal industry of death." Galeano brings an almost Manichean dualism to his disquisitions on stock markets, capitalism, unemployment, nuclear arms—-and much, much more.

Old-time agitprop from south of the border.

show me the lie, asshole

mookieproof, Friday, 21 July 2023 03:04 (one year ago) link

Did unperson write this?

xyzzzz__, Friday, 21 July 2023 22:12 (one year ago) link

eleven months pass...

Really liked how she reads from her POV and just has a go at breaking it down. Makes me want to read more Cusk, any other reviews make her sound boring

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 29 June 2024 07:03 (two months ago) link

That is a good one. I'd like to read the linked pieces by cusk though the brexit one is paywalled and may destroy my respect for her. I can't say I want to read the book in question even ignoring the weird if true gender politics, I didn't like her last one (the second place) all that much.

ledge, Saturday, 29 June 2024 07:13 (two months ago) link

the NYT cusk review was pretty brutal. for the new book.

scott seward, Saturday, 29 June 2024 18:20 (two months ago) link

"The art talk that consumes this novel is leaden. It is the way you might begin to speak if you were raised solely in the Tate and the Whitney and had never eaten a hot dog. Watching trees fall makes one artist reconsider the “question of verticality.” Certain paintings are shocking because they do not traffic in the “moral barter of representation.” Homeless people are “reproaches to subjectivity.” One searches for signs that Cusk is writing satire, but there are none."

scott seward, Saturday, 29 June 2024 18:22 (two months ago) link

That so many people are homeless is certainly a reproach, but not to that

Guayaquil (eephus!), Saturday, 29 June 2024 20:37 (two months ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.