EMusic - C/D

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (340 of them)
I hate when these types of discussion occur with little or no mention of JUST HOW MUCH free downloading is going on out there.

Of course people will spend their entertainment dollar elsewhere when the stuff is free. And the prime demo 18-24 is quite unaccustomed to paying for music let alone getting choked up about primo physical product. If you were 18 in the year 2000, you are now OUT OF THIS DEMO.

The big problem is all of the KEY MISSTEPS taken by the RIAA at crucial times. Their efforts to go after working families with college or mall kids was plainly a huge PR blunder that anyone in the industry is still paying for. It was cruel, seemed (well, was) arbitrary and it also got people realizing that "illegal downloading" ISN'T EVEN ILLEGAL!!! The Supreme Court will probably one day change that but for now it's still the Betamax "fair use" ruling that we (in the U.S.) are going off of.

I think that if anything, they have created a climate of "download absolutely everything because soon it's all going to change radically", just as it was in the final days of the "all you can eat" model of eMusic.

Dude, btw I wouldn't leave eMusic because Domino is going. That's just some crazy ass shit. I might leave if Prestige/Riverside/Fantasy etc did but DOMINO?!!

Saxby D. Elder, Friday, 11 May 2007 03:49 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, and free downloading irritates me and I refuse to do it. I still think it's a kind of stealing, even if it's not equivalent to shoplifting. I mean it's inevitable that a person is going to copy a song or an album from a friend once in a while - has been so since long before downloading, but it's another thing to expect a whole library of music for nothing.

I'm just not sure what's to be done about it.

Hurting 2, Friday, 11 May 2007 03:54 (sixteen years ago) link

You know, the other thing that actually saddens me just a bit is that people don't even really care about "lossy" music anymore.

I mean, I am no Flim & the BBs fan (i.e. no audiophile wanker) (wanker maybe but not a classic audiophile), but I still really get into the full spectrum of sound that Vinyl offers (and which CDs do their digital best to approximate).

Seems like yet another part of the paradigm lost in the discussion.

(and yes, I know about FLACs ya dumbass so don't even start).

Saxby D. Elder, Friday, 11 May 2007 04:02 (sixteen years ago) link

the thing with illegal downloading is that an entire generation is growing up now with basically no other alternative -- at my school, i honestly don't know anyone who gets their music primarily through stores (buys music, sure, but everyone downloads it first), and i'm not just talking about the techy kids. even the "oh i listen to __(selection of top 40 groups)__" kids get their music through the internet, as a rule.

lucas pine, Friday, 11 May 2007 04:08 (sixteen years ago) link

Regarding lossy music: give me convenience or give me death, as someone cleverer than I once called an album.

Mr. Odd, Friday, 11 May 2007 04:12 (sixteen years ago) link

the thing with illegal downloading is that an entire generation is growing up now with basically no other alternative


There are many alternatives, e.g., iTunes, eMusic, InSound, a label's own online store, and so forth.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 11 May 2007 04:23 (sixteen years ago) link

yes

but no matter how many sales these retailers claim, i can say with 90% certainty that i don't know a single person who listens to music (new music -- not their parents' beatles collection) and doesn't download it illegally

lucas pine, Friday, 11 May 2007 05:10 (sixteen years ago) link

hmmm this is at the very least pretty goddamn anecdotal but I buy it.

I think I mentioned on another thread (or here maybe, too tired to look), take a look sometime at the OiNK top 10 snatches. The top entry is like 22,000+ snatches. Then factor in USENET (which the RIAA still doesn't seem to have noticed incidentally), Soulseek, IRC, Limewire, AIM, MSN and the billions of other ways to get and exchange "free music" and you really have to be talking about millions of dollars in lost sales, even factoring in those people who would have never in a million years purchased the item in question.

And who is the big winner here? The ISPs who look the other way on this. You think they don't know which ports soulseek uses?! My ISP has a fantastic array of newsgroup options of "pre-teen" sex groups to choose from as well, let alone the music binary groups us normal people frequent. Then they are looking to strip your net neutrality from you and all of a sudden they seem quite evil.

Not to mention what my ISP has done to the Knicks!! Criminals!!!!

Saxby D. Elder, Friday, 11 May 2007 05:46 (sixteen years ago) link

I spend more money each month buying real CD copies of stuff I have liked that I got initially via eMusic than I do on the eMusic subscription itself. Boredoms and Clientele, for instance, have done very well out of me having an eMusic subscription.

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 11 May 2007 06:47 (sixteen years ago) link

one month passes...

bit of an update on this... I had a chat with a "digital music professional" who told me that the sort of math contained in this thread, while technically correct, does not accurately reflect the sort of business model being used by eMusic. He likened it to the "Gym Membership" model, where essentially they sign you up and pray like hell that you never use their gym.

So, the gross numbers are all correct, but the hope is that the labels will net just a bit more because not everyone (including me!) remembers to use up their 40 DLs every month.

The net for labels and artists IS still quite low regardless.

Saxby D. Elder, Sunday, 17 June 2007 19:21 (sixteen years ago) link

Right - they basically divvy up a pool of subscription money based on downloads, so it's not a solid per-track fee.

In any case, bad deal for labels/artists or not, I think it's one situation where the market can work things out. No one is forcing any artist or label to be on eMusic, and if the deal is unfair, they can renegotiate or leave. As long as a label puts their stuff on the site, I'm going to assume they're ok with the compensation.

Hurting 2, Sunday, 17 June 2007 19:47 (sixteen years ago) link

yeah, exactly...

Saxby D. Elder, Sunday, 17 June 2007 20:06 (sixteen years ago) link

xpost - Why do you do that, Nick? I thought it was only sad older guys like me who grew up fetishizing the physical that need to buy CD copies of stuff they download and like.

Mr. Odd, Sunday, 17 June 2007 21:18 (sixteen years ago) link

one month passes...

Man, eMusic has been seriously crashing Safari the last few days. I know I have an older version of the browser, but the site used to load perfectly. Dud.

Roy Kasten, Friday, 27 July 2007 14:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Heh, I was going to bump this to say something. Just noticed the problem yesterday-- can't access their site on Safari at all. It's been going on for days?

Jon Lewis, Friday, 27 July 2007 14:30 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah. Loads fine in Firefox, but instant crash on Safari 1.3.2. I wonder if newer versions of Safari are working ok.

Roy Kasten, Friday, 27 July 2007 14:41 (sixteen years ago) link

hey guys -- there is a bug w/ 1.3 and we (emu) are working on it. thx for yr patience.

YGS, Friday, 27 July 2007 14:52 (sixteen years ago) link

Thanks, Y.

Jon Lewis, Friday, 27 July 2007 14:56 (sixteen years ago) link

Gracias big Y.

Hurting 2, Friday, 27 July 2007 15:05 (sixteen years ago) link

The new Safari is MUCH BETTER and my eMusic works fine with it.

I really recommend the new Safari, it's worth the upgrade or whatever you have to do if you are a user of a previous version.

Mine was working so poorly before and I thought it was because I hacked into it and changed it so that it will remember my entire "history" for 99 years. But now that i am on the new version, it runs way better than Firefox, which I have grown to really hate. HTH, FWIW, YMMV, ETC

Saxby D. Elder, Friday, 27 July 2007 15:42 (sixteen years ago) link

Ah, thanks Y. It would be most awesome if you're able to work out the bugs--I can't upgrade my Safari without buying a whole new Mac OS, which might not run on my faithful clamshell iBook anyway.

Roy Kasten, Friday, 27 July 2007 16:53 (sixteen years ago) link

In any case, bad deal for labels/artists or not, I think it's one situation where the market can work things out. No one is forcing any artist or label to be on eMusic, and if the deal is unfair, they can renegotiate or leave. As long as a label puts their stuff on the site, I'm going to assume they're ok with the compensation.

perhaps someone has said this somewhere upthread -- i'm too lazy to read -- but it's a demonstrably better deal for artists and labels, dollars- and cents-wise, than bittorrent, megaupload and other free avenues, which is what this is competing with.

fact checking cuz, Friday, 27 July 2007 18:29 (sixteen years ago) link

I think that's a good point cuz and I don't think that's been mentioned yet.

My computer is really old too btw... It is a G4 tho. Also, I think Tiger only comes as a DVD, so if you only have a CD-ROM drive you might have to install in some sort of makeshift manner. Feel free to msg me for some mac talk, anyone...

Saxby D. Elder, Friday, 27 July 2007 21:39 (sixteen years ago) link

four months pass...

dumb question (but my googling/looking at their website for a few mins didn't answer it): is it really priced per track, with no concession for albums? so this cd would cost over $20? or am i missing something?

http://www.emusic.com/album/Paul-Hillier-Theatre-of-Voices-Stockhausen-Stimmung-MP3-Download/11077559.html

toby, Saturday, 15 December 2007 14:47 (sixteen years ago) link

You're right. It's an eMusic quirk. On the other hand, you can download full albums with just a few very long tracks for far less than on, say, Amazon or iTunes. At a minimum, it balances out.

Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 15 December 2007 14:50 (sixteen years ago) link

wow, that seems extraordinary - i would have signed up, but i think most of the albums i'm interested in (all classical) would be way more expensive than buying them on CD, which sucks.

toby, Saturday, 15 December 2007 15:17 (sixteen years ago) link

I keep promising myself to get into what I understand is a deep catalogue of good classical stuff on eMusic. If you're interested in that, there are a few places to investigate: this thread from the eMusic message boards and this 'Dozens' list.

Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 15 December 2007 16:20 (sixteen years ago) link

Thanks - those links are more encouraging! Maybe I'll give it a go.

toby, Saturday, 15 December 2007 16:48 (sixteen years ago) link

Toby, here's one more: Nereffid's Guide to eMusic Classical. Once you look into it, I'd be interested in hearing what you think is the best classical pieces on eMusic. I'd like to download some of this genre, but with so many versions by so many performers, it's hard to separate the wheat from the chaffe (although the sites I've linked will help in this regard).

Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 15 December 2007 20:58 (sixteen years ago) link

toby: but i think most of the albums i'm interested in (all classical) would be way more expensive than buying them on CD, which sucks.

I find it a very good deal for classical, but then I guess I mainly use it for "classical" classical -- symphonies, sonatas etc rather than works like this Stockhausen one, or for that matter opera (I've found the same opera can have wildly varying prices in different recordings, since it's all down to how the record company have divided the tracks -- as Daniel said, it's an emusic quirk).

Daniel: I'd be interested in hearing what you think is the best classical pieces on eMusic. I'd like to download some of this genre, but with so many versions by so many performers, it's hard to separate the wheat from the chaffe

Well, as for the works themselves, with labels such as Naxos, they more or less have the entire repertoire and then some, so "best classical pieces on eMusic" is similar to "best classical pieces period". (Among the exceptions are things that are still in copyright etc, since these may not be workable for budget labels.)

Things are obviously complicated quite a lot if you're looking for particular or just "the best" recordings of a given work -- but if you just want to get familiar with a work (or venture into the lesser-known repertoire for fun or research), I've found it a fantastic resource. (I am at this very moment listening to -- of all things -- a concerto for two clarinets and orchestra from 1802 by Franz Krommer, downloaded for under a buck just because I randomly read something about him yesterday.) The Naxos recordings (to mention them again) may not give you the crème-de-la-crème or talk-of-the-town versions of any given (overplayed) piece, but in general they range from just rather good & serviceable to excellent.

anatol_merklich, Saturday, 15 December 2007 21:19 (sixteen years ago) link

To clarify/amplify end of previous post abt Naxos: focus there is on the works, rather than on performers; this is somewhat in opposition to what majors tend to do*: bring out The Great Works yet again in another version by the star(let) of the year, no doubt influenced by the massive success of "star power" that has been demonstrated by the pop world these last fifty years.

*) I am oversimplifying, of course.

anatol_merklich, Saturday, 15 December 2007 21:42 (sixteen years ago) link

two months pass...

waht's wrong wi/emusic? last two nights it just gives me error messages. i have 11 downloads that are gonna expire in 2 day, but the site won't give me access to anything.

tipsy mothra, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 07:51 (sixteen years ago) link

one month passes...

I was surprised to see that a bunch of Rolling Stones stuff has been made available:

http://www.emusic.com/artist/The-Rolling-Stones-MP3-Download/11661667.html

Hurting 2, Monday, 7 April 2008 15:29 (sixteen years ago) link

We're sorry. The albums by this artist are unavailable for download in your country (United Kingdom) at this time.

Mark G, Monday, 7 April 2008 15:45 (sixteen years ago) link

Yeah, The Rolling Stones discs on eMusic are available in the U.S., but not the U.K. I've never been much of a Rolling Stones fan, but this run of discs that just hit eMusic (Aftermath up to but not including Sticky Fingers) is pretty good. Also, eMusic just got 25 David Murray discs from the DIW label that are otherwise unavailable (this is, apparently, a big deal for some jazz fans). And eMusic is getting the Kompakt label soon, too.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 7 April 2008 15:49 (sixteen years ago) link

i'm a little unimpressed by the fact i've not had a response to an e-mail i sent a week ago complaining about duff MP3s (which i actually managed to fix myself by converting them to AAC). other than that, i heart emusic.

grimly fiendish, Monday, 7 April 2008 21:21 (sixteen years ago) link

(in fact: e-mail is wrong. it was using the form on their website specifically designed for reporting defective tracks. all i have is an automated reply. still. hey ho.)

grimly fiendish, Monday, 7 April 2008 21:21 (sixteen years ago) link

You're 100% right. They're Customer Service Dep't isn't good about responding to email. It's one of my few criticisms of the service. But if you call them, they're very responsive, polite and professional. Not sure if the problem you're raising is something they'll address over the phone, but maybe.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 7 April 2008 21:26 (sixteen years ago) link

ach: it doesn't matter, 'cos i had an idea about how to fix it straight after i got in touch, and -- woah! -- it worked. if there'd been an easy way to reply to the e-mail/send another comment using the ID number they gave me/whatever, i'd have done so; there wasn't, so i didn't.

ultimately: it's only an issue if a) anyone happens to be downloading "the unutterable" by the fall; b) the problem isn't unique to that album. and, as problems go, it wasn't all that serious.

but still ... :)

grimly fiendish, Monday, 7 April 2008 21:29 (sixteen years ago) link

I hear you. For such a good, responsive company, I don't know what's up with eMusic's slow-response to email inquiries and problems.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 7 April 2008 21:35 (sixteen years ago) link

seven months pass...

From a Napster press release a few months ago:

Napster is the first music subscription service featuring major label content to offer 100% of its catalog in the MP3 format for download sales.

Is this true? I thought eMusic was 100% DRM-free mp3s. (This is for work, but I can't find the answer anywhere else.)

jaymc, Thursday, 13 November 2008 18:19 (fifteen years ago) link

emusic doesn't have major label content, tho'

bendy, Thursday, 13 November 2008 18:48 (fifteen years ago) link

anybody have any tips for finding stuff on eMusic? I just subscribed for the first time a couple weeks ago, and the charts seem kinda useless to me so I never know what's on there unless I think to search for a specific artist.

forkslovetofuk (some dude), Thursday, 13 November 2008 18:51 (fifteen years ago) link

emusic doesn't have major label content, tho'

Good point. I skimmed over that part.

jaymc, Thursday, 13 November 2008 18:56 (fifteen years ago) link

tips for finding stuff on eMusic?

Find an artist you like, then look through the member-created playlists associated with the page. Put in Burial, for instance, and you'll get links to a whole bunch of deeper dubstep'ish stuff to sample. There's a lot of hidden gems on the site. Pickup stuff as soon as you're sure about it: labels fall off the site all the time. Also, the 17dots.com blog, by eMusic staffers, has a lot of good alerts for new arrivals. I really get something close to the crate-digging experience on eMusic, which I can't say about any other online music resource.

bendy, Thursday, 13 November 2008 19:33 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah i like just browsing the different categories, the various "dozen" lists, etc. i've downloaded a lot of stuff just on a whim, some of it great. i agree that it's the closest thing online to a good, quirky record store (or the closest legal thing, anyway).

tipsy mothra, Thursday, 13 November 2008 20:08 (fifteen years ago) link

the roir free sampler they have up right now is pretty decent, tho i have a fair bit of it already.

Booker van Permalink (Hunt3r), Thursday, 13 November 2008 20:19 (fifteen years ago) link

when I'm browsing I usually start with one of the "dozens" and then go from there on the albums' pages. The search engine is pretty sweet for finding remixes since it will look for an artists' name in individual song titles

TOMBOT, Thursday, 13 November 2008 22:25 (fifteen years ago) link

Anybody have any tips for finding stuff on eMusic?

I usually check New and Noteworthy and Dozens and then I browse categories or labels by editor's picks if I don't have a specific artist or album I want.

There's pretty much always some Riverside/Fantasy jazz record or Folkways record worth having when I run out of other ideas.

Albert Jeans (Hurting 2), Thursday, 13 November 2008 22:29 (fifteen years ago) link

three months pass...

Noticed the Load Records catalog is up. Not sure if that's new. Not sure if that's exciting.

Bonobos in Paneradise (Hurting 2), Thursday, 26 February 2009 17:00 (fifteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.