goddamn smirky eyebrow-raised badass poochie cartoons nowadays

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (353 of them)

http://www.preston.gov.uk/Images/News/Wallace%20and%20Gromit.jpg

Tom D., Thursday, 19 June 2008 15:47 (fifteen years ago) link

ratatouille wasn't smirky at all..it was very sincere.

honestly i don't feel like pixar is at all a part of this sort of thing. (which i hate)

it's more of a dreamworks thing.

M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 19 June 2008 15:49 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah the Pixar movies are none of these things. xp

Pancakes Hackman, Thursday, 19 June 2008 15:50 (fifteen years ago) link

and while these types of films are successful, pixar has been more successful by far.

M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 19 June 2008 15:50 (fifteen years ago) link

the end monologue by the french food critic guy might be the best manifesto for criticism ever.

M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 19 June 2008 15:51 (fifteen years ago) link

well, Cars was a little smirky.

some dude, Thursday, 19 June 2008 15:51 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, my first thought was WHAT ABOUT PIXAR?

Kung Fu Panda has had very good word of mouth, to be fair.

chap, Thursday, 19 June 2008 15:56 (fifteen years ago) link

Antz
Shrek
Shrek 2
Shark Tale
Madagascar
Over the Hedge
Shrek the Third
Bee Movie
Kung Fu Panda
Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa
Shrek Goes Fourth
Puss In Boots: The Story of an Ogre Killer
Shrek 5
http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:0sUpDm4JFOqAKM:http://www.shillpages.com/movies/judgmentatnuremberg1961dvd.jpg

and what, Thursday, 19 June 2008 15:56 (fifteen years ago) link

^^^ dreamworks wall of shame

and what, Thursday, 19 June 2008 15:57 (fifteen years ago) link

and yeah cars is pretty 'tudey
http://www.channel4.com/4car/media/features/2006/cars-film-review/03-large/cars-lightning-mcqueen.jpg

and what, Thursday, 19 June 2008 15:57 (fifteen years ago) link

theyre seriously not fucking done w/ shrek yet??? or even close, apparently? ugh

deeznuts, Thursday, 19 June 2008 15:58 (fifteen years ago) link

I like the first Shrek.

chap, Thursday, 19 June 2008 15:58 (fifteen years ago) link

fuck angelina jolie doing a voice in it. and balls to being fair as well. (:p)

Upt0eleven, Thursday, 19 June 2008 15:58 (fifteen years ago) link

Also, for comparison's sake, via Rotten Tomatoes:

66% The Incredible Hulk $55.4M
88% Kung Fu Panda $33.6M
20% The Happening $30.5M
34% You Don't Mess with th… $16.4M
77% Indiana Jones and the … $14.7M

When a movie is rating higher than Indy IV and the latest Marvel joint, yeah, it might be actually not too bad.

Pancakes Hackman, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:00 (fifteen years ago) link

all of these cartoons get ridiculously good critical reviews

deeznuts, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:01 (fifteen years ago) link

what about shark's tale?

Upt0eleven, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:01 (fifteen years ago) link

Cameron Diaz has reportedly asked for the film to have an eco-friendly storyline about a threatened swamp.

Ugh.

chap, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:04 (fifteen years ago) link

shrek 4 is set to be directed by the director of deuce bigalow: male gigalo

and what, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:04 (fifteen years ago) link

what about shark's tale?

-- Upt0eleven, Thursday, June 19, 2008 12:01 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

aka "crossed arms: the motion picture"

http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mo/sharktalebig.jpg
http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2004/10/07/shark_tale_narrowweb__200x372.jpg

and what, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:05 (fifteen years ago) link

lol crossed fins

some dude, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:07 (fifteen years ago) link

Shark 'Tude

some dude, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:07 (fifteen years ago) link

Shrek the Third 42%
Bee Movie 53%
Madagascar 56%
Over the Hedge 73%

What metric are we using for "ridiculously good" here?

Shark Tale 34% BEST REVIEWED MOVIE LOL

Pancakes Hackman, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:07 (fifteen years ago) link

well i guess yeah cars maybe was a little bit of bad dudes with baddass 'tudes

but still it's nowhere NEAR as snarky as say shrek.

the big thing with Pixar is that they don't do pop culture reference gags...each movie is true to its own fantasy world, they don't break to wink at the audience...

cars is the least of the pixar movies though.

M@tt He1ges0n, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:08 (fifteen years ago) link

"Shrilly pandering to edgy, jive-talking, hip-hopping bents of the moment, [Shark Tale] churns up a sea of offensive ethnic stereotypes, unfunny situations, unsympathetic characters and lousy plotting." Houston Chronicle

A MUST-SEE!!

Pancakes Hackman, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:09 (fifteen years ago) link

eh i was griping about these kids today when i was 14, im not too worried about coming off like a curmodgeon

-- deeznuts, Thursday, June 19, 2008 8:38 AM (27 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

Suspicions about nuts's age confirmed.

libcrypt, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:09 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, Kung Fu Panda is the only one of these I actually want to see, for the whole "actual animal master of corresponding animal style" thing.

kingfish, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:10 (fifteen years ago) link

the Shark Tale producers presumably concluded that the secret to Nemo's success was the fact that it had fish in it. OMG FISH ARE SO IN THIS YEAR!!!!

cocks

Upt0eleven, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:12 (fifteen years ago) link

When a movie is rating higher than Indy IV and the latest Marvel joint, yeah, it might be actually not too bad.

-- Pancakes Hackman, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:00 (7 minutes ago) Link

Smirking computer animation edges out the corpse of a movie franchise and yet another comic book film (the second take on this one), what an accomplishment.

mh, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:12 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, Kung Fu Panda is the only one of these I actually want to see, for the whole "actual animal master of corresponding animal style" thing.

-- kingfish, Thursday, June 19, 2008 12:10 PM (54 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

that's a really strange criteria for wanting to see a movie.

some dude, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:13 (fifteen years ago) link

Finding Nemo only came out a year before Shark Tale, and these computer animation movies take years and years to produce.

some dude, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:15 (fifteen years ago) link

Yeah, Kung Fu Panda is the only one of these I actually want to see, for the whole "actual animal master of corresponding animal style" thing.

-- kingfish, Thursday, June 19, 2008 12:10 PM (54 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

that's a really strange criteria for wanting to see a movie.

-- some dude, Thursday, June 19, 2008 12:13 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

coyote kingfish

and what, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:17 (fifteen years ago) link

i saw monsters inc on tv & its great but theres def pop cult refs... buscemi makes fargo woodchipper jokes!!

and what, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:17 (fifteen years ago) link

lol argh @ tweety

sleep, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:18 (fifteen years ago) link

I like kung fu movies, what do you want? Trad kung fu movies make a point of demonstrating contrasting styles, the more the better. Hell, even the pilot for the David Carradine series had each of the 5(ish) animal styles portrayed. The conceit of taking your otherwise bog standard dreamworks talking animals cheapo CGI but using it to instead match up said animal with the animal style interests me.

Let's see if this movie has James Hong in it.

[imdb check]

HA! It does!

kingfish, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:19 (fifteen years ago) link

Finding Nemo only came out a year before Shark Tale, and these computer animation movies take years and years to produce.

Dreamworks and Pixar so know what the other is working on, even if they're not meant to, and even if it's just "hey they're doing a fish film". Goes as far back as Bug's Life/Antz.

Matt DC, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:19 (fifteen years ago) link

tweety is one of the OGs of this shit imo xposts

sleep, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:19 (fifteen years ago) link

Finding Nemo only came out a year before Shark Tale, and these computer animation movies take years and years to produce.

there were leaks. so i hear.

Upt0eleven, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:19 (fifteen years ago) link

http://www.buzzbunny.co.uk/images/050217_loonatics.jpg

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:19 (fifteen years ago) link

O_o

bnw, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:19 (fifteen years ago) link

yeah i dunno...i feel like competing studios have more to lose than to gain by jumping on similiar themes/premises. i always imagine that it's more of a situation of both teams getting really far along on pre-production before finding out what the other is doing and going "fuck it, we've already put a lot of time into this, let's just do ours and hope it's better than theirs."

some dude, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:21 (fifteen years ago) link

ughghhggh i dont know if anyone saw the chipmunks trailer in theaters but it revolved around some kind of joke that involved one of them having to eat one of their own turds to prove to dave it wasnt a raisin

not kidding

deeznuts, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:21 (fifteen years ago) link

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a4/PreStitch.jpg

woulda been cool if stitch looked like that

bnw, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:22 (fifteen years ago) link

er was a raisin obviously

deeznuts, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:22 (fifteen years ago) link

haha I was about to post the whole chipmunk turd trailer -- the ENTIRE TEASER was a poop joke

mh, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:22 (fifteen years ago) link

to appeal to the stoner frat bro demographic - xxxpost

Upt0eleven, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:22 (fifteen years ago) link

o_O at Disney's next picture being based on a Philip K. Dick fantasy story. Did somebody just option everything the guy wrote and they're trying to clear out the cheap properties?

mh, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:25 (fifteen years ago) link

i saw monsters inc on tv & its great but theres def pop cult refs... buscemi makes fargo woodchipper jokes!!

They do have em, but they're always completely peripheral to the characters and plots.

chap, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:28 (fifteen years ago) link

In other words, they're not "Family Guy".

Pleasant Plains, Thursday, 19 June 2008 16:31 (fifteen years ago) link

those are US numbers btw

rob, Wednesday, 4 August 2021 20:27 (two years ago) link

There are many things to despise about society as a whole but the myriad ways in which every thought expressed in public must be crushed into a false binary straitjacket so it can be applauded or denounced in the simplest terms is one of the worst.

it is to laugh, like so, ha! (Aimless), Wednesday, 4 August 2021 20:29 (two years ago) link

It's really more that your pathological need to be the most nuanced person in the room makes you post unnecessary things that don't expand or enrich the conversation

Karl Havoc (DJP), Wednesday, 4 August 2021 20:35 (two years ago) link

unnecessary things that don't expand or enrich the conversation

this makes me feel abnormally typical

it is to laugh, like so, ha! (Aimless), Wednesday, 4 August 2021 20:40 (two years ago) link

hmm, i feel the converse. the filters making young people look much more conventionally attractive cannot be good for self-image and just anecdotally i know tons of women, some in their 20s, who are getting fillers and botox now whereas i knew none 5 years ago

yeah kind of my feeling, I put a pic of myself through a filter and thought "damn! I look good!" and then got depressed that I don't actually look like that. it also seems to be kind of a thing on dating apps - my wife has a cousin who's meeting people using one but using a picture of herself that looks nothing like actually does...I don't wanna be insensitive, but this almost feels like a form of catfishing?

frogbs, Wednesday, 4 August 2021 20:40 (two years ago) link

frog you're a fox

maf you one two (maffew12), Wednesday, 4 August 2021 20:42 (two years ago) link

great revive

Linda and Jodie Rocco (map), Wednesday, 4 August 2021 20:48 (two years ago) link

well thanks but imagine if my nose were smaller. it would be game over for all of you

frogbs, Wednesday, 4 August 2021 20:59 (two years ago) link

xp
sounds like someone needs an eyebrow raise and a little light smirkening around the mouth

rob, Wednesday, 4 August 2021 21:02 (two years ago) link

The article rob posted above was interesting. People are not just trying to look “hotter” — younger, slimmer, smoother — they are turning themselves into human cartoons with cartoon facial expressions and sound effects. The ideal is not even realistic for anyone — not even the most conventional looking person around — it isn’t meant to be on our plane of reality. This is about virtual representations of the self supplanting the real self, probably causing weird kinds of dysmorphia.

treeship., Wednesday, 4 August 2021 21:48 (two years ago) link

Not even dysmorphia. A more general or fundamental alienation from the body. I think this is why it seems so dystopian.

treeship., Wednesday, 4 August 2021 21:53 (two years ago) link

I guess digital foot-binding and skull shaping is preferable to IRL foot-binding

Andy the Grasshopper, Wednesday, 4 August 2021 22:14 (two years ago) link

Yeah that is true. But people are getting real-life surgery to approximate anime body proportions.

treeship., Wednesday, 4 August 2021 22:18 (two years ago) link

this is the terrifying sequel to 28 days later I really needed

Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 4 August 2021 23:12 (two years ago) link

Alex Jones is not yet 50

Andy the Grasshopper, Wednesday, 4 August 2021 23:15 (two years ago) link

eleven months pass...

maximum Poochie

Critique of the Goth Programme (Neil S), Monday, 18 July 2022 09:37 (one year ago) link

The original Legion of Super-Pets is v much not a smirky eyebrow-raised badass Poochie comic strip

https://dc.fandom.com/wiki/Legion_of_Super-Pets_%28Earth-One%29

Ward Fowler, Monday, 18 July 2022 09:53 (one year ago) link

two months pass...

https://i.imgur.com/R4JmXDx.jpg

Wiggum Dorma (wins), Saturday, 1 October 2022 09:10 (one year ago) link

Excellent.

Fronted by a bearded Phil Collins (Tom D.), Saturday, 1 October 2022 10:01 (one year ago) link

two months pass...
six months pass...

Dreamworks, it is time for you to learn to draw faces

hiroyoshi tins in (Sgt. Biscuits), Saturday, 24 June 2023 08:34 (nine months ago) link

There is a large slice of society for which smirk=WINNER and a smaller slice to whom smirk=sociopath, we must choose a side

assert (matttkkkk), Saturday, 24 June 2023 08:51 (nine months ago) link

Well going by the trailer for that movie, the filmmakers are in the latter slice since she’s the baddie lol

Duane Barry, Saturday, 24 June 2023 17:22 (nine months ago) link

del Toro just a few days ago:

The 58-year-old filmmaker spent a good portion of his Annecy master class deriding what he sees as destructive tendencies in much commercial animation where characters and emotions are “codified into a sort of teenage rom-com, almost emoji-style behavior. (If) I see a character raising his fucking eyebrow, or crossing his arms, having a sassy pose — oh, I hate that shit. (Why) does everything act as if they’re in a sitcom? I think it's emotional pornography. All the families are happy and sassy and quick, everyone has a one-liner. Well, my dad was boring. I was boring. Everybody in my family was boring. We had no one-liners. We’re all fucked up. That’s what I want to see animated. I would love to see real life in animation. I actually think it’s urgent. think it’s urgent to see real life in animation.”

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 24 June 2023 20:47 (nine months ago) link

Guillermo del Toro, welcome to the resistance

Lavator Shemmelpennick, Saturday, 24 June 2023 21:14 (nine months ago) link

"Well, that just happened."

immodesty blaise (jimbeaux), Saturday, 24 June 2023 21:21 (nine months ago) link

one month passes...

http://https%3A//media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/230504113629-01-what-are-zillennials-olarte-wellness.jpg%3Fc%3D16x9%26q%3Dh_540%2Cw_960%2Cc_fill/f_webp

from: "Zillennials: The newest micro-generation has a name" https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/10/health/what-are-zillennials-wellness/index.html

Apparently this is the smirking generation. No generation has suffered more. "“They attended college during the pandemic, and missed out on important social markers.” So they must smirk.

I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Sunday, 6 August 2023 01:55 (eight months ago) link

goddamit

I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Sunday, 6 August 2023 01:56 (eight months ago) link

well just click the link to get your dose of smirk

I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Sunday, 6 August 2023 01:56 (eight months ago) link

i give up.

I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Sunday, 6 August 2023 01:59 (eight months ago) link

six months pass...

https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/garfield/images/2/22/Garfield1980.png/revision/latest/scale-to-width/360?cb=20231128184048

Garfield was kind of a pioneer when it comes to smirky cartoon characters

soref, Tuesday, 6 February 2024 19:44 (two months ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.