Who will have the last word on this thread ?

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (268 of them)

View Previous Page...

oh well, maybe some of your more interesting wishes will come true !!

― baggy (baggy), Saturday, 4 January 2003 17:57 (twenty-one years ago) link

haha good point!

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 4 January 2003 18:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm not trying to have the last word on this thread, since I know that's quite impossible.

― Rockist Scientist, Saturday, 4 January 2003 18:52 (twenty-one years ago) link

it'll go on longer than any of my threads, that's for sure...

i could start talking about ass, that would kill it 4 sure. except i think my new ironic crush is on a young keith emerson...

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 19:06 (twenty-one years ago) link

*drive by posting*

― Kim (Kim), Saturday, 4 January 2003 19:21 (twenty-one years ago) link

kate stepping out with her new ironic bf...

http://www.echonyc.com/~cleo/concert.jpeg

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 19:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

SOMBRERO

― jel -- (jel), Saturday, 4 January 2003 20:02 (twenty-one years ago) link

fringe...

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

lunatic...

― jel -- (jel), Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:16 (twenty-one years ago) link

as in lunatic fringe! (lets turn this into word association!)

frost...

― jel -- (jel), Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:18 (twenty-one years ago) link

frost-ed lipstick

― sand.y, Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:19 (twenty-one years ago) link

frosty dipstick... goes back to the 'how cold is too cold to snow...' argument.

when will ed com back so we can eat xmas cake...

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:22 (twenty-one years ago) link

Is it not better to eat cake without Ed? He'll only want a share of it! Or is he bringing the cake?

― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:45 (twenty-one years ago) link

ed came back, we ate the cake. i had the heel w/all the marzipan, yum. thoug i've decided i like fruitcake better w/butter because marzipan is so yummy tht eveything pales by comparison.

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 21:52 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'll tell you something that's been bugging me lately...that mobile phone ad, with that woman who wants to do this and that, like get rid of pigeons, bring back bob marley and ban beards. Hold on there! Bob Marley had a beard, what you gonna bring him back and make him shave off his beard?!?

― jel -- (jel), Saturday, 4 January 2003 22:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

now we know how 2 get rid of nick... start perving on circa '94 photos of bobby's scottish knob...

― masonicboom, Saturday, 4 January 2003 23:34 (twenty-one years ago) link

you lot have just given up, haven't you... will i really win...

― masonicboom, Monday, 6 January 2003 00:57 (twenty-one years ago) link

yes, and you deser . . . doh!

― felicity (felicity), Monday, 6 January 2003 01:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

thank. i knew i wasn't that sad... d'oh!!!

― masonicboom, Monday, 6 January 2003 01:05 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yes, here I am again. Do I win yet?

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 6 January 2003 13:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

Nope.

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 16:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

Disregard DP. You won, Sarah! But only in an unsatisfying, theoretical way.

― Aimless, Monday, 6 January 2003 16:56 (twenty-one years ago) link

DO NOT DISREGARD ME. Send me money instead.

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 16:59 (twenty-one years ago) link

Ok. Stop bickering. I win for sure now.

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 6 January 2003 17:41 (twenty-one years ago) link

― rosemary (rosemary), Monday, 6 January 2003 17:51 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm still waiting for that money...

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 17:51 (twenty-one years ago) link

I win for today, But have to go home now......anougher day, anougher stress related headache.

― baggy (baggy), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

there can be no winner surely?

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:05 (twenty-one years ago) link

yeah, but it's a fun game!!

― baggy (baggy), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:07 (twenty-one years ago) link

me.

― Curtis Stephens, Monday, 6 January 2003 18:13 (twenty-one years ago) link

no.

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

next time.

― baggy (baggy), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:17 (twenty-one years ago) link

ME!

― Aaron W, Monday, 6 January 2003 18:18 (twenty-one years ago) link

no.

― baggy (baggy), Monday, 6 January 2003 18:19 (twenty-one years ago) link

WHERE'S MY MONEY GODDAMMIT???

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 19:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

in the bank.

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:04 (twenty-one years ago) link

WHERE'S MY ACCOUNT NUMBER GODDAMMIT???

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:08 (twenty-one years ago) link

in the drawer.

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:08 (twenty-one years ago) link

WHERE'S MY (ha you're not going to get me that easily)

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:10 (twenty-one years ago) link

there should be a magic word which locks threads

― naked as sin (naked as sin), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:12 (twenty-one years ago) link

And that magic word is...

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:13 (twenty-one years ago) link

Hitler?

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:40 (twenty-one years ago) link

Titties!

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 6 January 2003 20:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

HITLER-TITTIES!

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 21:12 (twenty-one years ago) link

b@ngbus

― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 6 January 2003 21:14 (twenty-one years ago) link

(I really thought "hitler-titties" would stop the thread cold.)

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 22:02 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'm winning!

Jeez you guys suck at this game

― Curtis Stephens, Monday, 6 January 2003 22:07 (twenty-one years ago) link

I heard you guys were talking about Hitler-titties in here!

― Aaron W, Monday, 6 January 2003 22:10 (twenty-one years ago) link

Boobies!

― jel -- (jel), Monday, 6 January 2003 22:51 (twenty-one years ago) link

GOEBBLS-BOOBIES!

― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 6 January 2003 22:52 (twenty-one years ago) link

Skipping 168 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

Senator BRUSHES. Begot surrounds, abuses of old hall, and accelerated to maturity by necessities economic and enthusiasm uncalculating of world war, and by use prodigal of money and of threats political by league of Against-Hall, prohibition national entered effect legal upwards does of six years, but truth can to be this which, unless a highly qualified degree, never _ has entered practical effect all appetite for drink, that to have to be one main great impulse human mass to be since then Jesus in Grey hair to show ahead its glory, to use word st. Juan, to turn water six water pote in wine, to have, in its extensive fight with repressive agency to fix to movement by eighteenth amendment and Volstead act, to equip another illustration truth, that neither moralistic nor statesman to always have to forget, uniforms in his the more fervid moment disinterested or abundant sensation, that man to be one creature who power to be to regulate and to improve, but to be able not to be to do above. Once, during the agitation for the abolition of the human slavery, the Brougham henry denigrated what it called "the wild and guilty fantasy that the man can carry out the characteristic in man." Wild and then guilty it is the fantasy that the energy of the federal government even can prevail totally to man of its hot clothes of the sensations, desires, and the appetites animals. Since then the tenth eighth amendment and Volstead the act became parts of the legislation of our earth the human instinct of the personal freedom, directed by a correct sense of the limits within which the natural right can be controlled by municipal ordinances, it has maintained an intact resistance to them; and nothing can be more unjustifiable than the declaration often heard that this resistance is limited a single social class one sameone. It is not continued reason why they call prohibitionists, vainly search to excite disaffection and social jealousy, the elegant social system, that it is in favor more bravely of the members of the American federation of the work. Any social class or sect is not limited. It has brought near relations of work around between bootlegger and the thousands of the most intelligent and more virtuous members of American society that does not feel not more of remorse on the violation of the act of Volstead that the free Soiler did on the violation of the law of the slave of the fugitive one, or the southern target did on annulling to ignorante black, suffrage, the federal constitution in each case on the contrary in spite of and the file whenever it mounted of the haltings for the embriaguez in all our American cities since the promulgation of the act of Volstead indicates only too much perceivably that the humblest members and less lucky people of the society they also have illicit his purveyors of the drink. Jewish the recent elocutions of rabbis, protestant bishops and ministers, and of you bark catholics has taste of cardinals ÓConnell and Hayes, demonstrates to the existence of a sensation every greater time, uniform between the American clergy, who the absolute prohibition is not the ally but the enemy of the human morality.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 10 February 2003 21:17 (twenty-one years ago) link

Dang I was just thinking the other day that I should revive this and indeed get the last word.

― Aaron W (Aaron W), Monday, 10 February 2003 21:19 (twenty-one years ago) link

Aaron, you're obviously missing the axiom here.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 10 February 2003 21:20 (twenty-one years ago) link

ALL POSTS BELOW THIS ONE SHOULD BE ONLY BE MADE BY CHILD MOLESTERS AND MOMMY KILLERS

― Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 21:24 (twenty-one years ago) link

With the exception of this one...
And I am not a dumbass!

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Monday, 10 February 2003 21:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

(you mommy killer!)

― Oops (Oops), Monday, 10 February 2003 21:30 (twenty-one years ago) link

oops thats not fair.

― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 10 February 2003 22:35 (twenty-one years ago) link

me?

― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Tuesday, 11 February 2003 04:51 (twenty-one years ago) link

B-b-but I'm Tha Threadkilla! ILX threads are the only things I ever kill! (Well, those and vodka bottles.)

― j.lu (j.lu), Tuesday, 11 February 2003 05:21 (twenty-one years ago) link

shut UP!!!

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Tuesday, 11 February 2003 14:09 (twenty-one years ago) link

― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 13 February 2003 07:38 (twenty-one years ago) link

Naughty Sterling.

― Graham (graham), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:31 (twenty-one years ago) link

Thanks, Graham. Back to business as usual!

― Sarah McL (coco), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yo yo, MC L is in the muthafuckin' hizzouse!

― oops (Oops), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:37 (twenty-one years ago) link

This is a really short thread, all things considered. 250-odd posts in over a month. If people really cared it'd be much longer.

So we might as well finish it now.

― James Ball (James Ball), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:40 (twenty-one years ago) link

yes, might as well.

Sarah???

― oops (Oops), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yes, oops?

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:43 (twenty-one years ago) link

Hm.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:44 (twenty-one years ago) link

Hm.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:45 (twenty-one years ago) link

Wow, the lights were too bright there.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:45 (twenty-one years ago) link

Let's try again.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:46 (twenty-one years ago) link

Much better. Soft lighting.

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:46 (twenty-one years ago) link

Never mind

― oops (Oops), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:47 (twenty-one years ago) link

Amateurist you've turned "Contribute an answer" yellow. Fix it, right now!

― smee (smee), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:48 (twenty-one years ago) link

Arrrghgh! THis yellow is not very soothing!

ARrrghhgh! I am a pirate!

― Sarah McLusky (coco), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

You prefer?

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

Lovely.

― Sarah McLUsky (coco), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

Amatuerist I'm gonna count to three.....

― smee (smee), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:50 (twenty-one years ago) link

One

Two

Three

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:51 (twenty-one years ago) link

OK, sorry

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

What an amateur

― oops (Oops), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:56 (twenty-one years ago) link

― Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 13 February 2003 15:57 (twenty-one years ago) link

Now look what you've done!

― smee (smee), Thursday, 13 February 2003 16:01 (twenty-one years ago) link