no boys allowed in the room!!!!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (10067 of them)

AWW!

sarahel, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 19:58 (fourteen years ago) link

I solved my shopping problem by not going shopping, at least recreationally, and I solved the fitting-pants problem by not wearing pants. Viola.

WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 19:59 (fourteen years ago) link

I realize this is not an option for everybody.

WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:01 (fourteen years ago) link

should i go back to my style from the early 90s of wearing dresses and skirts with thick tights and clunky shoes and boots?

sarahel, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:01 (fourteen years ago) link

A friend of mine and I were recently talking about the day we realized that clunky shoes were no longer in style, and how we both got a little sad. And had to quick go buy some new shoes.

she is writing about love (Jenny), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:03 (fourteen years ago) link

xp Do you feel like it's "you"? Will the things you have to do in your life accommodate that style of dress, ie can you make it work for both business and personal commitments? If yes to both, then Y!

WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:04 (fourteen years ago) link

xp - I can't wear pumps or heels or anything with a narrow/small sole because otherwise I'd be returning to a world of pain.

I don't have the job I used to have that required me to wear pants, and I can play drums in a skirt/dress as long as it's not too narrow/tight. So, uh yeah. It's the shoes thing I worry about.

sarahel, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:06 (fourteen years ago) link

I cannot fathom committing to pantslessness in Chicago tbh

quincie, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:12 (fourteen years ago) link

i live in the SF bay area.

sarahel, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:16 (fourteen years ago) link

xp It's an art.

http://freelancersfashion.blogspot.com/2009/12/anatomy-of-dressing-when-its-really.html

sarah, I can't wear heels either.

she is writing about love (Jenny), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:17 (fourteen years ago) link

i guess the thing for me - is to figure out what height/length of boots would be flattering with a dress or skirt, so that my legs don't look stumpy.

sarahel, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:19 (fourteen years ago) link

Huh. I think that's just something you need to develop an eye for, cos it's so individual and also on a case-by-case basis.

WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:20 (fourteen years ago) link

is it more flattering, if you have thick calves, for boots to hit somewhere on the calf, or slightly below?

sarahel, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:24 (fourteen years ago) link

A friend's calves were so thick she found it difficult to get knee-line boots at all.

Those giant scary platform heels or ankle boots with the studs, spikes and ginormous price tags do look good with thick tights and loose-fitting dresses/tops/sweaters. Also, the only way I will wear the peep toe (my feet are nice but I hate hangy-outy toes on me). I've been mostly wearing Etienne Aigner fake equestrian boots with skinny jeans and big sweaters/tulip-drape dresses but otherwise my mid-length boots are not suitable on this spin of fashion's carousel. Which is a shame - kitten heels are being revived soon and the Manolo Blahnik one-off pair of boots with same bought from random fashion archivist BITD would be fab to wear.

The '90s ended the second they stopped making Donna Karan black matte jersey tights - they are bulletproof and I have at least five undamaged pairs to this day.

sacher torte reform (suzy), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:25 (fourteen years ago) link

Yeah - you mentioned those tights way upthread, and I expressed my envy!

sarahel, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:27 (fourteen years ago) link

I was just remembering the other day that when I was young and my mom was getting "personal style" books out of the library, the rule was that boots should go a little bit UNDER the skirt hem, so that no leg showed. The idea being that a longer line in similar (dark-on-dark) colors would "lengthen" the leg visually.

More recently, the rule has been that there should be a slice of bare (or hoisery-ied) leg visible between boot and skirt hem. Apparently this is regardless of any visual trickery.

I don't have any nice boots so it's a moot point to me.

WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:27 (fourteen years ago) link

As a thick-calved women, I can say that I've worth both. Usually the shorter the skirt, the more I am inclined to go for taller boots. I'm wearing boots now that are similar to these here right now.

xp - yeah I have to look for "wide calf" or "extended size" boots if I want to wear boots higher than mid-shin.

she is writing about love (Jenny), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:28 (fourteen years ago) link

I was dreaming of being able to afford Duo boots, Jenny, but they discontinued the 1 or 2 styles I liked anyway. Sad face.

WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:29 (fourteen years ago) link

huh - so i could do boots that are a little higher than ankle length and do mid-calf skirts, or slightly below the knee boots and slightly-above the knee skirts and not look I have sausages for legs?

sarahel, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:30 (fourteen years ago) link

I really like that dark plaid-ish dress that Justin3 posted on the wedding dress style help thread!!

sarahel, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:31 (fourteen years ago) link

If I wore heels, I'd have a pair of these so fast it'd make yer head spin: http://www.duoboots.com/products/boots/detail/calf_fitted_boots_boutique/madeira/243/colour/1-black_leather/

I managed to get mine when they were 1) on sale, and 2) offering free shipping. Happy face!

I'm actually wearing two pairs of tights today, speaking of wearing skirts in Chicago.

Sarah, yes, you could totally do that.

she is writing about love (Jenny), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:31 (fourteen years ago) link

Oh! Here are my boots, the very ones I am wearing today: http://www.duoboots.com/products/boots/detail/calf_fitted_boots_everyday/naples/93/colour/1-black_leather/

she is writing about love (Jenny), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:32 (fourteen years ago) link

I'm gonna wear a dress or a skirt today - you have inspired me!

sarahel, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:33 (fourteen years ago) link

They used to make a kitten-heeled, mid-calf patent leather pair with pointy toes -- alas, no longer.

WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:33 (fourteen years ago) link

Mom-sourced style books were WRONG.

Boots I have: Aigner, Blahnik, 13-hole steel cap Dr Marten, Kurt Geiger taupe suede with bows but also distinct junior high stonergirl vibe, black wedge knee boots, 2x French Connection ankle boots (1 black patent, 1 red patent), pointy black crocodile Valentino couture ankle boot with 5" spike heel. On, and black and chartreuse Etnies Girl moccasin boots in suede and leather, basically for those who don't do Uggs. There are other boots in storage somewhere but old, unloved etc. Would still be happy with those Mad Max/Balenciaga mindmeld ankle boots or similar hardware-looking things.

sacher torte reform (suzy), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:40 (fourteen years ago) link

You have to keep in mind, suzy, that the skirts in question were like long, tweedy, walking affairs.

WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:43 (fourteen years ago) link

Or at least a little longer than is currently considered current.

WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:44 (fourteen years ago) link

Now I really wish I could remember what book that was! It made a big deal about things looking "rich" whether they were expensive or not -- basically the "quality and enduring style over seasonally 'in' things" argument. Also used the designation "Quality", eventually shortened to "Q" and "non-Q", to describe hypothetical items.

WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:50 (fourteen years ago) link

Laurel, you are Q.

sarahel, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:53 (fourteen years ago) link

Hahaha that's nice, thank u. Suzy and daria and a few others are really the hi-style fashion mavens, I am actually v v conservative in dress.

WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:57 (fourteen years ago) link

all the girls on this thread are Q, imo.

sarahel, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:57 (fourteen years ago) link

That book will be responsible for moms of a particular era wearing their best gold with black angora but never, ever black satin. I totally had a quality meme drilled into me because one grandmother was a trained fashion designer (but actually a fashion buyer) who despised synthetic fabrics and would moan at my mother if we appeared in lame prints, character/word t-shirts, or if the seams on the fabric did not cohere. Before I figured out there was this thing, fashion, I wore preppy everything or dressed up in approximations of b/w film actress looks.

If tweed, a brogue pattern of any kind is yr friend, whether shoe or boot. I used to do the mid-calf laced-up brogue, cableknit tights, tweed skirt thing.

sacher torte reform (suzy), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:59 (fourteen years ago) link

never, ever black satin.

I think it might have allowed black satin if your personal style/lifestyle fell into "Miami Beach Formal". Other options included "East Coast Old Guard" and...damn. I am seriously wracking my brains to remember more about this genius book.

WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:02 (fourteen years ago) link

I FOUND IT!!!! It is Dressing Rich: A Guide to Classic Chic for Women with More Taste than Money.

I present to you http://blog.shopittome.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/dressing-rich.jpg

WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:05 (fourteen years ago) link

The fashion sketches alone are worth buying a used copy on amazon.com -- I want this book.

WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:07 (fourteen years ago) link

LOL 1988* RUN AWAY FROM THE MAUVE.

*This is a guess because carbon-14 shoulder pad dating difficult at the angle of Cheryl Tiegs clone pose.

sacher torte reform (suzy), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:10 (fourteen years ago) link

1988? It looks earlier to me - mid-80s maybe.

sarahel, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:10 (fourteen years ago) link

1982! Oh yeah, it's a doozy. On other other hand, it namechecks people like Dame Edith Sitwell, which is how I first learned of her existence, and she was a byword in my mind for a certain kind of grandiose, turbaned fashion for oh, well, STILL.

WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:15 (fourteen years ago) link

I learned of Dame Edith Sitwell from a Morrissey t-shirt, I think.

sarahel, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:17 (fourteen years ago) link

Not to mention things like sketches of shoes with worn-down heels and hems that hang askew, with the instructions to get thee to a cobbler or dry cleaner ASAP to fix them, because SLOPPINESS IS NEVER Q.

xp hahaha oh yes I didn't have a Morissey kind of childhood.

WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:17 (fourteen years ago) link

I think we need to point out when threads are "Non-Q"

sarahel, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:18 (fourteen years ago) link

There is actually an artist's sketch of THIS photograph in the section about fashion exceptions, and how some people simply make something their life's look but that it's best to do that when you know the rules already.

http://images.artnet.com/artwork_images_424158012_438719_sanford-roth.jpg

WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:20 (fourteen years ago) link

I'm sorry, I must be boring the shit out of everyone, but I am tbh really really excited to re-find this book. Every page will probably unlock some childhood memory of mine, of sitting around reading it and practicing thinking about being a grown-up lady.

WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:21 (fourteen years ago) link

no that book sounds awesome!

sarahel, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:22 (fourteen years ago) link

I mean I was SIX when this book came out and I re-read it extensively. My childhood idea of being a woman was having clothes like the ones in this book, wearing Chanel No 5, and owning shoes that made noise on the wood floors.

WHY DON'T YOU JUST LICK THE BUS DIRECTLY (Laurel), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:23 (fourteen years ago) link

Book sounds awesome and hilarious and you should not apologise.

I think I first heard of Edith Sitwell during high school, when I wanted to know what the Bloomsbury Set did.

sacher torte reform (suzy), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:28 (fourteen years ago) link

That book is totally awesome. Morbidly curious about Does This Make Me Look Fat, too.

she is writing about love (Jenny), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:30 (fourteen years ago) link

Morbidly curious about Does This Make Me Look Fat, too.

Me too!

sarahel, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:30 (fourteen years ago) link

Although I think a more constructive question to ask oneself is, "Does this fit well?"

she is writing about love (Jenny), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:38 (fourteen years ago) link

I desperately want you to get this book and devote a thread to it, L.!

quincie, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 21:50 (fourteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.