Colin Powell presents the case to the UN...

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (157 of them)
By the way the UK parliament still has not had a vote on military action, or even on the deployment of troops to the gulf. Neither is such a vote necessary under British Law. The reason given is that the a vote would destroy the element of suprise. How suprised will the Iraqis be when the hundreds of thousands of troops massed in kuwait and saudi come pouring over the border.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 6 February 2003 19:11 (twenty-one years ago) link

Oh and apparently UK.gov copied pages 6-16 of its most recent dossier, quoted heavily by powell, from a US grad students paper in an obscure mid east journal, even typos and spelling mistakes remained in tact.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 6 February 2003 19:17 (twenty-one years ago) link

Where did you read that, Ed?

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Thursday, 6 February 2003 19:22 (twenty-one years ago) link

It was just on channel 4 news. I very reliable source most of the time. Have a look at http://www.channel4.com/news">their site.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 6 February 2003 19:24 (twenty-one years ago) link

Perhaps I need to clarify some points:

I'm *against* unilateral action against Iraq because I believe the proof that they have strong ties to terrorism and therefore are an immediate threat to the US and its allies is very weak.

I'm *in favor of* UN action against Iraq in accordance with the 4-5 UN Resolutions banning WMD in the nation of Iraq (the result of the war in Kuwait). I believe there is still a month or two before for some very serious negotiations between the two parties (UN and Iraq) and they should be trying to get a hold of each other. I find it difficult to believe that anyone would deny Iraq has such weapons.

I need to add to something too....

>>And of course the problem with the Iraq + Al Qaeda = KILL THEM ALL equation is that Pakistan easily solves A, B and C of yr hypothesis above<<

The US went to the UN yesterday to prove that Iraq still has a chemical and biological weapons program, which they CANNOT have by international law and are subject to disarmament as a result. The US cannot do the same thing with Pakistan in the UN, even if they wanted to. Why? Because Pakistan can have as many WMD as it damn well pleases. It never lost a war so badly that it had to negotiate a cease fire that gave away its ability to have such things. Iraq does not have this freedom, thus the US went to the UN to try and drum up support.

>>How suprised will the Iraqis be when the hundreds of thousands of troops massed in kuwait and saudi come pouring over the border. <<

They aren't coming from Saudi Arabia, far as I know. The Saudis aren't housing troops this time because they're scared shitless of the possible "retorts" from their citizens.

-
Alan

Alan Conceicao, Thursday, 6 February 2003 19:30 (twenty-one years ago) link

OK turkey then. The Turkish Parliament said yes to the use of ports and bases.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 6 February 2003 19:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

>>OK turkey then. The Turkish Parliament said yes to the use of ports and bases.<<

Yup...just read that. They must be getting oil rights and a aid package then. They held out for a loooooong time.

-
Alan

Alan Conceicao, Thursday, 6 February 2003 20:07 (twenty-one years ago) link

I don't think I think 'it's all about oil'. I don't understand 'oil', really. I do think talk of war is criminal.

the pinefox, Thursday, 6 February 2003 21:23 (twenty-one years ago) link

Turkey are getting the minimum amount of autonomy possible for the kurds of northern Iraq.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 6 February 2003 22:46 (twenty-one years ago) link

When I called it a war that "hasn't started yet" I was using nabisco's language and also just refering to the shooting part. People and equipment have been moving into place for months, and it's not a simple matter of "move all your guys over there and then start shooting." My point is still that Bush is busy and doesn't have time to debate with average people with average expertise.

Stuart, Thursday, 6 February 2003 23:57 (twenty-one years ago) link

I think you could have chosen a slightly better phrasing for your conclusion there...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 7 February 2003 00:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

Kiss my conclusion, smartypants.

Stuart, Friday, 7 February 2003 00:25 (twenty-one years ago) link

Your conclusion's too small to kiss, Stuart.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 7 February 2003 01:04 (twenty-one years ago) link

In fact the only conclusion smaller is Bush's.

Momus (Momus), Friday, 7 February 2003 01:47 (twenty-one years ago) link

Right this instant, C-SPAN2 is showing Tony Blair debating the Iraq situation with a room full of Brits from all walks of life. Tune in, suckas.

Stuart, Friday, 7 February 2003 04:02 (twenty-one years ago) link

Damn, I missed it. Thanks for the info, though, Stuart.

I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Friday, 7 February 2003 04:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

eighteen years pass...

interesting to read these threads 18 years later

mens rea activist (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 20 October 2021 05:27 (two years ago) link

pic.twitter.com/U32mZrjF8g

— Ken Klippenstein (@kenklippenstein) October 19, 2021

mens rea activist (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 20 October 2021 05:44 (two years ago) link

ackerman: https://foreverwars.substack.com/p/the-only-man-who-could-have-stopped

mookieproof, Wednesday, 20 October 2021 05:49 (two years ago) link

momus OTM

symsymsym, Wednesday, 20 October 2021 06:18 (two years ago) link

The US is just trying to show that Iraq is lying about its stockpiles of WMD (which almost certainly exist except in the mind of only the most hardened pacifist)

People on the internet of 2003 were really shooting from the hip, huh

Nature's promise vs. Simple truth (bernard snowy), Wednesday, 20 October 2021 11:23 (two years ago) link

Holy shit at how conservative/blinkered 2003 ilx was. "I just assume Iraq has WMDs and connections to Al Q", "Taking oil is a legitimate foreign policy action".

The invasion of Iraq was the turning point in my radicalization from a somewhat apolitical former conservative toward a progressive. So, thanks, GWB.

Hannibal Lecture (PBKR), Wednesday, 20 October 2021 11:58 (two years ago) link

Momus and Lynsk3y as the voices of reason!

tbf I'm guessing a lot of what was happening here was ppl pushing back against Momus because of his hot takes on, like, a hundred other topics

Daniel_Rf, Wednesday, 20 October 2021 12:19 (two years ago) link

I didn't expect to spend 40 mins yesterday destroying Colin Powell's rep on Facebook with Democrats.

So who you gonna call? The martini police (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 20 October 2021 12:23 (two years ago) link

Yeah lol same. I was raised v conservative yet entirely put off by W’s affect and evangelicalism. So even when I’d moved to voting solely for Democrats —mostly for aesthetic reasons tbh—I spent most the two years between 9/11 and the invasion and fallout thinking “well gee whiz they clearly know things we don’t and surely they wouldn’t just cook this up whole cloth. It’s just been eXeCuTeD pOoRlY”.

What a fucking rube. The absolute state of public school history classes in this country.

caddy lac brougham? (will), Wednesday, 20 October 2021 12:27 (two years ago) link

(Re - The invasion of Iraq was the turning point in my radicalization from a somewhat apolitical former conservative toward a progressive. So, thanks, GWB)

caddy lac brougham? (will), Wednesday, 20 October 2021 12:28 (two years ago) link

I'll admit being the first black national security advisor, chairman of JCOS, and secretary of state are important, and, according to the former State Department employees I argued with yesterday, he "modernized" the joint; but fuck him and fuck these people who accused me of lacking nuance.

So who you gonna call? The martini police (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 20 October 2021 12:36 (two years ago) link

*Black

So who you gonna call? The martini police (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 20 October 2021 12:37 (two years ago) link

(public school history classes and a compliant housebroken MSM)

caddy lac brougham? (will), Wednesday, 20 October 2021 12:40 (two years ago) link

robin wright’s take too, also apparently a very nice guy! she stumbles over cliched reverence for his path like only a white liberal could

https://www.newyorker.com/news/postscript/colin-powell-the-humble-american

mens rea activist (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 20 October 2021 12:42 (two years ago) link

After Bush was reëlected, in 2004, Powell drew up a list of things he wanted to work on during the second term. He took it with him when he was summoned to the White House. He never had a chance to explain it, he later told me. Bush blindsided Powell by announcing that he had just asked Condoleezza Rice to serve as his next Secretary of State. Powell had been fired. He was clearly stung. It was an ignoble end to a lifetime of public service.

Wait -- so he was fired? How did I not know this? This makes him more repugnant. I thought he'd resigned.

So who you gonna call? The martini police (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 20 October 2021 13:12 (two years ago) link

Apropos of nothing, did anyone go from opposing the war at the start to enthusiastically supporting it?

Typo? Negative! (Boring, Maryland), Wednesday, 20 October 2021 14:25 (two years ago) link

Colin Powell lol jk

caddy lac brougham? (will), Wednesday, 20 October 2021 14:27 (two years ago) link

no joke, him signing on was really key for me (and clearly a lot of people, which the Bush admin and pro-War media leaned on hard obv) initially thinking that It Just Has to be Done

caddy lac brougham? (will), Wednesday, 20 October 2021 14:36 (two years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.