Taking Sides: Liverpool vs Everton

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1610 of them)
We (Hibs) drew, not necessarily a bad thing.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Thursday, 15 September 2005 21:44 (eighteen years ago) link

At least they got that vital away goal...

love,
someone else who has seen their team lose five goals away to a shitey bunch of European no-hopers in Europe xx

ailsa (ailsa), Thursday, 15 September 2005 23:27 (eighteen years ago) link

(aldo, Hibs were rubbish)

ailsa (ailsa), Thursday, 15 September 2005 23:30 (eighteen years ago) link

Everton dumped out of UEFA shocka.

We're used to thinking of the teams that bounce in and out of the premiership (Palace, Sunderland, Bolton until recently) as the yo-yo teams, but Everton seem to have been experimenting with an intra-premiership yo-yo over the last few seasons.

Teh HoBB (the pirate king), Friday, 16 September 2005 06:44 (eighteen years ago) link

I wrote something very rude and bitter on this thread last night, post-pub, but thought better of it and deleted it.

It's like we're Sissy Spacek in Carrie, invited to the prom, made queen, and then humiliated in front of the masses. Unfortunately, to the best of my knowledge, none of the Everton squad are telekinetic. They're barely kinetic.

Thanks for the commiserations, Ailsa. I'd settle for that 4-0 home leg too.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 16 September 2005 08:01 (eighteen years ago) link

Is the home leg gonna be on terrestrial TV? I have to see it.

Crackity (Crackity Jones), Friday, 16 September 2005 08:09 (eighteen years ago) link

ITV2 probably. 0-3, two sent off, Cahill out for the season, I expect. Enjoy, Crackity.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 16 September 2005 08:17 (eighteen years ago) link

I feel bad for Everton.

Actually,that's not completely true. Really, I feel bad for Jonesy. Sorry Jonesy.

Nevertheless "They're barely kinetic" made me laugh.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 16 September 2005 08:22 (eighteen years ago) link

It's an Artmedia moment... except Dinamo Bucharest are a better team

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 September 2005 08:47 (eighteen years ago) link

xxpost

Oh good, I've got Freeview. I will enjoy it either way, I'm a Red! Hope they storm through actually, as long as they don't end up winning the thing. In any case, they have to go for it so there'll be goals aplenty I'm sure.

Crackity (Crackity Jones), Friday, 16 September 2005 08:52 (eighteen years ago) link

I feel bad for Everton.
Arsenal away next, where they lost 7 (seven) - 0 last season.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 16 September 2005 09:00 (eighteen years ago) link

I feel bad for Everton.
Arsenal away next, where they lost 7 (seven) - 0 last season.
-- Onimo (gerry.wat...), September 16th, 2005.

LOL I always felt the spelling out of the number on the Videprinter rubbed it in somewhat for the team that just got their asses whupped.

Crackity (Crackity Jones), Friday, 16 September 2005 09:12 (eighteen years ago) link

I think if Matt DC ever has to read out such a score on that red button thingy, he should announce "open brackets", SPELL THE WORD then "close brackets".

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Friday, 16 September 2005 09:17 (eighteen years ago) link

To be fair, we didn't have anything to play for at Highbury in May and so got passed off the park by a vastly superior side without ever getting stuck into them. Whereas last night...

Considering how dreary the Premiership has been so far this season (how many 0-0s?), it's probably about time yr faithful Sky subscribers got a goalfest. Monday might be it. We should put Richard Wright in, help the cause.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 16 September 2005 09:27 (eighteen years ago) link

Considering how dreary the Premiership has been so far this season

It was hardly a thrill-a-minute last season

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 September 2005 09:29 (eighteen years ago) link

Still more exciting than any other division in the world ;)

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 16 September 2005 09:30 (eighteen years ago) link

Is that so?

Baaderonixx and the choco-pop babies (baaderonixx), Friday, 16 September 2005 09:39 (eighteen years ago) link

So they keep telling us

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 September 2005 09:40 (eighteen years ago) link

Well it may come as a shock to you to know that they sometimes have no-score draws in La Liga as well.

I suppose excitement is relative though e.g. Exeter fans will be finding the Conference v exciting at the mo.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 16 September 2005 09:51 (eighteen years ago) link

The conference is exciting all the time.

Also nil-nil draws are very often fascinating, you philistines.

Also fizz it up long to the big lad ect ect.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 16 September 2005 09:54 (eighteen years ago) link

I never said 0-0 draws were boring, I said the Premiership was

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 September 2005 09:57 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm finding the Conference very exciting at the mo' - I read the Non-League paper in the Sydenham Sainsbury's the other day and I might even buy a copy in the near-future. It is mostly cos of Exeter though.

xpost (I'm sure some of the Prem 0-0s have been good value [Spurs-Lpool f'instance] but I suspect that there's a fairly high level of tedium in The Best League In The WorldTM at the mo'. Football should've ended in 1970 anyway).

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 16 September 2005 09:57 (eighteen years ago) link

I don't find the Conference exciting, but I wish Exeter well. I find the Premiership exciting often. I am excited about Charlton now - it would be great to see them challenging for a CL place. West Ham also look to be full of surprises. The quality of football is as ever depending on what side of their bed individual players got out of and the price of feesh.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 16 September 2005 10:01 (eighteen years ago) link

Roman and Malcolm have killed teh Premiership TM.

manner the whirled, Friday, 16 September 2005 10:03 (eighteen years ago) link

At least Roman has made it a three horse race as opposed to two.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 16 September 2005 10:04 (eighteen years ago) link

Dada it was MJ and SteveM who made the link between 0-0 and dull. So you're in the clear. And Jonesy is in the clear because he had an upsetting night last night. SteveM, I'm going to get you later.

The good thing about the Conference is that any team has the capacity to have a very bad off day and blow it horribly against apparent no-hopers. This is still no reason to buy The Bad Paper though, Mike. They still hate us, btw.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 16 September 2005 10:04 (eighteen years ago) link

Polanski and McDowell? Maybe football did end in 1970.

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 September 2005 10:04 (eighteen years ago) link

At least Roman has made it a three horse race as opposed to two.

No, he's made it a one-horse 'race'.

manner the whirled, Friday, 16 September 2005 10:09 (eighteen years ago) link

0-0 draws are often very boring. There is nothing wrong with this statement. I have not claimed that they ALL are however, though you are forgiven for believing that I implied this.

The last Premiership game I went to was a 0-0 and it pissed down with rain, so maybe I'm still just bitter about that (and paying £40 for the privilege). But still the most exciting league in the universe!

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 16 September 2005 10:10 (eighteen years ago) link

DON'T BUY THE BAD PAPER, it is the start of a decline that can see you, without realising it, becoming interested in step four promotion and relegation issues and even, in worse case scenarios, becoming a GROUND-HOPPER!!

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Friday, 16 September 2005 10:12 (eighteen years ago) link

Well, OK, not just 0-0s, but an extraordinary shortage of goals all round, Tim. And, yes, if a 0-0 can be thrilling, so can a 1-0 or a 1-1, but as a general indication of excitement, several weeks of low- or no-scoring games suggests a slight drabness to proceedings.

Just my perception - I'm not very engaged by things in the top flight of Engish football at the mo' (= I can't be bothered watching MOTD) because (a) my team is doing badly, (b) we all know who's going to win the thing, (c) there aren't many goals about.

Maybe this is the best season yet cos the defences are all playing like gods, I dunno.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 16 September 2005 10:17 (eighteen years ago) link

i often wish it were 1970. nothing to do with football though

terry lennox. (gareth), Friday, 16 September 2005 10:48 (eighteen years ago) link

It's not 0-0's that are boring; it's that fact that too many teams are playing crap 0-0s, trying to get points on the board through fear. Teams are picking their matches to try and win, such as West Brom against Chelsea. The vogue for 4-5-1 is the very epitome of this - the new percentage football, calculated to restrict the opposition and nick goals when you can.

The idea that the Premiership is the best in the world though is fucking laughable. Really is. On every level, apart from misplaced nationalistic fervour and myopia, it's bobbins. For every world class player, there's 3 donkeys getting the best gig in their lives.

Dada OTM - It's now a 1.5 horse race, when it was two. Left to its own devices, it'd now be a 3.5 horse race, but that's gone out the window. The stadiums are designed with little vision or sense of history, the prices are obscene, the wages equally so. Ant it doesn't know what it's for. It has no sense of itself except as a blob like entity who must keep on taking, taking taking lest, like a fish that stops moving, it sinks to the bottom. It's entire raison d'rtre is like aan amoeba - it reproduces year-on-year.

I was at a reception last night for the Racial Equality Standard, where 5 premiership club s were awarded this kite mark which showed how they were actively working toi improve the diversity of their non-playing staff. But in the midst of the rather obscene backslapping, no-one dared point out the rather obvious point that the biggest barrier to participation in the lives of clubs is the ticket barrier, which is the biggest problem young ethnic kids and families in inner cities have. But lets not talk about common or garden economics. That's so old labour isn't it?


Dave B (daveb), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:04 (eighteen years ago) link

There's a good thread on this on the When Saturday Comes messageboard

Dave B (daveb), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:08 (eighteen years ago) link

I largely agree with your sentiments DB but there is a strong argument which says that (at the top end of football at least) the need to actually be at games in order to "participation in the life of a club" is a thing of the past.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:09 (eighteen years ago) link

The idea that the Premiership is the best in the world though is fucking laughable. Really is. On every level, apart from misplaced nationalistic fervour and myopia, it's bobbins. For every world class player, there's 3 donkeys getting the best gig in their lives.

I know we all have this argument every three months but...Where is this NOT the case? I'm still sceptical that La Liga or Serie A really contain an overall better class of players/football - and you can't seriously be claiming any other league to be up there. Notice I've not said 'best league' re the Premiership anyway, only most 'exciting'.

Name other leagues where it's not a 1.5 horse race too. Presumably only Barcelona and Real pending some managerial miracle can win the Spanish league, as usual. In Italy it will doubtless come down to Milan or Juve once again. All the top tier divisions are 'predicatable' in this regard.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:14 (eighteen years ago) link

But in the midst of the rather obscene backslapping, no-one dared point out the rather obvious point that the biggest barrier to participation in the lives of clubs is the ticket barrier, which is the biggest problem young ethnic kids and families in inner cities have.

I said this here before, compare the percentage of black faces on the pitch to black faces in the crowd - well, no comparison really

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:14 (eighteen years ago) link

Yes the crowd wins, statistically, clearly.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:16 (eighteen years ago) link

What exactly is exciting about the Premiership? Apart from occasional flashes from genius from exceptional players? I honestly would much rather be watching Scottish football week in, week out (absence makes the Hearts grow fonder)

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:17 (eighteen years ago) link

So circa 40% of the Chelsea team on Tuesday was black and over 40% of the crowd was black?

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:18 (eighteen years ago) link

Oh right I see! Semantic slippage on my part.

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:19 (eighteen years ago) link

Yes, I didn't expect you meant percentages, that's just silly!

You're obviously not going to be convinced by any pro-Premiership argument so why bother? ;) There remain as many pros as cons I think. I would be surprised if it was deemed to necessary to list all these pros and cons once again.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:19 (eighteen years ago) link

I admit the fact that I don't care about any of the teams or who wins it rather mitigates against me criticising it!

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:21 (eighteen years ago) link

What exactly is exciting about the Premiership?
OTM

Instead of pointing out how other euopean leagues are "as bad" as the english one, you should be explaining what exactly makes it "more exciting". Suspense? Nope. Big names? Not really. Glitzy technical prowess? Definitely not.

Baaderonixx and the choco-pop babies (baaderonixx), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:27 (eighteen years ago) link

The Premiership can be very exciting indeed but the title race is not one of those reasons right now. How quickly we forget the four-way relegation battle on the last day of last season. Tsk, it's Big Clubbism gone mad, Mr Boyle.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:28 (eighteen years ago) link

Then again I support a team capable of putting four goals past Arsenal and still losing, so maybe I'm not a reliable barometer here.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:30 (eighteen years ago) link

Instead of pointing out how other euopean leagues are "as bad" as the english one, you should be explaining what exactly makes it "more exciting". Suspense? Nope. Big names? Not really. Glitzy technical prowess? Definitely not.

There is no point in me pointing out why I think the Premiership is more exciting because excitement, like boredom, is relative. The Premiership has suspense (will Psycho Pearce lose all his hair by March?), big names (Ruud Van Nistelrooy = 17 characters), glitzy technical prowess (the new floodlights at the Reebok stadium are sensational).

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 16 September 2005 11:32 (eighteen years ago) link

Most leagues have big beast who win things, but most leagues have teams who can have great seasons and win things , and can certainly upset the direction of the big title through .

In Italy, Roma and Nazio are traditionally weaker than Milan or Juve, but can occasionally win the thing, and can beat those teams on their day. IN Germany, Bayern are usually there or thereabouts, but they lose matches, and have several rivals and always have. There's a steady stream of challengers over the years - Gladbach, Hamburg, Bremen, Cologne, Schalke, Dortmund etc. In Spain, Depor and Valencia are decent teams, and the big two don't get their own way.

The Premiership is actually worse than the SPL. The SPL has games where the result is not in doubt, loike here. But the problem with games between, say Killie and Motherwell is not that the result is predictable but that no-one gives a shit. They usually try to play football though. Too many games here, where the result is in doubt, still have shite football.

And then there's the sheer jaw dropping tedium of the hype. Where Sky can bill the game between Chelsea and Arsenal - in advance of kick-off - as having been a classic. Really? To quote Brendan Burns, it makes me want to shit blood out of my eyes. I can't buy into this utter bollocks about best league in the world when the markers of a great league are just not present. You've qualified 'best' to 'exciting' but even that I struggle to see. What's exciting about the premiership tomorrow? What's fun about it? It's stadium where the self-created culture is being drowned out by a screaming tannoy announcer, where everyone must get in their regimented seat, where music replaces celebratory cheering and chanting, where crowds get older and duller because prices get higher and higher, where players cast as demigods have average games and get paid obscene amounts for it and kick some back to a retinue of moneygrabbing hangers on, where the press and media cynically avoid anything that might take the gloss of, as they're part of the very beast they should be exercising critical distance from. It's irredeemably awful.

Dave B (daveb), Friday, 16 September 2005 12:03 (eighteen years ago) link

I think it's the really poor quality dull-as-fucking-ditchwater football played by teams outside the Top 6 (with a few exceptions) that I object too, in what Hell would anyone want to watch any game involving Middlesborough?. There should only be 16 teams in the League, get rid of the chaff

Raymond Douglas Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 16 September 2005 12:09 (eighteen years ago) link

The Premiership is actually worse than the SPL. The SPL has games where the result is not in doubt, loike here. But the problem with games between, say Killie and Motherwell is not that the result is predictable but that no-one gives a shit. They usually try to play football though. Too many games here, where the result is in doubt, still have shite football.

There's more teams in England and more big money places (UEFA CUp etc.) up for grabs, so I don't think this holds up. There might be a particular game between Kilmarnock and Motherwell which proved to be more exciting than another particular game between Middlesbrough and Man City, but the same is true in reverse at another time. You can't measure quality or excitement in this way surely, it's too speculative.

Where Sky can bill the game between Chelsea and Arsenal - in advance of kick-off - as having been a classic.

Why were you watching this anyway? Sky pre-match build-up is always annoying crap, and this goes for Auld Firm games and Barca vs Real as much as anything else.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Friday, 16 September 2005 12:14 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.