Aperture 2 vs. Lightroom 2

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (123 of them)

new aperture raw update out today....added support for newest canon/nikon cameras, still no support for olympus/panasonics. ugh. very very close to just getting lightroom

囧 (dyao), Friday, 18 December 2009 03:46 (fourteen years ago) link

one month passes...

Aperture 3's out! Now w/Lightroom-style selective brushes (at last)

stet, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 13:44 (fourteen years ago) link

presets too. wonder if they've matched lightroom 3's handling of noise, though.

joe, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 13:48 (fourteen years ago) link

http://images.apple.com/aperture/features/images/adjustments-curves-20091020.jpg

:D

joe, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 14:06 (fourteen years ago) link

Looks like it's got everything apart from split-toning, so still no 300 preset :)

stet, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 14:09 (fourteen years ago) link

i don't really understand what split toning is so i won't feel like i'm missing anything.

joe, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 14:26 (fourteen years ago) link

The split/merge library feature is a good one: you can have one master library on your home Mac, and start a new one on your laptop when you're travelling, then later merge them.

stet, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 14:48 (fourteen years ago) link

Looks good. Going down the list of cameras with RAW support - yes to the Pana G1/GF1, no to the various Oly Pens...

Michael Jones, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 15:13 (fourteen years ago) link

g1/gh1; no gf1!

99. The Juggalo Teacher (dyao), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 15:18 (fourteen years ago) link

feel like if I upgrade I'll be forever paying canikon taxes to apple (I.e. delayed and sporadic support)

99. The Juggalo Teacher (dyao), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 15:19 (fourteen years ago) link

is LR3 out of beta yet?

werewolf bar mitzvah of the xx (gbx), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 15:27 (fourteen years ago) link

the beta expires on april 30, so i guess they'll have the finished product then.

joe, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 15:28 (fourteen years ago) link

gotcha.

worth using? or should i just stick with LR2 for the moment

werewolf bar mitzvah of the xx (gbx), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 15:29 (fourteen years ago) link

i've just dabbled, but it seems pretty good. high iso stuff comes out looking v natural and filmlike. it's free, so why not?

joe, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 15:42 (fourteen years ago) link

D'oh - misread, sorry! No GF1.

Michael Jones, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 16:01 (fourteen years ago) link

really mystifies me that G1/GH1 are supported but not the others. LX3 and S90 are supported too, so it looks like they've finally built in lens-correction into their RAW processor.

99. The Juggalo Teacher (dyao), Wednesday, 10 February 2010 03:11 (fourteen years ago) link

two weeks pass...

http://www.boingboing.net/2009/08/28/drudge-siren.gif aperture release supports e-p1, gf-1 http://www.boingboing.net/2009/08/28/drudge-siren.gif

Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ (dyao), Friday, 26 February 2010 01:13 (fourteen years ago) link

Aperture 3.0.1. update U&K too!

Elvis Telecom, Friday, 26 February 2010 03:14 (fourteen years ago) link

congratulations to aperture and all its supporters

nitzer ebbebe (gbx), Friday, 26 February 2010 13:36 (fourteen years ago) link

Congratulation to aperture for its update

Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ (dyao), Friday, 26 February 2010 14:55 (fourteen years ago) link

I can get Aperture 3 for about £60 with education discount; seeing as I *ahem* acquired Aperture 2 free of charge, I'd not mind paying for 3. Should I upgrade?

No, YOU'RE a disgusting savage (Scik Mouthy), Saturday, 27 February 2010 10:28 (fourteen years ago) link

I definitely would for 3.0, the new feature set seems pretty excellent and once I hassled with getting my library converted over I like it a lot.

Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 27 February 2010 11:35 (fourteen years ago) link

try it out first?

Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ (dyao), Saturday, 27 February 2010 11:54 (fourteen years ago) link

I tried it out in the Apple shop last week, will def. download an upgrade.

nate woolls, Saturday, 27 February 2010 11:55 (fourteen years ago) link

picked up the upgrade copy last night. love apple packaging

noted schloar (dyao), Wednesday, 3 March 2010 02:00 (fourteen years ago) link

Have downloaded the trial at work. Think I may splurge.

No, YOU'RE a disgusting savage (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 4 March 2010 08:15 (fourteen years ago) link

Downloading upgrade now..

nate woolls, Thursday, 11 March 2010 19:29 (fourteen years ago) link

anyway know what the de facto aperture forum is? would love to find a kodachrome preset

but actually it is impossible to have a penis on the body of a mermaid (dyao), Friday, 12 March 2010 00:54 (fourteen years ago) link

new lightroom beta has support for video (metadata, library, etc., not video editing).

caek, Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:54 (fourteen years ago) link

Also the Tone Curve is Photoshop-like now - as many points as you want, endlessly tweakable.

Michael Jones, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:43 (fourteen years ago) link

how do you even work a tone curve

drink more beer and the doctor is a heghog (gbx), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:45 (fourteen years ago) link

are the ends still fixed or can i dial down overexposed whiteness to greyness?

the big pink suede panda bear hurts (ledge), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:46 (fourteen years ago) link

The ends are not fixed.

gbx, we pointed you at a coupla tutorials on the other thread a few weeks ago! Sheesh!

Michael Jones, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:50 (fourteen years ago) link

(Just kidding, like).

can i dial down overexposed whiteness to greyness?

Mind you, pulling the ends in (crunching the DR) is not the way to do this. That's actually going to brighten your higher mid-tones. You're better off with the Recovery slider to pull back blown-out highlights (shooting Raw, you might even find there's detail in there, not just greyness).

Michael Jones, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:53 (fourteen years ago) link

Recovery had the same problem though, i.e. brightest whites (FFF) were always unaffected. Has that changed? I know, I know, learn to shoot better, stop trying to fix yr schoolboy errors in post :)

the big pink suede panda bear hurts (ledge), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 16:01 (fourteen years ago) link

Hmmm. I need to have a play with a larger catalog than the one I have at work (which is mostly photos of Movember and various Bake-Offs) to see what you mean. I know that I often haven't been able to completely eliminate blown highlights in the past but IMO it's better to leave them like that than pull them down into greyness (which you could do in a very blunt way by using the adjustment brush and pulling down exposure).

Michael Jones, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 16:38 (fourteen years ago) link

http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/photoshop-curves.htm

this site has a very good intro to curves (and to post processing in general)

ain't no thang but a chicken ㅋ (dyao), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 00:00 (fourteen years ago) link

thx dude, will look into it

drink more beer and the doctor is a heghog (gbx), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 00:09 (fourteen years ago) link

You mean you didn't when I posted the same link on the Processing thread in January? ;) It is a good site, that.

I suspect I've been missing a trick or two with the Tone Curve in LR2.x, reading Milo Z's comment upthread and judging by some of the wacky shapes I see in some of my presets. Definitely seems easier to manipulate in a PS CS2+ style in LR3, but perhaps I never figured out how to do that with LR2. I'm generally pretty happy with a little S-curve and using the histogram sliders for everything else.

If they could incorporate specific lens distortion algorithms (a la DxO Optics Pro) in LR3 then I'd definitely be in. It's only maths, innit?

Michael Jones, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 09:03 (fourteen years ago) link

lens correction is already built into camera raw - if your camera has the right EXIF info (i.e. you're shooting a micro 43ds, LX3, or S90) it'll apply the correction automatically. of course you may want to do more than the manufacturer has dialed in (to remove excess CA etc.)

ain't no thang but a chicken ㅋ (dyao), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 10:45 (fourteen years ago) link

Hmm, I guess the lens correction I'm limited to with ACR (with my Canon EF lenses) is just vignetting/CA (which is all there in the LR interface). Judging by the profound effect I see when applying the 40D+28/1.8 DxO module to images taken with that combo (and these are tiffs exported directly into DxO from the imported LR Raw), there's clearly no barrel distortion fixing going on with ACR.

I should experiment a bit more though. This is based on an hour last night...

Michael Jones, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 11:48 (fourteen years ago) link

PS already has a lens correction tool I think, but it's pretty basic and not calibrated for individual lenses - it would be nice if Adobe incorporated it, but I don't see it happening...

as each lens has its own distortion characteristics, you need to specify how much correction to dial in for each particular lens, and if it's a zoom, at each particular focal length. so it's easy to do for a prime, but for a standard 24-70, you'll have up to 46 different possible distortion characteristics which you need to compensate for..

you should also give PTLens a try - much cheaper and does the same thing

ain't no thang but a chicken ㅋ (dyao), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 12:20 (fourteen years ago) link

Yes, that seems pretty good. As fun as the FilmPack stuff is with DxO, I have no real use for much else that it does, as it duplicates a lot of Lightroom functionality. The one-click appeal of DxO is rather lost when you find it doing something you don't actually like (the auto noise reduction is not as subtle as LR, I don't think; though you can customise so it limits what it does in Auto mode) and then you have to start going through drop-down menus.

Also, it's not ideal calling external editors from within LR on images you may have already processed in LR; not only do you lose the changes in the export (OK, not with PS or PSE), what you get back is a TIFF or a JPG, so that copying the original LR adjustments over gives you something wildly different. It's tricky working out what the correct workflow would be with something like DxO; either you have to do everything in DxO or just accept that the nicely flat, sharp image you get back in can't be manipulated with quite as much freedom.

Michael Jones, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:45 (fourteen years ago) link

for users of aperture - apparently this update may improve stability/memory leaks with aperture 3, and it doesn't show up in the software update

http://support.apple.com/kb/dl1008

ain't no thang but a chicken ㅋ (dyao), Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:20 (fourteen years ago) link

aperture 3 has been an absolutely nightmare for me. i think the prokit update and 3.02 have fixed it, but i'm still rebuilding my (admittedly stupidly large) library after trying twice to import all my photos (first by transferring aperture 2 library, then by reimporting files and folders) left me each time with an application that crashed as soon as it was opened, every time. I HATE APPLE etc etc.

anyway, hopefully the reinstall and new library will do the trick.

joe, Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:52 (fourteen years ago) link

haven't had any problems yet here (knock on wood). hope yer problems get sorted out! (I have a pretty small library to begin with - also I store my photos in folders on the HD, instead of inside the aperture library package.)

ain't no thang but a chicken ㅋ (dyao), Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:55 (fourteen years ago) link

yeah so do i - they're on external drives. but it's huge, because i'm too lazy to throw stuff out. basically:

Level V Hoarder

Household will require intervention from a wide range of agencies. Professional organizers should not venture directly into working solo with this type of household. The Level V household may be under the care of a conservator or be an inherited estate of a mentally ill individual. Assistance is needed from many sources. A team needs to be assembled. Members of the team should be identified before beginning additional work. These members may include social services and psychological/mental health representative (not applicable if inherited estate), conservator/trustee, building and zoning, fire and safety, landlord, legal aid and/or legal representatives. A written strategy needs to be outlined and contractual agreements made before proceeding.

joe, Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:59 (fourteen years ago) link

lol - 'external drives' says it all!

ain't no thang but a chicken ㅋ (dyao), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:01 (fourteen years ago) link

two months pass...

So, Lightroom 3 is out. Worth the upgrade from 2.x, I wonder?

Michael Jones, Tuesday, 8 June 2010 08:58 (thirteen years ago) link

I've been using the beta -- it's pretty good, and I like the noise reduction and Flickr integration. Don't know if I'd pay cash money to upgrade if I'd bought 2, though.

stet, Tuesday, 8 June 2010 11:38 (thirteen years ago) link

this decision to fork lightroom is really insane

, Saturday, 23 December 2017 13:56 (six years ago) link

i might live to regret this but i think i'm going to subscribe to lightroom cc

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 29 December 2017 21:32 (six years ago) link

i decided to stick with aperture and bought affinity photo the photoshop killer. if i need a better digital cam program (right now primarily managing film scans) i’ll fork out the 300 or so for capture one.

, Friday, 29 December 2017 21:58 (six years ago) link

two weeks pass...

should i buy lightroom 6 while they're still selling it without a subscription? i "acquired" 5.x and i like it. facial recognition is the only reason i know of that i want to upgrade to a new version. i assume the cloud version also has a slicker workflow for sharing galleries and getting photo snaps into the library.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 15 January 2018 05:47 (six years ago) link

I preferred 5 to 6 -- the performance tanked miserably for me with 6. CC is getting better, but obviously the standalone doesn't benefit from that

stet, Monday, 15 January 2018 10:38 (six years ago) link

LR6 feels slower than 5 to me for no clear reason. i needed the upgrade in order to handle the RAW files for my new camera so i guess that's that...

it also adds the ability to go in and futz vertical adjustment, not just take what the algorithm decides (tho what you can do is still a bit constrained) and maybe there are other goodies i can't see...

Righteous wax chaperone, rotating Wingdings (Doctor Casino), Monday, 15 January 2018 13:00 (six years ago) link

three weeks pass...

I went from Lr5 on a budget Toshiba W8.1 laptop to LrCC (what they now call Classic) on a Mac Book Pro, so any slow-down was more than compensated for by a huge leap in hardware performance.

Also like the latest color/luminance range masking in Lr, which I'd only previously seen in something like CaptureOne (it was much nicer to use in there though). Though naturally I still do basically the same shit to every photo I work up (with the occasional round-trip to Ps for content-aware fill, or Silver Efex Pro for B&W), so most new tools are wasted on me.

I think the layout in Lr is a bit tired and mid-'00s now. You shouldn't have to scroll down a massive panel on the right to access all the tools. I don't know how I'd rework the UI, tbh.

Michael Jones, Tuesday, 6 February 2018 15:54 (six years ago) link

one year passes...

choice quote

"Many people, including myself, developed long-term health problems. One person, as I mentioned, had a nervous breakdown, others just took forever to get any spark back in their careers. I would look these people in the eyes, and they had this look like someone close to them died.

An amusing aside was that in my annual review, I got the most substantial bonus I’ve ever gotten and the most significant salary increase. I guess getting yelled and screamed at has its perks. Or they felt guilty. Who knows."

Elvis Telecom, Thursday, 30 January 2020 04:41 (four years ago) link

six months pass...

I've been meaning for ages to get off Lightroom CC after it caused me to lose a few hundred images last year, and this week's 5.4 "sorry we deleted your pictures" update has finally prodded me into it.

The Downloader is predictably terrible — I have 500gb (how did I manage that) to download and after an hour it's still sitting at 1%.

I'll figure out where to go next after this. I've been using Lightroom since v1. Capture One seems to be the only serious alternative, right?

stet, Friday, 21 August 2020 17:04 (three years ago) link

one month passes...

i switched from lightroom to apple photos and honestly it's fine for my purposes. the developing side is more than i need. the organization is a little basic but fine. it knows about live photos and all the other weird shit that comes out of an iphone.

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 7 October 2020 07:31 (three years ago) link

eight months pass...

Adobe finally updated LR so it remembers which preset you’re on when you step away and come back

ncxkd, Friday, 18 June 2021 17:59 (two years ago) link

one year passes...

Okay so moving to M1 Mac means my old copy of Lightroom no longer works. And I'm not paying for a subscription. Anyone have a recommendation?

Right now I'm tempted to just write a script to make the right folders in the photo library and copy images from the SD card, then use Pixelmator on individual images I give a shit about. (I don't shoot a ton any more, although that will change if my family situation turns out as I expect it to.)

what have I done to deserve you (lukas), Tuesday, 31 January 2023 20:11 (one year ago) link

A pro I know swears by Affinity (which is about $60?) but it’s not an organising tool; not sure what else there is for that. I still have a basic version of Capture One knocking around - apparently that can convert Lr catalogs.

I can understand not wanting to give Adobe a tenner a month for the rest of time but I can’t switch, not now. And AI masking in the latest version is really good.

Michael Jones, Tuesday, 31 January 2023 21:13 (one year ago) link

i switched from lightroom to apple photos and it's been fine

𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 2 February 2023 22:41 (one year ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.