Orbital - Classic or Dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (551 of them)

I'm not gonna fight you on that. "Nothing Left" isn't bad, it's just that I adore the first three songs on that album so much it's a little frightening.

HI DERE, Thursday, 12 June 2008 22:09 (fifteen years ago) link

Well I just listened to the whole album from tracks 3-8 (first two extremely familar/no need) and I didn't notice a dip in enjoyment during the last three. If anything, the vocal sample in Style and subsequent drum build actually enhanced my pleasure.

Although when I now listen to "Way Out ->" I'll probably recant. ;)

Just got offed, Thursday, 12 June 2008 22:15 (fifteen years ago) link

I've always thought that "Know Where To Run" would do serious damage at, like, a proper rave. The synth hooks in that are quite amazing. Middle Of Nowhere was an album I was massively into right around the time I first tried pills and that track and second half of "Nothing Left" just seemed like extended love songs to drugs. I almost wonder if this album was kinda the Hartnolls playing on the twin meanings of "psychedelic" in dance music - in a much more deliberate and grandiose manner than they had before bar "Impact (The Earth Is Burning)".

"I Don't Know You People" is the weak track if only because the specific sounds seem too tied up with big beat - and the implied allusions to funkiness undercut the ostensible menace.

Whereas "Style" (which I adore) is ostensibly about levity but in fact is melancholy and sublime.

Tim F, Thursday, 12 June 2008 23:02 (fifteen years ago) link

is the weak track if only because the specific sounds seem too tied up with big beat -

does not compute...

yea 'nothing left' to me is an almostly terrifyingly bleak (lol ACHINGLY BEAUTIFUL amirite) track, don't find it easy to listen to. getting into challops mode, though the first track and last (two) track(s) of 'in sides' are my prog-techno jam for all time, maybe MON is... their... best album!

banriquit, Thursday, 12 June 2008 23:11 (fifteen years ago) link

though the first track and last (two) track(s) of 'in sides' are my prog-techno jam for all time, maybe MON is... their... best album!

this is terrifyingly close to being in complete accord with my own views

Just got offed, Thursday, 12 June 2008 23:12 (fifteen years ago) link

was there ever an original version of "speed freak" available?

El Tomboto, Thursday, 12 June 2008 23:13 (fifteen years ago) link

"does not compute..."

It's not that big beat is bad, I just think they can't make those sounds fit the vibe they're going for. When big beat did menace it was through a certain blunt heaviness, and 1999 model Orbital were a bit too prissy to go there - which is why all the other menacing tracks on Middle of Nowhere are basically Detroit Techno X Sasha.

Tim F, Thursday, 12 June 2008 23:15 (fifteen years ago) link

(the Sasha reference is not meant to be a diss - listen to the Xpander EP he released only a few months later! Between that and Hybrid I spent 1999 thinking prog-trance was about to become an extended Orbital homage - it was not to be, of course...)

Tim F, Thursday, 12 June 2008 23:16 (fifteen years ago) link

I guess it's kind of funny, I loooove Orbital, but only have the brown album (the 2cd version with the live set on the other disk). That one thread about not buying other albums by bands you like becuase it would ruin the mystique or whatever springs to mind. I'd probably do well to get In sides and snivilization, but I'll leave it at that.

mehlt, Thursday, 12 June 2008 23:44 (fifteen years ago) link

but that kind of superstition is crazy-insane madness and any rational adult should realise this

Just got offed, Friday, 13 June 2008 00:19 (fifteen years ago) link

actually he's just being sensibly frugal

El Tomboto, Friday, 13 June 2008 00:26 (fifteen years ago) link

brown album + snivilization is all you really need

El Tomboto, Friday, 13 June 2008 00:27 (fifteen years ago) link

uh NO

In Sides is one of my favorite albums of all time

HI DERE, Friday, 13 June 2008 01:43 (fifteen years ago) link

wow i agree with El Tomboto. Something about In Sides just killed it for me. I think I was just over Orbital by the time it came out. I remember not even being all that excited about it. I eventually bought Middle of Nowhere, but never got into it at all. I couldn't think of one song from it. Snivilization was always my favorite.

I'm reading this thread realizing that out of all of the groups I've ever been a really devoted fan of, Orbital was dropped abruptly and haven't had a single urge to listen to anything by them since. Maybe it's finally time to revisit them.

rockapads, Friday, 13 June 2008 02:17 (fifteen years ago) link

OH GOD WHY HAVE I GOT NO ORBITAL ON MY WORK COMPUTER

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 13 June 2008 09:14 (fifteen years ago) link

you motherfuckers

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 13 June 2008 09:15 (fifteen years ago) link

But yeah, Snivilisation>In Sides>>Brown>MoN>>>Green>>>Blue>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Altogether

Scik Mouthy, Friday, 13 June 2008 09:15 (fifteen years ago) link

Or In Sides>>Brown>>Snivilisation>>Green>>MoM>>Blue>>Altogether

Kaliova, Friday, 13 June 2008 09:36 (fifteen years ago) link

brown is best

latebloomer, Friday, 13 June 2008 09:49 (fifteen years ago) link

Brown is the best starting point, very possibly, either that or InSides depending which angle you're coming from. Brown for dancefloor/big field orientated techno, InSides for pretty living room listening.

I still think Brown, especially the four or five tracks that work as a continuous mix, is the best and possibly earliest manifestation of how to do a techno album without going down the dreaded 'album dance' route.

Matt DC, Friday, 13 June 2008 11:49 (fifteen years ago) link

I'm talking in mainstream album-buying circles here, at least.

Matt DC, Friday, 13 June 2008 11:53 (fifteen years ago) link

InSides for pretty INCREDIBLE MAJESTIC 'OMG IT'S THE RAPTURE AND I'M FLOATING UP TO HEAVEN' living room listening

ledge, Friday, 13 June 2008 12:03 (fifteen years ago) link

^ add italics, quote attribution

ledge, Friday, 13 June 2008 12:03 (fifteen years ago) link

Thanks to all this talk I am currently playing the brown album at work, and I salute you all.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 13 June 2008 16:26 (fifteen years ago) link

I honestly think the Green album is unfairly maligned - the triumvirate of Chime, Midnight and Belfast is completely unfuckable with. There are a couple of clunkers (eg Desert Storm) but Fahrenheit 303 is nearly up there with frequencies era LFO I reckon. Much as I like the Brown album, I find the vibe a bit too proggy in places.

sam500, Friday, 13 June 2008 16:58 (fifteen years ago) link

still love this joint dumb vocals and all
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrzcgU-1rYk

and what, Friday, 13 June 2008 17:03 (fifteen years ago) link

Glad you lot inspired me to get In Sides yesterday, I've listened to it three times today and it's fucking great. I love how lots of the tracks don't really reveal themselves till several minutes in. Both parts of Out There Somewhere make me feel like I've bosched two or three incredibly mongy pills, with the ketamine coming out a couple of minutes before the end of part two.

But seriously, there's way more to this music than can be described with lazy drug references - the attention to detail is astounding, and I look forward to exploring the rest of their catalogue in more depth.

chap, Saturday, 14 June 2008 00:01 (fifteen years ago) link

^_^

HI DERE, Saturday, 14 June 2008 00:05 (fifteen years ago) link

the comments about how In Sides is great are all basically describing exactly my problems with it
stuff like secret tapes of dr eich or saw 85-92 boils down to one or two really good ideas per track and then they just work it for 4-6 minutes
In Sides is a bunch of pretentious wibble, the long version of The Box at least tacitly admits that it's a total Rush jam for synth fnerds

El Tomboto, Saturday, 14 June 2008 00:12 (fifteen years ago) link

InSides for pretty INCREDIBLE MAJESTIC 'OMG IT'S THE RAPTURE AND I'M FLOATING UP TO HEAVEN' living room listening

^^^^ yech

El Tomboto, Saturday, 14 June 2008 00:12 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't get how you can not like this!

HI DERE, Saturday, 14 June 2008 00:14 (fifteen years ago) link

I get yr point Tombot but I don't think "take one or two ideas and work them" straightforwardness and proggy complexity are something we have to choose between. There are good and bad versions of both surely.

Tim F, Saturday, 14 June 2008 00:36 (fifteen years ago) link

That's not even taking into account the fact/opinion that said "proggy complexity" exists in their work as far back as "Satan".

HI DERE, Saturday, 14 June 2008 00:57 (fifteen years ago) link

Not surprising that Tombot chose Underworld over Orbital in the versus thread - Underworld are kinda like the middle ground between these two positions, jacking one or two ideas and then gradually transitioning to jacking another one or two ideas. The myopic intensity of many of the best tracks on Beaucoup Fish is an excellent example of this.

Incidentally Snivilisation strikes me as an album with intentionally few ideas-per-track, with only a handful of obvious exceptions ("Forever", "Sad But True", "Are We Here?"). I probably listen to this album the most of their albums but mostly for sentimental reasons - in many senses it's weaker than Brown, In Sides and MoN in that it mostly shies away from what is Orbital's key weapon - the redemption of complexity as a viable modus operandi in and of itself.

I think "Spare Parts Express" is probably the most ostentatiously restless of Orbital's tracks, and the way it goes from so ludicrously bright and intense (like fluorescent lights pointed directly into your face) into nervous territory and then gothic territory and then back again is quite amazing - not because it does this per se, but because each idea drifts into the next so organically, so inevitably, such that the joins don't register as joins. I suspect the title is truthful - this is a speed-trip through a whole host of fragments of tracks that Orbital had come up with, and decided to work into a single track. What makes this track so amazing, so distinctively Orbital, is the fact that they can do this so successfully: in isolation these sonic motifs would be less remarkable, it's their seamless interconnectedness which stuns. There's a compositional craft here which critics are too quick to translate into non-dance music terms (e.g. Orbital as the Bach of techno) - surely dance music has always been about the overlaying of motifs, albeit via the grafting of disparate tracks from multiple artists on top of one another. I think of Orbital at their best as a kind of mercantilist venture: they act as agents of change (usually the role of the DJ) as well as agents of repetition (the traditional role of the producer).

Tim F, Saturday, 14 June 2008 00:59 (fifteen years ago) link

I remember watching an interview with one Hartnoll or other on telly yonks ago, in which he said he didn't see himself as an artist as much as a craftsman, and that creating an Orbital track was like making a teak desk. I liked that so much it's stuck with me. Refreshingly humble and quite drole.

chap, Saturday, 14 June 2008 01:21 (fifteen years ago) link

the long version of The Box at least tacitly admits that it's a total Rush jam for synth fnerds

Bahahahah! This is comedy gold, folks.

Bimble Is Still More Goth Than You, Saturday, 14 June 2008 03:55 (fifteen years ago) link

I listened to Rush today at the gym...plenty of synths. Outdated ones but very beautiful.

I'm dying to pull out Orbital again. Because of this thread.

Bimble Is Still More Goth Than You, Saturday, 14 June 2008 03:57 (fifteen years ago) link

Playing In Sides now for the first time in a billion years...

Bimble Is Still More Goth Than You, Saturday, 14 June 2008 04:19 (fifteen years ago) link

I thought Paul Oakenfold or someone made that teak desk comment? Maybe he ripped it off.

Matt DC, Saturday, 14 June 2008 13:18 (fifteen years ago) link

straightforwardness and proggy complexity are something we have to choose between

they shouldn't be, right? I have Weather Report and Jeff Beck on here, right? Except that I can chuckle at them because yeah EVERYBODY knows those guys are trying too hard/wanking/self-indulgent/goofy but Orbital (on this thread) gets a pass for the same shit because they run in through a hardware sequencer and market to people who do a different brand of drugs. Fuck that. It's masturbatory prog. Worship it at your own peril etc

said "proggy complexity" exists in their work as far back as "Satan".

which is the biggest piece of trash on the green album by a long shot, even beating desert storm.

El Tomboto, Saturday, 14 June 2008 13:26 (fifteen years ago) link

i never 'got' the brown album, not totally.

i think the single versh of 'halcyon' is one of their best ever things and the elpee mix is not quite as good. 'impact' is also a total fave but better in the live version and the version on 'diversions'.

apart from those, though... it's more dancey, but it's still not *that dancey* is it? feel they fell between stools a bit w. 'lush', 'remind', 'walk now'. whereas even on the not-dancey 'snivilisation' you still have 'are we here'.

plus brown album reminds me of 'shopping' -- sonics much more of their time than the other lps, imo.

banriquit, Saturday, 14 June 2008 13:29 (fifteen years ago) link

^ OTM I think.

"I have Weather Report and Jeff Beck on here, right? Except that I can chuckle at them because yeah EVERYBODY knows those guys are trying too hard/wanking/self-indulgent/goofy but Orbital (on this thread) gets a pass for the same shit because they run in through a hardware sequencer and market to people who do a different brand of drugs. Fuck that. It's masturbatory prog."

So, Tombot, what you're really saying is "we don't have to choose between simplicity and complexity, as long as we only think of complex music as a joke."

Tim F, Saturday, 14 June 2008 13:43 (fifteen years ago) link

go fuck yourself

El Tomboto, Saturday, 14 June 2008 13:58 (fifteen years ago) link

having to explain my distaste for their overwrought bullshit on In Sides and everything afterwards has only served to make me more extremist in my views and I am seriously like five minutes away from deleting everything by them off my hard drive

yes, Tim, "trying too hard" is a sin, in music and everything else, whatever. Indulging it without recognizing it for what it is is some coldplay/dave-matthews spectrum bullshit. go put on a ballcap and see about that open mic.

El Tomboto, Saturday, 14 June 2008 14:03 (fifteen years ago) link

WORK SMARTER NOT HARDER
polyphony is the hobgoblin of small minds
etc

El Tomboto, Saturday, 14 June 2008 14:04 (fifteen years ago) link

chillax

banriquit, Saturday, 14 June 2008 14:06 (fifteen years ago) link

You couldn't be wronger about this.

The thing that Orbital is good at, possibly better than all of their contemporaries, is making maximalism seem effortless. I'm listening to "Are We Here?" right now and the beat-crafting going on in that track combined with the seamless blend from one music section to another, the stereo panning, the sung and spoken vocal sample placements... even down to the moment when they turn up the tinny reverb on an isolated drum loop then drop back into the main warm sine wave motif a little over 8 minutes into the track... It's great. There's nothing wrong with proggy maximalism if you know what you're doing and it's patently obvious these guys know what they're doing.

You seem to be on some "multiple layers of music is always bad" horseshit here, which is really is really just a Geirism in a funny hat.

(For the record, I really like what I've heard of The Weather Report and I don't really know Jeff Beck so I can't comment, but your analogy kind of doesn't work if other people don't actually agree with you about the artists you're comparing them to, either.)

HI DERE, Saturday, 14 June 2008 14:34 (fifteen years ago) link

I don't really see where this is going because the Brown album and (especially) Snivilisation are JUST as proggy and overwrought as In Sides, considerably more so in Snivilisation's case.

And except maybe Are We Here, I don't think of any of this stuff as that complex or polyphonic either. InSides for all its self-conscious grandeur is actually a much more intimate listen than either of its predecessors, perhaps this explains why that material didn't work as well live.

I'm specifically thinking of InSides in contrast to something like Dominik Eulberg's Fauna & Flora here, which which aims for that same combination of psuedo-classical intricacy and intimacy and big gesture grandeur but works better as functional dance music, maybe it's the sense of space or a more obvious pulse, I dunno.

Matt DC, Saturday, 14 June 2008 14:50 (fifteen years ago) link

You seem to be on some "multiple layers of music is always bad" horseshit here, which is really is really just a Geirism in a funny hat.

Not just Geirism in a funny hat but pretty much the opposite of everything I stand for musically. Can we also ditch the vituperative descriptor "proggy maximalism", please?

Just got offed, Saturday, 14 June 2008 14:59 (fifteen years ago) link

My point, really, is that minimalism and maximalism both work really, really well if the people doing them are "good" at it. There's nothing inherently better about one vs the other; you can find just as much awesome in "Out There Somewhere" as you can in Exposure's "Peak Experience" or F.U.S.E.'s "F.U.".

HI DERE, Saturday, 14 June 2008 15:04 (fifteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.