― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 5 June 2006 15:32 (seventeen years ago) link
― Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 5 June 2006 15:45 (seventeen years ago) link
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 5 June 2006 16:09 (seventeen years ago) link
No, but that was feeble even by ILM standards.
― FesterBesterTester, Monday, 5 June 2006 16:34 (seventeen years ago) link
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 5 June 2006 16:52 (seventeen years ago) link
http://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?action=download&ufid=43004CC422C5E485
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 5 June 2006 17:34 (seventeen years ago) link
when i'm working w/ tons of tracks it seems to help a bit to constantly condense tracks together using the quick mix function. obv, you should save incrementally before you do this so you can go back if you don't like your levels or want to change something. it still takes forever to save a file but i had less problems w/ audacity crashing when i did that.
one more thing that could be done to overcome the 'too many tracks' issue would be to export mixed-down .wav's whenever possible and then re-import them into a new session. (condense all drums into one .wav file, all guitars/synths, all vocals, etc) this will also rid you of all your 'history' info in your data folders, which speeds up the saving process as well as make audacity run smoother. again, save often and incrementally if you're going to do that.
there's some other quirks that i've come across but i can't think of them right now. i'll try to answer any specific questions if you have them...
― 6335, Monday, 5 June 2006 22:56 (seventeen years ago) link
http://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?action=download&ufid=167228EC2A1DE210
― 6335, Monday, 5 June 2006 23:01 (seventeen years ago) link
Good thing about Cubase is that it keeps your original tracks and remembers what you've done to them, so you can always undo effects/eq at a later time - or so the manual would have you believe.
Audacity's good for futzing around, getting your feet wet in recording digitally, quick scratch pad stuff, but I hesitate to do anything serious with it.
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 13:44 (seventeen years ago) link
then it's just about what i need right now haha!
thx for the advice everyone...i have another thing almost finished. it doesn't suck as much as the first thing i posted in this thread.
― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 14:53 (seventeen years ago) link
agreed, though = it does kind of defeat the purpose of multi-track. it's something i've made do w/ for the time being because my home computer (which has cool edit pro, adobe audition, a couple other programs, and is what i normally use) has been down for a while and needs to get repaired..
― 6335, Tuesday, 6 June 2006 14:59 (seventeen years ago) link
― 6335, Tuesday, 6 June 2006 15:00 (seventeen years ago) link
― Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 6 June 2006 16:07 (seventeen years ago) link
http://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?action=download&ufid=4486D9264864E00E
― Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 13:09 (seventeen years ago) link
Okay, I'm exporting (in Audio Mixdown) a few tracks. I have them solo'ed and the indicators setup correctly. When I do this and then re-import them, they're at a slower tempo. But otherwise in time and correct. What the fuuuuuuck.
Sounds like it might be a sample rate issue? Moving between sample rates can fuck up the speed tracks play back at.
― Edward III (edward iii), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 16:11 (seventeen years ago) link
― Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 17:22 (seventeen years ago) link
― Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 7 June 2006 23:02 (seventeen years ago) link
― Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 8 June 2006 00:34 (seventeen years ago) link
― 6335 (6335), Thursday, 8 June 2006 21:36 (seventeen years ago) link
― Steve Go1dberg (Steve Schneeberg), Friday, 28 July 2006 22:37 (seventeen years ago) link
Will I be able to work directly off an external drive of this sort or will I need to load files onto the laptop to work on them?
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00ZYNHDT4/ref=gwm_tlc_pi?pf_rd_p=8a89d6cc-6768-4927-9476-0d5144805ddd&pf_rd_s=grid-6&pf_rd_t=Gateway&pf_rd_i=mobile&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=YCSK7TZ0Y4484ZHGDH9P#productDescription_secondary_view_div_1473286910618
― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 7 September 2016 22:46 (seven years ago) link