I have to agree with Sym: the article didn't read as a parody of Music Blogs, but as a parody of Salon's opinion of Music Blogs.
Going by my initial reactions to music blogs (ie reactions to the most obvious/begging to be parodied elements).
1) Higher standard of writing/thought than in big media.
2) Less likely to have rants about death of pop/rock/albums/whatever.
3) Obsessed with pop and interested in taking pop music seriously.
4) Conversation tone meaning: a)a pain to get into as they are referring to articles/squabbles/arguments/theories the first-time reader have no idea about (and no introductory chapter) b) constant referring to other blogs.
These are features that I see no trace of in this parody.
A better parody (for example) would have featured complaints about Timberlake performance featuring not enough dancing by Timberlake and bemoaned his striving towards musicality.
― Jedmond, Tuesday, 10 February 2004 06:28 (twenty years ago) link