the simpsons' peak period - can we have some consensus please ?

Leeee I love you pls have my kiddies that I dont even want anyway, thankyew.

I'd like to know what people thought of the Simpsons if they saw it the way we see it in Aus - every weeknight at 6pm is an episode repeated, and at least once a week theres also a new ep, or a newer one (which means one night has maybe 3 eps). So I've probably seen, btwn that and my DVDs, more Simpsons than a lot of people here. And while I agree earlier stuff was on the whole better, I still dont get the point of starting these arguments. Do people argue about the Flintstones jumping the shark?

I watched it pretty much every day on Sky for six years! The daily episodes were random and there would be a new one or two every Sunday usually, sometimes with gaps to allow them to stock up for new ones as they emerged. I'd watch the weekly BBC showing if it was a good one. I've not really watched it since it moved to Channel 4, but I'll still watch it on Sky now and then.

umm, sorry trayce i asked it almost 3 years ago!

so...can we have consensus now (ducks).

Americans actually do get the chance to see Simpsons on a daily basis; thanks to the magic of syndication, any given market will air 1 to 3 episodes per night (currently, my area has 2 per night, I believe). The problem is that the pool of episodes from which stations choose seems to have narrowed a tonne: "Seymour's Sense of Snow," for instance, probably aired 3 times in 6 weeks. I suspect that the Simpsons poobahs were afraid of poaching DVD sales if they re-aired golden oldies.

And I just had my third most brilliant idea ever (which also is my second worst idea ever): Pynchon should be hired as a writer on the show!

It does seem though that, throughout these nerdliest of arguments, nobody seems to really care to defend seasons 12-present, which, I do say my good man, is close to being "consensus".

many-x-post Leeeeee, those are great moments from those 2 episodes.

In Missionary Impossible, they are about to be crushed by burning timbers, and then a Fox pledge drive cuts in, Bart calls in a huge pledge, and the ending lines are

Rupert Murdoch: You saved my network!
Bart: Wouldn't be the first time.

The best has yet to come.

More promotional ‘Simpsons’ shorts will be coming to Disney+ throughout the year. All of them will pay homage to some of Disney’s top brands and Disney+’s most popular shows.

Source: https://t.co/c3WQdQBBha pic.twitter.com/lPm8WSvj6x

— Cartoon Crave (@thecartooncrave) May 3, 2021

make purchase of the merchandise

Why did i used to write like a 13 year old texting one handed on a bicycle?

Just read a great long interview with John Swartzwelder in the NYer this morning. Laughed very hard at this bit:

Do you remember the first funny thing you wrote?

I do, mostly because the reaction I got to it was so startling. I had just learned how to form letters into words, so I decided to write a play. The only thing I remember about the play itself, except for the last two lines, is that it was hilarious. But, when I read it aloud to my family, it got no laughs! Just supportive smiles and nods. I didn’t get it.

But then I got to the second-to-last line, which was supposed to set up the big joke at the end. The setup line was: “This play has been brought to you by the Trash Can Airplane Company,” which—since this was Boeing country—got a huge, possibly undeserved, laugh. Baffled, but feeling that I finally had my audience in the palm of my hand, I leaned back and practically screamed the big finish: “P.S. It stinks!!!” More supportive smiles and nods. Plainly, there was a trick to comedy, and I didn’t know what it was.

Do you know what the trick is now?

No. “P.S. It stinks!!!” should have gotten a laugh. I don’t get it.

I'm sure something similar was said somewhere upthread, but I really feel like what the Simpsons lost after its "classic" years was more its emotional center than its humor. Without that, the constant absurdist jokes started to feel decadent and the cynicism started to feel aimless.

I've always maintained that the Simpsons just slowed down in how quickly they pummelled you with jokes. Like they just left more room to breathe and think and "get it". The only show post-Simpsons that I think even approached that energy was 30 Rock.

Like if this bit from a season 18 episode was in a season 9 episode, I don't imagine it would have had the second part explaining the joke

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q34Qxl5HINg

I remember feeling very distinctly at the time that the show finally became irrevocably unmoored when Kid Rock and Joe C guest-starred, and I think I'd stand by that assessment today.

I like that

I'm going thru the seasons chronologically and I'm at 8 now. Some great episodes in it but last night I watched the 1st one where I really did not like Homer. Because he was TOO stupid, plus was being an asshole. It was "A Milhouse Divided". Obv overall it was a slow slide into shittiness for the series but the 2 minute or so section of Homer overcompensating by fawning over Marge was jarring, like they stuck season 30 Homer into the episode.

Granny Dainger out here complaining about Homer in the episode where he says "I sleep in a big bed with my wife"

Lol that's kinda my point. There's this 2 minute stretch where nuHomer is born.

pretty much everything terrible about nu simpsons (1998-now) can be found in the classic episodes in less concentrated and morbid forms so it probably sowed the seeds for its own decay and wasn't built to last as long as my entire fucking life

just noticed the AV club (whose writers have wasted years trying to convince themselves it's still good) has decided to stop covering new episodes altogether which is pretty damning, I mean if you've lost them

I also say nu-Simpsons starts in 2002

Seasons 10, 11 & 12 are def a "clearly not-peak-era-but-also-not-offensively-terrible" zone

1-9: Phil Spector 1959-1966
10-12: Phil Spector 1970-1980
13-present: Phil Spector 2003-2021

i don't remember specifics from season 13, but season 14 was home to that episode with the rolling stones, so that ^^ seems to check out

Season 13 gave us the "Old Man Yells At Cloud" image at least.

Are the Rolling Stones the only (group of) people to work with both the Simpsons and Phil Spector?

Ramones as well

iirc season 14 has the one where marge gets new boobs and homer sings a song about them, the one where marge gets roid rage and rapes homer, and the one where frank grimes jr shows up to get his revenge. def beyond redemption at that point

paul mccartney (sort of)

xp

The show peaked with Season 8. Specifically, "Homer's Enemy." The Frank Grimes episode should have been the series finale. They were never gonna do anything funnier, and there was no coming back after torching the show's entire conceptual superstructure that way.

I'm sure something similar was said somewhere upthread, but I really feel like what the Simpsons lost after its "classic" years was more its emotional center than its humor. Without that, the constant absurdist jokes started to feel decadent and the cynicism started to feel aimless.

I've always maintained that the Simpsons just slowed down in how quickly they pummelled you with jokes. Like they just left more room to breathe and think and "get it".

I thought it was interesting that Swartzwelder said in his interview that he thought season 3 was the series peak because I feel like there was a shift between season 3 and 4 where they sacrificed some degree of character based humour for joke density and surrealism. I think a lot of the writing staff changed between those two seasons? I think seasons 2 and 3 might be my favourites, it's strange though because I would have guessed that Swartzwelder would come down more on the 'density and surrealism' side than the character/realism side.

paul mccartney (sort of)

Definitely George & Ringo!

I've been rewatching some episodes lately and I've gotten that same impression, the S2-3 ones are better than I remembered while the S7-8 ones are maybe a bit too overexposed and absurd. obviously still very funny though. last one I watched was the one where he eats the psychedelic chili pepper, the first 2/3rds of which is maybe one of the finest episodes of any animated show ever (and clearly seemed to be the inspiration for a bunch of Futurama episodes), but man I'd forgotten how cobbled together and dull the final third is. like, it ends with Marge randomly forgiving him and then they prevent a shipwreck together? its like they couldn't figure out how to end it.

I also say nu-Simpsons starts in 2002

Seasons 10, 11 & 12 are def a "clearly not-peak-era-but-also-not-offensively-terrible" zone

re-read the beginning of the thread

I feel like there was a shift between season 3 and 4 where they sacrificed some degree of character based humour for joke density and surrealism. I think a lot of the writing staff changed between those two seasons?

All the staff Simon hired stayed as long as he did, and several left with him after S4. Oakley/Weinstein and Conan are the only two that joined between 3 and 4.

This thread was started during S14.

I don't remember it exactly but I think there's a quote about jazz thats something like 'jazz is about seeing how far out you can go and still get back', like when a musician improvises around a tune how far can they go while still retaining some connection to that original tune - and the I think the surrealism in the Simpsons is kind of like that. For the first 10 years of the show's life a lot of the humour comes from how there is some base level of realism, the laws of physics apply, people act like real humans to some degree, but because it's a cartoon they can stretch the realism and flirt with outright surrealism, and when they stretch it to the point of breaking and there are no rules left that's when the show stopped being any good.

like the bit with Homer jumping the gorge on a skateboard is funny because it's treading this fine line between loony tunes cartoon surrealism and realism, it's Wile E Coyote type joke but he actually ends up bruised and bloodied. It wouldn't be funny if the Simpsons was set in a world with no rules where cartoon physics applied, but it also wouldn't be funny if the Simpsons was set in a world that was strictly realistic.

Definitely George & Ringo!

― blue whales on ambient (C. Grisso/McCain), Monday, May 3, 2021 2:48 PM (nine minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

george was nearly as memorable as his co-star, a giant plate of brownies

I don't remember it exactly but I think there's a quote about jazz thats something like 'jazz is about seeing how far out you can go and still get back', like when a musician improvises around a tune how far can they go while still retaining some connection to that original tune - and the I think the surrealism in the Simpsons is kind of like that. For the first 10 years of the show's life a lot of the humour comes from how there is some base level of realism, the laws of physics apply, people act like real humans to some degree, but because it's a cartoon they can stretch the realism and flirt with outright surrealism, and when they stretch it to the point of breaking and there are no rules left that's when the show stopped being any good.

i was trying to think of a post-season 12 joke that i really loved and i remembered this one: "aww, i have three kids and no money. why can't i have no kids and three money?"

from episode 397 (season 18)

I've been listening to the commentaries too and the first few times Groening noted he had a problem with a joke in that regard I thought he was being overly fussy but a few seasons later I find myself agreeing with his stance more. Made me wonder if he's still doing commentaries on like season 21 or whatever?