so when i keep showing up and saying "the majority of suggest bans come from when people attack other posters out of the blue" over and over again, you dudes just think im lying to you or what
― NAKES HAVE THE STAPLES IN THEM (jjjusten), Thursday, 26 November 2009 18:01 (fourteen years ago) link
am willing to argue that "having unpopular opinions or being a weird dude" can comfortably, in the thread in which the assertion was made, be elided to "it's weird dudes who get the SB." if I end up at a press conference about this thread I will quote Lamp's post in full rather than referring to it.
xpost jjusten the anti-sb ppl don't believe you because they like the idea of sb as some evil villain striking down the creatives
― a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Thursday, 26 November 2009 18:02 (fourteen years ago) link
this is just a natural progression--we worked our way thru all the ppl who were just dicks, we did ppl who register strong opinions in a less-than-graceful way, now we're just gonna do ppl who post a lot and aren't sweet and cheerful 100% of the time.
― omaha deserved 311 (call all destroyer), Thursday, 26 November 2009 18:02 (fourteen years ago) link
fuk u if u disagree or w/e
― velko, Thursday, 26 November 2009 18:03 (fourteen years ago) link
I have a hard time believing that j0rdan or kate were malicious to another poster out of the blue more than the majority of 51 times
― unban everyone tbh (Curt1s Stephens), Thursday, 26 November 2009 18:03 (fourteen years ago) link
"more than the majority" - excuse my english
― unban everyone tbh (Curt1s Stephens), Thursday, 26 November 2009 18:06 (fourteen years ago) link
anti-SB ppl need to come up with something better than "let the moderators moderate!" (since old-timers know that back when it was just mods making the call, the howling over the moderators not having the right to make choices that impact the community was just as loud, and would be again) as a solution imo
― a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Thursday, 26 November 2009 18:06 (fourteen years ago) link
as for Lamp's "it's 'weird dudes' who get the SB" - you're kidding right?
deeznuts - annoying mb tried zinging ppl but more of punchingbag than some1 who attacked other posterslou jagz - lol show your bellyt-dawg - lol sb debatesand what - sure, altho i think weve been told its for image bombing (rip dom passantino)gabbneb 1.0 - lol yuppiesgabbneb 2.0 - yes, being a dickcpt lorax - lol mental illnesscankles - racism; being a dickdoc morbius - lol leftist blogaments bimble - well i meanmasonic boom - british chicknrq - okay hes a dick but also one of the best posterswhiney - lol self-loathing j0rdan - lol killing hippies
this is a list of ppl with difficult opinions and/or weird dudes (<3 but i mean) some of them could be dicks but realistically so can A LOT of posters including a # of our mods and u yourself
jj weve been told over and over that we dont deserve any transparency into what gets sb'd or by who because "it should be obv". and then u keep saying this "its about being a dick" stuff anytime someone gets banned - these two statements contradict each other imo
― ¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨ (Lamp), Thursday, 26 November 2009 18:28 (fourteen years ago) link
booming post
― unban everyone tbh (Curt1s Stephens), Thursday, 26 November 2009 18:30 (fourteen years ago) link
jj weve been told over and over that we dont deserve any transparency into what gets sb'd or by who because "it should be obv".
this is total bullshit, and if you don't stop making shit up to further some weird non-argument I'm going to ban you from this thread.
― mu-mu (Pashmina), Thursday, 26 November 2009 18:32 (fourteen years ago) link
lamp breakin it down
― plaxico (I know, right?), Thursday, 26 November 2009 18:33 (fourteen years ago) link
uh lamp kinda otm imo but whatevs
xp - would it be more accurate to say that the people that have been sb-ed have all had a combination of dickishness/aggressiveness and an over the top posting style - in differing proportions, obviously.
― sarahel, Thursday, 26 November 2009 18:34 (fourteen years ago) link
i like sb as it is pretty much but it would be cool if there was a write-in thing where you could put a description of why you hit sb, which could eventually be made public or at least disclosed to the sb'ed while the sb'er remains anonymous. might also force people to think about it and maybe even change their mind about sb'ing that person
― harbl, Thursday, 26 November 2009 18:34 (fourteen years ago) link
^^ heh, it could be like facebook's options for why you don't like an ad:
offensiveunintertestingoverly repetitiveirrelevant
― sarahel, Thursday, 26 November 2009 18:35 (fourteen years ago) link
yeah it could have radio buttons with common reasons and then maybe one for "other" like, i just think this person is a cockfarmer
― harbl, Thursday, 26 November 2009 18:37 (fourteen years ago) link
dude i dont even no u but HI DERE and jjusten have said a couple of times that it should be clear to any posters getting 51'd what they do that annoys so many ppl w/o resorting to giving them specific examples - ive always agreed with that i just dont think that what say l.jagger does that gets under other poster's skin is "being a dick"
lol "making shit up" tho a+++ response v. constructive
― ¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨ (Lamp), Thursday, 26 November 2009 18:37 (fourteen years ago) link
Show me an example of either JJ or Dan telling anyone they don't "deserve" any transparency.
― mu-mu (Pashmina), Thursday, 26 November 2009 18:40 (fourteen years ago) link
most schools don't give multiple plusses after an a u kno, u may want to revise that
― plaxico (I know, right?), Thursday, 26 November 2009 18:41 (fourteen years ago) link
xxp - i think more people sb-ed L0uis for having one - and going on about related issues, er, at length, than being one.
― sarahel, Thursday, 26 November 2009 18:50 (fourteen years ago) link
howbout 'let the mods moderate but in a very laissez faire manner where banning is a last resort'? - I mean of the above posters, how many would have been banned on any msg board with traditional moderation? probably...cankles?
imo the sb system has been a pretty big failure and it seems like everyone but the mods is beginning to accept this.
this whole thing is just getting so patronizing. the poor silent majority can't protect itself? mods might let you back after 30 days and maybe even twice but maybe not it depends whether you learned your lesson? if somebody should be banned, they should be banned - if we really decide that 51 anonymous people is the best way to go about that, fine, but at least have consistency about it.
― iatee, Thursday, 26 November 2009 19:17 (fourteen years ago) link
part of the reason there's no consistency is because we've wanted to make it work, and people have seen obvious flaws, so we've been chopping and changing as we go. that's why I'm saying we should leave it running unmeddled for a period till we can work out what's actually useful and unquestionably bust about it.
― stet, Thursday, 26 November 2009 19:22 (fourteen years ago) link
gd to see history mayne back from the land of monochrome, even if his 'white ribbon' review made me want to SB him
― Ward Fowler, Thursday, 26 November 2009 19:52 (fourteen years ago) link
When does Geir get back from his exile in wastes of the icy north?
― The bugger in the short sleeves (NickB), Thursday, 26 November 2009 20:20 (fourteen years ago) link
in the wastes, even
― The bugger in the short sleeves (NickB), Thursday, 26 November 2009 20:21 (fourteen years ago) link
this whole thing is just getting so patronizing. the poor silent majority can't protect itself?
yeah seriously law-of-the-jungle ideology like this is exactly what the SB is great against. the notion that people should either learn to be dicks back to people who're being dicks to them, or in some way develop strategies against hostile, antagonizing posters, is bullshit. but it fact, the silent majority can project itself. by clicking the suggest ban button.
― a full circle lol (J0hn D.), Thursday, 26 November 2009 20:46 (fourteen years ago) link
The problem with the silent majority is that they're fucking silent too fucking often.
― The bugger in the short sleeves (NickB), Thursday, 26 November 2009 20:50 (fourteen years ago) link
Happy Thanksgiving!
― lift this towel, its just a nipple (HI DERE), Thursday, 26 November 2009 21:09 (fourteen years ago) link
by clicking the suggest ban button.
e.g. being dicks, anonymously
― iatee, Thursday, 26 November 2009 21:18 (fourteen years ago) link
wait i.e.
I do think that if anyone clicks the SB button more than 10 times or so, a message should come up that says 'Wait - don't you think that you might be the problem here?'.
― The bugger in the short sleeves (NickB), Thursday, 26 November 2009 21:20 (fourteen years ago) link
only if it then gave you an option to sb the system
― iatee, Thursday, 26 November 2009 21:21 (fourteen years ago) link
http://www.p2fe.com/Silent_Majority_Badge_2.jpg
― Kiwi, Thursday, 26 November 2009 21:25 (fourteen years ago) link
Stick that on your proud member.
― The bugger in the short sleeves (NickB), Thursday, 26 November 2009 21:29 (fourteen years ago) link
But don't post a picture of it to the WDYLL thread.
― sarahel, Thursday, 26 November 2009 21:33 (fourteen years ago) link
It's all making sense now...from the proud silent members at www.narlo.org:
"We give inspirational speeches to groups of 50 or more on freedom, liberty, the constitution and property rights. For details contact us by telephone at 1 800 682-7848 or by e-mail at: i✧✧✧@na✧✧✧.o✧✧"
― Kiwi, Thursday, 26 November 2009 21:42 (fourteen years ago) link
I disagree pretty strongly with this! Not a mod etc.
― Gravel Puzzleworth, Thursday, 26 November 2009 21:42 (fourteen years ago) link
get a badge etc
― Kiwi, Thursday, 26 November 2009 21:44 (fourteen years ago) link
i disagree too
― harbl, Thursday, 26 November 2009 21:45 (fourteen years ago) link
I disagree massively. SB is far from perfect but it's an improvement on unilateral modding imo, and I mean that without disrespect for the mods. As far as I can tell the SB system has made modding the boards a marginally less stressful job than it used to be, which means that reasonable people are more likely to be happy to do the job.
― Herman G. Neuname is the first European president (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 26 November 2009 21:54 (fourteen years ago) link
again, no disrespect, but is that the point? to make the mods' jobs easier?
― we be emi robin' (k3vin k.), Thursday, 26 November 2009 22:03 (fourteen years ago) link
to ban more people more efficiently
― harbl, Thursday, 26 November 2009 22:04 (fourteen years ago) link
power to the people... ilx "proud silent member" avatar please
― Kiwi, Thursday, 26 November 2009 22:16 (fourteen years ago) link
even if his 'white ribbon' review made me want to SB him
This is the fucking problem. SB'ing because of differing opinions. Engage the review, point out its flaws. Grapple with his taken position. State your own. Only press SB if you think someone is providing noise rather than signal. Critical comment is signal.
I am cool with the SB system because I never, ever think to click the button. It's there, unused, dormant, but its mere presence is placatory for many. Sadly, people rarely engage ideals of tolerance, community or broad-mindedness when they use it. They do so out of a Pavlovian response which dictates that a moment's disaffection ought to equal a lengthy ban.
People of ILX, press that button if and only if someone is directly and wilfully undermining your enjoyment of ILX, and only if they are showing signs of persisting in this behaviour. I know these words will fall on deaf ears, and I know a load of people will possibly SB this post for joeks (because invisible bans upon someone who isn't going to be 51'd ever, ever again are so lol-bringing), but please, try to look at it from the potential bannee's perspective. SB is there for a reason, and a dismally large number of you are misusing it.
― GET THAT BABY JESUS RIGHT UP YE (acoleuthic), Thursday, 26 November 2009 22:35 (fourteen years ago) link
hey dumbass he said it "made me want to SB him" not it "made me SB him" so basically he followed your guidelines
― congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 26 November 2009 22:38 (fourteen years ago) link
(Also, yes I know many SBs are given after someone has inadvertently annoyed a poster a number of times. Each annoyance, when taken in isolation, is trifling. At this juncture, I recommend a killfile or a gritted-teeth toleration. There will be other threads. Better still, let them know openly why they're being annoying, because subsequent persistence will be an SB'able offence under my proposed unofficial guidelines.)
(ha n/a but for many 'want to' becomes 'really does')
― GET THAT BABY JESUS RIGHT UP YE (acoleuthic), Thursday, 26 November 2009 22:41 (fourteen years ago) link
(Of course, this gets difficult, if what one poster perceives as intolerable and SB'able is deemed by the annoying poster as perfectly reasonable. Free speech issues are thus implicated and the whole thing gets too much for me to handle...just learn to live with each other kthxbi)
― GET THAT BABY JESUS RIGHT UP YE (acoleuthic), Thursday, 26 November 2009 22:42 (fourteen years ago) link
http://www.dropshots.com/photos/275370/20070419/004544.jpg
― Twisted Hipster (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 26 November 2009 22:44 (fourteen years ago) link
l-r: kate, lj, history mayne, harbl
― sarahel, Thursday, 26 November 2009 22:45 (fourteen years ago) link
why me???
― harbl, Thursday, 26 November 2009 22:46 (fourteen years ago) link
^^ that post of mine could very well belong on posts very much in character thread.
― sarahel, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 18:38 (fourteen years ago) link
no, but that one could
― a. cole, u thic (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 18:56 (fourteen years ago) link
get a board you two
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 19:03 (fourteen years ago) link
i have sb'd sarahel for her own good.
― history mayne, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 19:15 (fourteen years ago) link
she needs a break
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 19:20 (fourteen years ago) link
needin' some of this:http://pagels.teamexpansion.org/sqjtaipei/wp-content/uploads/2006/01/ohyea3.gif
― sarahel, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 19:32 (fourteen years ago) link
save it for your comeback
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 19:37 (fourteen years ago) link
Haha, that nabisco post about Tristram Shandy and How I Met Your Mother is funny and insightful. I wonder if there are any other examples like that in contemporary pop culture.
This is a terrible time to be a mod, and I'm glad I'm not one. Not that any one poster is just completely insufferable, but the idea of reading so much of ilx is almost upsetting.
― bamcquern, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:21 (fourteen years ago) link
Not that I ever would be elected to be one or want to be one.
hint hint
― Drama Mama's and Papa's too! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:37 (fourteen years ago) link
As a mod you can post as different user names. I envy mods this ability.
― sarahel, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:41 (fourteen years ago) link
lol
― sarahel (not), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:44 (fourteen years ago) link
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Gr3uCNxPTu4/SuPOj5rPBII/AAAAAAAACaM/_p5K8kVLbzQ/s400/Sutherland-body-snatcher.jpg
― Drama Mama's and Papa's too! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:45 (fourteen years ago) link
Awesome!
― sarahel, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:46 (fourteen years ago) link
No, not even for twatson, forks.
― bamcquern, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:50 (fourteen years ago) link
i cannot parse that?
― Drama Mama's and Papa's too! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:54 (fourteen years ago) link
Oh, I thought you meant - never mind.
― bamcquern, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:56 (fourteen years ago) link
"Deleting unused users and clearing old suggest bans"
― cantus in memory of benjamin bratt (omar little), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 22:01 (fourteen years ago) link
ayo can i get a list of unused users?
― harbl, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 22:01 (fourteen years ago) link
needin' some of this:
COOL AIDMAN NEEDS YOU BABY
― KOOL-AID MAN, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 22:05 (fourteen years ago) link
Kool Aids Man Day
― Drama Mama's and Papa's too! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 22:13 (fourteen years ago) link
cool aidman???
― harbl, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 22:20 (fourteen years ago) link
cool aidsylangston
― Santa Boars (winshit@burgerfuel.co.nz) (sic), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 23:27 (fourteen years ago) link